737 réponses à ce sujet

[The Spamming Troll]

im confused.

if the reapers created TIM, that means the reapers created shepard?

[corporal doody]

ExtremeOne wrote...

If this is wrong info wouldn't Bioware or EA ask for PC Gamer to make a correction to the info in the mag .

nah..it gets people talking...and gains more interest

[Tyrannosaurus Rex]

1136342t54 wrote...

Lizardviking wrote...

1136342t54 wrote...

The Collectors could easily take down Turian Cruisers

I hope you also are aware that a heavy-frigate could take out the collector cruiser in a straight up fight?

I hope you are aware that same Heavy Cruiser has the most advanced armor, weaponry, shields, and engines. It also has an actual AI (Reaper enhanced AI) and the best pilot in the Alliance Navy flying it.

Heavy Frigate isn't the right word for it.

The Normandy SR-2 can be fully un-upgraded and still easily crush the cruiser. And remember, it's shields had just been severely weakened from going through the debris field. Sure it had Joker and EDI. But if one single heavy-frigate completely wrecked the cruiser, then I am sure a few normal alliance frigates or cruisers would do the job just fine.

[didymos1120]

ExtremeOne wrote...

If this is wrong info wouldn't Bioware or EA ask for PC Gamer to make a correction to the info in the mag .

What, you think they get an editorial pass on every article written about their games? 

[The-Person]

ExtremeOne wrote...

If this is wrong info wouldn't Bioware or EA ask for PC Gamer to make a correction to the info in the mag .

It is too late for that, the company who makes the magazine is not going to recall all the magazine they printed. Too much money is lost.

[ExtremeOne]

1136342t54 wrote...

ExtremeOne wrote...

If this is wrong info wouldn't Bioware or EA ask for PC Gamer to make a correction to the info in the mag .

Bioware is too shrewd for that. They are likely not going to confirm or deny the information until E3 or a later date.

  


Ok then if they will not ask for a retraction or a correction .  Then if they do not want to clear up what part of the pc gamer article is wrong .  Its bull sh*t either its true or its not true . Which is it Bioware its a simple question 

[1136342t54_]

Lizardviking wrote...

1136342t54 wrote...

Lizardviking wrote...

1136342t54 wrote...

The Collectors could easily take down Turian Cruisers

I hope you also are aware that a heavy-frigate could take out the collector cruiser in a straight up fight?

I hope you are aware that same Heavy Cruiser has the most advanced armor, weaponry, shields, and engines. It also has an actual AI (Reaper enhanced AI) and the best pilot in the Alliance Navy flying it.

Heavy Frigate isn't the right word for it.

The Normandy SR-2 can be fully un-upgraded and still easily crush the cruiser. And remember, it's shields had just been severely weakened from going through the debris field. Sure it had Joker and EDI. But if one single heavy-frigate completely wrecked the cruiser, then I am sure a few normal alliance frigates or cruisers would do the job just fine.

Maybe but remember Turian cruisers were easily destroyed by the Collector Cruiser without taking any damage. The only reason why the unupgraded Normandy was even able to take it out was by getting into knife fight range using a frigate that is faster than any other Frigate out there and using Javeling Torpedoes that heavily damaged the Normandy SR2 that was already armored as good as a cruiser or better.

My opinion. The SR2 unupgraded won by speed and maneuverability. It would make sense since the Turian Cruisers were immediately eliminated by the Collector ship without trouble.

[hex23]

I've just skimmed this thread but....Cerberus working with the Reapers =/= TIM and the full Cerberus organization is working with the Reapers. Half the time TIM doesn't seem to know what his group is doing, the Reapers could've indoctrinated 100-200 Cerberus troops, enough to cause Shepard significant problems in ME3, without having anything to do with TIM, the core group, or Cerberus pro-human agenda.

[ExtremeOne]

The-Person wrote...

ExtremeOne wrote...

If this is wrong info wouldn't Bioware or EA ask for PC Gamer to make a correction to the info in the mag .

It is too late for that, the company who makes the magazine is not going to recall all the magazine they printed. Too much money is lost.

