Aller au contenu

Photo

DA Is Confirmed As Future IP For EA


233 réponses à ce sujet

#201
Lewie

Lewie
  • Members
  • 963 messages
If Biowares games totally change into franchised sequels thrown out i won't buy any more. I simply won't pay for pure crap.

Bioware don't make bad games. Time will tell. I have absolute faith in Bioware but fear they are getting swallowed up by a bigger company and a forum that most of the time rips them to shreds.

#202
Bratt1204

Bratt1204
  • Members
  • 1 587 messages

the_one_54321 wrote...

MyKingdomCold wrote...

Jean-Funk Van Damme wrote...

Electronic Arts CEO John Riccitiello says...
The first, he said, is pushing EA's stable of popular IP, including FIFA, Madden, Battlefield, Need for Speed, The Sims, Tetris, Dragon Age and other titles.

"We fully intend to make these properties into year-round businesses that lead their sectors across a range of platforms," Riccitiello said.

Basically, it's not BioWare's fault -- it's EA.

so wll we see Dragon Age 25?


We will see "Dragon Age is Now Repetative Overpriced Crap."



:lol::lol: Soooooo true.

#203
PaulSX

PaulSX
  • Members
  • 1 127 messages
this is not a good news, 'one-year round business' is ok for sports or racing games, but one-year round rpg? Hell

#204
lalley

lalley
  • Members
  • 1 messages
I still like the game, can't wait for another

#205
devSin

devSin
  • Members
  • 8 929 messages
I think he's talking about revenue derived year-round instead of just once every few years when a full release comes out. So things like DLC or possibly expansions, maybe merchandising or other tie-ins, and franchise spinoffs (Legends), all of which are earning money between the Dragon Age II and Dragon Age III games (for example).

Even if you disregard the fact that it's simply impossible to create an actual BioWare game every year, I don't think it really makes sense to interpret it that way. He's speaking to using their IP to make recurring profit (whereas now they just try to live one hit to the next, with a bunch of break-even or money-losing filler in between), not trying to flood the market every year with throwaway games that only end up diluting the IP and driving it into the ground (it would probably be the quickest way to shut the BioWare studio down, though).

#206
sympathy4saren

sympathy4saren
  • Members
  • 1 890 messages
Watch...now games are gonna be shoved out at an even faster rate. Blah!!!!!

At least we still have Bethesda

#207
Kilshrek

Kilshrek
  • Members
  • 4 134 messages

sympathy4saren wrote...

Watch...now games are gonna be shoved out at an even faster rate. Blah!!!!!

At least we still have Bethesda


I honestly never rated Bethesda games. FO 3 was the the biggest disappointment since no FO after 2. (to me that is)

#208
A Crusty Knight Of Colour

A Crusty Knight Of Colour
  • Members
  • 7 472 messages

Kilshrek wrote...

sympathy4saren wrote...

Watch...now games are gonna be shoved out at an even faster rate. Blah!!!!!

At least we still have Bethesda


I honestly never rated Bethesda games. FO 3 was the the biggest disappointment since no FO after 2. (to me that is)


Lol, Fallout 2 is probably my fave crpg of all time.

*brofist*

Also, Fallout 3 was a pretty good game. But you just had to pretend that it wasn't a Fallout game. That was the key to enjoying Fallout 3 for me. It was a non-canon spin off. Sadly, that would probably apply to New Vegas, despite NV being a pretty good sequel for Fallout 2.

You should try out Morrowind if you can. Would give you a good taste at what Bethesda's capable of. I honestly can't recommend Oblivion unless they've modded it beyond recognition, but Morrowind is a damn good game even out of the box, imo.

Anyways, I think more Dragon Age is a good thing. We all pretty much like the world, the story, the lore, etc. The games themselves could go one way or another, but I do think it does deserve to be fully fleshed out and it's story told.

Modifié par mrcrusty, 08 mai 2011 - 06:54 .


#209
Esbatty

Esbatty
  • Members
  • 3 760 messages
No Uwe Boll Dragon Age movies. Dear sweet tiny jeebus.

#210
dreadpiratesnugglecakes

dreadpiratesnugglecakes
  • Members
  • 217 messages
Well, hopefully the Witcher 2 will be good..and I can replay my old Bioware titles. Can't wait to see Gaider out there pimping year to year shovelware.

What a way to end Bioware's wonderful run. Like seeing your favorite oscar winning actress start doing adult movies.

Oh well. Other places to spend my money.

#211
Kilshrek

Kilshrek
  • Members
  • 4 134 messages

mrcrusty wrote...

Lol, Fallout 2 is probably my fave crpg of all time.

*brofist*

Also, Fallout 3 was a pretty good game. But you just had to pretend that it wasn't a Fallout game. That was the key to enjoying Fallout 3 for me. It was a non-canon spin off. Sadly, that would probably apply to New Vegas, despite NV being a pretty good sequel for Fallout 2.

You should try out Morrowind if you can. Would give you a good taste at what Bethesda's capable of. I honestly can't recommend Oblivion unless they've modded it beyond recognition, but Morrowind is a damn good game even out of the box, imo.

Anyways, I think more Dragon Age is a good thing. We all pretty much like the world, the story, the lore, etc. The games themselves could go one way or another, but I do think it does deserve to be fully fleshed out and it's story told.


Word.

Yes, there is that, but I don't do well at pretending that a pretend thing isn't pretend. NV actually knew what it took to get close to the Fallout feel, but that game engine...

I may try this Skyrim, since so much fuss is being made over it, but I hear it's going the way of DA 2 as well. Maybe one day I'll pick up Morrowind, because the only two Bethesda games I played were FO 3 and Oblivion, and I can't say I was impressed by either.

