244 réponses à ce sujet

[Shadooow]

I say legit. I dont think that everything is cheating. If you use toolset to modify a singleplayer (which is not possible unless you know the trick btw) and you for example add a new locations I would call this modding. If you install Tony-K AI or ILKAYs and mine spellfix pack I would call this fixes. If you install acp combat styles or icons overrides I would call it graphical enhance. But I can't see how anyone can think that starting with more gold than inteded is legit, thus mod, fix or graphical enhance etc. You just trying to rationalize it and thats the issue. The cheat is still cheat even if you convince yourself that you would get that ammount of gold anyway (later). The advantages of this are very clear and was already said.

I dont really understand, try to use maphack in Diablo and then tell the diablo community that its not cheating cos you do it in singleplayer. Noone would agreed there. Noone.

Modifié par ShaDoOoW, 11 mai 2011 - 05:17 .

[qaerinju]

This thread is getting dull and repetitive without the participation of the guy whose post spawned it. So come on Kail, get stuck in!

[Elhanan]

ShaDoOoW wrote...

I say legit. I dont think that everything is cheating. If you use toolset to modify a singleplayer (which is not possible unless you know the trick btw) and you for example add a new locations I would call this modding. If you install Tony-K AI or ILKAYs and mine spellfix pack I would call this fixes. If you install acp combat styles or icons overrides I would call it graphical enhance.

But I can't see how anyone can think that starting with more gold than inteded is legit, thus mod, fix or graphical enhance etc. You just trying to rationalize it and thats the issue. The cheat is still cheat even if you convince yourself that you would get that ammount of gold anyway (later). The advantages of this are very clear and was already said.

I dont really understand, try to use maphack in Diablo and then tell the diablo community that its not cheating cos you do it in singleplayer. Noone would agreed there. Noone.

The edited portion is my problem. What you or anyone else consider to be right, fair, and 'legit' does not define what may be seen as 'legi't for another for solo play; only the indv Player themselves.

Modifié par Elhanan, 11 mai 2011 - 06:24 .

[Shadooow]

Yes but what you saying is applicable on anything like cheating in multiplayer, so im not cheater if I cheat in multiplayer cos I dont define it as cheating. Totally insane.

Modifié par ShaDoOoW, 11 mai 2011 - 06:57 .

[Elhanan]

ShaDoOoW wrote...

Yes but what you saying is applicable on anything like cheating in multiplayer, so im not cheater if I cheat in multiplayer cos I dont define it as cheating. Totally insane.

Not at all; big diff from m/p gameplay, and using the Multi-player Client for solo play.
 
In m/p format, the rules agreed to by the group determines fair play. If I added gold in this context, then I most likely would be cheating. Pls re-read the thread if you can stomach it.

Modifié par Elhanan, 11 mai 2011 - 11:05 .

[Shadooow]

I would say read your own posts on your suggestion to re-read the topic lol.

Look, you are saying that you doesnt cheat because you can make your own rules. I say that you can make your own rules in MP too. You say SP is different than MP and we are at the beginning of the discussion. There is lot of peoples that are trying to explain that there are general rules, designer intend etc. But you dont want to accept this.

BTW I made a poll for this thread, vote please http://social.biowar...07/polls/19916/

[Pstemarie]

Rather trivial conversation if you ask me, but, since no one else did, I'll shut-up now <_<

Heh - I just flamed myself

Modifié par Pstemarie, 12 mai 2011 - 10:35 .

[Elhanan]

ShaDoOoW wrote...

I would say read your own posts on your suggestion to re-read the topic lol.

Look, you are saying that you doesnt cheat because you can make your own rules. I say that you can make your own rules in MP too. You say SP is different than MP and we are at the beginning of the discussion. There is lot of peoples that are trying to explain that there are general rules, designer intend etc. But you dont want to accept this.

BTW I made a poll for this thread, vote please http://social.biowar...07/polls/19916/ 

I accept there are general rules. I simply add House rules for solo play.

In m/p, the group agrees to the rules used for play, and this gathering often has an active DM. In solo games, the Player is the DM.

