Dubya75 wrote...
MorrigansLove wrote...
Dubya75 wrote...
Persephone wrote...
BobSmith101 wrote...
Persephone wrote...
It's an old principle that there is no story that everbody will connect to. None. Not even the greatest blockbuster will win over everyone, moot point.
Yes, there are some supposed flaws I do not care about. And there are some flaws in both games I do care about. And that's a problem how?
It's a moot point unless you are using it as comparitive, which is what you are doing. DA2 affected you deeply, thats' all that is worth. Its not a standard.
Because again you are using your personal likes/dislikes as some sort of universal measure.
Bodies not rotting being cleaned up when they should is bad immersion. By ignoring that you are just making it look like you have low standards
It is a completely moot point because nobody speaks for everybody. I never said it was worth anything more than any other opinion. Don't confuse me with the people who say "DAII sucks and whoever disagrees is lying!" Or "Only a Biodrone, Biobot, fanboy, idiot could like DAII, that's a FACT!".
And question: Whose viewpoint IS a standard?
Again, the bodies in Fenris' mansion are a small detail. (And they look pretty decomposed to me) I can pick dozens of details like that in ANY RPG and thus claim "Whoever likes this has low standards, hah!".
a game is as good or as bad as experienced by any individual. For me it's an excellent game. For others it's the worst game ever.
We're gonna have to agree to disagree.
Whoever says it's the worst game EVARRR, is a moron. It's a really good game, but It could have been GREAT and even a contender for Game of the Year.
You are about 10 seconds away from getting reported, so cut it out with the insults.
Tried to read this thread, but it was full of spam like this from Dubya, and now a threat? ROFL