Aller au contenu

Photo

ME3 releasing Q1 2012, two new pictures


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
528 réponses à ce sujet

#351
Lusitanum

Lusitanum
  • Members
  • 334 messages

InvaderErl wrote...

I agree with every single thing you just said except maybe blaming the fans for DA2. While I think the fans played a part the real blame rests with whoever rushed it and the dev crew for putting a game out that I think was going to be mediocre regardless of dev time. 


Oh yes, definitely. The blame for delivering a sub-par product lies on whoever made it. But what I'm saying is that, if you think that your audience isn't particularly bright because you've seen how they care more about something out of a harlequin romance novel than about actual gameplay and depth, wouldn't you also feel like maybe that crowd would eat up anything you threw at them as long as you gave them them all the romantic options they could wish for? And wouldn't those fans be a lot more to blame for your crappy game than the more mainstream crowd who just wanted a good product and didn't get it (and yet somehow were still to blame for your mistakes)?

#352
gorrillasnake

gorrillasnake
  • Members
  • 516 messages
Image IPB

#353
InvaderErl

InvaderErl
  • Members
  • 3 884 messages

Lusitanum wrote...

InvaderErl wrote...

I agree with every single thing you just said except maybe blaming the fans for DA2. While I think the fans played a part the real blame rests with whoever rushed it and the dev crew for putting a game out that I think was going to be mediocre regardless of dev time. 


Oh yes, definitely. The blame for delivering a sub-par product lies on whoever made it. Butwhat I'm saying is that, if you think that your audience isn't particularly bright because you've seen how they care more about something out of a harlequin romance novel than about actual gameplay and depth, wouldn't you also feel like maybe that crowd would eat up anything you threw at them as long as you gave them them all the romantic options they could wish for? And wouldn't those fans be a lot more to blame for your crappy game than the more mainstream crowd who just wanted a good product and didn't get it (and yet somehow were still to blame for your mistakes)?



I think there's a good deal of truth to that and there were indeed times during DA2 where I felt as if the writing had taken some kind of strange turn into a fan-fiction-y sort of place. To further the point you're making I think DA2's real failure is not even that its a bad RPG, but its a bad GAME.

Modifié par InvaderErl, 05 mai 2011 - 01:40 .


#354
Da Mecca

Da Mecca
  • Members
  • 999 messages
I feel like that's the majority of the fanbase sometimes Lusitanum.

Both ME and DA

What would happen if Bioware released a game without romance at all?

#355
Jaron Oberyn

Jaron Oberyn
  • Members
  • 6 754 messages

xYOSSARIANx wrote...

First reaction - Good, MOAR dev time = MOAR polish & a better game.

Read story on Joystiq about WHY it's been delayed

Second Reaction - WTF they are delaying it to dumbing it down even more for the COD shooter fans.

I worried EA buying Bioware would effect their game quality, I believed EA when they said they had changed. Then they shipped Dragon Age 2 and now this news. It's over for oldskool quality Bioware games.

I'll probably buy it as I want to see the end of the story, but I can see a point in the very near future where BW games do not register the slightest on my radar.

All good things come to an end.


Wow. And here I thought EA did something good. And now this. Completely ridiculous. A larger fanbase? Do you guys realize that casual gamers do not play RPG's because of the complexity? Oh that's right, you do realize that. That's why you dumbed down ME2. Now you're going to dumb down ME3 even more, and then extend the development time for additional catering to the shooter fanboys. You guys have completely lost all of my respect. I have no expectations for this game anymore. It's probably going to have multiplayer now. I suggest you stop calling it a shooter rpg just to appease whats left of your old fanbase, and go ahead and embrace what it is - a shooter. 

-Polite

#356
corebit

corebit
  • Members
  • 326 messages
Very happy that ME3 is delayed. I certainly don't want a repeat of DA2 rushed failure.

Bioware please take your time and don't rush anything!

#357
Someone With Mass

Someone With Mass
  • Members
  • 38 560 messages
**** those CoD retards. Stick with what works.

Trust me, BioWare. You don't want anything to do with those ****stains.

#358
M8DMAN

M8DMAN
  • Members
  • 765 messages
The game was fully playable last Christmas, one of the dev's confirmed it. Why the hell are they pushing it back another year?