I acceot that there is designer intent in the mods. In solo play, I alter the rules for use in my own solo game.

And your poll fails to mention my position at all, so I pass on giving feedback that is again deemed to be without value.

[Shadooow]

Elhanan wrote...

I accept there are general rules. I simply add House rules for solo play.

In m/p, the group agrees to the rules used for play, and this gathering often has an active DM. In solo games, the Player is the DM.

I acceot that there is designer intent in the mods. In solo play, I alter the rules for use in my own solo game.

And your poll fails to mention my position at all, so I pass on giving feedback that is again deemed to be without value.

Whats your position then?

And if you agree there are general rules/designer intend then its the same as you would cheat in multiplayer, agreed there are server rules but you would make your own house rules for yourself and called it legit. Thats my point.

EDIT: And before you say there are other players in multiplayer. There are other players in single player too, they just dont play with you. Its again the same as if you would cheat in multiplayer and thought its legit when you play solo and dont interact with other players.

Modifié par ShaDoOoW, 12 mai 2011 - 01:00 .

[Elhanan]

ShaDoOoW wrote...

]Whats your position then?

And if you agree there are general rules/designer intend then its the same as you would cheat in multiplayer, agreed there are server rules but you would make your own house rules for yourself and called it legit. Thats my point.

That one may cheat in solo play by cheating and spoiling the game for themselves; not by the simple use of command codes. But I did suggest re-reading the thread.

And I completely disgree with the point of equating solo rules to those of m/p, but this may be a language barrier issue.

[Shadooow]

??? sorry but I dont know what you are talking about I meant cheating generally I didnt say "using command codes"

you re-read the thread, its not me who says that using console commands is cheating

Modifié par ShaDoOoW, 12 mai 2011 - 01:15 .

[Tybae]

Elhanan wrote...

Tybae wrote...

Missed one: Which rules to choose?

No I didn't and I'd prefer you didn't put words in my mouth. 

Would not think of it, though you might consider thought before speech.

I was attempting to include the above statement in the former one you quoted, and replied to earlier. If I was including words, it was to that previous idea. But again, reading, context, comprehension, are not up to chips on shoulders.

*worries for the humanoid race*.

Wow.  I had no idea my father was on this thread.  If I wanted his advice, I'd ask him.  You may want to consider whether or not someone wants advice before giving it.

[Elhanan]

Tybae wrote...

Wow.  I had no idea my father was on this thread.  If I wanted his advice, I'd ask him.  You may want to consider whether or not someone wants advice before giving it.

My pleasure; no chanrge. And say Hi to Dad for me!

[WebShaman]

As has been pointed out, it all boils down to the essential point :

Cheating only occurs if rules are being broken

This seems to be something that everyone in this thread agrees with (and I would hazard to say that just about everyone, period).

Thus, the discussion is really about are rules being broken in Closed SP play. To answer this, one has to first answer, who makes the rules in Closed SP play?

In Closed SP play (I have already defined this, look it up), only the Player is making the rules. There is nobody else there to make them. I can DL a Mod that has rule suggestions, for example, but I normally discard them anyway. I prefer to play by my own self-made rules. Yes, I open the Mods I DL, I change them (some quite drastically), modify them, and then play them.

Why do I do this? To amplify my playing enjoyment. I tend to play with the OHS, I like having CEP and the PRC in my mods as well (though the latter does not play well with the OHS). I like having total freedom to change the looks of my Main Character and the rest of the Party as I see fit! This broadens my RP horizon and increases my enjoyment of the game I am playing in a Closed SP environment.

Thus, in a Closed SP environment, only the Player is making the rules to be played by. No one else is. Period. Prove this to be otherwise.

With the above established, then one can see that no rules are being violated. As that is the case, then it follows that THERE IS NO CHEATING GOING ON!

This was established long ago, in the old forums.

Even if you never discussed the game with another person, playing clean has potentially greater rewards. Reward for a task in the human brain is normally correlated to effort expended, shortcuts in effort lead to shortcuts in reward. If you actually want to experience what the designer created as intended, playing clean is better. Cheating may be harmless, but it still isn't as good as playing clean even in the pure single player case.

