Aller au contenu

Photo

Cerberus is more evil than most people realise.


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
1342 réponses à ce sujet

#726
Arijharn

Arijharn
  • Members
  • 2 850 messages

Moiaussi wrote...
And your evidence that is anything other than wishful thinking on your part is what, exactly? If TIM is Cerberus and Cerberus is Humanity, where does that leave the rest of us who normally consider us humanity? And he didn't just assassinate a Terra Firma guy, he assassinated two Earth presidents just to make it easier to get some legislation through. Assassinating those who vote against your policies is not democracy.

He didn't give Michael Lang orders to assassinate the two Earth presidents, and the difference isn't slight. He could have inferred it just as much as he shut down the project entirely. 

This whole thread is about wishful thinking moi, 'get with the program.' My response is predicated by the fact that he's a moderate in terms of international politics, he could have done much 'worse' than just the Terra Firma party, which makes me think he isn't out for blood.

Moi wrote...
Pardon? More rampant wishful thinking on your part? If the Volus ever did get their own fleet, they could offer financial guidance to the Council as their specialty, just as the Turians specialize in military, Asari in diplomacy, and Salarians in espionage. The Turians would still benefit economicly. The Volus just haven't been willing to put their own lives on the line in ships so far.

It's not wishful thinking, it's based on the whole idea of diplomacy and 'mutual advantage' to which diplomacy represents, no matter how much you 'wish' otherwise. The entire reason why the volus went to the Turian's in the first place is because they 'don't have the bodies for it' (slight paraphrasing), which seems to me that they're very much 'locked in contract.'

The Volus indeed does the things you mentioned, remember they're responsible for the standardised galactic economy, but it's only the Turian's that supposedly give them support (and only apparently when it's convenient for the Turian's to do so, you can't tell me that the entire Turian Hierarchy fleet was involved with the Taetrus campaign because well, that's just plain stupid moi). This means to me at least that if the Volus wants to change it would be exceptionally difficult to do so (and I doubt it would be plain sailing) because of numerous factors; most notably the fact that the Turian's economic might is largely dependent upon the Volus.

So, I don't see it as 'rampant wishful thinking' but rather extrapolation from what I see as part of the galactic community and my knowledge that diplomacy isn't really cut and dried. Let me put it this way; do you really think that politicians are the ones who plan out diplomatic trade etc? Because you're woefully naive if you do, that stuff is handled by trained negotiators.

Moi wrote...
The Terminus systems get away with a lot simply by playing hardball with the Council. Udina on the other hand has made a career out of licking their boots. And as for the Volus, they would obviously build the fleets first with a clean transition of power. They might even start by buying up surplus Turian vessels and refitting the controls to be more volus-friendly. Of course the council wouldn't step in, but that doesn't mean the Volus would be idiots about it either.

What does the Terminus systems have to do with Eden Prime really? I know what was said at the start of ME1, but Eden Prime falls officially within the domain of Citadel space. Nihilus says however that it's the discovery of the Prothean beacon that might tempt the Terminus Systems from making a grab for it.

As to Terra Nova, I can't remember if it was ever mentioned if it was in or near the Terminus Systems, but remember that slavers make frequent attacks outside batarian space (for what should hopefully be painfully obvious reasons).

Moi wrote...
v2 wasn't genocide either though, and Krogan society is indeed stabilizing under Wrex (or his stand-in)'s guidance. There was no intent at all to eliminate the race, merely to stabilize population growth.

I really hope you aren't undergoing studies to become a lawyer moi :P

Let me try and illustrate an example; if the genophage was deployed against us, would you be so quick to say it isn't genocide? Or is genocide to you only limited to the (mass) killing of the current standing population?

Lets say there is usually a birth rate of 10 million each well breeding cycle (however long that may be), considering the fact that the genophage reduces the rate to 1:1000, then there is only about 10,000 new infants that survives birth. That's a pretty staggering fact imo. And you say it's okay because it's 'stabilizing to pre-industrial levels'? Well unfortunately, the Krogan aren't in their 'pre-industrial levels' anymore, so the point is kinda, well, utter bs. It's kinda amazing to me that I consider war to be actually more 'ethical' in comparison. Genophage v1 fair enough considering the mark of the times, but v2 was putting the boot in when they're down.

Moi wrote...
It isn't genocide because there is neither intent to eliminate the race, nor is that effect in place.

But look at the facts moi. Look at the circumstance and look at the result.

Moi wrote...
If that distinction isn't important, everyone who ever kills anyone regardless of circumstances is committing genocide.

Forgive me moi but... you're an idiot. Tell me you aren't actually using this flimsy 'excuse'. Genocide is the killing of members, if a child is unable to be conceived but shows an eventual inverse to the standard population levels (adults dying for whatever reason), then you're obviously making 'less' people appear, which is well... kinda 'genocide by proxy'. Pre-industrial levels is a buzzword used by Mordin to convince himself, mainly because no one (not even the Krogan) are living in pre-industrial levels anymore. Krogan are still an 'uplifted species.'

Moi wrote...
And Krogan society is recovering and evolving. Pre-genophage, the Krogan killed themselves and anyone/anything else they could find as a challenge, as a birth control method. That sure sounds like a lot more suffering than this to me.

This does not compute. How are the Krogan 'recovering and evolving' when the Genophage is as still prevalent (well, technically more so considering Mordin made it immune to the effects of evolution) now as when it was when Mordin, Maelon and the crew of Kirrahe deployed it? The Krogan are in as much of the same place now as before really. Even Wrex says he wont change his people from 'the way they are' even if he does make sweeping changes in their breeding program (which in all honesty just makes it sound like he's getting rid of insular breeding practices by enforcing increased genetic diversity, because the females will be 'shared around.' This doesn't mean that somehow they're going to circumvent the 1:1000 magic number).

Moi wrote...
You keep ignoring context. You ignore the Krogan situation pre-genophage and the effects of unrestrained rapid population growth. You ignore the fact that the genophage stabilizes populations. You assume the Volus, who are portrayed as managerial geniuses could not handle a simply implementation and transition to their own fleets. Experimenting on creepers and husks wasn't evil in its own right, but the experiments on Toombs as part of a plan to create 'geneticly enhanced super soldiers' implies taking the data from such studies and crossing it with human DNA.

Moi, you keep on ignoring the obvious. The krogan no longer live in pre-industrial levels or society. Rapid population growth is a problem, but doesn't require 'genocide by proxy' to fix, namely because you rob the Krogan of tackling the problem themselves. It doesn't 'stabilize' the population because the Krogan keep on moving away from Tuchanka and their worlds to experience mercenary work because they've collectively thrown up their hands in despair. You ignore that the Volus' own words (I think in ME1, Barla Von?) say that they don't have the bodies for essentially rough and tumble work (which sorta means that even if they wanted to move from the Turian's they'd be resistances -- and I think this is even touched upon in ME2 in a renegade playthrough, the Volus wants to move from the Turian's to the Alliance).
I'm not going to really touch upon your 'implication' point, because that's incredibly nebulous by definition, which is something you've taken to me above. Supersoldier program was 'confirmed' by Kahoku (and what would he really know?) but why is a supersoldier program necessarily bad in and of itself? That sort of mentality honestly makes me think of people who are resistant to the idea of AI research in the real world because they fear that AI's will completely go SkyNet on us (without fail). And the Toombs thing is still pretty lose in its facts.

#727
lolwut666

lolwut666
  • Members
  • 1 470 messages
@Arijharn

You forget that the krogan's gestation period and the time it takes for the to reach maturity is much shorter than those of humans, so the genophage is not as aggravating to them as it would've been to us.

Plus they have technology now to protect themselves from the hazardous environment of their home planet - which was the reason why they evolved to breed so fast in the first place - and they have the technology to get off world and colonize other planets if they so desire.

Also, genocide only happens when a species is completely sterilized. There are obviously many krogan still alive in the galaxy, and new krogan are born every now and then. You're exaggerating their situation.

Once the krogan learn how to live peacefully alongside the rest of the galactic community, the salarians might decide that they deserve to be cured, and all will be well for everyone.

None of the things the Council did (endorsing the genophage or the genocide of the galaxy) were not in the galaxy's best interests. If those things hadn't been done, rather than the genocide of the rachni and the partial neutering of the krogan, we'd have the genocide of every other species in the galaxy.

The things Cerberus did, on the other hand, were done for no reason other than personal gain.

Modifié par lolwut666, 03 mai 2011 - 08:19 .


#728
Guest_Saphra Deden_*

Guest_Saphra Deden_*
  • Guests
Democracy is overrated anyway.

#729
Dave666

Dave666
  • Members
  • 1 339 messages

Saphra Deden wrote...

Democracy is something I have the luxury of taking for granted anyway.


Fixed that for you.

#730
Asheer_Khan

Asheer_Khan
  • Members
  • 1 551 messages
I wonder if this board IS monitored by outside "sources" because slowly from clear game discussion board it's changing in to something rather disturbing...

Saphra Deden wrote...
Democracy is overrated anyway.


Then what you propose instead?... complete anarchy or restitution absolute Monarchy?

Europe already tested two other "social systems" which "failed" to fulfill expectations and we pay too high blood price for delusions following both of them...

#731
Guest_Saphra Deden_*

Guest_Saphra Deden_*
  • Guests

Dave666 wrote...

Fixed that for you.


If it vanished it would have no effect on me what-so-ever.

#732
Dave666

Dave666
  • Members
  • 1 339 messages

Saphra Deden wrote...

Dave666 wrote...

Fixed that for you.


If it vanished it would have no effect on me what-so-ever.


Riiiiiight...

Democracy is gone, you now live in my dictatorship where you live or die at my whim.  Good luck with that.

#733
lolwut666

lolwut666
  • Members
  • 1 470 messages

Saphra Deden wrote...

Dave666 wrote...

Fixed that for you.


If it vanished it would have no effect on me what-so-ever.


Really?

Where do you think you'd be in a non-democratic society?

#734
Seboist

Seboist
  • Members
  • 11 989 messages

Asheer_Khan wrote...

I wonder if this board IS monitored by outside "sources" because slowly from clear game discussion board it's changing in to something rather disturbing...

Saphra Deden wrote...
Democracy is overrated anyway.


Then what you propose instead?... complete anarchy or restitution absolute Monarchy?

Europe already tested two other "social systems" which "failed" to fulfill expectations and we pay too high blood price for delusions following both of them...


In my first playthrough after sacrificing the council I picked Anderson so the Citadel could be run by a military dictatorship and in my second(and canon playthrough)I picked Udina for a conventional dictatorship. :D

So yea, those are my alternatives.

#735
Guest_Saphra Deden_*

Guest_Saphra Deden_*
  • Guests

lolwut666 wrote...

Where do you think you'd be in a non-democratic society?


The same place I am right now.

#736
lolwut666

lolwut666
  • Members
  • 1 470 messages

Saphra Deden wrote...

lolwut666 wrote...

Where do you think you'd be in a non-democratic society?


The same place I am right now.


Only without rights and freedom.

#737
TobyHasEyes

TobyHasEyes
  • Members
  • 1 109 messages

Asheer_Khan wrote...

I wonder if this board IS monitored by outside "sources" because slowly from clear game discussion board it's changing in to something rather disturbing...

Saphra Deden wrote...
Democracy is overrated anyway.


Then what you propose instead?... complete anarchy or restitution absolute Monarchy?

Europe already tested two other "social systems" which "failed" to fulfill expectations and we pay too high blood price for delusions following both of them...


 Well to be fair democracy doesn't have a fantastic track record for avoiding atrocities; I'd say I support democracy as a means to an end, but if alien species' really did make another system work well for the people then kudos to them

#738
Guest_wiggles_*

Guest_wiggles_*
  • Guests

Riiiiiight...

Democracy is gone, you now live in my dictatorship where you live or die at my whim. Good luck with that.

Lack of democracy /=/ dictatorship.

#739
Guest_Saphra Deden_*

Guest_Saphra Deden_*
  • Guests

lolwut666 wrote...

Only without rights and freedom.


Rights and freedom don't come from democracy.

#740
lolwut666

lolwut666
  • Members
  • 1 470 messages

Saphra Deden wrote...

lolwut666 wrote...

Only without rights and freedom.


Rights and freedom don't come from democracy.


Yes, they do.

Your voice carries no weight in a dictatorship.

#741
Guest_Saphra Deden_*

Guest_Saphra Deden_*
  • Guests

lolwut666 wrote...

Your voice carries no weight in a dictatorship.


My voice carries no weight in this democracy or any democracy.

I'm no more free and have no more rights here than I would in China.

#742
TobyHasEyes

TobyHasEyes
  • Members
  • 1 109 messages

lolwut666 wrote...

Saphra Deden wrote...

lolwut666 wrote...

Only without rights and freedom.


Rights and freedom don't come from democracy.


Yes, they do.

Your voice carries no weight in a dictatorship.


 But you could have a dictator who allows you to right to free speech, property rights etc. If freedom is defined by nobody stopping you from doing what you want to then a dictator can give you lots of freedom.. just not the freedom to engage in politics

#743
Dave666

Dave666
  • Members
  • 1 339 messages

wiggles89 wrote...

Riiiiiight...

Democracy is gone, you now live in my dictatorship where you live or die at my whim. Good luck with that.

Lack of democracy /=/ dictatorship.


Agreed, I was using an extreme example to make a point.

To be fair though there aren't that many other forms out there (that work).

Link to wiki.

Most of them are variations on a theme.


@TobyHas Eyes, granted, a benevolent dictatorship can be better, but it invariably fails after the first generation and has other flaws.  Is your second in command trustworthy?  'Cause he speaks in your name too.  How about the guy under him?  Or the guy under him?

Is your successor also benevolent or power hungry?  Will they be wise enough to handle situations without letting fear lead them to over react and cause an atrocity?  Because if not then there's nothing to stop it happening, who could stop them?

Modifié par Dave666, 03 mai 2011 - 08:59 .


#744
lolwut666

lolwut666
  • Members
  • 1 470 messages

Saphra Deden wrote...

lolwut666 wrote...

Your voice carries no weight in a dictatorship.


My voice carries no weight in this democracy or any democracy.

I'm no more free and have no more rights here than I would in China.


By yourself, no.

But when enough people voice a common opinion, they are heard, and in a democracy they have the freedom to do so.

In a dictatorship, you'd have none of that.

You might not even have the freedom to play your video games, or to do a lot of the things you enjoy, because the dictator has the last word in what is allowed in his society.

#745
TobyHasEyes

TobyHasEyes
  • Members
  • 1 109 messages

lolwut666 wrote...

Saphra Deden wrote...

lolwut666 wrote...

Your voice carries no weight in a dictatorship.


My voice carries no weight in this democracy or any democracy.

I'm no more free and have no more rights here than I would in China.


By yourself, no.

But when enough people voice a common opinion, they are heard, and in a democracy they have the freedom to do so.

In a dictatorship, you'd have none of that.

You might not even have the freedom to play your video games, or to do a lot of the things you enjoy, because the dictator has the last word in what is allowed in his society.


 In a democracy you MIGHT not have the freedom to play your video games, you MIGHT be an oppressed minority, The reason I support democracy is because any good form of future government (or whatever) needs a change in attitudes, which requires engaging the people

#746
Guest_Saphra Deden_*

Guest_Saphra Deden_*
  • Guests
Dictators hate video games. You heard it here first, folks.

You don't know what things I enjoy, and regardless, I can't do most of them anyway.

#747
lolwut666

lolwut666
  • Members
  • 1 470 messages

TobyHasEyes wrote...

lolwut666 wrote...

Saphra Deden wrote...

lolwut666 wrote...

Your voice carries no weight in a dictatorship.


My voice carries no weight in this democracy or any democracy.

I'm no more free and have no more rights here than I would in China.


By yourself, no.

But when enough people voice a common opinion, they are heard, and in a democracy they have the freedom to do so.

In a dictatorship, you'd have none of that.

You might not even have the freedom to play your video games, or to do a lot of the things you enjoy, because the dictator has the last word in what is allowed in his society.


 In a democracy you MIGHT not have the freedom to play your video games, you MIGHT be an oppressed minority, The reason I support democracy is because any good form of future government (or whatever) needs a change in attitudes, which requires engaging the people


That's because no government is perfect, and there are going to be economical and social issues in all of them.

I'm describing the differences between both policies in theory. In practice, it never works like that.

#748
TobyHasEyes

TobyHasEyes
  • Members
  • 1 109 messages

Dave666 wrote...

wiggles89 wrote...

Riiiiiight...

Democracy is gone, you now live in my dictatorship where you live or die at my whim. Good luck with that.

Lack of democracy /=/ dictatorship.


Agreed, I was using an extreme example to make a point.

To be fair though there aren't that many other forms out there (that work).

Link to wiki.

Most of them are variations on a theme.


@TobyHas Eyes, granted, a benevolent dictatorship can be better, but it invariably fails after the first generation and has other flaws.  Is your second in command trustworthy?  'Cause he speaks in your name too.  How about the guy under him?  Or the guy under him?

Is your successor also benevolent or power hungry?  Will they be wise enough to handle situations without letting fear lead them to over react and cause an atrocity?  Because if not then there's nothing to stop it happening, who could stop them?


 Hey like I say, I support democracy, I was just saying if aliens have pursued another form of goverment successfuly without extreme abuse, then well done to them. I agree, dictators never work out in real world situations

#749
Moiaussi

Moiaussi
  • Members
  • 2 890 messages
[quote]Arijharn wrote...

He didn't give Michael Lang orders to assassinate the two Earth presidents, and the difference isn't slight. He could have inferred it just as much as he shut down the project entirely. 

This whole thread is about wishful thinking moi, 'get with the program.' My response is predicated by the fact that he's a moderate in terms of international politics, he could have done much 'worse' than just the Terra Firma party, which makes me think he isn't out for blood.[/quote]

All we know of the contract is that they armed him, and that Cerberus benefitted from the assassinations. That implies they had a hand. At the very least if they knew to arrange their ops so that they would benefit, they knew enough that they could have prevented the assassinations. The best operative is always the one that does your bidding without need of instruction or tracable links.

Your definition of 'moderate' is that they only killed someone in the Terra Firma party? Besides the presidents, I didn't realize Pope Clement was a Terra Firma member..... I suspect neither did he. Are you sure you are reading from the right program?

[quote]It's not wishful thinking, it's based on the whole idea of diplomacy and 'mutual advantage' to which diplomacy represents, no matter how much you 'wish' otherwise. The entire reason why the volus went to the Turian's in the first place is because they 'don't have the bodies for it' (slight paraphrasing), which seems to me that they're very much 'locked in contract.'[/quote]

No clue where you are going here.... the whole point of technology is to compensate for the limitations of our bodies. Regardless, there is no question of Humans suddenly losing the ability to fly starships, armed or otherwise, so in what way are humans at risk of that fate?

[quote]The Volus indeed does the things you mentioned, remember they're responsible for the standardised galactic economy, but it's only the Turian's that supposedly give them support (and only apparently when it's convenient for the Turian's to do so, you can't tell me that the entire Turian Hierarchy fleet was involved with the Taetrus campaign because well, that's just plain stupid moi). This means to me at least that if the Volus wants to change it would be exceptionally difficult to do so (and I doubt it would be plain sailing) because of numerous factors; most notably the fact that the Turian's economic might is largely dependent upon the Volus.[/quote]

The Turians are only supposed to do whatever the contract with them requires that they do. It seems exceedingly unlikely that the Volus are paying for the availability of the entire Turian fleet. What that has to do with the fact that the Volus could design ships they could fly and/or fight from is anybody's guess. And the degree of dependance on the part of the Turians is based primarily on Volus skill rather than raw dollars. The Volus pay in part by way of accounting/economic consulting, compensating for a Turian lack of interest in that field. It is a typical 'gains from trade' arrangement, to the mutual benefit of both races.

[quote]So, I don't see it as 'rampant wishful thinking' but rather extrapolation from what I see as part of the galactic community and my knowledge that diplomacy isn't really cut and dried. Let me put it this way; do you really think that politicians are the ones who plan out diplomatic trade etc? Because you're woefully naive if you do, that stuff is handled by trained negotiators.[/quote]

The details are worked out by trained negotiators , but limits on acceptable trade terms, as well as final approval still rest in the hands of politicians. It is a false assumption that the best economic choices for a country are also the popular or politicly feasable ones.

[quote]What does the Terminus systems have to do with Eden Prime really? I know what was said at the start of ME1, but Eden Prime falls officially within the domain of Citadel space. Nihilus says however that it's the discovery of the Prothean beacon that might tempt the Terminus Systems from making a grab for it.[/quote]

It speaks to the what the Council respond to in terms of negotiations. The Council have a paranoid fear that the Terminus systems, who in the blitz were fought off by a small garrison and civilians. constitutes some sort of major threat.

[quote]As to Terra Nova, I can't remember if it was ever mentioned if it was in or near the Terminus Systems, but remember that slavers make frequent attacks outside batarian space (for what should hopefully be painfully obvious reasons).[/quote]

The Terminus pirates aren't all Batarian. The Blitz included Batarians, but was led by a human pirate.

[quote]I really hope you aren't undergoing studies to become a lawyer moi :P

Let me try and illustrate an example; if the genophage was deployed against us, would you be so quick to say it isn't genocide? Or is genocide to you only limited to the (mass) killing of the current standing population?

Lets say there is usually a birth rate of 10 million each well breeding cycle (however long that may be), considering the fact that the genophage reduces the rate to 1:1000, then there is only about 10,000 new infants that survives birth. That's a pretty staggering fact imo. And you say it's okay because it's 'stabilizing to pre-industrial levels'? Well unfortunately, the Krogan aren't in their 'pre-industrial levels' anymore, so the point is kinda, well, utter bs. It's kinda amazing to me that I consider war to be actually more 'ethical' in comparison. Genophage v1 fair enough considering the mark of the times, but v2 was putting the boot in when they're down.[/quote]

We don't have Krogan reproductive rates. Apples and oranges. Per Wrex, who has first hand knowledge, the Krogan could do fine if they stopped running off to fight whereever all the time. Indeed, if Wrex takes over in ME2, he has the population stable and growing, and is successful in reuniting the clans. Also it is reasonable to conclude that the V2 run took into account changes to Krogan society, so was likely at least a little less agressive.

Btw. we do have a similar program on Earth. China has had a law limiting reproduction to 2 per family for a while now, and it is considered oppressive by some, but it isn't considered genocide by anyone.

[quote]But look at the facts moi. Look at the circumstance and look at the result.[/quote]

The facts are that it isn't intended to eliminate the race (per Mordin), and that the population is indeed stable. Those are the facts and the result. How is that genocide? If you consider birth control genocide in and of itself, please keep that discussion to other boards. We will just have to agree to disagree on that point.

[quote]Forgive me moi but... you're an idiot. Tell me you aren't actually using this flimsy 'excuse'. Genocide is the killing of members, if a child is unable to be conceived but shows an eventual inverse to the standard population levels (adults dying for whatever reason), then you're obviously making 'less' people appear, which is well... kinda 'genocide by proxy'. Pre-industrial levels is a buzzword used by Mordin to convince himself, mainly because no one (not even the Krogan) are living in pre-industrial levels anymore. Krogan are still an 'uplifted species.'[/quote]

We will have to agree to disagree. You obviously believe birth control is genocide in and of itself. As for your hangup over pre-industrial, lifespans and survival rates normally increase with technology, not decrease, hence the need for birth control in the Krogan. Pre-industry, their birth control methods consisted of a harsh environment and blowing their own civilizations up periodicly. The environment is less harsh now due to better techniques and equipment, and they are spacefaring, which means they can blow others up instead of themselves now. Both lead to lower levels of 'natural' birth control, requiring compensation to keep population levels sustainable.

[quote]This does not compute. How are the Krogan 'recovering and evolving' when the Genophage is as still prevalent (well, technically more so considering Mordin made it immune to the effects of evolution) now as when it was when Mordin, Maelon and the crew of Kirrahe deployed it? The Krogan are in as much of the same place now as before really. Even Wrex says he wont change his people from 'the way they are' even if he does make sweeping changes in their breeding program (which in all honesty just makes it sound like he's getting rid of insular breeding practices by enforcing increased genetic diversity, because the females will be 'shared around.' This doesn't mean that somehow they're going to circumvent the 1:1000 magic number).[/quote]

Wrex is showing them a more sustainable alternative to their normal cultrual 'solutions.' Alternatively,  Wreav is, but not the same alternative and not as effectively. In the pre-industrial era, they had a natural 1:1000 survival rate due to war and the environment. Again, neither of those are the threats they used to be. Well war could be, but it is one that is generally to be avoided, especially if everyone else becomes caught up in it again.

[quote]Moi, you keep on ignoring the obvious. The krogan no longer live in pre-industrial levels or society.[/quote]

But that is precisely the problem. Why do you think we have contraception methods on Earth? And we don't breed in batches of 1000..... You figure that if we did breed at the same rate as the Krogan that we would be able to sustain that without some sort of extremely agressive birth control? And you say I am the one ignoring the obvious?

#750
lolwut666

lolwut666
  • Members
  • 1 470 messages

Saphra Deden wrote...

Dictators hate video games. You heard it here first, folks.

You don't know what things I enjoy, and regardless, I can't do most of them anyway.


Well, in a dictatorship, the government might choose to evict you from your house if they so desire, for example, and there's nothing you can do about it.

If you're arrested for a crime you didn't commit, you might be denied the right to legally defend yourself.

Human rights have no place in a dictatorship.