Who's the (hardest) Boss? opinions wanted
#76
Posté 25 mai 2011 - 12:21
I do not advise attempting to kill off rage demons on nightmare with fire based weapons with a few physical rune slots. ><
#77
Guest_jollyorigins_*
Posté 25 mai 2011 - 12:23
Guest_jollyorigins_*
#78
Posté 25 mai 2011 - 03:31
Fighting the two revenants at the same time is impossible unless your mabari draws a 100% aggro on one of them while you take the other one down
Bloom battleaxe maes the high dragon fight a lot easier and shorter
Xebenkeck is a pain in the ass with all those rage demons going only after your squishies.
#79
Posté 25 mai 2011 - 03:58
#80
Posté 25 mai 2011 - 04:01
Xebenkeck it is for me. It's the only fight I need the Dog and a warrior on the team.
Modifié par Banky77, 25 mai 2011 - 04:02 .
#81
Posté 25 mai 2011 - 04:01
#82
Posté 25 mai 2011 - 04:12
@Luke - Haha me too, I always raged at the raiders who joined in - Ended up having 3-4 elites stealthing and capable of one-shotting my companions.
I think the main problem is that it is a lot harder to bottleneck them and typically destealthing abilities and damage CCCs aren't fully developed yet.
After the first few playthroughs I took to hunting down the raiders to extinction before doing the secret rendezvous. haha
Though my elemental warrior didn't come across any problems (it kills them fast enough that stealth-backstabs aren't an issue)
The hardest fight imo would probably be xebenkeck - I never figured out a way to stay in the room with a fully glass cannon party for my spirit-mage playthrough (no cold spells) as the rage demons were impossible to kill and could one-shot almost any party member...Of course if you leave the room it becomes one of the easiest fights..
Modifié par mr_afk, 25 mai 2011 - 04:26 .
#83
Posté 25 mai 2011 - 07:22
mr_afk wrote...
The hardest fight imo would probably be xebenkeck - I never figured out a way to stay in the room with a fully glass cannon party for my spirit-mage playthrough (no cold spells) as the rage demons were impossible to kill and could one-shot almost any party member...Of course if you leave the room it becomes one of the easiest fights..
Agreed. I'm trying to push an initiative of locking down excessive kiting in boss fights going forward. Basically I want all our important boss fights (especially those side ones) to require you to fully plan your party ahead of time and have 0 chance of cheesing it out by kiting adds 4 rooms away.
Modifié par Luke Barrett, 25 mai 2011 - 07:23 .
#84
Posté 25 mai 2011 - 07:59
At the risk of sounding like Sylvius the Mad, no encounter should require meta-gaming to defeat, regardless of difficulty. That's bad design.
#85
Posté 25 mai 2011 - 08:01
#86
Posté 25 mai 2011 - 08:14
ishmaeltheforsaken wrote...
"Planning your party ahead of time" is all well and good, but there needs to be in-game information to support it.
At the risk of sounding like Sylvius the Mad, no encounter should require meta-gaming to defeat, regardless of difficulty. That's bad design.
I kind of agree.
On Hard or Nightmare difficulty, the Rock Wraith was pretty much impossible for me until I came back with electricity warding runes equipped, at which point the fight became a trivality. It really sucked because I had to redo the entire Deep Roads just so I could come properly equipped.
I'm okay with ceratin equipment or items making life easier for you, but not to the point that it's all but impossible to win without them.
EDIT: Indeed, planning ahead is good so long as we can plan ahead without necessarily having to repeat long sections. So for instance, if there's a side boss that one can come back later, that's a case where I'm fine with planning ahead (example, the High Dragon). But in the case of the Rock Wraith it was very annoying for me.
SECOND EDIT: On topic, the hardest boss fight for me was... hmm, well, none of the boss fights felt too hard once I knew their trick (i.e., fire resistance for the High Dragon, electricity resistance for the Rock Wraith). The hardest battles for me were actually the ones that involved many assassins at once, like in Hubert's quest from Act 2 with the people stealing from the Bone Pit, or whenever you were facing dozens of demons at a time (of which there were plenty).
For the record, I haven't faced Xebenkeck yet (didn't destroy the tomes).
Modifié par Zjarcal, 25 mai 2011 - 08:22 .
#87
Posté 25 mai 2011 - 08:26
Zjarcal wrote...
ishmaeltheforsaken wrote...
"Planning your party ahead of time" is all well and good, but there needs to be in-game information to support it.
At the risk of sounding like Sylvius the Mad, no encounter should require meta-gaming to defeat, regardless of difficulty. That's bad design.
I kind of agree.
On Hard or Nightmare difficulty, the Rock Wraith was pretty much impossible for me until I came back with electricity warding runes equipped, at which point the fight became a trivality. It really sucked because I had to redo the entire Deep Roads just so I could come properly equipped.
I'm okay with ceratin equipment or items making life easier for you, but not to the point that it's all but impossible to win without them.
EDIT: Indeed, planning ahead is good so long as we can plan ahead without necessarily having to repeat long sections. So for instance, if there's a side boss that one can come back later, that's a case where I'm fine with planning ahead (example, the High Dragon). But in the case of the Rock Wraith it was very annoying for me.
Agreed.