That Joystiq article has got me worried. EA said the same thing about DA2 and look how that turned out.

Modifié par M8DMAN, 05 mai 2011 - 02:13 .


#359
sevalaricgirl

sevalaricgirl
  • Members
  • 909 messages
Wow, I certainly hope they don't screw up this game. It's the most anticipated game of Bioware fans and now they do this. This may be the last Bioware game I buy. I'm already not buying any more games in the DA series.

#360
CajNatalie

CajNatalie
  • Members
  • 610 messages
At first I was glad for more dev time.

But now I see this 'catering to the shooter audience' crap...

Ah yes, "Mass Effect", the RPG-Shooter hybrid, we have dismissed that claim.

Just call it a shooter, toss out all tech and biotic powers, and market it to the droolers who don't care about games that go in depth but instead only care for mindless action. Fill it with explosions and make a husk with a gun for a head guns for arms and the guns shoot guns at you that shoot at you.

I better be over-reacting.

Modifié par CajNatalie, 05 mai 2011 - 02:17 .


#361
Lusitanum

Lusitanum
  • Members
  • 334 messages

InvaderErl wrote...

I think there's a good deal of truth to that and there were indeed times during DA2 where I felt as if the writing had taken some kind of strange turn into a fan-fiction-y sort of place. To further the point you're making I think DA2's real failure is not even that its a bad RPG, but its a bad GAME.


Indeed. That's why I think that the whole "the broader market approach is what's ruining ME/DA" doesn't hold any water: if it's a game is well-built (good story, good combat, good... anything) then it's a good game, regardless of what audience it's aiming for. And what ruined DA wasn't the fact that it tried to cater to draw in more people. You could still have all that fast-paced combat and it wouldn't have made a difference in the overal quality of the game. But Dragon Age 2 itself is just bad. I couldn't even finish it and I'll play anything. Fast-paced shooters, slow, ponderous puzzle games, micromanage-heayv RTS, city builders... hell, just recently I've discovered that I like tower defense games a lot more than I thought I would. But above all else, I love RPGs. Be it, Baldur's Gate, KotOR, the whole Fallout series, Mass Effect and even JRPGs, if it's good, I'll play it and probably love it. And yet I couldn't finish DA2. Because after a while I just realized that it wasn't worth the bother.

Da Mecca wrote...

I feel like that's the majority of the fanbase sometimes Lusitanum.

Both ME and DA

What would happen if Bioware released a game without romance at all?


I have to disagree there. I think that's the majority of the fanbase that frequents the forum. I honestly don't think that your average Bioware fan, the kind that just enjoys Bioware games because they're freaking awesome would be too upset if its romance options were a bit more realistic (i.e.: not everyone is interessted in you and is freaking bi-curious :? ). The romance options were just fine in KotOR or Jade Empire. Mass Effect had the drawback that all your LI were, in my opinion, the three least interesting characters in your party, but hey, that's just how love can work in real life: sometimes you really don't have anyone that catches your fancy. Then Dragon Age started getting a little weird: one male and female character that was heterosexual and two bi-curious, one of each gender. That felt somewhat implausible, but what the hell, I can live with that.

And then... Dragon Age 2. Where everyone and their mother loves both genders when in the previous game it was just a kind of uncommon (even if not frowned upon, thankfully) personality trait. And that just felt like pandering to the horny fanfiction crowd who now no longer needs to ship any characters because chances are you can already do that in the game.

PoliteAssasin wrote...

Wow. And here I thought EA did
something good. And now this. Completely ridiculous. A larger fanbase?
Do you guys realize that casual gamers do not play RPG's because of the
complexity? Oh that's right, you do realize that. That's why you dumbed
down ME2. Now you're going to dumb down ME3 even more, and then extend
the development time for additional catering to the shooter fanboys. You
guys have completely lost all of my respect. I have no expectations for
this game anymore. It's probably going to have multiplayer now. I
suggest you stop calling it a shooter rpg just to appease whats left of
your old fanbase, and go ahead and embrace what it is - a shooter. 

