NKKKK wrote...
First off, most of you aren't in the military, I think you should stop waving capital offence like it's your dong. I''m in the military, and I''m pretty sure saving the world over the interests of your country goes beyond what a soldier is trained to do.
Second, who are you pathetic humans to judge the actions of one man, maybe there are things a bit bigger than the Alliance and Cerberus at stake here. So you're whole Cerberus/Alliance fanboyism is really just beyond silly.
Anderson isn't Shepard, he doesn't know what Cerberus has done except for the bad things, If i was in his positon, I would have done the same thing.
Thirdly, at the end of the novel he saved a boy's life in a paragon interrupt, so quit it with you're whole wishing death upon him like some jihadists.
Anderson won't betray you, Udina has and probably will again and Jack Harper will too.
I have two responses to this for two different Shepards.
1. Alliance Loyalist
Here is the problem, Anderson was not acting to save the world as you put it, he was acting to do a favor for a romantic interest. If Anderson really cared about humanity or the Alliance he would of put aside his emotions for a woman and realized that a single kidnap victim is not worth the diplomatic, political, and military crisis which would happen by involving the Turians.
How in the world does a lightning strike with the Turians which embarrased the Alliance, ruined its image, and arguably breached human soveriegnty seem better than going through Alliance channels to remove the Cerberus operatives. The book mentions that he is afraid of Cerberus influence within the Alliance, but surely there are people he trusts and enough officers who would be willing to take down Cerberus.
Instead the entire galaxy got to watch high level Alliance officers and officials being led away by all Turian CSEC squads. But thats ok, at least they freed Grayson...
The bigger problem in all of this is that Anderson broke military law. Not only did he withold intelligence from the Alliance which was critical, he handed it to a alien government, helped organize a police action that directly targeted naval officers and high ranking diplomats...
Your in the military, you tell me what would happen. If I was a member of the Admiralty I would be livid, because not only has Anderson screwed the public's perception of the Alliance at a time when it needed influence more than any other... he has created a precedent that anyone who wants can take intel and solve problems the way they see fit. The service cannot operate under that precedent and cannot suffer anyone, especially an admiral to do so. Capital punishment would be to much in this time period, but he certainly should be court marshalled.
2) Cerberus Loyalist
Disgust is the only way I can describe what I felt when I read retribution, and my main Shepard is a Cerberus loyalist. He screwed the Alliance (Humanity), he screwed Cerberus right after they had stopped the collectors (and Anderson knew they did), and he did so with the Turians.
It would have been much easier to forgive if he had done what I suggested he should have done from the Alliance standpoint. But allowing the Aliens to weaken and embarass humanity with the Reapers coming is just uncontionable. Honestly the first thing I thought about was killing Anderson while reading that book, and now not only will I not get the chance, but I have to fight Cerberus. Also I am not advocating capital punishment, I am advocating assassination or a stupid, dangerous, and traitorous fool.
What I just don't understand is why Anderson saw it as an appropriate time to strike. He knows about the Reapers, he knows that humanity is going to need to be on its A game to rally the citadel fleet and races. Was striking a blow at Cerberus really the most beneficial thing to do at that moment? Regardless of how you look at Cerberus (And my Alliance Shepard certainly does not look kindly) how was this the right time? Because someone got kidnapped? Why not give the intel to men he knows and trusts so they could have removed the Cerberus influence themselves?
Finally I want to preempt the arguement I know will be brought forward. If Anderson had not acted independently before and released the Normandy, the world would already be gone. But thats the key, it was the end of life or break the rules. That was not the case with Retribution, if anything, Anderson damaged the war effort.