Forum mods
#51
Posté 22 avril 2011 - 08:24
#52
Guest_Link Collins_*
Posté 22 avril 2011 - 08:25
Guest_Link Collins_*
Tazzmission wrote...
Pacifien wrote...
That's okay, the pain of having to censor you for violating the site rules is no longer my concern. It actually wasn't my concern before either, but you seem rather convinced of it, so who am I to shatter your reality?Tazzmission wrote...
woos a cool guy but he did ban me for my mk threads. .... tbh hes way better than pacifen who just loves to censor everything i create
just stating a fact pacifen. i maybe encountered woo 3 times regarding threads as long as i been here. every other mod basicly let me speak my mind. just explaining the diffrences between who has done what. and i would like to mention that taking a job to serious can be a bad image wich i think everyone can indeed agree to an extent
Pacifien is actually quite lenient, trust me. Woo Just does patrol as much as he used to or he would have locked your threads a lot faster than Pacifien did.
Modifié par Link Collins, 22 avril 2011 - 08:26 .
#53
Posté 22 avril 2011 - 08:28
Pacifien wrote...
I was such a bad, bad moderator! I ruined the Off-Topic forum! Now it can get back on track! Post those sociopolitical threads! Woo won't mind at all.
defensive much?
#54
Posté 22 avril 2011 - 08:28
#55
Posté 22 avril 2011 - 08:29
#56
Posté 22 avril 2011 - 08:29
Link Collins wrote...
Tazzmission wrote...
Pacifien wrote...
That's okay, the pain of having to censor you for violating the site rules is no longer my concern. It actually wasn't my concern before either, but you seem rather convinced of it, so who am I to shatter your reality?Tazzmission wrote...
woos a cool guy but he did ban me for my mk threads. .... tbh hes way better than pacifen who just loves to censor everything i create
just stating a fact pacifen. i maybe encountered woo 3 times regarding threads as long as i been here. every other mod basicly let me speak my mind. just explaining the diffrences between who has done what. and i would like to mention that taking a job to serious can be a bad image wich i think everyone can indeed agree to an extent
Pacifien is actually quite lenient, trust me. Woo Just does patrol as much as he used to or he would have locked your threads a lot faster than Pacifien did.
Have to agree. From my experience, I don't remember Pacifien being overly zealous. Just trying to keep these forums a nice place. Quite a difficult job at times, I think x
#57
Posté 22 avril 2011 - 08:30
#58
Posté 22 avril 2011 - 08:31
But i doubt anyone blames her, this thread is now a perfect example of that
#59
Posté 22 avril 2011 - 08:32
#60
Posté 22 avril 2011 - 08:33
I've seen some forums where the moderating is arguably draconian. IMHO this isn't one of them.
Modifié par vometia, 22 avril 2011 - 08:34 .
#61
Posté 22 avril 2011 - 08:34
Yes. You made me feel like a failure. And I was a failure. That's why I'm not a moderator anymore.Tazzmission wrote...
defensive much?
#62
Posté 22 avril 2011 - 08:37
lmao! Tell us another good one!Ramirez Wolfen wrote...
I have a clean record as well, actually. Yes I was banned once, but that wasn't because of something I did.
Banned twice, for homophobic comments and polls. How you keep fanegaling your way back onto these forums is a mystery. Who did you pay off, and what was the cost?
#63
Posté 22 avril 2011 - 08:37
#64
Posté 22 avril 2011 - 08:38
DreGregoire wrote...
The squeaky wheel get's the grease again. I am not surprized. I am not impressed by the inconsistent moderation of the forums. Obviously there is too much to moderate for any consistency, so only if somebody complains (PM's a moderator or reports it) does it get any attention. What a wonderful way for somebody to destroy another forum member just because they don't like what the person has to say. I'm getting a bit tired of having a thread I am interested in getting shut down because a select few people ruin it for the rest. There is nothing like coming on the forums to see a stampede of threads closed; it's not a positive atmosphere in any form or manner.
heck when i would go to pacifen to discuss this like an adult she would say pm evil chris. if people who are mods cant actually hold a adult convo with there posters and say pm someone else than imo they shouldnt be mods. and i wanna point out im not trying to get a flame war going but this really is an issue we all have to take care of.