   


I hope we can get a answer to this 

[1136342t54_]

ExtremeOne wrote...

1136342t54 wrote...

ExtremeOne wrote...

If this is wrong info wouldn't Bioware or EA ask for PC Gamer to make a correction to the info in the mag .

Bioware is too shrewd for that. They are likely not going to confirm or deny the information until E3 or a later date.

  


Ok then if they will not ask for a retraction or a correction .  Then if they do not want to clear up what part of the pc gamer article is wrong .  Its bull sh*t either its true or its not true . Which is it Bioware its a simple question 

Bioware obviously likes to let fans get pissed off at things about the game (Delaying ME3, Cerberus probably working for the Reapers etc.) and explain things much later. I doubt they would answer the question with E3 so close by.

[Tyrannosaurus Rex]

1136342t54 wrote...
Maybe but remember Turian cruisers were easily destroyed by the Collector Cruiser without taking any damage. The only reason why the unupgraded Normandy was even able to take it out was by getting into knife fight range using a frigate that is faster than any other Frigate out there and using Javeling Torpedoes that heavily damaged the Normandy SR2 that was already armored as good as a cruiser or better.

My opinion. The SR2 unupgraded won by speed and maneuverability. It would make sense since the Turian Cruisers were immediately eliminated by the Collector ship without trouble.

I would say the only reason the Collector cruiser had any succses is because it always managed to get the jumo on the opposition.

[ExtremeOne]

1136342t54 wrote...

ExtremeOne wrote...

1136342t54 wrote...

ExtremeOne wrote...

If this is wrong info wouldn't Bioware or EA ask for PC Gamer to make a correction to the info in the mag .

Bioware is too shrewd for that. They are likely not going to confirm or deny the information until E3 or a later date.

  


Ok then if they will not ask for a retraction or a correction .  Then if they do not want to clear up what part of the pc gamer article is wrong .  Its bull sh*t either its true or its not true . Which is it Bioware its a simple question 

Bioware obviously likes to let fans get pissed off at things about the game (Delaying ME3, Cerberus probably working for the Reapers etc.) and explain things much later. I doubt they would answer the question with E3 so close by.

 



Then at E3 I hope we get a answer .  I am betting that PC gamer has the info right 

[didymos1120]

ExtremeOne wrote...

Ok then if they will not ask for a retraction or a correction .  Then if they do not want to clear up what part of the pc gamer article is wrong .  Its bull sh*t either its true or its not true . Which is it Bioware its a simple question 

Uh-huh. They're gonna read this and go "ZOMG!!  We better answer that ExtremeOne guy!  I mean, what if he makes Ash stay on the Normandy the whole time in ME3 because we refused to answer?  Or rants on the forum? We cannot let this question go unanswered!"

[1136342t54_]

Lizardviking wrote...

I would say the only reason the Collector cruiser had any succses is because it always managed to get the jumo on the opposition.

If thats true (its possible) than that supports some of my statements. The Collectors advantage is surprise and advanced weaponry. They will continuosly be superior and better at engagements as long as the Council can't find them. Without Shepard the Collectors could easily just keep attacking and will eventually be done with completing the Human Reaper.

Of course some people seem to think that a Reaper is a push over.

[Tyrannosaurus Rex]

1136342t54 wrote...

Lizardviking wrote...

I would say the only reason the Collector cruiser had any succses is because it always managed to get the jumo on the opposition.

If thats true (its possible) than that supports some of my statements. The Collectors advantage is surprise and advanced weaponry. They will continuosly be superior and better at engagements as long as the Council can't find them. Without Shepard the Collectors could easily just keep attacking and will eventually be done with completing the Human Reaper.

Of course some people seem to think that a Reaper is a push over.

But that kind of tactic is only going to work on outlying colonies?

[1136342t54_]

Lizardviking wrote...

1136342t54 wrote...

Lizardviking wrote...

I would say the only reason the Collector cruiser had any succses is because it always managed to get the jumo on the opposition.

If thats true (its possible) than that supports some of my statements. The Collectors advantage is surprise and advanced weaponry. They will continuosly be superior and better at engagements as long as the Council can't find them. Without Shepard the Collectors could easily just keep attacking and will eventually be done with completing the Human Reaper.

