Aller au contenu

Photo

Anders, the Most Successful Companion Story


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
43 réponses à ce sujet

#1
Nimrodell

Nimrodell
  • Members
  • 828 messages
Anders, Hated and Loved – The Most Successful Companion Story

Yet another topic about Anders, and still I’m hoping it actually it won’t turn into it. I wouldn’t write anything more about him, but for the past month I’ve been reading these forums on daily basis and that’s how I noticed that whether people love, hate, like or dislike Anders, they keep talking and debating about him. No other DA2 character received such attention from the players as he did. And that’s what inspired me to write this post and even do a little experiment with my own students – just to see how young people from my country perceive what’s moral and when that idea of morality gets bent.

Anders, We Were Friends, Lovers and Still You Didn’t Trust Me


Posted Image
OK, stop whining and kiss me already! Just don’t let Justice touch my behind!

Since Hawke didn’t have Warden’s knowledge on Anders (a player does), I’ll treat his character as such – so no funny, a bit selfish Anders that likes cats and tattoed women and asks only to shoot occasional fireballs and a pretty girl by his side. Hawke’s Anders is a tormented, moody man, calculated when his skin is endangered, witty but in petty sense, generous when need be but also selfish and narrowminded when something is not following his vision of right and wrong. A perfect character for girls that are 16, 17, 18 years old and still think there’s something mystic and good hidden, some wisdom and suffering, behind that exterior of a man that elder ones would mark as ’potential problem and trouble’. There’s always appeal to the idea of saving some tormented soul. Especially if there’s some ’outside’ influence that effects our interest of saving.

Hey, in some aspects he resembles so much Arthas Menethil, that I almost wished for Jaina to teleport to the Gallows and say: ’Hawke, don’t mourn and lick your wounded heart, road to Hell is mostly paved by good intentions! Tell him that you love him, and fight beside him but also that you won’t forget that easily what he did.’ But even she had the privilege that was stripped from our Hawke (guess, blondies get better deals in the end) – she was able to acknowledge outloud her love for the doomed prince but also not to condone or agree with his crime. Seems that all Shepards and Hawkes of this world are doomed to blind acceptance or just look plain stupid if they want to stand by their lovers/friends... either that or ’we’re no more’, even though it plays out differently in life itself. Guess those that go for bugged rivalry path got better bargain in the end – friendship is the thing from previous century anyway, stale and boring... I mean, man toward other man is a wolf and who are we to deny that? How can we care for someone and stand by them and still not agree with the things they do? Tis either, yeeeehaaaa! for your bad deeds and misconceptions or knife in the back since, after all, I am too self-righteous arse.

Posted Image
Kaidan, I love you, but that’s just crap what you’re saying now after I’ve been dead for 2 years and saved you and the Horizon! So, don’t mess with me, hon!


Posted Image
Anders, but but I do support you and all other mages! See, I even told them I’m Bas Serabaas... and lost all my chances with the Arishok, darn it!


Haters Gonna Hate Anders, Fans Will Keep Drawing Silly Pictures of Him With Cats and Who Knows What Else
(They should actually petition Whiskers cat food brand to rename some of their products into ’Anders ka-boom cat delight’ or something like that.)

OK, lets see what’s happening to our emo companion since DA2 is released. Ah, tis fun, bread and games, people are berserking over poor Anders – murder-knife him, love him, bromance him for destroying the chantry, torture him with siding with templars, tranqulize him, put him in Aeonar... ah variations are limitless indeed. But one thing I didn’t see so far on these forums (maybe I missed it since there are so many topics about him, so many posts). I didn’t notice truly human approach toward ’Hawke-Anders’ problem... the one that actually covers grayness of our existence. Even rivalry path shows that issue and still, tis like people kinda miss it (maybe it’s ’cause he’s made of pixels and not real, but still, tis strange). Is it really that easy to murder a man that shared so many years with you as a companion (either as a rival, friend or a lover)? Is it really that easy to be the judge and executioner in the same time, especially if one was personally involved? And if it is that easy, how can one claim then that he/she isn’t same as Anders, or better said, as corrupted Justice that actually doesn’t comprehend the complexity of mortal world? That’s a tough question for me but as I see, people are to eager or fast to play all mighty and powerful role of being just by their own standards when it’s only hypothetical?

