Did the Reapers wipe out the dinosaurs?
#26
Posté 17 avril 2011 - 05:26
#27
Guest_Imperium Alpha_*
Posté 17 avril 2011 - 05:26
Guest_Imperium Alpha_*
SNascimento wrote...
.lolwut666 wrote...
The comet was a actually a Reaper doing a biotic charge.
That's actually possible, given the size of a reaper.
oohhhh wait.... 65 million year ago a Reapers (A vanguard like sovereign) crash on earth..... I know how ME3 end now
Modifié par Imperium Alpha, 17 avril 2011 - 05:28 .
#28
Posté 17 avril 2011 - 05:27
#29
Posté 17 avril 2011 - 05:39
#30
Posté 17 avril 2011 - 05:42

*Puts on flame retardant suit and runs for the door, echoes of evil laughter shattering the sunday air.*
#31
Posté 17 avril 2011 - 05:43
Its like they are not interested in thresher maws or varren
But well who knows..
#32
Posté 17 avril 2011 - 05:51
grimkillah wrote...
Granted the dinosaur that evolved into bird represent a very small perentage of all dinaosaur that ever existed, but extinction imply no direct descendant left, while birds contradict that statment.Eterna5 wrote...
grimkillah wrote...
It is a common misconception that dinosaurs were extinct. In fact birds are their direct descendant, so in a way dinosaur are still with us, we just call them birds now.
Birds are an offshoot, just a small group of theropods that was able to diversify in the last few million years. They are connected to dinosaurs, but not enough to warrant being called dinosaurs. They are there own group now.
It would be like calling a frog a fish.
Extinction does not have to be a whole group of Animals. Wolly Mammoths are extinct but their relatives still exist today.
What happend to the dinosaurs was a mass extinction. Dinosaurs are extinct, only a small offshoot of them survived, Birds are not dinosaurs. Dinosaurs had two groups called Saurischians and Ornithischians, birds do not belong in these groups, rather they diversified so much as to have their own order.
Its the same thing with amphibians, Amphibians descended from Fish, however due to their adaptions became their own Order, and though they can be traced back to fish they are in no way fish.
#33
Posté 17 avril 2011 - 05:58

