AgentWhale wrote...
Wow, David Gaider is the man!
Yes, because being rude condesending is really cool <_<
AgentWhale wrote...
Wow, David Gaider is the man!
Modifié par AgentWhale, 22 avril 2011 - 05:31 .
TUHD wrote...
jds1bio wrote...
Fourth, we need the link to David Gaider's comment. While your comment may be well-intentioned, I'm not going to believe hearsay.
There you go....
Modifié par Rockpopple, 22 avril 2011 - 05:28 .
Modifié par RinpocheSchnozberry, 22 avril 2011 - 05:42 .
Rockpopple wrote...
I can agree with that. But he's only human. He might have been having a bad day (or a bad month).
TUHD wrote...
- Interviews. (Indirectly) Insulting customers is a great way to ****** people off and drive them away from your company. Laidlaw, I am mostly looking at you - but also Zeschuk and others.
Modifié par RinpocheSchnozberry, 22 avril 2011 - 05:47 .
Sabriana wrote...
[
"There is not enough companion interaction and/or character growth. "
This includes postings from people who like DA 2 equally/more than DA:O. However, I just found out that David Gaider posted this:
=====================================================================================
"If you felt less connected to your followers, that's too bad. There
could be many reasons for that, but if the requirement to someone
feeling connected is having long, rambling conversations in the party
camp... I can safely say that's unlikely to happen again. I could see
front-loading the characters a bit more so players are more thoroughly
introduced (as it was, a lot of the character interaction ended up in
Act 2 quite by accident) but I have absolutely no intention of
returning to the reams of expository dialogue as a replacement for
character development anytime soon"
Full text at:
social.bioware.com/forums/forum/1/topic/305/index/7154827/1
=====================================================================================
I'm sorry, but dimissing a major, standing out like a sore thumb concern and complaint of people with arrogance is not a good thing to do. "Too bad?" Yes, indeed it is. Too bad for them. There are others, and I can spend my money there quite easily.
"Long, rambling conversations?" I see. I guess that makes those of us who actually like talking to our companions a lot and in-depth idiotic old fogeys who like "ramblings". In the spirit of the post, I find that remark derogatory. Personally, I get the feeling of being pat-patted on the head, and send out to play and "grow up."
Sorry, but this just doesn't cut it. Not for me. If this is truly the direction they're heading in, then I wish them a pleasant journey. I'll be waving good-bye, with a few tears in my eye. It has been a great ride, but now we must part.
No, losing my piddly little euros won't bother them. But I'll feel great, and I will spend them on creators who do cater to my personal preferences. It's a simple as that.
---> sarcasm:
Heaven's forbid they actually listen to one of the major complaints about DA 2. Why, they might even apease people. And what's worse, they might even increase sales. And they certainly can't have that. They rather be "right", and look down their noses at all those whose opinion differs. /sarcasm
Sabriana wrote...
Kajan451 wrote...
I agree with the Original PostShadowbanner wrote...
I'd wager that they have no experience in damage control
In my opinion they have no experiance in dealing with any kind of negative feedback.
In the past Months i have seen many fine examples on this board which just left me with the opinion some of the Devs are either incredibly arrogant or just plain d***s. I won't name names, because i do not want to turn this into a personal insult, but that "suck it up, princess" sounds believable. Even if it is made up, which is beyond my ability to judge, it sounds authentic enough.
If not for Luke Barrett, who has restored my faith in at least some members of the team, i would most likely have accepted the Team responsible for DA as beyond hope.
But i make no mistake, its not like my opinion would matter either way. All i can hope for is that someone is still reading these threads and maybe has a word with some members of the Team.
After all, adding insult to injury is never the way to go.
And as Artist, i simply have to say: If you can't deal with ignoring people bad mouthing your work, and still remain a civil and smiling facade, no matter how much it hurts that your work is considered bad by people, then you should be looking for a different profession.
Not even Rockstars and Movie Celebrities can get away with being a total ass insulting, unless they are Charlie Sheen (it seems).
Sadly, this seems to be true. They appear arrogant and dismissive, with a few notable exceptions. For example, many, many posts I have read include the complaint:
"There is not enough companion interaction and/or character growth. "
This includes postings from people who like DA 2 equally/more than DA:O. However, I just found out that David Gaider posted this:
=====================================================================================
"If you felt less connected to your followers, that's too bad. There
could be many reasons for that, but if the requirement to someone
feeling connected is having long, rambling conversations in the party
camp... I can safely say that's unlikely to happen again. I could see
front-loading the characters a bit more so players are more thoroughly
introduced (as it was, a lot of the character interaction ended up in
Act 2 quite by accident) but I have absolutely no intention of
returning to the reams of expository dialogue as a replacement for
character development anytime soon"
Full text at:
social.bioware.com/forums/forum/1/topic/305/index/7154827/1
=====================================================================================
I'm sorry, but dimissing a major, standing out like a sore thumb concern and complaint of people with arrogance is not a good thing to do. "Too bad?" Yes, indeed it is. Too bad for them. There are others, and I can spend my money there quite easily.