But I’m grateful for this situation, it gave me the new insight and the reason to talk about these issues with my students. I presented them with Hawke-Anders dilemma and they surprised me pleasantly. There was 10 minutes pause on the classes and they did think seriously about it... I was already worried when the first hand came up and almost all of them told me – I would not be able to play the role of imposed righteousness if I’ve spent time with that person – I would act selfish in that matter, I would not condone or agree with a crime nor with distrust, but I would either force that person to do what must be done to minimize the suffering and then take responsibility for his/hers actions or I would spurn him/her but I would not kill... ’cause I have better understanding and insight into his/hers problems and what led to that devious act. It gave e a flicker of hope that not all are so fast to take the role of corrupted DA2 Justice/Vengeance... and trust me, you would understand me better if you knew from which country I am.

Posted Image
I don’t agree with your crime, Anders, but I will stand by those that were blameless, like I always did and show Justice that he doesn’t know a thing about what justice is... and you, my lad, will take responsiblity and I’ll be beside you then, to take the hit.

So, I guess it all has to do with that famous old psychological test with a kid and his understanding of story about the man who stole medicines for his sick wife and the question if it’s moral thing to do. (If you want to know more about it, I managed to find online version of it https://www.msu.edu/...bergtheory.html ).



What is My Final Message to Jennifer Helper if She by Any Chance Reads This?

Posted Image
Anders, you’re sexy when you’re glowing blue, sweety, but please, be a man more! We elder chicks like to see occasional feminine side shown in our man, but... Just recall Commando’s words that will stay forever: Remember, Sully, when I promised to kill you last... I lied. See, that’s testosterone talking, hon, and it’s a kind of magic... another way to oppose evol templars!

Redoing Anders was a hard job because out there, there are so many players that will have their own vision of him already imprinted by Awakening. Model change, voice change, character change and the risk that many of them won’t see motivation behind it that drives him to act the way he does. And I trully think that miracle was accomplished with him, ’cause no one is indifferent when it comes to him. Everyone has an opionion, and these forums got some of the best and some of the worst posts thanks to him. Hey, even Hilarious Images topic exploits him indefinitely. So, yes, he is great success in that regard. Anders haters hate him profoundly and Anders fans love him til there’s last man standing on that silly battlefield. And he’s just a character from a story, but somehow he really gained his life, somehow he breathes and provokes emotions from people.

Posted Image
To be or not to be? Alas, Anders, why do people love or hate thee?

To be honest, blowing up the chantry didn’t show that he actually grew a bit of backbone though. I had seven playthroughs so far (yes, I’m a freak that likes to see everything when it comes to stories and games) and as I progressed in that number, I was finding less and less reasons to perceive him just as Anders – the one condemned or loved by posters. But one thing was lacking in all those playthroughs and that was a backbone – plain, simple thing that many people possess... and sometimes it really bothered me because it would be rather refreshing to actually meet a npc that can deal with its issues with more backbone (ah Sten, I miss you, you’re still more cool than Arishok). Or at least an illusion of it... I know very well Aristotle’s rules of tragedy and what’s provoking katharsis (hey, I’m actually teaching that... and being bored by it since like I keep repeating those rules like a stupid parrot), but if that is the goal, one should look again at Tolkien’s Faramir (not the movie version one! Don’t you even dare! lol). Sometimes Carth Onasi or Kaidan Alenko or Alistair or Anders (and Fenris as well) could actually grow up as character, show their emotions but also stay men... they could use ’Are you feeling lucky, punk?’ attitude sometimes... at least have some resemblance to their roots that begin with alpha males.

Now, one can say ’But, but, Anders blown up the chantry and said those famous words – The Circle has failed us, Orsino – in front of Meredith and all those templars... but still he was rendered powerless because he was actually afraid for his life through the entire game, manipulating and whining, using Hawke (just remember how he says – I should look for a nicer place or how he asks to move in with Hawke is she/he doesn’t choose the option ’I love you’). Growing backbone in Gallows final scenes is just not something that will mark a character as one that has it. And I’m not saying that it was intention, it’s just, it would be nice to actually have male characters apart from player’s hero with a bit of backbone... they can have serious issues and still keep one. Even Gilgamesh had one even though he had issues with his friend Enkidu dying and death... and loo! He survived as hero for so many centuries.