Beyond that, are social aspects when you bring your private cheating public. If just for the benefit of speaking of the game in the same context, playing clean is better. When communicating with designers (feedback,reviews,questions) playing clean is better.

Playing clean is better. I will never pretend cheating is of equal merit to playing clean.

-Lowlander

Absolute rubbish! I can say with absolute certainty that playing "clean", as you put it, is a horrible way to play NWN SP in a Closed SP environment! Doing so is leaving out literally TONS of improving content such as the OHS, the ability (or not) to change character appearance as one sees fit (for RP purposes), leaves out the PRC, CEP, etc! Not all Mod designers include such additions to their mods, unfortunately. So a Mod with a really interesting storyline may not include resources that I want. Guess what? NWN allows me, the Player, to change this! And so I do.

I applaud your different take on the thread, and it has become increasingly obvious that no manner of argument is going to convince people who choose to bend or modify the rules to their whim that they are doing anything out of the ordinary. The distinction, and the choice, is simple:

If someone bends the rules they are either:
(a) No longer playing the same game.
( Cheating.

-AmstradHero

As I have pointed out, no rules are being bent. I really hate to break it to you, AmstradHero, but as a Mod creator/Dev, you do NOT dictate to me how I play my Closed SP games. No one does, with the exception of myself. Should I DL one of your Mods, I guarantee you that I will alter it, change it, and make it into a more enjoyable (for me) playing environment. NWN gives me this ability, and I make use of it. There are just too many really good resources available for NWN that I do not want to give up, just because some Mod creator/Dev didn't use it, for whatever reason.

So, to recap :

Cheating only occurs when rules are being broken (agreed upon).

In a Closed SP environment, the Player makes the rules.

As such, no rules are being broken.

Therefore, there is no cheating in a Closed SP environment.

Now we come to a further interesting thing :

If I have created my own Mod, and I alter it, am I cheating?  I am interested in how this will get answered.

Modifié par WebShaman, 12 mai 2011 - 01:58 .

[Elhanan]

WebShaman wrote...

As has been pointed out, it all boils down to the essential point :

Cheating only occurs if rules are being broken

This seems to be something that everyone in this thread agrees with (and I would hazard to say that just about everyone, period).

Thus, the discussion is really about are rules being broken in Closed SP play. To answer this, one has to first answer, who makes the rules in Closed SP play?

In Closed SP play (I have already defined this, look it up), only the Player is making the rules. There is nobody else there to make them. I can DL a Mod that has rule suggestions, for example, but I normally discard them anyway. I prefer to play by my own self-made rules. Yes, I open the Mods I DL, I change them (some quite drastically), modify them, and then play them.

Why do I do this? To amplify my playing enjoyment. I tend to play with the OHS, I like having CEP and the PRC in my mods as well (though the latter does not play well with the OHS). I like having total freedom to change the looks of my Main Character and the rest of the Party as I see fit! This broadens my RP horizon and increases my enjoyment of the game I am playing in a Closed SP environment.

Thus, in a Closed SP environment, only the Player is making the rules to be played by. No one else is. Period. Prove this to be otherwise.

With the above established, then one can see that no rules are being violated. As that is the case, then it follows that THERE IS NO CHEATING GOING ON!

This was established long ago, in the old forums.

Even if you never discussed the game with another person, playing clean has potentially greater rewards. Reward for a task in the human brain is normally correlated to effort expended, shortcuts in effort lead to shortcuts in reward. If you actually want to experience what the designer created as intended, playing clean is better. Cheating may be harmless, but it still isn't as good as playing clean even in the pure single player case.

Beyond that, are social aspects when you bring your private cheating public. If just for the benefit of speaking of the game in the same context, playing clean is better. When communicating with designers (feedback,reviews,questions) playing clean is better.

Playing clean is better. I will never pretend cheating is of equal merit to playing clean.

