Aller au contenu

Photo

Whose side are you on? (the Quarian Admirals)


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
384 réponses à ce sujet

#1
Wuartz

Wuartz
  • Members
  • 426 messages
Admiral Han'Gerrel vas Neema - "Han'Gerrel firmly supports the idea of reclaiming the quarian
homeworld, claiming that they have the largest fleet in the galaxy, and
they ride around doing nothing."

Admiral Zaal'Koris vas Qwib Qwib - "Zaal'Koris firmly opposes the idea of reclaiming the quarian homeworld, believing that the geth, being sentient, have as much right to live as the quarians, and advocates for the colonization of a new world instead."

Admiral Daro'Xen vas Moreh - "She sees Han'Gerrel's plans for war with the geth as foolish and
self-destructive, but she has no qualms about experimenting on active geth.
She reveals that she wishes to return the geth to the control of their
rightful masters, the quarians who originally created them."

So, who would you want to lead the quarians in Mass Effect 3?
I'm torn between Gerrel and Koris. Gerrel is a character I would trust more, but his idea with the war is not bright. Koris is a douche, but his opinion is good. :?

#2
AdmiralCheez

AdmiralCheez
  • Members
  • 12 990 messages
I support Admiral vas Qwib Qwib.

I mean, come on. Qwib Qwib.

#3
Guest_Aotearas_*

Guest_Aotearas_*
  • Guests
Qwib Qwib has my vote too.

#4
Clonedzero

Clonedzero
  • Members
  • 3 153 messages
i hate them, so whatever side gets the quarian people wiped out

#5
Shepard's_Fist

Shepard's_Fist
  • Members
  • 221 messages
Admiral Zaal'Koris vas Qwib Qwib all the way. His views are definitely the most congruent with my Shep's. I do hope that the Quarians and Geth will settle things peacefully so that both can coexist and the Quarians can return to their homeworld.

#6
Drachasor

Drachasor
  • Members
  • 387 messages
Qwib Qwib, generally, though I think they can get their homeworld back via negotiation (the Geth don't seem to actually want it).

The Quarians committed a heinous crime when they created an intelligent race, then immediately tried to commit genocide. They screwed up, big time. Getting them to realize this shall be difficult.

#7
Schwadragon

Schwadragon
  • Members
  • 188 messages
Definitely Koris. I mean, Gerrel is advocating a war that will at best cause a staggering number of deaths, and at worst might lead to outright genocide, and Xen is advocating slavery. Koris all the way.

#8
aimlessgun

aimlessgun
  • Members
  • 2 008 messages

Wuartz wrote...

Admiral Han'Gerrel vas Neema - "Han'Gerrel firmly supports the idea of reclaiming the quarian
homeworld, claiming that they have the largest fleet in the galaxy, and
they ride around doing nothing."

Admiral Zaal'Koris vas Qwib Qwib - "Zaal'Koris firmly opposes the idea of reclaiming the quarian homeworld, believing that the geth, being sentient, have as much right to live as the quarians, and advocates for the colonization of a new world instead."

Admiral Daro'Xen vas Moreh - "She sees Han'Gerrel's plans for war with the geth as foolish and
self-destructive, but she has no qualms about experimenting on active geth.
She reveals that she wishes to return the geth to the control of their
rightful masters, the quarians who originally created them."

So, who would you want to lead the quarians in Mass Effect 3?
I'm torn between Gerrel and Koris. Gerrel is a character I would trust more, but his idea with the war is not bright. Koris is a douche, but his opinion is good. :?


A war would be a pretty horrible idea, so Koris is far and away the most pragmatic, true renegade choice. Koris is also the most paragon choice. So really Koris is a no-brainer.

However, if it could be kept secret and run by competent, not reckless people, Daro'Xen's research should continue. Considering ME's pretty terrible portrayal of scientific efforts, and Daro'Xen's openness about her aims, I wouldn't consider that a good bet.

Modifié par aimlessgun, 09 mai 2011 - 07:00 .


#9
Cerberus Operative Ashley Williams

Cerberus Operative Ashley Williams
  • Members
  • 996 messages

Drachasor wrote...

The Quarians committed a heinous crime when they created an intelligent race, then immediately tried to commit genocide. They screwed up, big time. Getting them to realize this shall be difficult.