Posted Image
So, you’re not the cool guy? Justice is... even tho he’s unwilling participant in our threesome? Bah...

Posted Image
If you keep it up like that Anders, I’ll kiss Emille. Step down, Isabela!

Modifié par Nimrodell, 21 avril 2011 - 10:29 .


#2
silver-crescent

silver-crescent
  • Members
  • 1 642 messages
Interesting post. I particularly agree with the "Haters Gonna Hate (...)" point, not so much with the other 2.

I'm pretty sure IRL I would never be able to kill/harm someone I know even if they did something awful either. And I also agree that it's not Hawke's place to decide if he deserves to live or die. Capital punishment is just something I can't approve of, be it in reality or in a fictional world.

#3
TripLight

TripLight
  • Members
  • 1 834 messages
This was a great post, and you brought many points up that a lot of people fail to recognize or simply ignore. However I do disagree about Anders being the perfect character for a 16-18 year old, my 27 year old self loved his train-wreck of a romance, I believe "it hurt so good" would accurately describe it for me. But then again I was roleplaying a 20-something character for a period of seven years as well.

#4
Sarcastic Tasha

Sarcastic Tasha
  • Members
  • 1 183 messages
Anders feels like more of a villain in DA2 than Meredith does to me. He bugged me even before I realised he was going to do blow up the Chantry. I couldn't stand the way he talked to Aveline and Merrill. But I did quite enjoy hating him, having him and Fenris as rivals while playing as a blood mage was very entertaining. So yeah I'd say he's a good character because he invokes a strong emotion from me. I do wish killing him at the end would have been more fun though, he seemed happy to be a martyr.

#5
Addai

Addai
  • Members
  • 25 850 messages
I got Anders' maps and pretty much that was it until he blew up the Chantry. If you liked him, fine, but don't generalize. People debate a lot about what he did, but that's because he blew up a building. Kinda hard to miss.

Modifié par Addai67, 22 avril 2011 - 12:51 .


#6
Nimrodell

Nimrodell
  • Members
  • 828 messages

Addai67 wrote...

I got Anders' maps and pretty much that was it until he blew up the Chantry. If you liked him, fine, but don't generalize. People debate a lot about what he did, but that's because he blew up a building. Kinda hard to miss.


Well, Meredith was doing killing job pretty well without blowing up buildings, Orsino was supplying and condoning  Quentin's research til certain extent thus helping (knowingly or not) mass murderer, Isabela is willing to let Castillon go and keep his expanding slavery in the Free Marches for a ship... but you don't see so many topics popping up about them nor about those issues. Anders' topics are not limited just to blowing up a building and that's why I do think that he was actually the most successful character. I didn't generalize, I just stated what I see currently on the forums.

#7
kromify

kromify
  • Members
  • 1 292 messages
nice post. i really got the feeling that at least a group of people only hate anders for taking away their choice; they feel railroaded into the final confrontation.

you say he was lacking in backbone... which was true in awakenings. justice was supposed to become his backbone - to give anders the strength to fight, which didn't turn out so well. it is kind of in character imo, since he spent a lot of his time in acts 1 and 2 trying to suppress justice.

anders's redeeming feature to me is that he tries to do the right thing (before the chantry). he lives in a sewer for years tending to the sick without asking for remuneration. he might be selfish, needy and sometimes petty, but he is kind.

my hawke romanced anders. i think they were fairly well suited to each other - remember that hawke has lost her whole family, her home, and is living in a town of templars who would just love to lock her up, lobotomise or kill her. their relationship is obsessive and unhealthy but neither is going to let go of it. she's lost too much already to give up on anders now.

sorry for the wall of writing!

#8
Zandilar

Zandilar
  • Members
  • 312 messages
I thought this was going to link to Anders' thread and say "nuff said".

I really don't think he needs anyone defending him. I really don't get why he's so popular, as he's just Standard Bioware Love Interest Type 1 (Aribeth and Bastila were also SBLI Type 1 - driven by circumstance/magic/injustice/whatever to become evil or do evil things, only to be redeemed by the Love of A Good Man tm... I'm not sure Anders really meets the last criteria, but you can spare him - so I assume there's some kind of "I'll give you a chance at redemption" involved.)