AVENGE ME MY EARTH BROTHERS!
#34
Posté 17 avril 2011 - 06:02
As for dinosaurs, they suffered a mass killing event, not an extinction. Every biologist know now that birds are evolved from a group of bipedal saurischian dinosaurs during the end of the Mesozoic and the beginning of Cenozoic period, in another word, they survived the mass killing event that wiped out most of other dinosaurs. So birds are a direct and clear descendant of the dinosaurs.
#35
Posté 17 avril 2011 - 06:05
Eterna5 wrote...
Extinction does not have to be a whole group of Animals. Wolly Mammoths are extinct but their relatives still exist today.
What
happend to the dinosaurs was a mass extinction. Dinosaurs are extinct,
only a small offshoot of them survived, Birds are not dinosaurs.
Dinosaurs had two groups called Saurischians and Ornithischians,
birds do not belong in these groups, rather they diversified so much as
to have their own order.
Its the same thing with amphibians,
Amphibians descended from Fish, however due to their adaptions became
their own Order, and though they can be traced back to fish they are in
no way fish.
The problem is, Aves (birds) is pretty much an arbitrary classification insofar as it is considered seperate from Dinosauria. Aves is a member of Maniraptora, which is considered a dinosaur clade; they fall under Theropoda, which is a sub-order of Saurischia. Ergo, birds are, in fact, dinosaurs, thus not all dinosaurs are extinct.
And another point: just because something can be traced back to fish, it does very much make them a fish. You cannot simply hand-wave away lines of descent simply because they don't correspond well to the simplified and arbitrary classification systems used in common non-scientific nomenclature. That would be like denying that you are a tetrapod of the clade Sarcopterygii. You can do it until you're blue in the face, but it doesn't change anything. So congratulations, you are a fish. We are all technically 'fish'. Huzzah!
Modifié par Olwydd, 17 avril 2011 - 06:29 .
#36
Posté 17 avril 2011 - 06:09
#37
Posté 17 avril 2011 - 06:11
Reaper Bob wrote...
When I look at a Krogan, I think dinosaurs exist in ME..
Hey, Bob. Did you guys wipe out the dinosaurs or not?
#38
Posté 17 avril 2011 - 06:18
The Shadow Broker wrote...
dont think so, they were no technologically advanced or any kind of menace to their supreme reign..didnt even reach the citadel neither even one basic construction or comunication system..
Its like they are not interested in thresher maws or varren
But well who knows..
Well theoretically they could have had culture/technology/civilizations. The problem is that they were wiped out several million years ago and any sort of signs (buildings, tech, etc.) would have been wiped out by a combination of time/nature.
If you've watched those Discovery specials about what would happen if humanity suddenly dissapeared from Earth you'll realize that it isn't far fetched to think we could be missing a huge chunk of that time period's history.
#39
Posté 17 avril 2011 - 10:16
Thargorichiban wrote...
The Shadow Broker wrote...
dont think so, they were no technologically advanced or any kind of menace to their supreme reign..didnt even reach the citadel neither even one basic construction or comunication system..
Its like they are not interested in thresher maws or varren
But well who knows..
Well theoretically they could have had culture/technology/civilizations. The problem is that they were wiped out several million years ago and any sort of signs (buildings, tech, etc.) would have been wiped out by a combination of time/nature.
If you've watched those Discovery specials about what would happen if humanity suddenly dissapeared from Earth you'll realize that it isn't far fetched to think we could be missing a huge chunk of that time period's history.
Except we are still finding dinosaur bones. Evidence of their existence is present, but nothing survived of their architecture? Surely it would be the other way around if Reapers "reap" organic life...
#40
Posté 17 avril 2011 - 10:36
IMO the Protheans were so advanced because on the previous Reaper cycle, the Protheans had our current level of technology and since they weren't part of the citadel because they didn't reach space or whatever the Reapers missed them. So, the Protheans had 50,000 years to advance and study the relay technology and thats why they managed to fight for so long.
Modifié par bluestrider25, 17 avril 2011 - 10:37 .
#41
Posté 17 avril 2011 - 10:38
Black Raptor wrote...
Thargorichiban wrote...
The Shadow Broker wrote...
dont think so, they were no technologically advanced or any kind of menace to their supreme reign..didnt even reach the citadel neither even one basic construction or comunication system..
Its like they are not interested in thresher maws or varren
But well who knows..
Well theoretically they could have had culture/technology/civilizations. The problem is that they were wiped out several million years ago and any sort of signs (buildings, tech, etc.) would have been wiped out by a combination of time/nature.
If you've watched those Discovery specials about what would happen if humanity suddenly dissapeared from Earth you'll realize that it isn't far fetched to think we could be missing a huge chunk of that time period's history.
Except we are still finding dinosaur bones. Evidence of their existence is present, but nothing survived of their architecture? Surely it would be the other way around if Reapers "reap" organic life...
Plus with T-REX arms you cant build ****
#42
Posté 17 avril 2011 - 10:41
Chewin3 wrote...
Coach Beer wrote...
You're funny.
LMAO, Commander Rex did the best job they could manage.
#43
Posté 17 avril 2011 - 10:44
I Will don't worry you will be avenged....aimlessgun wrote...
AVENGE ME MY EARTH BROTHERS!
#44
Posté 17 avril 2011 - 10:45
#45
Posté 17 avril 2011 - 10:45
#46
Posté 17 avril 2011 - 10:47
#47
Posté 17 avril 2011 - 11:14
Eterna5 wrote...
grimkillah wrote...
It is a common misconception that dinosaurs were extinct. In fact birds are their direct descendant, so in a way dinosaur are still with us, we just call them birds now.
Birds are an offshoot, just a small group of theropods that was able to diversify in the last few million years. They are connected to dinosaurs, but not enough to warrant being called dinosaurs. They are there own group now.
It would be like calling a frog a fish.
In cladistic terms, they are dinosaurs. Likewise, frogs are fish. Well, sort of. It's more like "contained within".
#48
Posté 17 avril 2011 - 11:15
#49
Posté 17 avril 2011 - 11:29
lolwut666 wrote...
Reaper Bob wrote...
When I look at a Krogan, I think dinosaurs exist in ME..
Hey, Bob. Did you guys wipe out the dinosaurs or not?
We only wipe out the races that taste good for our barbeque we have once every 50.000 years, so no.
#50
Posté 17 avril 2011 - 11:37





Retour en haut








