Rockpopple wrote...
@ Dangerfoot - I don't know if you know this, but when many people make love, they usually start out clothed. Clothes don't magically come off, and I'm not saying this as a jest to TW2, I mean it literally. That's what happens. People make out, they fall on the bed, and then stuff starts to happen. I'm not in the business of explaining the birds and the bees to forumites, but suffice it to say, there was nothing unrealistic about what DA2 portrayed.
Now do people usually rush to put on their underpants right after having sex then go back to bed and cuddle? Not usually. I'm not a fan of how BioWare did that and I've talked about how they could have used implied nudity for their scenes to make things more realistic, but that's neither here nor there.
And you're using a strawman. I never said "there is porn for nudity". Go back and read what I said. I said "there is porn for people who are so turned on by the sex scenes in TW2 that they rush off to buy the game". It's not about regulating or relegating sex or nudity at all. You're arguing against a strawman you propped up, and I'm not interested.
I stand by my statement. To me, people who are so turned on by a sex scene in a video game that that's their primary reason or inciting reason to buy the product are the same as 12 year olds sneaking into an R-rated movie. They can save that money by looking up sex on the internet, usually in the form of porn.
Once again - I'm totally pro-porn. No problem with it whatsoever. But cartoons don't turn me on. Maybe it does you, and that's totally fine. Different strokes for different folks. Again... no pun intended.
You keep saying you're pro-porn, but this isn't really about porn. I don't
want to see "cartoon" nudity in the sense that you seem to imply. I want for people to stop flipping out at the sight of Liara's blue butt and let nudity in art be. It is a part of life, can be used in many contexts, and should be used at the artists disgression. And when you say you're pro-porn in response to me saying that nudity isn't porn, I just get the idea that you don't think nudity has a place in art.
I don't support nudity in art because it turns me on, this isn't about porn, and I don't think that we're all nit-picking and expecting perfect realism as implied in your first paragraph. People just see quality love scenes with nudity (implied or otherwise) and then we see a love scene where
everything is implied. And we feel very little from it. Does my character love this person that they just laid on fully clothed? Was that night really special to them or just a fling? I can't tell because now they are fully clothed still and no longer having implied sex.
Good story telling is SHOWN to you, not TOLD. People want to see passion, not be told that those two characters probably did it and now they are like totally in love.
Modifié par Dangerfoot, 26 mai 2011 - 04:38 .