By the way, I welcome people proving me I'm wrong, because I'm not as familiar with Anders as I am with Aribeth and Bastila. Personally, I don't feel anything much for Anders - he was too overshadowed by the likes of Isabela. But then again, looking at my sig, you can see where my interests lie. :P

#9
Nimrodell

Nimrodell
  • Members
  • 828 messages
To be honest, I played Revan as a male only once and I didn't find Bastila compelling that much as a LI or a friend - I'm more Atton Rand (the version that didn't manage to get into the game itself, but he's Obsidian work not BW) and I would rather compare Atton to Anders than Bastila and him. Can't say that Anders is standard BW LI to be honest. Ah there is that 'deep issues and selfish focus on them' part, but still I find 'em all pretty unique in their own way.

#10
Caja

Caja
  • Members
  • 1 995 messages
Interesting read, though I don't agree with you on all points. However, I think you're right that Anders is a successfull character, because he evokes so many reactions.

Since DA 2 is rated 17 or 18, I am of the opinion that Anders is not (only) a character for girls aged 16 - 18. He is probably more appealing to older players. There was a survey a few days ago about the players age, but I can't find it anymore. Most of the participants were in their mid twenties, some were older.

Nimrodell wrote...

I would act selfish in that matter, I would not condone or agree with a crime nor with distrust, but I would either force that person to do what must be done to minimize the suffering and then take responsibility for his/hers actions or I would spurn him/her but I would not kill... ’cause I have better understanding and insight into his/hers problems and what led to that devious act.

I partly agree. Something I missed at the end of the game was the opportunity to take over responsibility for Anders actions, since he is my companion. I played as a mage who romanced Anders, and at the end I was willing to sacrifice myself and to turn myself in, so the templars could take me away. But given that the options are limited, you've got to work with what you've got ;).
That said, I think some players killed Anders out of mercy, because they had insight into his problems.

#11
Nimrodell

Nimrodell
  • Members
  • 828 messages
Ah, that age 16-18 was more of a joke, not a serious statement, tis just at that age girls dream the most about some cool dark guy that actually has heart of gold - so it wasn't conclusion, just recalling my having less realistic expectations from those 'I radiate dark and unhappy' thoughts guys. :) Sorry for not being more clear about it. I didn't even think that anyone will take it literally... Apologies. :)

#12
Caja

Caja
  • Members
  • 1 995 messages
Ah, thanks for clarification. No harm done Posted Image.

#13
Eternal Phoenix

Eternal Phoenix
  • Members
  • 8 471 messages
I think I'll continue the hate. I hate him more than Morrigan.

#14
Zandilar

Zandilar
  • Members
  • 312 messages

Nimrodell wrote...

To be honest, I played Revan as a male only once and I didn't find Bastila compelling that much as a LI or a friend - I'm more Atton Rand (the version that didn't manage to get into the game itself, but he's Obsidian work not BW) and I would rather compare Atton to Anders than Bastila and him. Can't say that Anders is standard BW LI to be honest. Ah there is that 'deep issues and selfish focus on them' part, but still I find 'em all pretty unique in their own way.


Kind of unfair to compare a Bioware character to an Obsidian one, especially since Obsidian has a completely different attitude towards LIs than Bioware. (I think the people at Obsidian would really rather not include romances in their games, but only do so because of percieved demand (or demands by their publisher), and it shows.)

He's standard in that he turns on the player at one point and does something evil. It's up to the player to allow him to at least seek redemption or not, which is also a Bioware standby. (I might point out that at least one, if not two NPCs in DA:O were seeking redemption. Leliana almost certianly was, and I think Zev's storyline touches on the redemption plot as well. Once again, it's the player's friendship/romance with them that influences them one way or another.)

