frustratemyself wrote...
Am I the only person that finds it hilarious that the best part of 6 pages have been spent arguing over the sexual orientation of pixels?
Yes. People have been debating and analyzing literary characters for thousands of years. The notion that a story loses legitimacy if it's on a modern format is, frankly, just stupid.
DeaHamlet wrote...
while Leliana... omg I hardened her so she'd become a bard and she's back with the chantry again? And there's zero explanation there.
Amen. Neo-Leliana makes me want to kick orphans.
MikoDoll wrote...
Anders blowing up the Chantry and forcing me to choose whether or not I had to shank him? Much bigger point in the story and I'd like to discuss if that was a viable portrayal of the character at this point.
What. Anders' Chantry stunt has approx. 361,850 threads. This week. A lot of this other stuff does need more attention, I'll agree with that, but definitely not the Chantry attack.
Viyu wrote...
This. Also, at what point does Anders start believing that the chantry is no longer necessary like he does in Awakening?
Did he ever say he felt the Chantry was necessary? I took what he said as meaning that trying to split from the Chantry would cause open war and it simply wasn't worth it. But he'd only seen the Ferelden Chantry. After 7 years of seeing the downright evil the Chantry turns a blind eye to in Kirkwall, he probably changed his mind. I know I did. And I didn't have to put up with them for the better part of a decade after they stole my lover's soul for writing a ****ing letter.
mhendon wrote...
Anders seems to be an Andrastian to some extent, but doesn't interpret the chant in the same way that the majority seems to as it pertains to mages. This is consistent from Awakening to 2 thankfully. So I don't think he has anything against the chantry otherwise.
No rational mind interprets Andraste's words as the idiots at the Chantry do. "Magic should serve man, not rule over him" is a pretty far cry from "Imprison all mages and do whatever it takes, including butchering children en masse, to keep them under control."
We should also consider that interpreting Andraste's phrasing as "Don't use blood magic to make rightful rulers your puppets," which while not exactly what Andraste said is a far more reasonable interpretation than the Chantry's, is the belief of the Tevinter Chantry. And if the wonderful people at the Chantry think you're a worshipper of theirs they'll
kill you for heresy. So even if people did believe the Chantry was taking that passage way too far, they're unlikely to be telling everyone.
Sabariel wrote...
They merged before Justice went Full Demon so that wouldn't make any difference. The process was complete.
I still don't buy this theory. It basically boils down to "spirits and demons are different. Except when they're not." If spirits and demons are two different sides of the same coin, they're under the same rules. This just seems like people QQ'd so much about Connor's situation having a "good" solution that they don't want to give us any more "good" solutions. It killed Leandra, and now it's seeming like it's removing the chance to seperate Anders from Justice.