Aller au contenu

Photo

How long untill Bioware admits they messed this game up?


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
233 réponses à ce sujet

#101
Rockpopple

Rockpopple
  • Members
  • 3 100 messages

Seena wrote...

Rockpopple wrote...

Whatever problems there are with the game - and there are many - I don't expect BioWare to "apologize" for it, or even acknowledge exactly what they feel were the problems with it were. Not until a DA III is in production.

The problem isn't hubris. BioWare is a company, as is EA, and their mandate is to defend their product. Business 101. I wouldn't expect them to do anything else. Companies that come out and admit that there's something wrong with their product are usually very, very rare. Most companies only admit wrong-doing if their product kills somebody, and even then... not all the time. See BP.

Obviously I'm not comparing Dragon Age II to the BP oil spill. lol. Ahh.... nevermind. =P


Omg did we agree on something>??????

Do you think the Orlesian Bards will put this in song?????


Only if they describe me as having big biceps. And luscious pecs. And a tight arse.

EDIT: LOL! That game was an Abomination! I'd have killed it with fire. :lol:

Modifié par Rockpopple, 22 avril 2011 - 01:56 .


#102
erynnar

erynnar
  • Members
  • 3 010 messages

Seena wrote...

erynnar wrote...



Um Seena? He never asked for an apology...just sayin'.  *hugs both Seena and Beef* okay guys you both have valid points. Let it go so the thread doesn't get locked (looks at foursome too).


And erynnar - in case you missed it:

BeefoTheBold


Formal, outright apology?

Never in a million years. Or at least
not unless new management gets brought in, which will be the company's
implied way of saying that they messed up and in turn will free up the
new management to say it.

Informal apology? Well, I think how
this will show is in what some of their public statements are like and
the course that you see Dragon Age 3 developing in.

If you start
seeing previews highlighting and emphasizing things that strongly
resemble Dragon Age Origins, then you'll know that, internally at least,
they think that they made a mistake in DA2. If, on the other hand, you
see the development progression of DA3 going along the same pathlines as
DA2, then you'll know that they don't think any mistakes were made
except for perhaps not going FAR ENOUGH after the COD crowd.

And,
sadly, this will be the first time ever that I will follow the
development of a Bioware game very closely instead of deliberately
trying not to be exposed so I can be surprised. 



I'm reading that as he expects an apology that he recognizes is not forthcoming.


Ah, I didn't read it the way you did. But as you can see, I think you both misread each other..easy to do when writing yes?  Come on guys...you are both intelligent, and well meaning...*HUGS* and we agree to disagree, apologize to each other for misunderstanding, each other? Pretty please?:):wub:

#103
Seena

Seena
  • Members
  • 510 messages

Rockpopple wrote...



Only if they describe me as having big biceps. And luscious pecs. And a tight arse.

EDIT: LOL! That game was an Abomination! I'd have killed it with fire. :lol:


Hmmmmm  - so, tell me, just HOW tight is your arse??

Curious minds want to know......

#104
erynnar

erynnar
  • Members
  • 3 010 messages

Rockpopple wrote...

Seena wrote...

Rockpopple wrote...

Whatever problems there are with the game - and there are many - I don't expect BioWare to "apologize" for it, or even acknowledge exactly what they feel were the problems with it were. Not until a DA III is in production.

The problem isn't hubris. BioWare is a company, as is EA, and their mandate is to defend their product. Business 101. I wouldn't expect them to do anything else. Companies that come out and admit that there's something wrong with their product are usually very, very rare. Most companies only admit wrong-doing if their product kills somebody, and even then... not all the time. See BP.

Obviously I'm not comparing Dragon Age II to the BP oil spill. lol. Ahh.... nevermind. =P


Omg did we agree on something>??????

Do you think the Orlesian Bards will put this in song?????


Only if they describe me as having big biceps. And luscious pecs. And a tight arse.

EDIT: LOL! That game was an Abomination! I'd have killed it with fire. :lol:


*Goes off to write a fanfiction one shot describing Rockpopple with luscious pecs and a tight arse*;)

#105
BeefoTheBold

BeefoTheBold
  • Members
  • 957 messages

Seena wrote...
Refer to the previous post.