I like  The Dragon Age Setting but I don't think I'll sit through another DA 2-esque game. Even my monitor has feelings, y'know.

Esbatty wrote...

No Uwe Boll Dragon Age movies. Dear sweet tiny jeebus.


*Sacrifices a billion goats in the name of all the dark gods to ensure this never ever comes to pass*

Besides I don't know if I could go toe to toe with him in a boxing match if I decide that his latest attempt at a "movie" sucks, again.

#212
A Crusty Knight Of Colour

A Crusty Knight Of Colour
  • Members
  • 7 472 messages
It depends really, Skyrim is becoming more streamlined in some areas like character development, but it's adding complexity in areas like NPC reactivity and hopefully branching questlines which really haven't been done much this side of Daggerfall.

Well, I don't know how many people can "stomach another DA 2", but it certainly deserves a chance. After all, it may be another DA:O.

#213
bEVEsthda

bEVEsthda
  • Members
  • 3 612 messages

the_one_54321 wrote...

MyKingdomCold wrote...

Jean-Funk Van Damme wrote...

Electronic Arts CEO John Riccitiello says...
The first, he said, is pushing EA's stable of popular IP, including FIFA, Madden, Battlefield, Need for Speed, The Sims, Tetris, Dragon Age and other titles.

"We fully intend to make these properties into year-round businesses that lead their sectors across a range of platforms," Riccitiello said.

Basically, it's not BioWare's fault -- it's EA.

so wll we see Dragon Age 25?


We will see "Dragon Age is Now Repetative Overpriced Crap."


It doesn't need to be like the sport franchises. I also think maybe EA is aware that the old sport franchise model is stale, and they are changing it even for their sport games.

He's talking IP here. Dragon Age is a bigger universe than Dragon Age: Origin. So what it could mean is that we get a DA:O "new" game every third year. Episodes using the same engine and much the same artwork, every year. Then, on the side, simpler action RPGs aimed mainly at the consoles, and even the Wii. Other content & games on handhelds, iPhones etc.

#214
Ari87

Ari87
  • Members
  • 54 messages
I never believed the "EA aren't bad guys anymore" nonsense.

#215
Guest_Alistairlover94_*

Guest_Alistairlover94_*
  • Guests

Ari87 wrote...

I never believed the "EA aren't bad guys anymore" nonsense.


Since when have EA ever been good guys?!Posted Image

#216
Oopsieoops

Oopsieoops
  • Members
  • 178 messages

Alistairlover94 wrote...

Ari87 wrote...

I never believed the "EA aren't bad guys anymore" nonsense.


Since when have EA ever been good guys?!Posted Image

A couple of years ago there was drive from EA to change it's public perception, and there were things like publicly commenting that the previous of taking over smaller developers, changing them beyond recognition until they went under, and then firing everybody was wrong. There was even a wave of high profile game developers like John Carmack comming out and saying EA had changed it's ways and was no longer the Evil Empire. Looking back that sounds like a bad joke now lol.

EA... EA never changes.

Modifié par Oopsieoops, 08 mai 2011 - 01:13 .


#217
In Exile

In Exile
  • Members
  • 28 738 messages

FellowerOfOdin wrote...
Yes, DA:RtP was a pretty mediocre game and a sheer disappointment and kick in the nuts for cRPG fans, but we all know that Bioware can do better and as much as I hate DA:RtP, I will be among the first to buy DA3 if it becomes as good as it used to be.


DA: RtP? I assume that's DA2, but what does it stand for?

#218
Merced652

Merced652
  • Members
  • 1 661 messages
rise to power? Not very aptly named.

#219
Guest_Alistairlover94_*

Guest_Alistairlover94_*
  • Guests

Oopsieoops wrote...

Alistairlover94 wrote...

Ari87 wrote...

I never believed the "EA aren't bad guys anymore" nonsense.


Since when have EA ever been good guys?!Posted Image

A couple of years ago there was drive from EA to change it's public perception, and there were things like publicly commenting that the previous of taking over smaller developers, changing them beyond recognition until they went under, and then firing everybody was wrong. There was even a wave of high profile game developers like John Carmack comming out and saying EA had changed it's ways and was no longer the Evil Empire. Looking back that sounds like a bad joke now lol.

EA... EA never changes.

Ron Perlman FTW!



#220
Phaedros

Phaedros
  • Members
  • 656 messages

Alistairlover94 wrote...

Ari87 wrote...

I never believed the "EA aren't bad guys anymore" nonsense.


Since when have EA ever been good guys?!Posted Image


Deluxe Paint IV was ok, things started getting iffy with DPaint V .. B)

#221
neppakyo

neppakyo
  • Members
  • 3 074 messages
Well, back in the 1980's, EA were pretty close to good guys...

#222
Guest_Alistairlover94_*

Guest_Alistairlover94_*
  • Guests

neppakyo wrote...

Well, back in the 1980's, EA were pretty close to good guys...


Really?! I started gaming in the 90s, so I wouldn't know (was born in the 80s, though).

#223
addiction21

addiction21
  • Members
  • 6 066 messages

neppakyo wrote...

Well, back in the 1980's, EA were pretty close to good guys...


Pretty close?

http://chrishecker.c...r_Make_You_Cry?

I dont think you can get much closer then that. Too bad..

#224
neppakyo

neppakyo
  • Members
  • 3 074 messages
addiction beat me to it with that link.

Now EA is about "Can a computer make us a sh!tload of money?"

#225
Guest_Alistairlover94_*

Guest_Alistairlover94_*
  • Guests

neppakyo wrote...

addiction beat me to it with that link.

Now EA is about "Can a computer make us a sh!tload of money?"


Too true...