A question for those who did dot enjoy Dragon Age II that much.
#1
Posté 21 avril 2011 - 05:35
Reason I'm asking is because Mass Effect 2 is widely seen as a console centric game and that's fine. Mass Effect has it's origins on consoles anyhow.
Dragon Age:Origins however was originally developed as a PC title and then ported over to consoles so I can understand why some PC fans of Dragon Age:Origins may have been slightly upset with the changes.
So I want to know if your dislike of Dragon Age II has more to do with the actual quality of the game, or your disappointment over the game not catering to the platform you enjoy the most.
#2
Posté 21 avril 2011 - 05:44
I think DA2 tried a bit too hard (in combat) to be something it wasn't meant to be. I think there's some middle ground to be had.
#3
Posté 21 avril 2011 - 05:46
#4
Posté 21 avril 2011 - 05:48
Modifié par Merced652, 21 avril 2011 - 05:49 .
#5
Posté 21 avril 2011 - 05:49
#6
Posté 21 avril 2011 - 05:50
#7
Posté 21 avril 2011 - 05:51
That said, I prefer the ME2 combat system over ME1, even though it has been lambasted as being more of a shooter than the previous game. (which I tend to agree with, sure ... but that wasn't simply because of the combat system, ME1 fealt more open and old school in its design ... but I can't stand the combat system any more)
Despite the changes to DA2 I would far prefer playing it on a PC than a console ... console games with even medium sized ability/spell lists always seem clunky and hard to navigate to me.
#8
Posté 21 avril 2011 - 05:53
DA2 tries to be something that it just can't be - an hack&slash/RPG-game which attracts 'CoD-crowd'. That's personally my concept of 'dumbing down'. Another problem is the most troublesome execution of the game.
To answer your question: no, it's not because of the console focus (unless the devs really think the interested people are really that non-intelligent that they think they are), but because of the execution/quality of the game - and the bloody interviews where insult after insult towards non-likers is stapled together.
#9
Posté 21 avril 2011 - 05:54
With DA2 they took an established style of game play and bastardized it into something that wasn't DA:O and wasn't really ME either. Stick with one gaming style. Fans are attracted to a game and come to accept a style based on their experiences with the said game, for better or worse. Don't change it. Improve on the game - yes, but don't change the mechanics once they are established.
It would be like taking a FPS like CoD and making it a turn based overhead strategy game... I think fans would be a little p!$$ed off at that as well.
#10
Posté 21 avril 2011 - 05:55
#11
Posté 21 avril 2011 - 05:56
Turnip Root wrote...
Did you like Mass Effect 2?
Reason I'm asking is because Mass Effect 2 is widely seen as a console centric game and that's fine. Mass Effect has it's origins on consoles anyhow.
Dragon Age:Origins however was originally developed as a PC title and then ported over to consoles so I can understand why some PC fans of Dragon Age:Origins may have been slightly upset with the changes.
So I want to know if your dislike of Dragon Age II has more to do with the actual quality of the game, or your disappointment over the game not catering to the platform you enjoy the most.
Good question! For me, no and I do play on PC. As long as I have access to all the functions I really don't care. I do understand that these games have to be 'ported' for the various formats and I do not envy the programmers that have this task. I do own an Xbox 360 and it is old and presently collecting dust on my shelf, but it does work fine when I want to use it. For me, I prefer the PC format because I feel that I get a much better image or graphics then my Xbox can produce. Since I work in graphics, I'm just used to working with a PC or Mac and I do prefer it. To be honest, I don't know if formatting the game for PC first then porting that to the other formats makes any difference or not, maybe some of you know more about this then I do. In any case, makes no difference to me as long as I can enjoy the game itself.
Modifié par Barefoot Warrior, 21 avril 2011 - 05:59 .
#12
Posté 21 avril 2011 - 05:56
#13
Posté 21 avril 2011 - 05:57
DA2 on the other hand... ughhh.
#14
Posté 21 avril 2011 - 05:57
TUHD wrote...
To answer your question: no, it's not because of the console focus (unless the devs really think the interested people are really that non-intelligent that they think they are), but because of the execution/quality of the game - and the bloody interviews where insult after insult towards non-likers is stapled together.
Well, after weeks of being cursed, demands that they be fired etc..... If you want respect, show respect. Hitting people over the head and then expecting them to treat you like they totally respect you for it? Bioware's employees' are people and have every right to defend their creation, just as you have every right to dislike it.