: )

And
just a bit of friendly advice? To save yourself such disappointment and
frustration?  In the future, wait until enough game reviews are
available to make an informed purchase.  : )


repetition, repetition, repetition.

If
you want to bother to actually ever respond to my argument from earlier
instead of simply repeating yourself over and over again, let me know.

In case you forgot it, here it is.


BeefoTheBold wrote...

Alright, enough sarcasm on my part.

The money isn't a big deal at all. I could go into the bathroom and flush it down the toiled the next time I feel the need to take a dump and it wouldn't materially impact me.

What I don't get is how people like you see no connection whatsoever to the very natural expectation that the sequel to a AAA game would play very similar and have the same level of quality to the previous AAA game with some tweaks and minor improvements, not a complete overhaul.

Expecting that is not naive blindness. It is a natural and logical assumption that gamers have been making for many, MANY years. To borrow from a different part of EA's game lineup, it's like expecting that Madden Football 2011 will be fairly similar to Madden 2010. You don't expect it to suddenly transform into a basketball game.

Further, your analogy is completely faulty because you're leaving out two incredibly important pieces:

1. Bioware's track record until recent memory. - You never did address the analogy of the favorite author.

Certain companies build up and establish credibility. It's the entire point to a preorder. There's an implied promise between the developer and the fanbase built into the joint history they have together. And for AAA titles, yes, it is completely normal to preorder to ensure you get an early copy when a certain level of quality is reasonably ensured.

When that implied promise is broken, yes, the developer shares blame. Don't try and tell me that Bioware didn't know things like, for example, the recycled environments weren't going to be negatively received.

2. The utter departure from a AAA title.

Name the last game that was a AAA title that got completely overhauled with the sequel. Did God of War 2 completely change up everything from God of War 1? Or how about Halo 2 vs Halo 1?

And this, yes, a developer shares faults for this as well. Particularly when the new game carries the same name as the previous one.

As with #1 above, a game carrying the same name carries the expectation that it will be the same type of game.



#106
Seena

Seena
  • Members
  • 510 messages

BeefoTheBold wrote...


Seena wrote...
Refer to the previous post.

: )

And
just a bit of friendly advice? To save yourself such disappointment and
frustration?  In the future, wait until enough game reviews are
available to make an informed purchase.  : )


repetition, repetition, repetition.

If
you want to bother to actually ever respond to my argument from earlier
instead of simply repeating yourself over and over again, let me know.

In case you forgot it, here it is.


BeefoTheBold wrote...

Alright, enough sarcasm on my part.

The money isn't a big deal at all. I could go into the bathroom and flush it down the toiled the next time I feel the need to take a dump and it wouldn't materially impact me.

What I don't get is how people like you see no connection whatsoever to the very natural expectation that the sequel to a AAA game would play very similar and have the same level of quality to the previous AAA game with some tweaks and minor improvements, not a complete overhaul.

Expecting that is not naive blindness. It is a natural and logical assumption that gamers have been making for many, MANY years. To borrow from a different part of EA's game lineup, it's like expecting that Madden Football 2011 will be fairly similar to Madden 2010. You don't expect it to suddenly transform into a basketball game.

Further, your analogy is completely faulty because you're leaving out two incredibly important pieces:

1. Bioware's track record until recent memory. - You never did address the analogy of the favorite author.

Certain companies build up and establish credibility. It's the entire point to a preorder. There's an implied promise between the developer and the fanbase built into the joint history they have together. And for AAA titles, yes, it is completely normal to preorder to ensure you get an early copy when a certain level of quality is reasonably ensured.

When that implied promise is broken, yes, the developer shares blame. Don't try and tell me that Bioware didn't know things like, for example, the recycled environments weren't going to be negatively received.

2. The utter departure from a AAA title.

Name the last game that was a AAA title that got completely overhauled with the sequel. Did God of War 2 completely change up everything from God of War 1? Or how about Halo 2 vs Halo 1?

And this, yes, a developer shares faults for this as well. Particularly when the new game carries the same name as the previous one.

As with #1 above, a game carrying the same name carries the expectation that it will be the same type of game.




