254 réponses à ce sujet

[Metaliban]

I prefered ME1 but I liked it enough to at least finish it and then never touched it again until there was a deal of the week on the Shadow Broker and I enjoyed that as well, even if it was a little too combat centric for my tastes.

I think the major difference between ME2 and DA2 comes down to the lack of development time given to the latter.

[xCirdanx]

BobSmith101 wrote...

Yes Mass Effect2 was a polished game with a decent combat system. I would never call ME2 a great RPG but it was a great game.

I second this.

When ME2 was released there were also a lot of complains, from inventory system to lack of exploration, rpg elements etc. These were all good points and i agree with all of them to this date. Now, take a look at ME3 and some of the "promises", more RPG elements, bigger areas etc. Upgrade system for weapons once again, they basically listened asap and where not defending their changes and telling players they "can´t handle change".

That´s a big difference. But they are also a different team of devs.

Also ME2 had not nearly the feel of being rushed out like there was no tomorrow, It was still a shooter, combat didn´t change that much. DA2s button smashing fest of combat can hardly be compared to Origins. ME1 already had a voiced pc and the cinematic feeling etc. Not to mention, that ME2 continued your story.

[Haexpane]

Turnip Root wrote...

Did you like Mass Effect 2?

Reason I'm asking is because Mass Effect 2 is widely seen as a console centric game and that's fine.  Mass Effect has it's origins on consoles anyhow.
Dragon Age:Origins however was originally developed as a PC title and then ported over to consoles so I can understand why some PC fans of Dragon Age:Origins may have been slightly upset with the changes.

So I want to know if your dislike of Dragon Age II has more to do with the actual quality of the game, or your disappointment over the game not catering to the platform you enjoy the most.

Flawed question based on flawed premise.

Did I like ME2? It was OK, I liked ME1 a lot better.
I like DAO 1000x more than DA2
I play on PS3 console mostly
The most complex, and difficult RPG in the past 5 years came out on the PS3 only, Demon's Souls.

Comments about "console games are dumbed down for dumb console kids" are completely wrong.  Go look at Demon's Souls or DCUO

[craigdolphin]

I liked ME2 about the same or better than ME1. Both had great points, both had a few less-than-stellar aspects. DAO was better than either. DA2 is my least favorite Bioware game to-date aside from ME Galaxy (although I never played DA:Legends, MW, SS, or Sonic, so they may well be worse). They made far too many design decisions that were clearly not aimed at people with my tastes for me to enjoy it.

xCirdanx wrote...
When ME2 was released there were also a lot of complains, from inventory system to lack of exploration, rpg elements etc. These were all good points and i agree with all of them to this date. Now, take a look at ME3 and some of the "promises", more RPG elements, bigger areas etc. Upgrade system for weapons once again, they basically listened asap and where not defending their changes and telling players they "can´t handle change".

That´s a big difference. But they are also a different team of devs.

Agreed.

[Kurzan]

 I hated Dragon Age 2 for pretty much the same reason I loved Mass Effect 2, the time spent on making the game. Mass Effect 2 was finely crafted and perfectly polished, Dragon Age 2 was rushed out and it really shows.

I am seriously worried about Mass Effect 3 in light of what has been done to Dragon Age 2 considering the development time allocated.

Modifié par Kurzan, 25 avril 2011 - 08:48 .