-Lowlander

Absolute rubbish! I can say with absolute certainty that playing "clean", as you put it, is a horrible way to play NWN SP in a Closed SP environment! Doing so is leaving out literally TONS of improving content such as the OHS, the ability (or not) to change character appearance as one sees fit (for RP purposes), leaves out the PRC, CEP, etc! Not all Mod designers include such additions to their mods, unfortunately. So a Mod with a really interesting storyline may not include resources that I want. Guess what? NWN allows me, the Player, to change this! And so I do.

I applaud your different take on the thread, and it has become increasingly obvious that no manner of argument is going to convince people who choose to bend or modify the rules to their whim that they are doing anything out of the ordinary. The distinction, and the choice, is simple:

If someone bends the rules they are either:
(a) No longer playing the same game.
( Cheating.

-AmstradHero

As I have pointed out, no rules are being bent. I really hate to break it to you, AmstradHero, but as a Mod creator/Dev, you do NOT dictate to me how I play my Closed SP games. No one does, with the exception of myself. Should I DL one of your Mods, I guarantee you that I will alter it, change it, and make it into a more enjoyable (for me) playing environment. NWN gives me this ability, and I make use of it. There are just too many really good resources available for NWN that I do not want to give up, just because some Mod creator/Dev didn't use it, for whatever reason.

So, to recap :

Cheating only occurs when rules are being broken (agreed upon).

In a Closed SP environment, the Player makes the rules.

As such, no rules are being broken.

Therefore, there is no cheating in a Closed SP environment.

Now we come to a further interesting thing :

If I have created my own Mod, and I alter it, am I cheating?  I am interested in how this will get answered.

First, I agree with the vast majority of your post. But I contend one is able to cheat themselves if the set parameters of rules they choose are exceeded by themselves, and spoil the game.

Example: the Player chooses to add Bags of Holding and gold as a viable method to aid shopping and collection. But in addition, they add a set of Haste boots later which were not originally intended by that same Player; hence they might be cheating and spoiling the game by violation of their own rules.

Thanks for the wrap up though.

[Shadooow]

Webshaman: I dont think there is closed SP game, you can think its closed but other peoples playing that game too, just not with you.

However what you say you do isnt cheating in my view either, thats modding imo. So you dont play the game that was given to you anymore, but new game. You upgraded your game with "community custom content" in order to get not advantage in play but new possibilities.

To clear my position - but if you give yourself that gold, which was given as example, then it's not a new game but cheating imo.

[Elhanan]

Lowlander wrote...

No, it was not established or decided merely on your say so.  Did GW Bush show up as "The Decider" and decree it so??

The player most certainly did not make the rules. The rules of a complex single player game like NWN come from negotiation/licensing between Bioware/WotC. These are the core rules of the game engine.

Then the Player chooses what rules in the engine they wish to use via sliders and settings.

Finally the Mod designer crafts an intended experience for players to download. This is pretty much the end of creative elements and rule making.

The finally, finally the Player may add the PGC3 mod to craft a PC for the game , and port in for play. Or add other Haks, mods, files, etc to season for personal taste.

Giving yourself a pile of gold/items is not "Making the SP rules", it is simply selective breaking of a couple of the rule to take shortcuts/give advantages.

No one is forcing you to play by the rules in SP, but it is completely farcical to suggest that issuing cheat codes to give yourself gold/items is "Making the rules" for SP game.

This is nothing but tenuous rationalizing.

Careful; getting your critcs mixed. Web did not mention such, or at least here; I did. And while it may be against your POV and iritate your sensabilities, such inclusions does not make them wrong for another player outside your myopic thoughts and world.

Then if I violate the rules I have chosen, then I may be cheating.. Thank you for playing!

[Shia Luck]

Lowlander wrote...

The player most certainly did not make the rules. The rules of a complex single player game like NWN come from negotiation/licensing between Bioware/WotC. These are the core rules of the game engine.

So we have to break the rules as expressed by WoTC/BW? Like fireballs do 1d6/lvl damage with a lvl cap of 10? Like fighters have 1/1 BAB? Like, it takes X xp to go from lvl2 to 3? Like undead are crit immune?  Because that sounds like things mod & module writers do.

Shado0ow does that. Shado0ow has changed the starting stats for characters if you press the reccomended button. Is this cheating? I know he would call it modding.