-Polite


*bangs head on wall. Repeatedly* :pinched::pinched:

And you know what? When I read this, I actually wish ME3 did have multiplayer. Not only would a co-op option help overcome the brain-damaged AI (and actually add to the depth of the game since then you could have actual tactics), at least playing with my friends would serve as a reminder that there are still people who play these games with more than two brain cells to rub together. :?

#362
M8DMAN

M8DMAN
  • Members
  • 765 messages
Hamburger Helper was one of the main problems with DA2, her writing reads like bad fanfiction.

Modifié par M8DMAN, 05 mai 2011 - 02:25 .


#363
sevalaricgirl

sevalaricgirl
  • Members
  • 909 messages
Hmm, I work in engineering, have two degrees, am an author and play these games. I think I have more than two brain cells.

#364
Lusitanum

Lusitanum
  • Members
  • 334 messages

sevalaricgirl wrote...

Hmm, I work in engineering, have two degrees, am an author and play these games. I think I have more than two brain cells.


Good. Then in that case I'm sure you've already figured out that:
  • that comment wasn't aimed at you specifically, it was meant for all the "it's ruined forever" idiots, and
  • all those things you mentioned don't stop people from being idiots. I'm not saying you are, but I've met more than my fair share of people with all kinds of fancy education degrees who still managed to be more moronic than the average Joe on the street with whom I can have a meaningful and interesting conversation. And vice-versa.


#365
sevalaricgirl

sevalaricgirl
  • Members
  • 909 messages

Lusitanum wrote...

sevalaricgirl wrote...

Hmm, I work in engineering, have two degrees, am an author and play these games. I think I have more than two brain cells.


Good. Then in that case I'm sure you've already figured out that:
  • that comment wasn't aimed at you specifically, it was meant for all the "it's ruined forever" idiots, and
  • all those things you mentioned don't stop people from being idiots. I'm not saying you are, but I've met more than my fair share of people with all kinds of fancy education degrees who still managed to be more moronic than the average Joe on the street with whom I can have a meaningful and interesting conversation. And vice-versa.

[*]
[*]
General comment because frankly I am leaning more towards the "it's ruined forever" side.  Name me one franchise that EA hasn't screwed up.  DA2 was a mess, I mean for pity sake, the swords the lead and npcs used were bigger than they were.  It was ridiculous.  Now I enjoyed ME2, but to make it more shooter and less rpg will definitely not make the game better.  It will make the game worse and frankly, the trilogy should go out with power and bring epic thrills to all of us faithful followers.  Bioware wants to do that, EA may just be stopping them from doing it.

Modifié par sevalaricgirl, 05 mai 2011 - 02:47 .


#366
jakal66

jakal66
  • Members
  • 819 messages
I think at this point they should shut up and not say anything else cuz so far all I'm hearing are changes that will make this game worse.

People I think chances are now 50/50, they can either make a glorious game with a more indepth story adding a few more RPG elements than ME2 or they can sink the game like DA2

Right now I think this "more time" is as scarier than ever...becuase what we saw in GI was actually cool,now we're hearing "Broad audience" "Handheld ME3"....not very promising.

God I hope I am 100% wrong and this game blows my mind but I am worried...3rd installments of a trilogy can easily be wrecked....


I mean look at Biowares DA....DA O was awsome....one of the best games I have played in the last years...and then look at DA2....

Bioware can indeed screw ME3 ...hopefully no

Modifié par jakal66, 05 mai 2011 - 02:59 .


#367
InvaderErl

InvaderErl
  • Members
  • 3 884 messages
Do you actually think the handheld is going to have ANY bearing on how ME3 pans out?

Seriously?

sevalaricgirl wrote...

General comment because frankly I am leaning more towards the "it's ruined forever" side.  Name me one franchise that EA hasn't screwed up.


Off the top of my head.

Dead Space, Battlefield, The Sims, and Mass Effect (any game that wins multiple GOTY awards is an objective success).

Modifié par InvaderErl, 05 mai 2011 - 02:59 .


#368
nubbers666

nubbers666
  • Members
  • 1 065 messages
PLEASE BIOWARE DO NOT RUSH THIS GAME

and ruin it like dragon age 2  take all the time you need :crying:

Modifié par katie916, 05 mai 2011 - 03:00 .


