117 réponses à ce sujet

[Raiil]

If I were into chicks? Sure, why not. As it stands, if male Shep had the right attitude (via paragon/renegade), I'd go for him too. Hell, I'd be intrigued by the idea of a guy I wouldn't have to pretend to be all flimsy and delicate around. Any guy who needs that to feel attractive is boring.

[NanQuan]

What's this "if I were a man" stuff? Pssh, I'd go gay for femshep.  She's a total bamf.


Though like it was pointed out before, doubt any of us would have a shot.

[Lapis Lazuli]

Buggirl70 wrote...

Lapis Lazuli wrote...
I didn't say being better at chess is a turnoff. I said knocking dudes out with one punch is. Knocking dudes out with one punch is a sign of lacking femininity.

That is your subjective opinion.

Standards, culturally speaking, vary a great deal on what is considered feminine. There was a time where being a woman in the workplace was considered a very 'unfeminine' thing to be doing. Who knows, perhaps by 2185, peoples perceptions as to what is feminine may have changed.

Turn off's are subjective, in case you haven't heard, and I wouldn't use anybody else's hypothetical standards. I would use my own, but that's just me...

What is objective is the fact that I reject the notion that 'insecurity' plays a part in this.

[jeweledleah]

Lapis Lazuli wrote...

jeweledleah wrote...

if I were a guy... scars wouldn't bother me, because they just add character,

errr....if you were a guy...errr.....

or a lesbian woman.  what, you subscribe to the theory that there are no girls on the internets?  oh you poor dear, no wonder you ask such silly questions

limited experience in bed means nothing - anyone can learn to be good in bed, as long as they are willing and eager, drinking - well she could drink for the both of us then, assuming that she'd chose to drink in a first place, and as for strength - why is this a problem. just because someone can do that doesn't mean they should or will, or are you saying that all femsheps are abusive individuals unable to control their strength?

femshep is a very broad definition anyways, just like maleshep. they could have any personality at all, and if the personality, values, attitudes mesh? why the heck not?

there's quite a difference between 'strength' and punching power second only to Mike Tyson and George Foreman. Do you understand the concept of 'turn offs'?

no, but you apparently don't understand the concept of "to each their own"  your turn offs are not everyone's turn offs.  and again, having a punching power of Mike Tyson and George foreman doesn't mean it will be used on you.  I think that feminine= weaker is a load of bull, perpetuated by insecure boys who have nothing to offer to an intelligent woman.

Modifié par jeweledleah, 08 mai 2011 - 04:51 .

[chq]

Jennifer Hale's voice makes me melt...

[lolwut666]

Like I said earlier, I'd rather live, but not because I'm afraid of her.

Who knows who might come after me to get to her.

Plus, unless we're gonna have a long-distance relationship, I'm gonna have to be aboard the Normandy to be with her, and that means getting into all sorts of trouble.

I'd rather not get shot by a Blue Suns merc or abducted by Collectors.

I wouldn't mind it if I were a badass, but since I'm not...

Modifié par lolwut666, 08 mai 2011 - 04:53 .

[PrinceLionheart]

I dunno, if some of Jacob's romance dialogye is anything to go buy, FemShep seems like the type of girl who wants to "fix" her boyfriend.

[CajNatalie]

My Paragade Vanguard femshep...?
Of course. She's too damn awesome to turn down.

I would not be of any interest to her, of course. Plus, she's not real.

Also I happen to already have a girlfriend, as little as I may be in contact with her... the fact remains.

[Fates end]

Well, like others have said, it would have to depend on the femshep in question. I probably wouldn't try to date one of the scarier renegade femsheps, as they seem to enjoy pushing people out windows and randomly shooting things.

But yeah, depending on the femshep, sure, I'd try to date her. (Assuming she'd date me Which is a pretty big assumption lol.)

[jeweledleah]

PrinceLionheart wrote...