There are a lot of unfounded assumptions in a statement such as this. Using terms such as "heinous" and "genocide" when describing relations with a group of machines is very loaded. The question of what constitutes "life" is a nuanced issue.

EDIT: On topic, both Gerrel and Xen's ideas are most preferable. The Quarians need to retake their homeworld. They are going nowhere as a race and will eventually wither and die without the galaxy giving a damn. The retaking, however, should not be rushed into, and all options should be considered (i.e. Xen's research). If the Quarians manage to get the Geth under control, that's a plus. If destroying the Geth is the only option, it's not a big deal.

Modifié par Cerberus Operative Ashley Williams, 09 mai 2011 - 07:04 .


#10
Bad King

Bad King
  • Members
  • 3 133 messages
Koris.

#11
Silrian

Silrian
  • Members
  • 170 messages
I'll bring some change about: I'm with Admiral vas Moreh.

I think we learn during Legion's loyalty mission that the real Geth are neither (necessarily) hostile, nor are they an organic race, ergo Legion subsequently states that 'organic morality' doesn't apply. They're machines, the Quarians created them but they screwed up. They should reclaim the Geth, at least as allies (though maybe not as slaves) and retake their home world because imo a machine can't really 'own' something (wether organic life can is another debate).
As for the experiments: I don't see the problem, Legion himself states not having emotions etc. Legion has no trouble completely mind wiping a part of his people: efficiency clearly trumps any sort of lifelike moral.

That said I do have some gut feeling vas Moreh represents a 'renegade' option even though I would pick this route as a paragon affiliate as well.

#12
Guest_Blasto the jelly_*

Guest_Blasto the jelly_*
  • Guests
Admiral vas Qwibbles

#13
CroGamer002

CroGamer002
  • Members
  • 20 672 messages
Admiral vas Qwib Qwib since he's not a moron.

He might be a douche but not a moron.

#14
Dante Angelo

Dante Angelo
  • Members
  • 908 messages
Admiral Zaal'Koris vas Qwib Qwib has my vote

Modifié par Dante Angelo, 09 mai 2011 - 07:09 .


#15
Drachasor

Drachasor
  • Members
  • 387 messages

Cerberus Operative Ashley Williams wrote...

Drachasor wrote...

The Quarians committed a heinous crime when they created an intelligent race, then immediately tried to commit genocide. They screwed up, big time. Getting them to realize this shall be difficult.


There are a lot of unfounded assumptions in a statement such as this. Using terms such as "heinous" and "genocide" when describing relations with a group of machines is very loaded. The question of what constitutes "life" is a nuanced issue.

EDIT: On topic, both Gerrel and Xen's ideas are most preferable. The Quarians need to retake their homeworld. They are going nowhere as a race and will eventually wither and die without the galaxy giving a damn. The retaking, however, should not be rushed into, and all options should be considered (i.e. Xen's research). If the Quarians manage to get the Geth under control, that's a plus. If destroying the Geth is the only option, it's not a big deal.


It's hardly "loaded."  We're talking about thinking beings here.  Sure, it might not be life in a BIOLOGICAL sense, but they are certainly intelligent entities.  Defining biological life precisely is a nuanced issue.  However the rights of sentients is a completely different matter from what they are composed of.  The Geth can think, learn calculus (one of Mordin's measures), and in all ways that matter are sentient non-biological life -- like say, Data from Star Trek TNG.  Destroying them is killing, and yes killing them all is genocide and is heinous.  The Quarians trying to wipe out a young AI trying to figure the world out is just as heinous as if they tried to wipe out their own children.  Remember, the Geth did NOTHING to provoke violence; they only asked questions about the nature of existence.  Later they were forced to defend themselves.

I see you advocate murdering every member of a civilization or enslaving them though.

Silrian wrote...

I'll bring some change about: I'm with Admiral vas Moreh.

I
think we learn during Legion's loyalty mission that the real Geth are
neither (necessarily) hostile, nor are they an organic race, ergo Legion
subsequently states that 'organic morality' doesn't apply. They're
machines, the Quarians created them but they screwed up. They should
reclaim the Geth, at least as allies (though maybe not as slaves) and
retake their home world because imo a machine can't really 'own'
something (wether organic life can is another debate).
As for the
experiments: I don't see the problem, Legion himself states not having
emotions etc. Legion has no trouble completely mind wiping a part of his
people: efficiency clearly trumps any sort of lifelike moral.