Just because I say a character shares traits in common with other characters from different, doesn't mean I don't think they're unique, by the way. That would be selling the writers short, and they did a sterling job with the time and resources they had. It's just that I'm rather tired of the trope Love Redeems - if you look at the Video Games category, you'll see the first and biggest example is KoTOR. NWN is also mentioned, and the tropers briefly touch on how similarly the scenes with Bastila and Aribeth play out. (This isn't to say I'd like to see an example where love doesn't redeem, it's just that I'd like to see an example where it isn't necessary.) Yes, they also show where KotOR subverts the trope, but given the examples are either how it effects Revan (the PC, and a cut option from the game would have let Carth redeem female Revan) or a non-LI NPC...

Modifié par Zandilar, 22 avril 2011 - 02:07 .


#15
PaulSX

PaulSX
  • Members
  • 1 127 messages

Zandilar wrote...

I thought this was going to link to Anders' thread and say "nuff said".

I really don't think he needs anyone defending him. I really don't get why he's so popular, as he's just Standard Bioware Love Interest Type 1 (Aribeth and Bastila were also SBLI Type 1 - driven by circumstance/magic/injustice/whatever to become evil or do evil things, only to be redeemed by the Love of A Good Man tm... I'm not sure Anders really meets the last criteria, but you can spare him - so I assume there's some kind of "I'll give you a chance at redemption" involved.)

By the way, I welcome people proving me I'm wrong, because I'm not as familiar with Anders as I am with Aribeth and Bastila. Personally, I don't feel anything much for Anders - he was too overshadowed by the likes of Isabela. But then again, looking at my sig, you can see where my interests lie. :P


I actually fail to see blowing the chantry is necessarily a crime. well, if from a modern time point of view, it's crime of course because he is killing people. but somehow I'd rather see Anders as a revolutionary mage than just a vilian type person. I wont say he is evil, he is naive and a little bit cruelhearted which actually gives him more depth than awakening's Anders. He is definitely different from Bastila, Bastila falls into dark side by force and turns back because of love, but Ander, he hates Chantry and Tmeplar from the very beginning, there is no such a thing can turn him back (at least in the game) or say 'redeem' himself. if your Hawke romanced him, that means you agree with this anti-chantry thing (at least that's how I understand Anders' romance). so he is rather a controversy character really depending on what player's opinion is (kind of like Loghain) .

#16
Zandilar

Zandilar
  • Members
  • 312 messages

suntzuxi wrote...
I actually fail to see blowing the chantry is necessarily a crime. well, if from a modern time point of view, it's crime of course because he is killing people. but somehow I'd rather see Anders as a revolutionary mage than just a vilian type person. I wont say he is evil, he is naive and a little bit cruelhearted which actually gives him more depth than awakening's Anders. He is definitely different from Bastila, Bastila falls into dark side by force and turns back because of love, but Ander, he hates Chantry and Tmeplar from the very beginning, there is no such a thing can turn him back (at least in the game) or say 'redeem' himself. if your Hawke romanced him, that means you agree with this anti-chantry thing (at least that's how I understand Anders' romance). so he is rather a controversy character really depending on what player's opinion is (kind of like Loghain) .


My Hawke was very anti-Templar, but she wasn't anti-Chantry. She had a great deal of respect for the Grand Cleric, and Anders blowing up the temple eliminated any hope of a compromise, and made conflict between mages and Templars unavoidable. It was a terrorist action, and no matter how justified his reasoning seems, it claimed the lives of many many innocents, and therefore is still an act of evil and a crime.

Despite that, my Hawke spared him. From a meta-game point of view, the only reason she didn't execute him for his crime is because I needed a healer. In characterly, it could play out one of two ways - 1) My Hawke was nothing if not practical. She was a warrior and knew she'd need healing in the upcoming battle, but letting him live then was merely a stay of execution, and she would deal with him later; or 2) Hawke wanted to give him a chance to redeem himself, or perhaps seperate him from the entity that was formerly known as Justice (whom she sees as the root of his evil, so to speak). I haven't settled on which is my Hawke's canon, yet.

Modifié par Zandilar, 22 avril 2011 - 02:27 .


#17
nos_astra

nos_astra
  • Members
  • 5 048 messages

silver-crescent wrote...
I'm pretty sure IRL I would never be able to kill/harm someone I know even if they did something awful either. And I also agree that it's not Hawke's place to decide if he deserves to live or die. Capital punishment is just something I can't approve of, be it in reality or in a fictional world.