Of course some people seem to think that a Reaper is a push over.

But that kind of tactic is only going to work on outlying colonies?

Remember Eden Prime!

It seemed like the Alliance have trouble to responding to an invasion force attacking a major colony world. They could only send one Frigate which already was extremely fast for its era.

[laudable11]

Cerberus working with the reapers?...hmm what if TIM isnt running Cerberus anymore?

What if something...happend? Could TIM have lost control of Cerberus?

Who knows, we will have to wait and see.

[The-Person]

ExtremeOne wrote...

1136342t54 wrote...

ExtremeOne wrote...

1136342t54 wrote...

ExtremeOne wrote...

If this is wrong info wouldn't Bioware or EA ask for PC Gamer to make a correction to the info in the mag .

Bioware is too shrewd for that. They are likely not going to confirm or deny the information until E3 or a later date.

  


Ok then if they will not ask for a retraction or a correction .  Then if they do not want to clear up what part of the pc gamer article is wrong .  Its bull sh*t either its true or its not true . Which is it Bioware its a simple question 

Bioware obviously likes to let fans get pissed off at things about the game (Delaying ME3, Cerberus probably working for the Reapers etc.) and explain things much later. I doubt they would answer the question with E3 so close by.

 



Then at E3 I hope we get a answer .  I am betting that PC gamer has the info right 

Or he is putting his speculation into the article. Why Bioware tell one magazine that it is a secret, but tell another magazine?

[Vertigo_1]

The-Person wrote...
Or he is putting his speculation into the article. Why Bioware tell one magazine that it is a secret, but tell another magazine?

They could just have made a speculation then put it up for sales perhaps

The cover says:
REVEALED: A GALACTIC BOMBSHELL

Modifié par Vertigo_1, 05 mai 2011 - 11:53 .

[ExtremeOne]

The-Person wrote...

ExtremeOne wrote...

1136342t54 wrote...

ExtremeOne wrote...

1136342t54 wrote...

ExtremeOne wrote...

If this is wrong info wouldn't Bioware or EA ask for PC Gamer to make a correction to the info in the mag .

Bioware is too shrewd for that. They are likely not going to confirm or deny the information until E3 or a later date.

  


Ok then if they will not ask for a retraction or a correction .  Then if they do not want to clear up what part of the pc gamer article is wrong .  Its bull sh*t either its true or its not true . Which is it Bioware its a simple question 

Bioware obviously likes to let fans get pissed off at things about the game (Delaying ME3, Cerberus probably working for the Reapers etc.) and explain things much later. I doubt they would answer the question with E3 so close by.

 



Then at E3 I hope we get a answer .  I am betting that PC gamer has the info right 

Or he is putting his speculation into the article. Why Bioware tell one magazine that it is a secret, but tell another magazine?

   



I will be curious to see if the next info that comes out on the game is wrong or not .  It does not make any sense but maybe at E3 we will get a answer 

[didymos1120]

1136342t54 wrote...

Remember Eden Prime!

It seemed like the Alliance have trouble to responding to an invasion force attacking a major colony world. They could only send one Frigate which already was extremely fast for its era.

They didn't send any frigate to aid the colony.  The Normandy just happened to be heading there anyway, and it was all over before reinforcements could have arrived.

Modifié par didymos1120, 05 mai 2011 - 11:57 .

[Babli]

So we´ve got whole squad from ME1 except for Wrex back as full-time squadmates?
I am afraid that whoever else will be on team, will die of boredom on the Normandy except for Mordin and Legion. I´d love to have these guys back in team.

And I really hope that Cerberus thing is more complex than it sounds.

And no new LI? One of my Shepards is single and WANTS Chakwas

Modifié par Babli, 05 mai 2011 - 11:57 .

[FlamingFlyingV]

..............

Bioware....

You disappoint me

Well, if this is real, there goes my single Shep runthrough for Joker >.>

[Da Mecca]

Making the concussive shot actually be effected by the type of ammo your using was a good move. A lot of possibilities with that.

I think I'll stay a soldier.