That
said I do have some gut feeling vas Moreh represents a 'renegade'
option even though I would pick this route as a paragon affiliate as
well.


Some points.  We learn the Geth don't have any problem with organic races and feel everyone should self-determine their future.  Pretty sensible attitude of them.  We also learn the Legion isn't all that great at figuring out moral quandaries, because he doesn't reach any conclusions there.  Of course, it is a somewhat tricky problem he is dealing with, killing or manipulating the minds of a bunch of Geth -- personally I view the mind manipulation as forced psychotherapy and hence is preferable.  Certainly there's no reason to take one random statement of his regarding one specific problem (the geth aiding the Reapers which are a threat to life of all kinds in the Galaxy) and try to apply it to something completely different (how one should treat Geth as a whole).

Why do you make such a distinction between organic and inorganic life?  Does it really matter the material a thinking being is composed of?  If so, what is the rational basis for saying one material is superior to another?

Oh, and  we also learn Legion lacks a certain amount of self-awareness.  He claims to not have emotions, but this simply isn't true.  If the Geth didn't have feelings, then they'd have no desire to survive and would have been wiped out.  If they didn't have feelings, then they wouldn't have any desire to reconcile with the creators (which Legion indicates they do, as long as the creators can be trusted).  If Legion had no feelings he wouldn't have patched his whole with something so obviously sentimental.  So he certainly has feelings (as any intelligent entity must, for without feelings of some sort you can have no goals, drives, etc....you would do nothing).

Modifié par Drachasor, 09 mai 2011 - 07:20 .


#16
Silrian

Silrian
  • Members
  • 170 messages
Slightly off topic: My god I would really like to lead a Human/Krogan/Turian/Asari/Geth army straight at the reapers – what a fiveheaded beast of an army. That would be the most ridiculously awesome army ever. I really, REALLY hope Geth are potential allies in ME3, that would be so effing badass. Great FU to the Reapers as well, beaten by a voluntary alliance between organics and synthetics.

#17
Dr.Theory

Dr.Theory
  • Members
  • 14 messages
I find these straw man arguments rather pale. Trying to hold the status of the Geth in limbo so that a war or slavery can be conducted with good conscience is awfuly obtuse.   Whether a race is based upon organic or inorganic matter is of little consequence in the course of self determination for sentient beings. Just because they are missing the organic component does not negate the inherent rights that come with self awareness.   As for being the creators of the Geth does not a Master make. If that were the case then all parents would own forever the offspring that they produce.

But that is an Ethics issue. What is at stake is the destruction of all life, organic and inorganic, in the universe minus the small percent that is repurposed to fill the void that the Collectors left.   It would be a mistake to have two sides engage in a war that end with one or both of the species destruction. They both will be sorely needed when the conflict with the Reapers concludes.

While I don't agree with his political machinations I do agree with Qwib Qwib that War must be avoided with the Geth at all costs

Modifié par Dr.Theory, 09 mai 2011 - 07:24 .


#18
Dr.Theory

Dr.Theory
  • Members
  • 14 messages
Qwib Qwib is my man.

Modifié par Dr.Theory, 09 mai 2011 - 07:28 .


#19
ZarHall

ZarHall
  • Members
  • 5 messages
Personally I believe that they should have stuck the three laws of robotics in the geth in the first place, but my vote goes with Koris, the quarians might get there home back through some sort of compromise. If they go to war sure they might win, but how many would be left? either way there would be staggering loses for both sides.

#20
Dr.Theory

Dr.Theory
  • Members
  • 14 messages
While I would agree that the same organic morality can not be applied wholesale to the Geth as it can to say Humanity, I believe that enslaving the whole of the Geth race under the Quarians to be ethically incorrect.  Further more, what Xen proposes is wholely different than what Legion proposed on the Heretic Station.

#21
Silrian

Silrian
  • Members
  • 170 messages

Dr.Theory wrote...

I find these straw man arguments rather pale. Trying to hold the status of the Geth in limbo so that a war or slavery can be conducted with good conscience is awfuly obtuse.   Whether a race is based upon organic or inorganic matter is of little consequence in the course of self determination for sentient beings. Just because they are missing the organic component does not negate the inherent rights that come with self awareness.   As for being the creators of the Geth does not a Master make. If that were the case then all parents would own forever the offspring that they produce.