Good thing Hawke remembers this at a very convenient moment, after spending years of poking his/her nose into things that are none of his/her business, killing people without any kind of trial for minor things.

#18
Nimrodell

Nimrodell
  • Members
  • 828 messages
@Zandilar: Well, Atton Rand is from KOTOR2, the game that Obsidian took from BW and those pcs were very much in line with KOTOR1 and as we can see now in DA2, we have almost same principle with KOTOR2 one when it comes to pcs - influence there, here friendship/rivalry. Either way, I wasn't even comparing, just saying that my favorite is Atton Rand.

As for Klarabella's comment - dear, there's a huge difference between Anders/Hawke final decision and Hawke's sticking nose into Kirkwall problems (and even that varies depending on Hawke's personality) and dealing with some random joes and janes. Anders is not some random person at the end for Hawke, simple as that. And that's the fact that changes rules of the game - perspective is changed for certain types of Hawke personality. And that's what makes people berserking about Anders on these forums - it is too personal and that's why Anders has such success as a character. No one is spilling tears or debating over Magistrate's son or Evet's Marauders, 'cause they are random joes - Anders at the end is not. Selfish might seem, I know, and hypocritical, but that's how it goes.

#19
Ryzaki

Ryzaki
  • Members
  • 34 422 messages

klarabella wrote...

silver-crescent wrote...
I'm pretty sure IRL I would never be able to kill/harm someone I know even if they did something awful either. And I also agree that it's not Hawke's place to decide if he deserves to live or die. Capital punishment is just something I can't approve of, be it in reality or in a fictional world.

Good thing Hawke remembers this at a very convenient moment, after spending years of poking his/her nose into things that are none of his/her business, killing people without any kind of trial for minor things.


Indeed. How dare Hawke kill the Arishok, the Magistrates son among other people. 

Sorry OP Anders doesn't get a special card just because the PC knows him. 

Modifié par Ryzaki, 22 avril 2011 - 05:01 .


#20
silver-crescent

silver-crescent
  • Members
  • 1 642 messages

klarabella wrote...

silver-crescent wrote...
I'm pretty sure IRL I would never be able to kill/harm someone I know even if they did something awful either. And I also agree that it's not Hawke's place to decide if he deserves to live or die. Capital punishment is just something I can't approve of, be it in reality or in a fictional world.

Good thing Hawke remembers this at a very convenient moment, after spending years of poking his/her nose into things that are none of his/her business, killing people without any kind of trial for minor things.


The only people Hawke kills during the game are mobs who attack him/her, he never plays the executioner.

#21
Ryzaki

Ryzaki
  • Members
  • 34 422 messages

silver-crescent wrote...

klarabella wrote...

silver-crescent wrote...
I'm pretty sure IRL I would never be able to kill/harm someone I know even if they did something awful either. And I also agree that it's not Hawke's place to decide if he deserves to live or die. Capital punishment is just something I can't approve of, be it in reality or in a fictional world.

Good thing Hawke remembers this at a very convenient moment, after spending years of poking his/her nose into things that are none of his/her business, killing people without any kind of trial for minor things.


The only people Hawke kills during the game are mobs who attack him/her, he never plays the executioner.


You're joking right? Hello Magistrate's son, hello Javaris, hello Arishok (you certainly don't just arrest him), and I'm pretty sure I can find far more examples if I could be bothered. 

Hawke kills plenty of people in game who don't necessarily have to atack him/her. (Javaris had already surrendered and killing him was petty considering he wasn't trying to attack Hawke in the first place, Magistrates son is an execution and you were to take him in), I'm sure you can use the murder knife on that slaver (when he's begging to be released and hasn't attacked you at all). 

So yeah. Hawke kills plenty of people in execution style. That's why the murder knife is there in the first place. 

Modifié par Ryzaki, 22 avril 2011 - 05:16 .


#22
silver-crescent

silver-crescent
  • Members
  • 1 642 messages

Ryzaki wrote...

silver-crescent wrote...

klarabella wrote...

silver-crescent wrote...
I'm pretty sure IRL I would never be able to kill/harm someone I know even if they did something awful either. And I also agree that it's not Hawke's place to decide if he deserves to live or die. Capital punishment is just something I can't approve of, be it in reality or in a fictional world.

