can you pm me the link plz...
PC Gamer info on ME3 **** (Heavy Spoilers duh) ****
Débuté par
Vertigo_1
, mai 05 2011 08:44
Retour en haut
#27
Posté 05 mai 2011 - 09:07
Tyrannosaurus Rex
-
- Members
- 10 781 messages
gorrillasnake wrote...
Cerberus working for the Reapers??
I had hoped Bioware would avoid using the idiot ball again.
#28
Posté 05 mai 2011 - 09:07
gorrillasnake
-
- Members
- 516 messages
man cheating is gonna bite you!!!! in the AZZ
#29
Posté 05 mai 2011 - 09:07
Conquerthecity
-
- Members
- 1 065 messages
Looks like I made a single Shepard for no reason.
#30
Posté 05 mai 2011 - 09:07
Sphynx118
-
- Members
- 938 messages
Not at all:PThank YOU for the heads up on the articleVertigo_1 wrote...
Sphynx118 wrote...
It took me literally 15 sec from reading this to finding the scans. Its not fake or trolling-.- You people just fail at the internet. Badly.
Thanks I try not to troll really! :innocent:
#31
Posté 05 mai 2011 - 09:07
Spacelion
-
- Members
- 169 messages
Simultaneous, international Tali fanbase squee in three....two....
#32
Posté 05 mai 2011 - 09:08
ExtremeOne
-
- Members
- 2 829 messages
candidate88766 wrote...
Well we don't know WHY Cerberus is working with the Reapers so it hasn't been spoiled that much. Although I hope Bioware doesn't give out much more story info - every article seems to have a little bit more and I'm not convinced Bioware have learned their lesson from spoiling virtually all of ME2 yet.
Also, for people saying it makes no sense for Cerberus to side with the Reapers: their goal is secure human dominance, and the best way to do that may be to either bargain with the Reapers (and probably get betrayed by them) or by allowing humanity to be Reaper-ified (which probably won't be what Cerberus was expecting and will probably be some kind of betrayal anyway). E
No it does not make any sense at all based on the story of Mass Effect 2. It is stupid and exactly what I assumed it would be the dumb indocunation story . Thank you Bioware for basically saying player choice does not matters and for telling us renegade players are choices are worthless . Its clear ME 2 was a mere side quest game
#33
Posté 05 mai 2011 - 09:08
AdmiralCheez
-
- Members
- 12 990 messages
inb4 collector base wangst--GOD DAMN YOU EXTREMEONE
Modifié par AdmiralCheez, 05 mai 2011 - 09:08 .
#34
Guest_mrsph_*
Posté 05 mai 2011 - 09:08
Guest_mrsph_*
Guest_mrsph_*
-
- Guests
AdmiralCheez wrote...
inb4 collector base wangst
RUINED FOREVER!
#35
Posté 05 mai 2011 - 09:08
candidate88766
-
- Members
- 570 messages
Apparently every weapon from ME2 returns, so here's hoping we get to keep the dlc ones too - lots of them have been in the screenshots after all.
#36
Posté 05 mai 2011 - 09:08
gorrillasnake
-
- Members
- 516 messages
this is a Metal gear solid Twist!!! (if you havent played MGS i....ts full of twist!)
Lizardviking wrote...
gorrillasnake wrote...
Cerberus working for the Reapers??
I had hoped Bioware would avoid using the idiot ball again.
#37
Posté 05 mai 2011 - 09:09
Sphynx118
-
- Members
- 938 messages
"If you werent faithful, thats going to come to a head at the worst possible time"
I am intrigued
I am intrigued
#38
Guest_mrsph_*
Posté 05 mai 2011 - 09:09
Guest_mrsph_*
Guest_mrsph_*
-
- Guests
Now all they need to do is confirm: Jacob (Oh, god please), Mordin, Zaeed (doubtful, but I hope!) and Legion and I'll be a happy camper.
#39
Posté 05 mai 2011 - 09:09
candidate88766
-
- Members
- 570 messages
ExtremeOne wrote...
candidate88766 wrote...
Well we don't know WHY Cerberus is working with the Reapers so it hasn't been spoiled that much. Although I hope Bioware doesn't give out much more story info - every article seems to have a little bit more and I'm not convinced Bioware have learned their lesson from spoiling virtually all of ME2 yet.
Also, for people saying it makes no sense for Cerberus to side with the Reapers: their goal is secure human dominance, and the best way to do that may be to either bargain with the Reapers (and probably get betrayed by them) or by allowing humanity to be Reaper-ified (which probably won't be what Cerberus was expecting and will probably be some kind of betrayal anyway). E
No it does not make any sense at all based on the story of Mass Effect 2. It is stupid and exactly what I assumed it would be the dumb indocunation story . Thank you Bioware for basically saying player choice does not matters and for telling us renegade players are choices are worthless . Its clear ME 2 was a mere side quest game
You don't know that for a fact. Maybe Cerberus disocvered that the Reaper plan is actually what is best for humanity? No indoctrination, just a deal - Cerberus take out Shepard and the Reapers do whatever they do. Wait for the full story before complaining.
