Ulicus wrote...
Responding to OP:
Companion 1) A Kal-Sharok traditionalist. He generaly supports the caste system and is disciplined. Could also be extremely battle-hardened (mainly fighting darkspawn or the main 'enemy' of the game), to the point of being deeply scarred (possibly his lover and all his family were slain to add to the drama).
This could be interesting, but as a supporter of the caste system what excuse does a Warrior/Noble (if he's battle hardened he must be one or the other) have for being on the surface? Has he been granted leave to do so? Was he forced to head to the surface? Does he consider himself a worthless surfacer now? Was he framed ala the Noble Origin?
I really like that he's from Kal Sharok rather than Orzammar, though. And are we talking a Sword/Board tank, here, too?
Companion 2) An exiled magister. Now old and stripped of his political power, he is seeking a new purpose. He finds one in teaching the protagonist (Possible lessons : Leadership, Magic, protagonist's special awesome abilities...etc). Wise and calm
Another cool idea. But are we talking about a genuinely wise and calm guy, here, or more of a duplicitous Master Li type? Considering how negatively Tevinter and Magisters are usually portrayed, I'd be all for this (ex)Magister being a thoroughly nice bloke. Though I'd prefer if they threw in a bit of ambiguity by maybe making him pro-slavery... but the kind of slavemaster who treated his "property" well.
If he's a blood mage, does he advocate using other people's blood or does he stick strictly to himself? Was he always calm and wise or was he once a complete monster who has mellowed dramatically in his old age?
Companion 3) A circle mage strongly supporting a specific fraternity (An isolasionist or a lucrosian since we have seen too much of the currently known others). Cunning and devious.
After DA2, I don't think the fraternities are going to exist as we currently know them. And aren't mages all going to be apostates, pretty much?
Companion 4) A shadow(!)-thief. It's about time we met someone who represents the abilities the shadows have! Carefree, avoiding to give insight about his past (fearfull of a betrayal), hideously cynnical , cleptomaniac and part of a huge criminal network.
NO-ONE CROSSES THE SHADOW THIEVES AND LIVES!!!
Hm. Yeah, it would be nice to have a straight up thief character. As opposed to a bard/assassin/adventurer/pirate type we've had so far.
Companion 5) A kossuth (I hope I got that right
) who is neither a Qunari nor a Tal-Vasoth, much like Maraas> Retaining the coolnes of Qunari responses (it just is style) while being less predictable.
Eh? If you're not Qunari and you're a kossith then you have to be Tal-Vashoth. Maraas was always a Tal-Vashoth. Just because he turned against the others didn't change the fact. But, yeah, I'd have no objections to a Maraas-type companion.
Only, as others have said, make her female. And I'm not just saying that because of "yay romance", but because then they could explore the issue of gender in qunari society a bit more.
Companion 6) An Alammari barbarian. His tribe is slaughtered for some reason and he has grown somewhat attached to you. A mix beetwen the classic D&D barbarian and Minsc.
You mean an Avvar barbarian. The Alamarri became the Ferelden/Avvar/Chasind.
Or maybe it's more complicated. I don't know. Either way, there are no more alamarri around now.
Honestly, though... I'm not particularly interested in this. Wouldn't be bad, but I think there are more promising ideas. An avvar barbarian would work better as a protagonist, IMO. Re-doing Minsc would be a bad, bad move for a full companion. That kind of thing would only work for a smaller NPC.
Companion 7) A strong noble (Anderfels, Tevinter or Orlais). Her father wanted a son and now her mother is, for some reason dead. Raised with great expectetaions, she is aggressive, demanding, headstrong, driven, cultured and knowledgable about almost everything. The only thing she has ever done is following her father's will (pursuing political power) leaving no room for everything else making her extremely sharp to cover her lack of experience in social matters.
Sounds too much like "Morrigan, only a noble" to me. With a bit of Anora thrown in.
Companion 8) An elf warrior who has rejected his/her people. He/She believes in all races being equal, and dislikes the Dalish. Striving to blend in to human societies, he/she joined the templars much to the dislike of others from his/her new order. However, his dedication has earned him/her the rank of Kinght-Captain.
Can elves even join the Templars? Hm.
I like the concept, have to say.
Oh, and I'll add my voice to the chorus who want a desire-abomination companion.... though since we just had Anders, I'm not seeing it happening any time soon.
Thank you so much for taking the time to analyze my characters! Here are my thoughts on your remarks
Companion 1) He is pretty much self-exiled, out of shame in fact. Thinking he failed his family and his nation, he resorted to the surface, which he found terrible. He is always trying 'to regain favour' as he would put it though, doing everything he can to make Kal Sharok stronger.
Companion 2) He is very complicated. He knows blood magic, but he uses it extremely rarely (and even when he does, he restricts himself to his own blood) thinking of it as a very dangerous tool. He is pro-slavery, but treated his slaves as people (which actually makes them servants) and not as animals to be used. (However, he was not exiled because of this, he was betrayed). Additionally, when he was young, he was a bit more power-hungry, but now he thinks that knowledge (and maybe magic) is/are the only form of true power. He also keeps his secrets and only when he deems the PC ready will he move to the next lesson, making him a rather Pythagorean figure. I also tend to think of him as being blind, but I am not sure about that. He practically is my favourite!

Companion 3) In fact, he is one of the few mages remaining in the circle, not because he agrees with the chantry, but he instead sees the circle as an opportunity to achieve his goals. Sorry for not making this clear.
Companion 4) It would rock, wouldn't it !?!
Companion 5) Yes, what you say seems to be true...

. And yes, it would be cooler if she was female.
Companion 6) You are right again, lore-wise (and I thought myself a lore-master, damn). But to companions however, I didn't describe a Minsc remake, but a blend with the classic D&D barbarian. It would go like this
D&D barbarian 65%, Minsc 30%, Something else 5% . Again sorry if this was not clear.
Companion 7) But she would be lawful unlike Morrigan, she most probably isn't a mage and unless she is a Tevinter noble she would be mostly pro-templar. (I have to admit however, that she indeed bears a resemblance to Morrigan and Anora)
Companion 8) Not only is it strange for an elf to be a templar, but it would be accounting two major issues with one character (rascism and mages).