I dunno, if some of Jacob's romance dialogye is anything to go buy, FemShep seems like the type of girl who wants to "fix" her boyfriend.

not necessarily.  see you can play Shepard in a variety of ways.  the only thing they all have in common is being in the military, specificaly having designation of n7 rank of leutenant commander, their age, the fact that they are strong and fit, can fight well, some are more charismatic then others, but all are concidered to be natural leaders in posession of ability to inspire others to follow them, and they eventualy end up saving the universe.   everything else is more or less up to the player.  so you can play your femshep as someone who wants to fix her boyfriend, or you can play her as someone who accepts decision and choices of others and isntead of trying to change their minds - asks them what would they prefer to do.

[lovgreno]

The paragade and paragon Femshep yes. Renegade FemShep, no way, even though those evil scars are kind of cool.

[Darkhour]

I'd have to get some of those bone weave and skin fiber upgrades. That way I could still beat her up if she got out of hand.

[Bugsie]

Lapis Lazuli wrote...
Turn off's are subjective, in case you haven't heard, and I wouldn't use anybody else's hypothetical standards. I would use my own, but that's just me...

What is objective is the fact that I reject the notion that 'insecurity' plays a part in this.

Thanks for pointing that out.  I had no idea that people's opinions on things were subjective. 

And you are already using someone elses standards, and incorporated them as your own.  You just don't realise it yet.

[shnizzler93]

Yes

[Confused-Shepard]

Lapis Lazuli wrote...

diskoh wrote...

Lapis Lazuli wrote...

I find it fascinating that if I said smoking was a turnoff, nobody would say sh*t, but if I say knocking dudes out like Oscar De La Hoya is a turnoff, I get insulted.

Disliking smoking isn't a sign of insecurity. Disliking someone because they're more capable than you is.

I didn't say being better at chess is a turnoff. I said knocking dudes out with one punch is. Knocking dudes out with one punch is a sign of lacking femininity.

That is the lamest excuse I have ever heard.  The 17th Century called, they want their dainty & innocent women back. Being intimdated by a woman of suficient physical prowres is a sign of lacking masculinity

Hell I would have a sexy sparring session with FemShep like Garrus suggested. 

Modifié par Confused-Shepard, 08 mai 2011 - 08:40 .

[Lapis Lazuli]

jeweledleah wrote...

no, but you apparently don't understand the concept of "to each their own"  your turn offs are not everyone's turn offs.  and again, having a punching power of Mike Tyson and George foreman doesn't mean it will be used on you.  I think that feminine= weaker is a load of bull, perpetuated by insecure boys who have nothing to offer to an intelligent woman.

When did I impose my preference on anyone else? The only imposition is coming from you and other like you who are telling me what I can't consider a turnoff. And I never said anything about something being used on me. And Feminie=stronger is a load of bull. I'm wouldn't be interested in the first female linebacker in the NFL, some guys yes, me no.

[Lapis Lazuli]

Confused-Shepard wrote...

Lapis Lazuli wrote...

diskoh wrote...

Lapis Lazuli wrote...

I find it fascinating that if I said smoking was a turnoff, nobody would say sh*t, but if I say knocking dudes out like Oscar De La Hoya is a turnoff, I get insulted.

Disliking smoking isn't a sign of insecurity. Disliking someone because they're more capable than you is.

I didn't say being better at chess is a turnoff. I said knocking dudes out with one punch is. Knocking dudes out with one punch is a sign of lacking femininity.

That is the lamest excuse I have ever heard.  The 17th Century called, they want their dainty & innocent women back. Being intimdated by a woman of suficient physical prowres is a sign of lacking masculinity

Hell I would have a sexy sparring session with FemShep like Garrus suggested. 

Nothing but imposition and ad hominum.

[Lapis Lazuli]

Confused-Shepard wrote...



The 17th Century called, they want their dainty & innocent women back.

I'm not allowed to like dainty and innocent females.

[lovgreno]

Lapis Lazuli wrote...Knocking dudes out with one punch is a sign of lacking femininity.