#40
Posté 05 mai 2011 - 09:10
ExtremeOne
-
- Members
- 2 829 messages
what the hell was the point of Mass Effect 2 now . I
#41
Posté 05 mai 2011 - 09:10
Chris Priestly
-
- Members
- 7 259 messages
While there is indeed an article in PC Gamer, keep in mind unless the article says "Casey Hudson said..." or similar, what they are writing is their take on the information they have seen (this applies to ALL media/magazines/websites, etc). Don't get too worked up on any one item until you hear it confirmed by BioWare someplace.
#43
Posté 05 mai 2011 - 09:11
Tyrannosaurus Rex
-
- Members
- 10 781 messages
Sphynx118 wrote...
"If you werent faithful, thats going to come to a head at the worst possible time"
I am intrigued
I really dislike the sound of that. Liara or Ashley/Kaidan should be mature enough not to shoot Shepard in the back or do something incredible stupid because Shepard decided to move on. <_<
Modifié par Lizardviking, 05 mai 2011 - 09:14 .
#44
Guest_mrsph_*
Posté 05 mai 2011 - 09:11
Guest_mrsph_*
Guest_mrsph_*
-
- Guests
We know Cerberus is working for the reapers. We do not know how this comes about. Be patient, you may be surprised.
#45
Posté 05 mai 2011 - 09:12
shnizzler93
-
- Members
- 1 637 messages
ExtremeOne wrote...
what the hell was the point of Mass Effect 2 now . I
...forgot to end this sentence.
#46
Posté 05 mai 2011 - 09:13
Vertigo_1
-
- Members
- 5 934 messages
Chris Priestly wrote...
While there is indeed an article in PC Gamer, keep in mind unless the article says "Casey Hudson said..." or similar, what they are writing is their take on the information they have seen (this applies to ALL media/magazines/websites, etc). Don't get too worked up on any one item until you hear it confirmed by BioWare someplace.
Agreed although they stated they watched a demo?
#47
Posté 05 mai 2011 - 09:13
Tamahome560
-
- Members
- 934 messages
Oh my god, this seems more bullsh*t than PS3M was ... or Bioware just trolled us with not revealing why Cerberus is after Shepard... I wouldn't take it at fact value just like the whole Heavy Melee class
Modifié par Tamahome560, 05 mai 2011 - 09:16 .
#48
Posté 05 mai 2011 - 09:14
Hathur
-
- Members
- 2 841 messages
The part about Cerberus working with the Reapers? I find that ... unlikely... would be hard to have that make any sense without some lame convoluted explanation.
#49
Posté 05 mai 2011 - 09:14
ExtremeOne
-
- Members
- 2 829 messages
candidate88766 wrote...
ExtremeOne wrote...
candidate88766 wrote...
Well we don't know WHY Cerberus is working with the Reapers so it hasn't been spoiled that much. Although I hope Bioware doesn't give out much more story info - every article seems to have a little bit more and I'm not convinced Bioware have learned their lesson from spoiling virtually all of ME2 yet.
Also, for people saying it makes no sense for Cerberus to side with the Reapers: their goal is secure human dominance, and the best way to do that may be to either bargain with the Reapers (and probably get betrayed by them) or by allowing humanity to be Reaper-ified (which probably won't be what Cerberus was expecting and will probably be some kind of betrayal anyway). E
No it does not make any sense at all based on the story of Mass Effect 2. It is stupid and exactly what I assumed it would be the dumb indocunation story . Thank you Bioware for basically saying player choice does not matters and for telling us renegade players are choices are worthless . Its clear ME 2 was a mere side quest game
You don't know that for a fact. Maybe Cerberus disocvered that the Reaper plan is actually what is best for humanity? No indoctrination, just a deal - Cerberus take out Shepard and the Reapers do whatever they do. Wait for the full story before complaining.
I'm reading the scans . It clearly says that Cerberus is working with the reapers and giving the base to them in 2 was giving it to the enemy . So Bioware basically is saying Mass Effect 2's story of Cerberus changing and working with them was total bull sh*t . More so us renegade players are being told in so many words our choices do not matter all . Its clear what Bioware did was they pleased and served the anti Cerberus fans and paragin fans . Oh that idea about player choice in Mass Effect games matter thats also full of sh*t as well .
#50
Posté 05 mai 2011 - 09:15
candidate88766
-
- Members
- 570 messages
Chris Priestly wrote...
While there is indeed an article in PC Gamer, keep in mind unless the article says "Casey Hudson said..." or similar, what they are writing is their take on the information they have seen (this applies to ALL media/magazines/websites, etc). Don't get too worked up on any one item until you hear it confirmed by BioWare someplace.
So PC Gamer may have misquoted someone about Cerberus working with the Reapers? That should lay some of the complaining to rest.
Bear in mind people that when we were told Cerberus was working against Shepard the magazine may've assumed that meant working with the Reapers. It seems we don't actually know.
Can we assume Tali, Liara and Garrus are back as squadmates now though Chris?
