Plaintiff wrote...
I think you'll find the Qunari do not consider war to be 'chaotic'. If they did, they wouldn't have a military arm in the first place. The Qunari want war. They're planning it, even. Neither Sten nor the Arishok make any secret of the fact that the ultimate goal of the Qunari is to force the rest of the world to submit to the Qun, violently if necessary. Indeed, it seems that violence is Plan A. Sten stresses Qunari invasion not as a possibility, but as an inevitability. Heck, the Tome of Koslun probably demands it..
That’s a good point. Though there seem to be some circumstances under which the Qunari do prefer peace to war, namely instances under which they are likely to lose.
I like to compare the Qunari idea of their own Manifest Destiny to the Andrastian idea of “the Chant must be sung from all four corners of the world!” I think they both deserve to be said in the same breath.
Plaintiff wrote...
The Arishok is basically a military general. War is his role within the Qun, his primary directive, so to speak. He needs no reason to raze Kirkwall beyond the mere fact of its existence. The only thing stopping him was that he had received no instructions to do so..
I’d call the Arishok significantly more than a general, he’s part of a ruling triumvirate, he has no superior to whom he owes even nominal allegiance, the only potential checks on his authority are the Arigena and the Ariqun. And given how the Qunari divide their society into “body”, “mind”, and “soul” it’s highly questionable just how far their willingness, let alone their ability, to check the Arishok goes.
Plaintiff wrote...
You could argue that the Qunari have proven themselves to be immoral, but only to other non-Qunari. Their concept of morality is extremely different from our own. To them, morality means living by the Qun, accepting your determined role and doing as you're told. The lives of 'bas' are worth nothing, as far as the Qunari are concerned.
I didn’t mean to give the impression that the Qunari are immoral exactly, at least not inherently so. Rather that they lack any sort of moral superiority. And to my way of thinking, that is even more significant!
Let me put it this way:
Alistair can claim that his “right” to rule Ferelden comes from the fact that he is Maric’s son. The Divine can claim that her “right” to rule the Chantry comes from the fact that the Maker’s Bride left her the “keys to the Kingdom” so to speak. But what can the Qunari claim is the source of their “right” to rule anyone, kossith, human or elf? They have to rely on the moral and logical superiority of the Qun.
So when the Qunari do something illogical and immoral, like start a potentially disastrous war over “what is essentially an expensive version of something they (should) already have.” It calls into doubt just how logical and moral the Qun and the Qunari really are. For the Crown of Ferelden and the Divine of the Chantry, a lack of logic is not really a problem, they are not logic based systems, but for the Qunari it is a crushing blow to their very foundation.
Modifié par General User, 23 avril 2011 - 02:36 .