#369
jakal66

jakal66
  • Members
  • 819 messages

InvaderErl wrote...

Do you actually think the handheld is going to have ANY bearing on how ME3 pans out?

Seriously?

sevalaricgirl wrote...

General comment because frankly I am leaning more towards the "it's ruined forever" side.  Name me one franchise that EA hasn't screwed up.


Off the top of my head.

Dead Space, Battlefield, The Sims, and Mass Effect (any game that wins multiple GOTY awards is an objective success).


Oh my friend...you never know...

#370
sevalaricgirl

sevalaricgirl
  • Members
  • 909 messages
Dead Space is okay, not great, especially if you play it on PC which I do. The Sims, well if you're into simulations, I'm not, and Mass Effect 1 was very good, Mass Effect 2 not so much so I wouldn't count that either and if you ask my son, every sports game they make is screwed up.  One more thing, the only game you listed that is an rpg is Mass Effect.  Dead Space (3rd person shooter), Sims (simulation and I checked it out and think those games are not good), and Battlefield games again are shooters.

Modifié par sevalaricgirl, 05 mai 2011 - 03:06 .


#371
InvaderErl

InvaderErl
  • Members
  • 3 884 messages

jakal66 wrote...



Oh my friend...you never know...


Common sense tells me otherwise.


sevalaricgirl wrote...

Dead Space is okay, not great, especially if you play it on PC which I do. The Sims, well if you're into simulations, I'm not, and Mass Effect 1 was very good, Mass Effect 2 not so much so I wouldn't count that either and if you ask my son, ever sports game they make is screwed up.


You're interjecting your personal opinion. You asked me which franchises did EA not screw up I answered you objectively. Anything else is merely your opinion and nothing more.

Modifié par InvaderErl, 05 mai 2011 - 03:07 .


#372
sevalaricgirl

sevalaricgirl
  • Members
  • 909 messages

InvaderErl wrote...

jakal66 wrote...



Oh my friend...you never know...


Common sense tells me otherwise.


sevalaricgirl wrote...

Dead Space is okay, not great,
especially if you play it on PC which I do. The Sims, well if you're
into simulations, I'm not, and Mass Effect 1 was very good, Mass Effect 2
not so much so I wouldn't count that either and if you ask my son, ever
sports game they make is screwed up.


You're interjecting your personal opinion. You asked me which franchises did EA not screw up I answered you objectively. Anything else is merely your opinion and nothing more.


No you are interjecting your opinion that these are NOT screwed up.  It is an opinion.  Just because a game is purchased doesn't mean it's great.  I own Dead Space 1 and 2 and both Mass Effect games and several other games that I wish I never purchased.  I've also purchased games that got low ratings that I love.  Everything here is opinion.  There is no fact involved in what you are saying or in what I am saying.

#373
SilentNukee

SilentNukee
  • Members
  • 1 665 messages

Annie_Dear wrote...

If it means it'll be more polished, then I'm happy.


DarthCaine wrote...

Image IPB

Oh hey, it's my dream team Image IPB

Mine as well :P Was for all of ME1! Except of course, my Shepard is female. :)

#374
Weiser_Cain

Weiser_Cain
  • Members
  • 1 945 messages
I don't mind the delay, take as long as it takes. But when I read 'larger market opportunity' I hear 'Dumb it down because we think RPG is poison to the dumb masses that play shooters. not RPG fan, they're a bunch of nerds'.
And frankly I'd love it if someone would come in and tell me I wrong, that they are making an RPG, that nothing is being taken out.

#375
InvaderErl

InvaderErl
  • Members
  • 3 884 messages

sevalaricgirl wrote...

No you are interjecting your opinion that these are NOT screwed up.  It is an opinion.  Just because a game is purchased doesn't mean it's great.  I own Dead Space 1 and 2 and both Mass Effect games and several other games that I wish I never purchased.  I've also purchased games that got low ratings that I love.  Everything here is opinion.  There is no fact involved in what you are saying or in what I am saying.



That's nice. Your opinion goes no further than YOU.

The Battlefield/Dead Space/Mass Effect/SIMS series are all financially and critically successfully thus far. Those are facts. That's an OBJECTIVE statement and has nothing to do with my opinion. End of.