me2 mini-game speed issue
#1
Posté 09 mai 2011 - 01:31
I have tried all sorts of issues from changing my mouse speed as well as my resolution/
The issue is for the pattern matching. I find that since I have to cick on the little white dots.
No matter what I try I can not hit the next button in time.
It becomes rather frustrating. Since I have not been able to make it work I have skipped openinng safes.
Until I came up agaisnt a mission critical one during the Thief's mission.
In ME1 I had no problems with the mini games since they were all key board based.
Altoough the option was to use the Gel also came in handy.
Since other games such as Medal of Honor give me the option of slowing down-game through the console.
I was able to play it at the top level.
Since I had also payed some money to upgrade my system, to play me2, I feel let down that there is no console option.
Is there anyway that i can adjust the game speed to help this issue.
Since bioware is one of my favoite studios I would feel let down,
------------------------
System Stuff
me2 1.02
Card name: ATI Radeon HD 4300/4500 Series
Win 7 64
Processor: AMD Phenom II X4 840 Processor (4 CPUs), ~3.2GHz
Memory: 4096MB RAM
Available OS Memory: 4096MB RAM
Page File: 1875MB used, 6313MB available
Windows Dir: C:\\Windows.
#2
Posté 11 mai 2011 - 02:51
Refer to the modding thread here for the how-to, and the utilities you need to do so.
http://social.biowar...8/index/5055832
This is what you will need;
Under:
[SFXGame.SFXGameModeBase]
Bindings=( Name="Left", Command="SloMo -5 | OnRelease SloMo 1" )
Note: You can change the -5 to -10, or any other negative number, depending on what speed you want. When you press the left arrow key, it will slow down what is being rendered by the game engine. I have not tested this, it is based purely on theoretical knowledge of the game engine.
#3
Posté 13 mai 2011 - 12:09
#4
Posté 16 mai 2011 - 12:23
The Basic, Raw Specifications aren't really a good indicator in this case except when you see the huge difference in the memory system bandwidth. The newer card just doesn't have what it needs to move the graphics in and out of its VRAM better than at a very slow rate.
www.gpureview.com/show_cards.php
Incidentally, desktop video graphics cards have been a tremendous bargain for the mid-range for the past year and a half to two years or so; there's just no need to suffer with such a bad video card, unless you happen to have a laptop (dead end there -- in order to get prices down, laptops have become disposables that hardly have any useful upgrade options from a gaming point of view).
Modifié par Gorath Alpha, 16 mai 2011 - 12:55 .
#5
Posté 08 juin 2011 - 07:22
System
Nvidia PNY Geforce 210 1 GB http://www.newegg.co...N82E16814133320
Win 7 32-bit
Res : 1632x1014
#6
Posté 08 juin 2011 - 07:49
You'll have to replace the video card, or if you have a very, VERY low screen resolution choice, go to that. The 210 is just bog-slow, and the game uses a graphics feedback system that simply doesn't work with such terrible cards.The 210 is far worse than the card that the OP needed to replace starting this message thread.Gorath Alpha wrote...
You have a very low quality. slow graphics device.
Incidentally, desktop video graphics cards have been a tremendous bargain for the mid-range for the past year and a half to two years or so; there's just no need to suffer with such a bad video card, unless you happen to have a laptop (dead end there -- in order to get prices down, laptops have become disposables that hardly have any useful upgrade options from a gaming point of view).
www.gpureview.com/show_cards.php
As you can easily see when the minimum is compared to that awful 210, it's behind on every shared measurement. It has only 25% of the bandwidth, only 69% of the pixel fill rate, and only on texture fill rate is it "close", at 92% of the minimum card's performance.
Modifié par Gorath Alpha, 08 juin 2011 - 08:44 .
#7
Posté 08 juin 2011 - 08:02
EDIT
As of now any other res will cut any game off my screen. even a simple 800x600.
Modifié par ETermin, 08 juin 2011 - 08:03 .
#8
Posté 08 juin 2011 - 08:44
Take a look at this. It's not really a "full power" version, since DDR2 RAM has replaced the GDDR3 it's supposed to have, but this is a Radeon HD 4670 for only $30 after the rebate!
www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx
As long as I had Newegg's page open, I called up everything listed for under $50, and over $25, six of their index pages with about twenty per page, a total of 120 cards (of which about a dozen were out of stock at present).
At least a dozen cards, and probably TWO DOZEN in the list were acceptable, and all but one was a Radeon. There was just a single more or less usable Geforce, a GT 220, for $50, not nearly as good of a card or a price as the cheap HD 4670.
Modifié par Gorath Alpha, 08 juin 2011 - 09:48 .
#9
Posté 08 juin 2011 - 11:09
#10
Posté 09 juin 2011 - 01:47
Has buttons on the top to change the mouse movement speed.
#11
Posté 25 juin 2011 - 09:01





Retour en haut