Yes of course, after several posts, it is a GIVEN that your sarcasm disclaimer refers to your comments about apologies expected.

Um - sure.

Even without said sarcasm - your post is one big blame fest  - while you refuse to accept any culpability.

With that I am through.

Enjoy your sense of betrayal - wallow in it in fact.   It will serve as a balm for your bruised sense of entitlement.

#107
Rockpopple

Rockpopple
  • Members
  • 3 100 messages
It can never get tight enough.

*looks at erynnar* Hey.. quit it. Cut that out. No unauthorized fanfiction! End of this!

#108
2Hard2C

2Hard2C
  • Members
  • 97 messages
[quote]Seena wrote...

[quote]BeefoTheBold wrote...

[quote]Seena wrote...


Whiny was directed not at you, specifically, yet you chose to have it apply - again, that is your burden, not mine.

[/quote]

 Oh? I could have sworn that this post earlier was directed specifically at me.

[quote]Seena wrote...
Wah Wah Wah

Perhaps those "loyal customers" should know - if you
have a low threashold for disappointment -  don't buy a game on release -
wait for the reviews, etc.

If you feel "ripped off" - you have only yourself to blame.
[/quote]

Are you going to claim that "Wah Wah Wah" is not the same thing as directly calling someone whiny? Quite a stretch there. Some impressive hair splitting.

[quote] Seena wrote...
Just as you not liking the game because you couldn't wait for reviews - is your burden, not Bioware's.
[/quote]

Keep repeating it. At some point, actually replying to my arguments from earlier might actually be helpful. I don't expect it, but I'm open to being pleasantly surprised.

[quote] Seena wrote...
My comment SPECIFICALLY and only addressed people who expected an apology - again, you CHOSE (like you CHOSE to buy the game sans  reviews) to reply to my comment, so I can only deduce that you expected an apology.
[/quote]

Or you could have, you know, either

A. Asked.
B. Changed your assumptions, or if you prefer "deducations", after the second time I explicitly stated in the thread that I wasn't expecting an apology. After all, it was only my very first post in the thread that said this.

[quote]BeefoTheBold said...
Formal, outright apology?

Never in a million years.
[/quote]

[quote] Seena said...
As for your point about Bioware not sending out advanced copies- that has NO bearing WHAT-SO-EVER on YOUR decision to buy the game sight unseen.

Still you try to pass the blame.
[/quote]

Since I'm tired of repeating myself, I'll simply copy paste the time earlier in this very thread that explained that you have yet to respond - still - to the reasoning I laid out earlier.

[quote]BeefoTheBold said in this exact thread...
Keep repeating it. At some point, actually replying to my arguments from earlier might actually be helpful. I don't expect it, but I'm open to being pleasantly surprised.
[/quote]

[quote]Seena said...
You also take it upon yourself to speak for Bioware as to why they didn't send out copies -  that in itself is telling.
[/quote]

Which is very funny after...

[quote]Seena said earlier...
As for pre-ordering a game from Bioware - I'm betting they'd agree - if
your expectations are set in stone - and you're the type that easily
gets their nose bent out of shape when your expectations aren't met -  -
they'd rather have you wait and decide to purchase AFTER you were more
educated about said purchase.
[/quote]

Which seems pretty hypocritical because you're saying it is "telling" that I'm interpreting Bioware's motivations after your doing the exact same thing. 

[quote]Seena said...
You don't know what happened (production issues preventing the sending out of advanced copies?) - yet you take the position that there was nefarious intent on Bioware's part.
[/quote]

Production issues prevent sending out a hundred or so extra copies to the most popular review site a couple of weeks before release date but don't prevent them sending out hundreds of THOUSANDS of copies two weeks later?

Riiiiiighhht. That makes SO much sense. Way more logical than they chose to hold back the advance copies out of a fear of negative reviews.

[quote]Seena said...
Oh the big bad Bioware. Evil Bioware. They purposely made the game the way they did - to ****** fans off.

Man- o Mano.
[/quote]

I must have missed the part where I said Bioware purposely made a game designed to ****** fans off. Can you point out where I said that or is that a particularly easy to spot Strawman argument?