If it's not cheating then why is the player not simply modding? 

Lowlander wrote...
Finally the Mod designer crafts an intended experience for players to download. This is pretty much the end of creative elements and rule making.

Sooooo, are you trying to claim that however the player modifys it there is no creative element going on?

Is your answer the same with a module that has been designed to be moddable by other people, Good vs Evil for example? 

[CBrachyrhynchos]

Sure, you can make your own rules. Obsidian and Projekt RED STUDIO did just that. And most of the people who come down on the "it's cheating" side liberally admit to using gameplay and content mods.

However, if you talk about your rule changes on the internet, other people are welcome to critique the new rules you create and judge them to be ridiculous modifications to what is already a reasonably easy game.

[CBrachyrhynchos]

And of course, you can't give advice on game mechanics and module content without an agreement on what they might be. Bringing this back around to the discussion that appeared to spawn this, my max-charisma monk build beats all other monk builds, assuming I give him "god mode" at the start of the session.

(He, of course, wields the Vorpal Wet Noodle of Abigail Van Buren, 1d2 annoyance damage + 10d6 shame, great cleave as a bonus feat.)

Modifié par CBrachyrhynchos, 12 mai 2011 - 08:40 .

[AmstradHero]

WebShaman wrote...

I applaud your different take on the thread, and it has become increasingly obvious that no manner of argument is going to convince people who choose to bend or modify the rules to their whim that they are doing anything out of the ordinary. The distinction, and the choice, is simple:

If someone bends the rules they are either:
(a) No longer playing the same game.
( Cheating.

-AmstradHero

As I have pointed out, no rules are being bent. I really hate to break it to you, AmstradHero, but as a Mod creator/Dev, you do NOT dictate to me how I play my Closed SP games. No one does, with the exception of myself. Should I DL one of your Mods, I guarantee you that I will alter it, change it, and make it into a more enjoyable (for me) playing environment. NWN gives me this ability, and I make use of it. There are just too many really good resources available for NWN that I do not want to give up, just because some Mod creator/Dev didn't use it, for whatever reason.

So, to recap :

Cheating only occurs when rules are being broken (agreed upon).

In a Closed SP environment, the Player makes the rules.

As such, no rules are being broken.

Therefore, there is no cheating in a Closed SP environment.

I absolutely and wholeheartedly disagree with your assertions here, and so does pretty much any and every book on (video) game design.

A mod design / game dev does not dictate exactly how you play your SP games. However, they give you a pre-defined set of rules which dictate exactly how you can interact with the world. Review my previous post in this thread for examples of these rules across multiple game genres. These rules define the player's experience, and the designer(s) must create a game that revolves around these rules and delivers an engaging and cohesive experience because of them. The player does not make the rules, they are given the rules by the designer. Any claim otherwise is patently false and ridiculous. Without the rules given to the player by the designer (which are then enforced by the game's engine), there is no game.

If the player makes the rules, why can't they make the story too? Let's change Neverwinter Nights so that Fenthick isn't executed at the end of Act 1. Now the story is so much better... oh, wait. Actually, with that change, the story falls apart into an incoherent mess.

If the player can make the rules and BioWare is a developer that
adamantly pushed this line of thought (as has been argued by some people
here who apparently have an intimate knowledge of what the developers
were thinking when they created the game!), then look at Knights of the
Old Republic. It has a rule system that's effectively copied from
Neverwinter Nights with some tweaks to "Star Wars"-ify it. It also has a
console that you can use to "modify the rules". When you do so and you
save your game, you get a little "Cheats Used" message next to the save.

D&D is not a special case. NWN is not a special case. Go to any other gaming forum and put forward your argument and I can almost guarantee that you'll get shot down by the vast majority of people. Heck, go do it on a Halo or Call of Duty forum if you really want to get some punishment.

[Elhanan]

AmstradHero wrote...

I absolutely and wholeheartedly disagree with your assertions here, and so does pretty much any and every book on (video) game design.