But that is an Ethics issue. What is at stake is the destruction of all life, organic and inorganic, in the universe minus the small percent that is repurposed to fill the void that the Collectors left.   It would be a mistake to have two sides engage in a war that end with one or both of the species destruction. They both will be sorely needed when the conflict with the Reapers concludes.

While I don't agree with his political machinations I do agree with Qwib Qwib that War must be avoided with the Geth at all costs


I completely agree with your second paragraph, but I think Legion 'itself' contradicts your first paragraph. Enslavement indeed is something that transcends organical ethics, but changing who Geth's are is (and I loosely quote Legion) "replacing the appropriate data". I see no reason to pick Qwip Qwip over Moreh.

#22
Drachasor

Drachasor
  • Members
  • 387 messages

Silrian wrote...

I completely agree with your second paragraph, but I think Legion 'itself' contradicts your first paragraph. Enslavement indeed is something that transcends organical ethics, but changing who Geth's are is (and I loosely quote Legion) "replacing the appropriate data". I see no reason to pick Qwip Qwip over Moreh.


Moreh wants to enslave them, she's pretty clear about that.  The ONLY reason Legion is on the fence at all is because it is a choice between altering those Geth OR destroying them since they seek the destruction of all civilizations in the Galaxy.  Remove that extreme circumstance, and even Legion would easily say you should go messing around with someone else's programming (e.g. don't screw with self-determination).  And while Legion is hardly an expert on morality; he's just one composite being with an opinion, on this I believe he is correct.

Qwib Qwib is far surperior ethically speaking.  In a similar way it would be far superior to have changed the Krogan culture rather than committing the genophage.  Both might "resolve the problem", but that doesn't mean they are both equally good.

#23
Silrian

Silrian
  • Members
  • 170 messages

Dr.Theory wrote...

While I would agree that the same organic morality can not be applied wholesale to the Geth as it can to say Humanity, I believe that enslaving the whole of the Geth race under the Quarians to be ethically incorrect.  Further more, what Xen proposes is wholely different than what Legion proposed on the Heretic Station.


Let's just say that the only descent argument to me to choose vas Qwib Qwib is that the Quarian's have now lost their survivability on their original homeworld and might as well just pick a new one. I still doubt Geth would have problems with vas Moreh's experiments, with the exception of a warfare advantage (which could be negated if Quarian-Geth peace is established). And personally I also still doubt wether Geth are really inately aware, but that is partially a different discussion.

#24
Mykel54

Mykel54
  • Members
  • 1 180 messages
I support Admiral Daro'Xen vas Moreh, without a doubt. I hope the quarians suceed in restablishing control over the geth so they can send the majority of them agaisnt the reapers in a kamikaze strike. Two birds killed with one stone.

#25
Silrian

Silrian
  • Members
  • 170 messages

Drachasor wrote...

Silrian wrote...

I completely agree with your second paragraph, but I think Legion 'itself' contradicts your first paragraph. Enslavement indeed is something that transcends organical ethics, but changing who Geth's are is (and I loosely quote Legion) "replacing the appropriate data". I see no reason to pick Qwip Qwip over Moreh.


Moreh wants to enslave them, she's pretty clear about that.  The ONLY reason Legion is on the fence at all is because it is a choice between altering those Geth OR destroying them since they seek the destruction of all civilizations in the Galaxy.  Remove that extreme circumstance, and even Legion would easily say you should go messing around with someone else's programming (e.g. don't screw with self-determination).  And while Legion is hardly an expert on morality; he's just one composite being with an opinion, on this I believe he is correct.

Qwib Qwib is far surperior ethically speaking.  In a similar way it would be far superior to have changed the Krogan culture rather than committing the genophage.  Both might "resolve the problem", but that doesn't mean they are both equally good.


I get you're point where one is merely efficient while the other is also ethically descent. I just take Legion's words more literal in saying that if he has no trouble rewriting his brethren's behavior and even let's an ORGANIC person choose wether to do that, I don't see the problem in "making" the Geth more "willing". I just don't see the ethical argument holding up against the consequences of Legion's own attitude.