#65
Guest_rynluna_*
Posté 22 avril 2011 - 08:38
Guest_rynluna_*
How fun.
#66
Posté 22 avril 2011 - 08:39
Tazzmission wrote...
woos a cool guy but he did ban me for my mk threads. .... tbh hes way better than pacifen who just loves to censor everything i create
just stating a fact pacifen. i maybe encountered woo 3 times regarding threads as long as i been here. every other mod basicly let me speak my mind. just explaining the diffrences between who has done what. and i would like to mention that taking a job to serious can be a bad image wich i think everyone can indeed agree to an extent
You never considered the possibility that you simply write really inane posts?
Modifié par LiquidGrape, 22 avril 2011 - 08:41 .
#67
Posté 22 avril 2011 - 08:40
Wait, I'm not a moderator anymore. Like I said. Once or twice. So the issue is....?Tazzmission wrote...
heck when i would go to pacifen to discuss this like an adult she would say pm evil chris. if people who are mods cant actually hold a adult convo with there posters and say pm someone else than imo they shouldnt be mods. and i wanna point out im not trying to get a flame war going but this really is an issue we all have to take care of.
#68
Posté 22 avril 2011 - 08:41
#69
Posté 22 avril 2011 - 08:41
homophobic? i wouldn't have thought that of someone with that kind of avatarSunnie22 wrote...
lmao! Tell us another good one!
Banned twice, for homophobic comments and polls. How you keep fanegaling your way back onto these forums is a mystery. Who did you pay off, and what was the cost?
#70
Guest_Link Collins_*
Posté 22 avril 2011 - 08:41
Guest_Link Collins_*
Tazzmission wrote...
DreGregoire wrote...
The squeaky wheel get's the grease again. I am not surprized. I am not impressed by the inconsistent moderation of the forums. Obviously there is too much to moderate for any consistency, so only if somebody complains (PM's a moderator or reports it) does it get any attention. What a wonderful way for somebody to destroy another forum member just because they don't like what the person has to say. I'm getting a bit tired of having a thread I am interested in getting shut down because a select few people ruin it for the rest. There is nothing like coming on the forums to see a stampede of threads closed; it's not a positive atmosphere in any form or manner.
heck when i would go to pacifen to discuss this like an adult she would say pm evil chris. if people who are mods cant actually hold a adult convo with there posters and say pm someone else than imo they shouldnt be mods. and i wanna point out im not trying to get a flame war going but this really is an issue we all have to take care of.
If your adult conversation is anything like how you're talking now, I can see why Pacifien wouldn't want to deal with you. You're a bit like a whiny child.
#71
Posté 22 avril 2011 - 08:44
And that was LONG time ago.
I mean then smudboy still wasn't banned and Ecael was active.
Modifié par Mesina2, 22 avril 2011 - 08:44 .
#72
Posté 22 avril 2011 - 08:44
LiquidGrape wrote...
Tazzmission wrote...
woos a cool guy but he did ban me for my mk threads. .... tbh hes way better than pacifen who just loves to censor everything i createjust stating a fact pacifen. i maybe encountered woo 3 times regarding threads as long as i been here. every other mod basicly let me speak my mind. just explaining the diffrences between who has done what. and i would like to mention that taking a job to serious can be a bad image wich i think everyone can indeed agree to an extent
You never considered the possibility that you simply write really inane posts?
define your term of insane. all i ever posted was one atheist thread a couple mk and green lantern threads and one we are at war with libya thread . whats insane about that? is it insane to mention anything regarding real life events wich in fact affect everyone? if my libya thread was such a political debate than ok why wasnt the japan crisis? anything and everything can be turned political.
Modifié par Tazzmission, 22 avril 2011 - 08:45 .
#73
Posté 22 avril 2011 - 08:45
#74
Posté 22 avril 2011 - 08:46
Keep up the good work.
#75
Posté 22 avril 2011 - 08:46




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut







