The Seekers
#101
Posté 02 mai 2011 - 03:11
#102
Posté 02 mai 2011 - 04:14
EmperorSahlertz wrote...
3 years.
...and only now and only after interviewing Varric (who was available the WHOLE TIME) are the Seekers (who are supposed to have oversight over the Templars) just now starting to figure out that Meredith was a complete fruit loop.
Man, I just love how competant these Seekers are......
-Polaris
#103
Posté 02 mai 2011 - 04:19
EmperorSahlertz wrote...
3 years.
How do we know this? Was it in a cutscene?(missed a few of them since I kept getting interrupted whenever one was on)
#104
Posté 02 mai 2011 - 04:29
HSHAW wrote...
EmperorSahlertz wrote...
3 years.
How do we know this? Was it in a cutscene?(missed a few of them since I kept getting interrupted whenever one was on)
We can directly inferr it. We are told the events in DA2 happen in a ten year period following the blight, but the actual events for Hawke's story take place in seven. Thus there are three years left.
-Polaris
#105
Posté 02 mai 2011 - 04:43
I'm also quite sure that either Mike Laidlaw or David Gaider adressed this. And clarified that the interrogation takes place in the tenth year.IanPolaris wrote...
HSHAW wrote...
EmperorSahlertz wrote...
3 years.
How do we know this? Was it in a cutscene?(missed a few of them since I kept getting interrupted whenever one was on)
We can directly inferr it. We are told the events in DA2 happen in a ten year period following the blight, but the actual events for Hawke's story take place in seven. Thus there are three years left.
-Polaris
#106
Posté 02 mai 2011 - 04:47
IanPolaris wrote...
HSHAW wrote...
EmperorSahlertz wrote...
3 years.
How do we know this? Was it in a cutscene?(missed a few of them since I kept getting interrupted whenever one was on)
We can directly inferr it. We are told the events in DA2 happen in a ten year period following the blight, but the actual events for Hawke's story take place in seven. Thus there are three years left.
-Polaris
The interrogation could simply be a few weeks or months after Act 3 with the remaining time covered in DLC and possibly an expansion pack.
#107
Posté 02 mai 2011 - 04:48
EmperorSahlertz wrote...
I'm also quite sure that either Mike Laidlaw or David Gaider adressed this. And clarified that the interrogation takes place in the tenth year.IanPolaris wrote...
HSHAW wrote...
EmperorSahlertz wrote...
3 years.
How do we know this? Was it in a cutscene?(missed a few of them since I kept getting interrupted whenever one was on)
We can directly inferr it. We are told the events in DA2 happen in a ten year period following the blight, but the actual events for Hawke's story take place in seven. Thus there are three years left.
-Polaris
Until I see a direct quote I'm going to have to take this with a grain of salt.
#108
Posté 02 mai 2011 - 04:50
Where's that information from? Could he not have been in hiding, himself?IanPolaris wrote...
...and only now and only after interviewing Varric (who was available the WHOLE TIME)
#109
Posté 02 mai 2011 - 05:04
Why are you so suspicious? Do you think they're lying? Why would they?HSHAW wrote...
EmperorSahlertz wrote...
I'm also quite sure that either Mike Laidlaw or David Gaider adressed this. And clarified that the interrogation takes place in the tenth year.IanPolaris wrote...
HSHAW wrote...
EmperorSahlertz wrote...
3 years.
How do we know this? Was it in a cutscene?(missed a few of them since I kept getting interrupted whenever one was on)
We can directly inferr it. We are told the events in DA2 happen in a ten year period following the blight, but the actual events for Hawke's story take place in seven. Thus there are three years left.
-Polaris
Until I see a direct quote I'm going to have to take this with a grain of salt.
Not a direct quote, but here's the Dragon Age Wiki which agrees with both of them: http://dragonage.wik...Timeline#Dragon
Modifié par OldMan91, 02 mai 2011 - 05:04 .
#110
Posté 02 mai 2011 - 05:09
Ulicus wrote...
Where's that information from? Could he not have been in hiding, himself?IanPolaris wrote...
...and only now and only after interviewing Varric (who was available the WHOLE TIME)
THe seekers should have known that Meredith was a fruitloop from even before Hawke arrived, and Varric is the owner/operator/"made man" of low-town....not exactly a low profile position in Kirkwall for at least 7 of the 10 years.
The seeker could (and should) have easily interviewed him far, far sooner than they did.
-Polaris
#111
Posté 02 mai 2011 - 07:21
Nevermind. Misread you. You're saying they should have known about this before the game even began. Gotcha.
Modifié par Ulicus, 02 mai 2011 - 07:22 .
#112
Posté 02 mai 2011 - 08:07
Up until the Chantry was bombed and the war started the situation was deemed under control apparently, or they didn't know of the Champions involvement, before he became Champion.
#113
Posté 02 mai 2011 - 08:32
EmperorSahlertz wrote...
They had no reason to interview him before the 7th year. If Hawke sided with the mages, Varric would have fled along with Hawke for possibly 3 years before they went their seperate ways.
Up until the Chantry was bombed and the war started the situation was deemed under control apparently, or they didn't know of the Champions involvement, before he became Champion.
Do you honestly believe the BS you just posted? Meredith was clearly a fruitloop LONG before year seven. She had cost the Templars all of their moral high ground and respect in Kirkwall, people will openly revolting against her (and not just mages), and we know that Elthina was in close communication with Divine Justina V to the point of sending a seeker agent to evaluate the situation.
20 minutes of any real investigation should have revealed that Meredith's intrasigence was if not the core issue at least close to it, but no seeker teams came to investigate. Meredith had been flouting Chantry law for YEARS (at least with tranquility), but there was no Seeker oversight.
I calls them as I seems them. The Seekers are bloody incompentant or Templar stooges. Pick one.
-Polaris
#114
Posté 02 mai 2011 - 10:15
OldMan91 wrote...
Why are you so suspicious? Do you think they're lying? Why would they?HSHAW wrote...
EmperorSahlertz wrote...
I'm also quite sure that either Mike Laidlaw or David Gaider adressed this. And clarified that the interrogation takes place in the tenth year.IanPolaris wrote...
HSHAW wrote...
EmperorSahlertz wrote...
3 years.
How do we know this? Was it in a cutscene?(missed a few of them since I kept getting interrupted whenever one was on)
We can directly inferr it. We are told the events in DA2 happen in a ten year period following the blight, but the actual events for Hawke's story take place in seven. Thus there are three years left.
-Polaris
Until I see a direct quote I'm going to have to take this with a grain of salt.
Not a direct quote, but here's the Dragon Age Wiki which agrees with both of them: http://dragonage.wik...Timeline#Dragon
Not so much thinking they're lying, it's more along the lines of I ask for a source whenever I see an odd sounding statement.





Retour en haut