"Long, rambling conversations?" I see. I guess that makes those of us who actually like talking to our companions a lot and in-depth idiotic old fogeys who like "ramblings". In the spirit of the post, I find that remark derogatory. Personally, I get the feeling of being pat-patted on the head, and send out to play and "grow up."
Sorry, but this just doesn't cut it. Not for me. If this is truly the direction they're heading in, then I wish them a pleasant journey. I'll be waving good-bye, with a few tears in my eye. It has been a great ride, but now we must part.
No, losing my piddly little euros won't bother them. But I'll feel great, and I will spend them on creators who do cater to my personal preferences. It's a simple as that.
---> sarcasm:
Heaven's forbid they actually listen to one of the major complaints about DA 2. Why, they might even apease people. And what's worse, they might even increase sales. And they certainly can't have that. They rather be "right", and look down their noses at all those whose opinion differs. /sarcasm
Modifié par Night Prowler76, 22 avril 2011 - 05:53 .
Modifié par Shamajotsi, 22 avril 2011 - 05:54 .
AgentWhale wrote...
I admire his restraint.
-edit-
I'm shocked and appauled that you had to suffer David Gaider's insults. Bwaaahaaaahaaaaa.
Actually you guys remind me of those cocky bullys. Who goad their victim into a reaction, then: waa waaa, he called me a rude word.. waa I'm telling on you. waaa.
Modifié par TUHD, 22 avril 2011 - 05:54 .
TUHD wrote...
*sighs* Oh gosh. Really. Try to make a point, and trolls start rolling in.... *facepalm*
@Shamajots: thanks, you rephrased what I putted in my original post - the problem of the flaming all around. That I get some negative feedback about my PM, fine - but some can go a bit too far.
RinpocheSchnozberry wrote...
1) You're wandering off of the thread's topic.
2) Hey, guys, DG was right. The poster was not trying to start a flame war. The poster was making points the OP could not deal with. The OP, seeing his argument was no good, ran to DG. DG told him (correctly) that there was no flame baiting. The OP needs to suck it up.
3) OP, you're wearing poop-colored glasses. You've tucked all the bad moments together (including many things BW had no control over) and you're claiming that's the whole experience. You are wrong.:lol:
jds1bio wrote...
The tone and wording of DG's response, no matter who you feel deserved it, was unprofessional and a poor decision on his part.
RinpocheSchnozberry wrote...
TUHD wrote...
*sighs* Oh gosh. Really. Try to make a point, and trolls start rolling in.... *facepalm*
@Shamajots: thanks, you rephrased what I putted in my original post - the problem of the flaming all around. That I get some negative feedback about my PM, fine - but some can go a bit too far.
You can't call anyone who disagrees with you a troll.:kissing:
In fact, I don't actually see you making any defense of your initial point beyond pointing at a rebuttal and screaming troll.
;)
RinpocheSchnozberry wrote...
1) You're wandering off of the thread's topic.
2)
Hey, guys, DG was right. The poster was not trying to start a flame
war. The poster was making points the OP could not deal with. The OP,
seeing his argument was no good, ran to DG. DG told him (correctly)
that there was no flame baiting. The OP needs to suck it up.
3)
OP, you're wearing poop-colored glasses. You've tucked all the bad
moments together (including many things BW had no control over) and
you're claiming that's the whole experience. You are wrong. [smilie]../../../images/forum/emoticons/lol.png[/smilie][smilie]../../../images/forum/emoticons/lol.png[/smilie][smilie]../../../images/forum/emoticons/lol.png[/smilie]
Modifié par Gamer Ftw, 22 avril 2011 - 06:06 .
RinpocheSchnozberry wrote...
jds1bio wrote...
The tone and wording of DG's response, no matter who you feel deserved it, was unprofessional and a poor decision on his part.
The truth is never unprofessional and never a poor choice. Additionaly, it was hilarious.
Rockpopple wrote...
TUHD, you have a bad habit of calling anyone who looks at you funny a 'troll'. I've seen you do that often around here. Often when the conversation isn't even about you, or wasn't started by you. You just zero in on people you don't agree with and call them trolls to their face.
If that's your attitude when approaching mods, then I'm not surprised that a) they find nothing to your accusations andthat they're short with you.
As for Gaider's tone and whatnot, his job is to write. That's what he does for me as a consumer of his product. I really don't care how he approaches people on the forums or how nice or mean he is to them - as long as he churns out high-quality writing in games, then he's being professional. The moment he stops that, then there's a problem.
If you're a lawyer, interacting with your clients is part of your job. I get that. Gaider's a writer. Writing's his job.
Modifié par TUHD, 22 avril 2011 - 06:12 .