And Xebenkeck was by far the hardest fight for me, even on lower difficulties.
#88
Guest_Puddi III_*
Posté 25 mai 2011 - 08:30
Guest_Puddi III_*
#89
Posté 25 mai 2011 - 08:32
ishmaeltheforsaken wrote...
"Planning your party ahead of time" is all well and good, but there needs to be in-game information to support it.
At the risk of sounding like Sylvius the Mad, no encounter should require meta-gaming to defeat, regardless of difficulty. That's bad design.
I actually disagree quite a bit. The in-game information is provided when you find the boss and get facerolled by it; you adapt and try again with a well thought out strategy based on what you learned. Aside from that you've got the tell-tale signs such as fire resist for dragons, disables for mages, spirit resist whenever dealing with ANY type of demons/blood mages.
Now, crit path bosses obviously shouldn't require you to completely reinvent the wheel but those optional bosses, such as Xeben or the Arwegian bosses are not mandatory and thus can have the difficulty heavily increased. They are also usually in a side area which allows you to easily go back and reset your party (unlike core bosses which are dug way deeper in to a dungeon or other such areas usually.
I would like to stress that this is specific to Nightmare play, lower difficulties than this are a separate issue (and obviously everything is balanced for Normal)
#90
Posté 25 mai 2011 - 08:33
Modifié par Luke Barrett, 25 mai 2011 - 08:34 .
#91
Posté 25 mai 2011 - 08:35
Luke Barrett wrote...
Now, crit path bosses obviously shouldn't require you to completely reinvent the wheel but those optional bosses, such as Xeben or the Arwegian bosses are not mandatory and thus can have the difficulty heavily increased. They are also usually in a side area which allows you to easily go back and reset your party (unlike core bosses which are dug way deeper in to a dungeon or other such areas usually.
Yep, and that's why I made an edit to my post saying that for side bosses, I am perfectly fine with the "planning ahead" mentality, or for any fight that is part of a side quest.
So long as it's not applied to mandatory bosses (especially those that require to do a lot before reaching them), then it's all good in my view.
Modifié par Zjarcal, 25 mai 2011 - 08:37 .
#92
Posté 25 mai 2011 - 08:35
If all he meant was picking good talents, then I'm okay with that.
But these fights that require certain resistances, or certain damage types... I'm okay with that as well. But there needs to be some in-character information from which I can deduce how I need to plan ahead. If my options are doing the fight and re-loading after I've seen it, reading a guide or forum post, and getting lucky and having the right damage type/resistance by chance, that's terrible design.
Varric should be telling me stories about lightning monsters in the deep roads if the deep roads boss requires me to have lightning immunity to defeat, as an example.
#93
Posté 25 mai 2011 - 08:36
Luke Barrett wrote...
Also, every encounter in the game is doable without resists on Nightmare - I just wouldn't recommend trying unless you're a masochist like me
Yeah... I spent about 1 hour on the Rock Wraith without resistances and I had it on the brink of death. But this was after my whole party had been wiped out and I was the only left... and then I got stuck in a wall and died. <_<
Modifié par Zjarcal, 25 mai 2011 - 08:37 .
#94
Posté 25 mai 2011 - 08:38
Luke Barrett wrote...
mr_afk wrote...
The hardest fight imo would probably be xebenkeck - I never figured out a way to stay in the room with a fully glass cannon party for my spirit-mage playthrough (no cold spells) as the rage demons were impossible to kill and could one-shot almost any party member...Of course if you leave the room it becomes one of the easiest fights..
Agreed. I'm trying to push an initiative of locking down excessive kiting in boss fights going forward. Basically I want all our important boss fights (especially those side ones) to require you to fully plan your party ahead of time and have 0 chance of cheesing it out by kiting adds 4 rooms away.
You have no idea how much I abused cheesing and kiting in my first run through on nightmare.
#95
Posté 25 mai 2011 - 08:40
#96
Posté 25 mai 2011 - 08:40
#97
Posté 25 mai 2011 - 08:41
I generally expect Nightmare to break that rule, though, so I wouldn't really complain.ishmaeltheforsaken wrote...
"Planning your party ahead of time" is all well and good, but there needs to be in-game information to support it.
At the risk of sounding like Sylvius the Mad, no encounter should require meta-gaming to defeat, regardless of difficulty. That's bad design.
And that's why I objected so strongly to FF being limited to Nightmare. You're right that I don't ever want to need metagame information to defeat an opponent (especially in these newer games that have completely abandoned strategic planning in favour of tactical planning), but that means never playing Nightmare (which is fine by me - I don't really see why difficulty is desirable). And yet, I also think the game mechanics don't make any sense with FF.
Anyway, back on topic, I don't see a problem with the setting that 's primarily designed to be a challenge for the player - which is essentially already a metagame concern - requiring metagaming on the part of that player.
#98
Guest_Mash Mashington_*
Posté 25 mai 2011 - 08:43
Guest_Mash Mashington_*
Mr.House wrote...
Xebenkeck felt like the developer who did the fight wanted to troll the player so they made a very powerful demon with ALOT of waves. >.>
Arishok was more like trolling because, you know
#99
Posté 25 mai 2011 - 08:59
#100
Posté 25 mai 2011 - 09:07





Retour en haut