[/quote]

Refer to the previous post.

: )

And just a bit of friendly advice? To save yourself such disappointment and frustration?  In the future, wait until enough game reviews are available to make an informed purchase.  : )

[/quote]

Not to cause undue stress, but I must interject; Frankly, BeefoTheBold has every right to be upset at Bioware for making DA2, a game that should not have been pre-ordered.

Bioware has consitently proven the past ten years or so, that they deliever a high-quality product and are about their customers first and the money second. I will assume that BeefoTheBold has been a long-time fan and customer of Bioware, and is willing to pay the extra money(or purchase months in advance) with a pre-order, and has always had high hopes for their products.

What you are argueing is expect the worse, always, a more cautious approach to be sure, but Bioware has built up a reputation and it is to be expected that they will make a good game, and the fact that DA2 was not up to their ability and expectations, many people should feel upset.

Not that you are wrong in your approach, just that BeefoTheBold's opinion is far more moderate than those pointlessly trolling, "DA2 sucks, period, Bioware, you suck even worse, et al, et al, et al", and that in reality if you do get this worked up about what Beefo says, then what is your reaction to the pointless trolling?<_<

#109
BeefoTheBold

BeefoTheBold
  • Members
  • 957 messages

2Hard2C wrote...

Not to cause undue stress, but I must interject; Frankly, BeefoTheBold has every right to be upset at Bioware for making DA2, a game that should not have been pre-ordered.

Bioware has consitently proven the past ten years or so, that they deliever a high-quality product and are about their customers first and the money second. I will assume that BeefoTheBold has been a long-time fan and customer of Bioware, and is willing to pay the extra money(or purchase months in advance) with a pre-order, and has always had high hopes for their products.

What you are argueing is expect the worse, always, a more cautious approach to be sure, but Bioware has built up a reputation and it is to be expected that they will make a good game, and the fact that DA2 was not up to their ability and expectations, many people should feel upset.

Not that you are wrong in your approach, just that BeefoTheBold's opinion is far more moderate than those pointlessly trolling, "DA2 sucks, period, Bioware, you suck even worse, et al, et al, et al", and that in reality if you do get this worked up about what Beefo says, then what is your reaction to the pointless trolling?<_<


YES. This is what I was trying (and I suppose failing) to express with this post here.

BeefoTheBold wrote...

Alright, enough sarcasm on my part.

The
money isn't a big deal at all. I could go into the bathroom and flush
it down the toiled the next time I feel the need to take a dump and it
wouldn't materially impact me.

What I don't get is how people
like you see no connection whatsoever to the very natural expectation
that the sequel to a AAA game would play very similar and have the same
level of quality to the previous AAA game with some tweaks and minor
improvements, not a complete overhaul.

Expecting that is not
naive blindness. It is a natural and logical assumption that gamers have
been making for many, MANY years. To borrow from a different part of
EA's game lineup, it's like expecting that Madden Football 2011 will be
fairly similar to Madden 2010. You don't expect it to suddenly transform
into a basketball game.

Further, your analogy is completely faulty because you're leaving out two incredibly important pieces:

1. Bioware's track record until recent memory. - You never did address the analogy of the favorite author.

Certain
companies build up and establish credibility. It's the entire point to a
preorder. There's an implied promise between the developer and the
fanbase built into the joint history they have together. And for AAA
titles, yes, it is completely normal to preorder to ensure you get an
early copy when a certain level of quality is reasonably ensured.

When
that implied promise is broken, yes, the developer shares blame. Don't
try and tell me that Bioware didn't know things like, for example, the
recycled environments weren't going to be negatively received.

2. The utter departure from a AAA title.

Name
the last game that was a AAA title that got completely overhauled with
the sequel. Did God of War 2 completely change up everything from God
of War 1? Or how about Halo 2 vs Halo 1?

And this, yes, a
developer shares faults for this as well. Particularly when the new game
carries the same name as the previous one.

As with #1 above, a game carrying the same name carries the expectation that it will be the same type of game.


