DAO MAdhatter wrote...
Its not a personal attack! Im calling out some ones BS! His perception on a game series can NOT be based on what he thinks of the makers ideas & one games design alone.
& I am no hater. I have nothing against the guy, just his stupid excuse for giving up on a great game series.
You called him a douche and then an idiot. That sounds like personal attacks to me.
I disagree. Laidlaw is not just "a designer", he is the Lead Designer. As such, it is under his direction that Dragon Age 2 was made. I'm sure that the higher ups gave him a project deadline and a checklist to complete, but the foundation and design of the game was his, and mostly his.
And yes, my perceptions of a game and/or future games may be impacted by what the Lead Designer of said game has, especially in regards to the game's flaws and/or criticisms. I'm not saying it always does, but it sometimes does.
For me, it doesn't really impact me much. My opinions of Dragon Age 2 aren't really changed based on what Laidlaw said.
But I can understand why it would affect the opinions of other people, for future games.