#15
Posté 21 avril 2011 - 05:58
#16
Posté 21 avril 2011 - 05:58
No.Did you like Mass Effect 2?
I just read Game Informer's preview of ME3 and am not in the mood to talk much about the ME series atm.
#17
Posté 21 avril 2011 - 06:00
Everwarden wrote...
ME2 was a great game with several coats of polish. DA2 was a trainwreck with several cans of toxic waste dumped onto it.
What's with the extremes? I mean...I get you don't like the game. But is it necessary to be this rude? And yet people get upset with Laidlaw "bashing" DAO?
#18
Posté 21 avril 2011 - 06:02
#19
Posté 21 avril 2011 - 06:03
Persephone wrote...
Everwarden wrote...
ME2 was a great game with several coats of polish. DA2 was a trainwreck with several cans of toxic waste dumped onto it.
What's with the extremes? I mean...I get you don't like the game. But is it necessary to be this rude? And yet people get upset with Laidlaw "bashing" DAO?(Is DAO a sacred cow or something?)
I do not consider his post rude at all.
Leaving personal tastes aside, DA2 has several critical flaws (granted, some were fixed last patch) that I never found on DAO.
#20
Posté 21 avril 2011 - 06:05
#21
Posté 21 avril 2011 - 06:06
#22
Posté 21 avril 2011 - 06:06
Uzaik wrote...
Persephone wrote...
Everwarden wrote...
ME2 was a great game with several coats of polish. DA2 was a trainwreck with several cans of toxic waste dumped onto it.
What's with the extremes? I mean...I get you don't like the game. But is it necessary to be this rude? And yet people get upset with Laidlaw "bashing" DAO?(Is DAO a sacred cow or something?)
I do not consider his post rude at all.
Leaving personal tastes aside, DA2 has several critical flaws (granted, some were fixed last patch) that I never found on DAO.
Good for you. (To me, bashing = rude. Many DAO fans seem to agree, since they keep cussing and mocking Mr. Laidlaw for bashing DAO.) To me DAO is a broken shell of a game without Mods. (Esp. Dialogue, Bug, restoring broken content and plot flags as well Epilogue patches. And even with all these, it's still riddled with bugs)
#23
Posté 21 avril 2011 - 06:07
#24
Posté 21 avril 2011 - 06:09
Persephone wrote...
Uzaik wrote...
Persephone wrote...
Everwarden wrote...
ME2 was a great game with several coats of polish. DA2 was a trainwreck with several cans of toxic waste dumped onto it.
What's with the extremes? I mean...I get you don't like the game. But is it necessary to be this rude? And yet people get upset with Laidlaw "bashing" DAO?(Is DAO a sacred cow or something?)
I do not consider his post rude at all.
Leaving personal tastes aside, DA2 has several critical flaws (granted, some were fixed last patch) that I never found on DAO.
Good for you. (To me, bashing = rude. Many DAO fans seem to agree, since they keep cussing and mocking Mr. Laidlaw for bashing DAO.) To me DAO is a broken shell of a game without Mods. (Esp. Dialogue, Bug, restoring broken content and plot flags as well Epilogue patches. And even with all these, it's still riddled with bugs)
Didn't realize bash was a synonym for rude. My mistake.
#25
Posté 21 avril 2011 - 06:11
Persephone wrote...
Uzaik wrote...
Persephone wrote...
Everwarden wrote...
ME2 was a great game with several coats of polish. DA2 was a trainwreck with several cans of toxic waste dumped onto it.
What's with the extremes? I mean...I get you don't like the game. But is it necessary to be this rude? And yet people get upset with Laidlaw "bashing" DAO?(Is DAO a sacred cow or something?)
I do not consider his post rude at all.
Leaving personal tastes aside, DA2 has several critical flaws (granted, some were fixed last patch) that I never found on DAO.
Good for you. (To me, bashing = rude. Many DAO fans seem to agree, since they keep cussing and mocking Mr. Laidlaw for bashing DAO.) To me DAO is a broken shell of a game without Mods. (Esp. Dialogue, Bug, restoring broken content and plot flags as well Epilogue patches. And even with all these, it's still riddled with bugs)
If I bash DA2 I am rude, but you bash DA:O that is ok. I'm must be missing something?
Modifié par drvaughn1999, 21 avril 2011 - 06:12 .





Retour en haut