A mod design / game dev does not dictate exactly how you play your SP games. However, they give you a pre-defined set of rules which dictate exactly how you can interact with the world. Review my previous post in this thread for examples of these rules across multiple game genres. These rules define the player's experience, and the designer(s) must create a game that revolves around these rules and delivers an engaging and cohesive experience because of them. The player does not make the rules, they are given the rules by the designer. Any claim otherwise is patently false and ridiculous. Without the rules given to the player by the designer (which are then enforced by the game's engine), there is no game.

Difference is that the designer makes the rules that are used to create the mod; the Player chooses the rules in which it is played. What was made does not have to be what is played.

If the player makes the rules, why can't they make the story too? Let's change Neverwinter Nights so that Fenthick isn't executed at the end of Act 1. Now the story is so much better... oh, wait. Actually, with that change, the story falls apart into an incoherent mess.

Funny you mention that, as in my fanfic imagination, Fenthick did not die; was his simulacrum that was hanged. Fen excaped when you left him on the stairs, and was to return in the sequel. No mess; no fuss. Just imagination and the fancy of the tale. Or do you not imagine the characters read from the books and scripts you ponder?

If the player can make the rules and BioWare is a developer that
adamantly pushed this line of thought (as has been argued by some people
here who apparently have an intimate knowledge of what the developers
were thinking when they created the game!), then look at Knights of the
Old Republic. It has a rule system that's effectively copied from
Neverwinter Nights with some tweaks to "Star Wars"-ify it. It also has a
console that you can use to "modify the rules". When you do so and you
save your game, you get a little "Cheats Used" message next to the save.

D&D is not a special case. NWN is not a special case. Go to any other gaming forum and put forward your argument and I can almost guarantee that you'll get shot down by the vast majority of people. Heck, go do it on a Halo or Call of Duty forum if you really want to get some punishment.

KOTOR is not NWN1, and has different design roots and teams. What those designers implemented does not loom over any other game save that one.

NWN1 is not a RTS, FPS, etc; it is based from D&D which offers the Players guidleines for play. As much difference that is seen in the rules of Mod creation may also be experienced in Player involvement. If we do not care for Hardcore rules, we omit them. If we want blue robes instead of scarlet, we tailor them.

But I will agree that NWN1 is not a special case. I contend that most any solo game I use that offers mods and command codes may be treated the same; just wil not try to compare results.  As for visiting other forums, I will pass; enough bias is seen here without the need for travel.

Personally I do not care if I am in the majority of thought; care more about freedom of choice and enjoyment than winning votes. As the song goes, I did it my way.

[AmstradHero]

Elhanan wrote...
Difference is that the designer makes the rules that are used to create the mod; the Player chooses the rules in which it is played. What was made does not have to be what is played.

No. The designer creates the rules that are used to play the mod or game. In some cases, they'll produce difficulty levels to allow the player to customise the challenge to suit their skill level. If the player chooses to operate outside of the standard functionality of the game (e.g. using console commands that won't work without additional "out-of-game" modification to settings files), then they're not playing the same game. They're using cheats.

Again, you're arguing with a bucketload of literature and doctrine on game design regarding rule mechanics if you say the designer's rules don't matter. But I guess that as a player that you know better than veterans of the game industry and people who dedicate large portions of their life writing about it?

Elhanan wrote...

AmstradHero wrote...
If the player makes the rules, why can't they make the story too? Let's change Neverwinter Nights so that Fenthick isn't executed at the end of Act 1. Now the story is so much better... oh, wait. Actually, with that change, the story falls apart into an incoherent mess.

Funny you mention that, as in my fanfic imagination, Fenthick did not die; was his simulacrum that was hanged. Fen excaped when you left him on the stairs, and was to return in the sequel. No mess; no fuss. Just imagination and the fancy of the tale. Or do you not imagine the characters read from the books and scripts you ponder?

Okay, and this is the point where you've completely lost all credibility. Now you've not only rewritten the story, but half of the characters as well.  He would have contacted Aribeth to let her know he was alright. At which point her betrayal (which effectively drives the story from part way through Act 2) would never happen because Fenthick isn't dead.