Depends on who you ask. What being able to knock out dudes in one punch is a sign of is good health and self esteem and I think that is something most of us find attractive. In fact I do belive most guys and gals likes a tough guy/gal.

[jeweledleah]

Lapis Lazuli wrote...

jeweledleah wrote...

no, but you apparently don't understand the concept of "to each their own"  your turn offs are not everyone's turn offs.  and again, having a punching power of Mike Tyson and George foreman doesn't mean it will be used on you.  I think that feminine= weaker is a load of bull, perpetuated by insecure boys who have nothing to offer to an intelligent woman.

When did I impose my preference on anyone else? The only imposition is coming from you and other like you who are telling me what I can't consider a turnoff. And I never said anything about something being used on me. And Feminie=stronger is a load of bull. I'm wouldn't be interested in the first female linebacker in the NFL, some guys yes, me no.

and yet you found it nessesary to try and refute MY opinion when originaly stated becasue apparently since my turn offs are different from your turn offs, and therefore I must not know the meaning of the word.

you can prefer whatever you like, but you need to realize that if you ask people for their opinions and end up getting some that don't match yours?  don't try to tell them that their opinions are wrong.  you spent half this thread trying to claim that people who actualy find femshep atractive - are wrong.

I concider femshep feminine enough, I don't think that being stronger then a partner in a relationship somehow makes that relationship undesirable, there's nothing wrong with some scars - beauty is in a eye of the beholder anyways, I don't think that so called traditional gender roles have any bearing on individual desirability, and I think that secure individuals will have no issues with partner who can match or outdo them, because relationship is not a competition, its a partnership.

[Confused-Shepard]

Lapis Lazuli wrote...

Confused-Shepard wrote...



The 17th Century called, they want their dainty & innocent women back.

I'm not allowed to like dainty and innocent females.

Not at all. Rather you expect all women to be like that when in fact soicety has grown and there are less gender restrictions than back in the day. You could say you are turned off my tough women but saying they are not femenine just because they can push back when needed is just insulting 

[Lapis Lazuli]

lovgreno wrote...

Lapis Lazuli wrote...Knocking dudes out with one punch is a sign of lacking femininity.

Depends on who you ask. What being able to knock out dudes in one punch is a sign of is good health and self esteem and I think that is something most of us find attractive. In fact I do belive most guys and gals likes a tough guy/gal.

But wait! A heterosexual woman who likes a tough guy has something wrong with her. I've been told that if I prefer a traditionally feminine woman then there is something wrong with me (i.e. insecure), therefore a heterosexual woman who prefers a traditionally masculine man has something wrong with her.

[lovgreno]

Lapis Lazuli wrote...

But wait! A heterosexual woman who likes a tough guy has something wrong with her. I've been told that if I prefer a traditionally feminine woman then there is something wrong with me (i.e. insecure), therefore a heterosexual woman who prefers a traditionally masculine man has something wrong with her.

You can like whatever kind of women you prefer as long as it's legal. Myself I try to see something attractive in most kinds of women as I belive variation is a good thing. And the stronger, both physicaly and mentaly, the better. But each to their own.

Modifié par lovgreno, 08 mai 2011 - 09:24 .

[Marta Rio]

I dunno about femshep or non-default maleshep, but I'd definitely turn down Sheploo. Maybe all the amusing memes/other fan nonsense are responsible, but Sheploo gives me the creeps ("RapeFace" anyone?).

[Lapis Lazuli]

Confused-Shepard wrote...

Lapis Lazuli wrote...

Confused-Shepard wrote...



The 17th Century called, they want their dainty & innocent women back.

I'm not allowed to like dainty and innocent females.

Not at all. Rather you expect all women to be like that when in fact soicety has grown and there are less gender restrictions than back in the day. You could say you are turned off my tough women but saying they are not femenine just because they can push back when needed is just insulting 

WTF, when did I say all women? I'm talking about the qualities that I prefer.

Modifié par Lapis Lazuli, 08 mai 2011 - 09:30 .