I'm not a pointless "bash Bioware" type. I'm simply pointing out that you can't simply say, "you stupid people who relied on Bioware's track record! It's 100% your fault for any letdown you're feeling because you didn't wait a few weeks for reviews to start filtering out." and excuse Bioware from all culpability.

Certainly, customers might have been better off if they did so. But Bioware relied big time on their past reputation to get preorders. They pushed based and utilized it. As someone who is not accustomed to being letdown by a company who has been a gold standard for consistent quality in the past, I happily had Bioware on my "preorder without a second thought list".

It is my firm opinion that's where Bioware WANTS their customers to be. I don't think it is a leap of logic to assume that customers that won't preorder in the future as a result of DA2 would be a concern for a game developer.

Does ANY of this mean that I expect an apology from Bioware? Not really. Do I think that not all the mistakes that were made in DA2 were mistakes of pure ignorance and good intentions? No, I do not.

Some things can be honest design decisions in an attempt to innovate. Things like recycled environments and gaping plot holes? No, those aren't differences of opinion built around subjective criteria.

Modifié par BeefoTheBold, 22 avril 2011 - 02:11 .


#110
Seena

Seena
  • Members
  • 510 messages

2Hard2C wrote...





Bioware has consitently proven the past ten years or so, that they deliever a high-quality product and are about their customers first and the money second. I will assume that BeefoTheBold has been a long-time fan and customer of Bioware, and is willing to pay the extra money(or purchase months in advance) with a pre-order, and has always had high hopes for their products.

What you are argueing is expect the worse, always, a more cautious approach to be sure, but Bioware has built up a reputation and it is to be expected that they will make a good game, and the fact that DA2 was not up to their ability and expectations, many people should feel upset.

Not that you are wrong in your approach, just that BeefoTheBold's opinion is far more moderate than those pointlessly trolling, "DA2 sucks, period, Bioware, you suck even worse, et al, et al, et al", and that in reality if you do get this worked up about what Beefo says, then what is your reaction to the pointless trolling?<_<


Pretty much every filmmaker, every author, every playwright - has an "off" production.  It's just the way things go. There's ups and downs - particularly in the gaming world, when devs try and accommodate player feedback.

Yes, we have expectations  - and certainly we are entitled to have them based on a (company's, artist's, filmmaker's) past performance.

But for some reason gamers take this sense of entitlement to the 10th degree.  And when you get down to it - - simply waiting for the reviews,  and not giving in to that need to get the bonus items, special edition etc -  would save a lot  of people a lot of heartache.

No one is forced to buy a game sight unseen.  No one.  Peronally I've learned my lesson after several disappointments.  When I buy a game at release - if I'm frustrated with bugs, that it isn't what I hoped- I accept that I took that chance.  It's on *me* for not waiting to read reviews.


edit - *I* did not react or address "Beef" - he addressed me.

Modifié par Seena, 22 avril 2011 - 02:16 .


#111
Seena

Seena
  • Members
  • 510 messages

Rockpopple wrote...

It can never get tight enough.

*looks at erynnar* Hey.. quit it. Cut that out. No unauthorized fanfiction! End of this!



I am thinking there is an upper limit of tightness. :blink:

#112
BeefoTheBold

BeefoTheBold
  • Members
  • 957 messages

Seena wrote...

edit - *I* did not react or address "Beef" - he addressed me.


Actually, this is a valid point. Tone of voice doesn't always come across well. My initial post was intended to be in the tone of voice of wry teasing about what I felt was Seena making an unduly harsh stab at anyone expressing disappointment with DA2 and not a personal attack, though in retrospect I think it was intepreted as one.

And for that I apologize. It was not my intention to attack but to point out that I think calling anyone disappointed with DA2, effectively, overly entitled whiners was painting with a very broad and unfair brush.

#113
2Hard2C

2Hard2C
  • Members
  • 97 messages

BeefoTheBold wrote...

Seena wrote...

edit - *I* did not react or address "Beef" - he addressed me.


Actually, this is a valid point. Tone of voice doesn't always come across well. My initial post was intended to be in the tone of voice of wry teasing about what I felt was Seena making an unduly harsh stab at anyone expressing disappointment with DA2 and not a personal attack, though in retrospect I think it was intepreted as one.