Good thing Hawke remembers this at a very convenient moment, after spending years of poking his/her nose into things that are none of his/her business, killing people without any kind of trial for minor things.


The only people Hawke kills during the game are mobs who attack him/her, he never plays the executioner.


You're joking right? Hello Magistrate's son, hello Javaris, hello Arishok (you certainly don't just arrest him), and I'm pretty sure I can find far more examples if I could be bothered. 

Hawke kills plenty of people in game who don't necessarily have to atack him/her. (Javaris had already surrendered and killing him was petty considering he wasn't trying to attack Hawke in the first place, Magistrates son is an execution and you were to take him in), I'm sure you can use the murder knife on that slaver (when he's begging to be released and hasn't attacked you at all). 

So yeah. Hawke kills plenty of people in execution style. That's why the murder knife is there in the first place. 


Of course Hawke can choose to kill people, but what I meant is that there's never another occasion in which it's pretty much "this person's life is in your hands, do what you will with it". The magistrate's son might be the most similar case, but even there you were told specifically to capture him, not to do whatever you want to him.

Modifié par silver-crescent, 22 avril 2011 - 05:43 .


#23
Addai

Addai
  • Members
  • 25 850 messages

Nimrodell wrote...

Addai67 wrote...

I got Anders' maps and pretty much that was it until he blew up the Chantry. If you liked him, fine, but don't generalize. People debate a lot about what he did, but that's because he blew up a building. Kinda hard to miss.


Well, Meredith was doing killing job pretty well without blowing up buildings, Orsino was supplying and condoning  Quentin's research til certain extent thus helping (knowingly or not) mass murderer, Isabela is willing to let Castillon go and keep his expanding slavery in the Free Marches for a ship... but you don't see so many topics popping up about them nor about those issues. Anders' topics are not limited just to blowing up a building and that's why I do think that he was actually the most successful character. I didn't generalize, I just stated what I see currently on the forums.

I meant that it's natural to talk about the guy who shows up with a pink weapon of mass destruction.  He also was known from a previous game, so there's controversy about the changes.   It doesn't necessarily go to his characterization, which I thought was pretty flat- whiny and tortured from beginning to end.  And, sure you see threads on those other topics.  Perhaps you're just noticing Anders' threads because they interest you. 

Modifié par Addai67, 22 avril 2011 - 05:42 .


#24
Ryzaki

Ryzaki
  • Members
  • 34 422 messages

silver-crescent wrote...
Of course Hawke can choose to kill people, but what I meant is that there's never another occasion in which it's pretty much "this person's life is in your hands, do what you will with it". The magistrate's son might be the most similar case, but even there you were told specifically to capture him, not to do whatever you want you him.


Actually the elf girl's father asks you to kill him and you can even agree. So yes you went in there to "execute" him in that case. 

Choosing to investigate Gascard has you tell him "No. I don't believe you." and Hawke agains attacks Gascard and kills him. 

It's nowhere near the first time Hawke plays executioner. 

The reason Anders is left for you to deal with is because A. You're the Champion and B. Orsino/Meredith have more important things to worry about

Modifié par Ryzaki, 22 avril 2011 - 05:45 .


#25
silver-crescent

silver-crescent
  • Members
  • 1 642 messages

Ryzaki wrote...

silver-crescent wrote...
Of course Hawke can choose to kill people, but what I meant is that there's never another occasion in which it's pretty much "this person's life is in your hands, do what you will with it". The magistrate's son might be the most similar case, but even there you were told specifically to capture him, not to do whatever you want you him.


Actually the elf girl's father asks you to kill him and you can even agree. So yes you went in there to "execute" him in that case. 

The reason Anders is left for you to deal with is because A. You're the Champion and B. Orsino/Meredith have more important things to worry about


Oh that's right. You can capture or execute him, but that basically just comes down to doing what the girl's father wants, or what the city guard/the magistrate wants.

In regards to Anders living or dying, regardless of circumstance I still feel like it was the only situation where it felt like you were playing executioner, with the choice 100% in your hands.

Modifié par silver-crescent, 22 avril 2011 - 05:48 .