I bought DA2 despite reservations, 100% riding on the coattails of my DA:O experience.
The people who loved DA:O did so in part because it emanated quality: despite not being perfect it obviously had heart, time and tears invested in it. you could click almost anyone and get a relevant comment. Even the courier type quests didn't seem AS thrown in just to waste your time.
I think DA2 improved many things, but they were superficial things. The MEAT and BONES of it, didn't improve and took a step backward. It ceased to take itself seriously and was sort of a hollow reminder of what made DA:O great. Some dialogue, while funny, didn't make sense, or didn't take our *characters* seriously. People joking as I searched for my mother??? Making jokes about returning someones remains ? Really?
Am I afraid the bad review would what? No, i am not sure anything I personally, or we as a whole, say make one iota of difference. Comments are of course taken as input, but I think the bottom line and $$$ is what motivates people to change.
You can totally improve what DA:O gave with the improvements DA2 brought to the table, but the game must take itself seriously. This just seemed to ride on the coattails of DA:O and instead of bringing something new and unique, capitalized on the success of DA:O without ever really trying to give us a TRUE sequel...a game in it's own right, but worthy of its predecessor.
DA2 is fabulous for people who want a simply so-so story with a lot of combat. Someone who wants a lot of story and choice with some combat to liven it up, were likely disappointed.
The only way they will change, is if they decide the story is more or equally as important as the combat. If the combat is their main goal in DA3, I doubt anything people say on here to the contrary will make one iota of difference.
Modifié par shantisands, 20 avril 2011 - 10:03 .