And for that I apologize. It was not my intention to attack but to point out that I think calling anyone disappointed with DA2, effectively, overly entitled whiners was painting with a very broad and unfair brush.


Seena, I am sorry for making a false assumption. However, my point holds valid towards your reaction(s) to moderate opinions, and I still am wondering what your reaction(s) would be to strong and/or extreme views.

#114
Seena

Seena
  • Members
  • 510 messages

BeefoTheBold wrote...

Seena wrote...

edit - *I* did not react or address "Beef" - he addressed me.


Actually, this is a valid point. Tone of voice doesn't always come across well. My initial post was intended to be in the tone of voice of wry teasing about what I felt was Seena making an unduly harsh stab at anyone expressing disappointment with DA2 and not a personal attack, though in retrospect I think it was intepreted as one.

And for that I apologize. It was not my intention to attack but to point out that I think calling anyone disappointed with DA2, effectively, overly entitled whiners was painting with a very broad and unfair brush.



Acknowledgement appreciated and apology warmly accepted.

I have no issue with people expressing disappointment, ect.  While I enjoyed the game, I had issues with it as well (and it took me some time to warm up to it).

However, people's legitimate complaints often get lost in a sea of demands that are petty and uncompromising - and that is what I take issue with. Especially when such demands culminate in the demand for an apology.

#115
Seena

Seena
  • Members
  • 510 messages

2Hard2C wrote...

BeefoTheBold wrote...

Seena wrote...

edit - *I* did not react or address "Beef" - he addressed me.


Actually, this is a valid point. Tone of voice doesn't always come across well. My initial post was intended to be in the tone of voice of wry teasing about what I felt was Seena making an unduly harsh stab at anyone expressing disappointment with DA2 and not a personal attack, though in retrospect I think it was intepreted as one.

And for that I apologize. It was not my intention to attack but to point out that I think calling anyone disappointed with DA2, effectively, overly entitled whiners was painting with a very broad and unfair brush.


Seena, I am sorry for making a false assumption. However, my point holds valid towards your reaction(s) to moderate opinions, and I still am wondering what your reaction(s) would be to strong and/or extreme views.


Imo a demand for an apology IS an extreme view.

#116
Sussurus

Sussurus
  • Members
  • 520 messages
Oddly I do like DA:O more and would have prefered its system, but I will most likely play more of DA:2.
Why? for whatever reason, I like that more of it is based on dialogue.
I'm still finding new things in conversation after so many complete and not complete run throughs.

I don't want to say that it's story was better, just that it has a lot more content regarding dialogue.

So as a gamer that plays for non combat reasons, I don't feel they messed up.. at least with intent.
That for DA:3 they should at least keep the water mark of amount of script in game as DA:2.

Modifié par Sussurus, 22 avril 2011 - 02:33 .


#117
thesuperdarkone

thesuperdarkone
  • Members
  • 1 745 messages
If people are making fanfiction, include Sektor or he will rage!!!!!!!!!!

#118
Guest_mrsph_*

Guest_mrsph_*
  • Guests
If they ever admit a mistake it is going to be waaaaaay down the line, or never.

#119
2Hard2C

2Hard2C
  • Members
  • 97 messages

Seena wrote...

2Hard2C wrote...

BeefoTheBold wrote...

Seena wrote...

edit - *I* did not react or address "Beef" - he addressed me.


Actually, this is a valid point. Tone of voice doesn't always come across well. My initial post was intended to be in the tone of voice of wry teasing about what I felt was Seena making an unduly harsh stab at anyone expressing disappointment with DA2 and not a personal attack, though in retrospect I think it was intepreted as one.

And for that I apologize. It was not my intention to attack but to point out that I think calling anyone disappointed with DA2, effectively, overly entitled whiners was painting with a very broad and unfair brush.


Seena, I am sorry for making a false assumption. However, my point holds valid towards your reaction(s) to moderate opinions, and I still am wondering what your reaction(s) would be to strong and/or extreme views.


Imo a demand for an apology IS an extreme view.

I wish not for an apology, but for Bioware to admit they did make errors in the development and production of Dragon Age 2. I don't expect it, but it would show a lot of maturity on Bioware's part to own up to it.

Frankly, Dragon Age  2 was rushed, and if they admit they could have allowed more time for it to happen, and the next Dragon Age game will take all the time nessesary to complete it, then that will be enough, for myself at least.

#120
BeefoTheBold

BeefoTheBold
  • Members
  • 957 messages

2Hard2C wrote...

Seena wrote...

2Hard2C wrote...

BeefoTheBold wrote...

Seena wrote...

edit - *I* did not react or address "Beef" - he addressed me.


Actually, this is a valid point. Tone of voice doesn't always come across well. My initial post was intended to be in the tone of voice of wry teasing about what I felt was Seena making an unduly harsh stab at anyone expressing disappointment with DA2 and not a personal attack, though in retrospect I think it was intepreted as one.

And for that I apologize. It was not my intention to attack but to point out that I think calling anyone disappointed with DA2, effectively, overly entitled whiners was painting with a very broad and unfair brush.


Seena, I am sorry for making a false assumption. However, my point holds valid towards your reaction(s) to moderate opinions, and I still am wondering what your reaction(s) would be to strong and/or extreme views.


Imo a demand for an apology IS an extreme view.

I wish not for an apology, but for Bioware to admit they did make errors in the development and production of Dragon Age 2. I don't expect it, but it would show a lot of maturity on Bioware's part to own up to it.

Frankly, Dragon Age  2 was rushed, and if they admit they could have allowed more time for it to happen, and the next Dragon Age game will take all the time nessesary to complete it, then that will be enough, for myself at least.


I think you'll end up getting what you wish, but in kind of a coded/indirect sort of way.

I think you'll hear statements like, "There are a few things we really wanted to be able to do with Dragon Age 2 that we weren't quite able to accomplish that we plan on getting implemented in Dragon Age 3." and other statements of the sort.

Or at least, I'm hoping to hear statements along those lines. The Laidlaw interview was interesting in that it's impossible to tell at this point if he truly believes some of the things he said or if he's just saying them for the time being to help sales and truly intends to course correct in DA3.

#121
rhautanen

rhautanen
  • Members
  • 127 messages

I wish not for an apology, but for Bioware to admit they did make errors in the development and production of Dragon Age 2. I don't expect it, but it would show a lot of maturity on Bioware's part to own up to it.

Frankly, Dragon Age 2 was rushed, and if they admit they could have allowed more time for it to happen, and the next Dragon Age game will take all the time nessesary to complete it, then that will be enough, for myself at least.


I want BW to do DA3 with adequate schedule & resources, having learned the proper lessons from both DAO and DA2. Admissions and apologizes are pretty but worthless. Now all we need is a proper definition of "proper".

#122
Shirosaki17

Shirosaki17
  • Members
  • 847 messages
Probably a couple years before they announce anything was wrong with the game. Even then it may be disingenuous if they are marketing DA3 while they talk about the flaws of DA2.

#123
erynnar

erynnar
  • Members
  • 3 010 messages

thesuperdarkone wrote...

If people are making fanfiction, include Sektor or he will rage!!!!!!!!!!


*writes fanfiction with Rockpopple's rock hard abs and tight arse and Sektor's manly muscled chest and tanned and toned biceps* Hmmm I am seeing a muscles posing weightlifters kind of challenge on the beach of Lake Calenhad....King Alistair will present the golden drinking goblet to whomever wins....Leliana, Isabela, Merrill, Morrigan, Wynne, my female warden Kai, and Zev to judge...:P  Oghren will have drank the contents of the goblet before you get it....

#124
Dragonslayr09

Dragonslayr09
  • Members
  • 82 messages

JasonPogo wrote...

Now I am not saying this game is the worst ever made and what not.  But I think at this point it is safe to asume that they succeded in pissing off most of their long time fans and brought in very few new ones.  At some point they will have to come out and say that yes this game did not performe as they wanted it to.  Just wondering how long that might take.

I just hope that time will coincide with DA3 if they make it.


What a waste of words.

#125
snfonseka

snfonseka
  • Members
  • 2 469 messages
I don't want them to admit it publicly, but I want them to not to repeat the errors in the future.