Never before have I seen a group of players with such a strong sense of entitlement to basically change anything they wish about a game and declare "I'm not cheating" and "I'm playing the same game."

I have no issue with cheating, but I'm astounded and flabbergasted at the extent of rationalisation and deception you're attempting to apply to yourselves and this entire conversation simply to avoid what you perceive to be the pejorative label of a "cheater". For me, that is the telling factor in this conversation, not the issue that you use mods or console commands to change the dynamics of your single player experience. Cheating is the concrete and explicit definition of that behaviour, no matter how you may attempt to justify it. I care not a whit if someone cheats in a single player experience, but I expect them to recognise and admit that is what they are doing.

And with that I really am done with this thread for good. Given the people declaring that using console commands is not cheating have chosen to eschew both the definitions of words in the English language as well as logical reasoning, I see absolutely zero purpose or benefit in involving myself in this discussion any longer.

Modifié par AmstradHero, 13 mai 2011 - 07:34 .

[Elhanan]

AmstradHero wrote...

No. The designer creates the rules that are used to play the mod or game. In some cases, they'll produce difficulty levels to allow the player to customise the challenge to suit their skill level. If the player chooses to operate outside of the standard functionality of the game (e.g. using console commands that won't work without additional "out-of-game" modification to settings files), then they're not playing the same game. They're using cheats.

Again, you're arguing with a bucketload of literature and doctrine on game design regarding rule mechanics if you say the designer's rules don't matter. But I guess that as a player that you know better than veterans of the game industry and people who dedicate large portions of their life writing about it?

Sometimes, I might. A few old souls may seem to recall this Anient One being among the first to ask on the forums for needed fixes to be made for the 3E Ranger. And seeing that the NWN1 Ranger is far above the lesser model, I cannot claim responsibility for the improved model, but was found to be correct when compared to the 3.5 version coming out soon thereafter. I ain't always right, but the same can be held for being wrong, too.

While the designer may wish, desire, and cross both their typing fingers for their rules to be used in play, it is the Player that decides and actually plays the game. Adding files, haks, and other possible rule variants does not make the Player a cheater.  The designer's choices do matter, as many will play the default methods, even myself. But it is still the indv Player that makes the final decision.

Okay, and this is the point where you've completely lost all credibility. Now you've not only rewritten the story, but half of the characters as well.  He would have contacted Aribeth to let her know he was alright. At which point her betrayal (which effectively drives the story from part way through Act 2) would never happen because Fenthick isn't dead.

Never before have I seen a group of players with such a strong sense of entitlement to basically change anything they wish about a game and declare "I'm not cheating" and "I'm playing the same game."

Hello? Read again: Imaginary fanfic taken from the same source and game as the Mod Design; did not change a thing. I was simply pointing out that I could rewrite the story which I posted now and again on the forums. In my version, he was also behind the ones seeking to turn Aribeth to the 'Dark Side', and was too cunning to be captured so easily. After all, Fenthick looks like Cary Elwes, and he is much too slick for such a simple misstep.

I have no issue with cheating, but I'm astounded and flabbergasted at the extent of rationalisation and deception you're attempting to apply to yourselves and this entire conversation simply to avoid what you perceive to be the pejorative label of a "cheater". For me, that is the telling factor in this conversation, not the issue that you use mods or console commands to change the dynamics of your single player experience. Cheating is the concrete and explicit definition of that behaviour, no matter how you may attempt to justify it. I care not a whit if someone cheats in a single player experience, but I expect them to recognise and admit that is what they are doing.

And with that I really am done with this thread for good. Given the people declaring that using console commands is not cheating have chosen to eschew both the definitions of words in the English language as well as logical reasoning, I see absolutely zero purpose or benefit in involving myself in this discussion any longer.

Reads like you do have a lot of issues with those that disagree with your notions of cheats, cheating, and chosen kind of play. Take your ball and go home to study if you wish, as myself and others have little to add to your closed mind and opinion. Simply be aware that you quit; nobody forced you to go. But leaving when you think you are correct does not equate to being correct, esp on matters of opinion.

Modifié par Elhanan, 13 mai 2011 - 09:16 .