Arcian wrote...
Listen, you're an ignorant douchebag who violates common sense on an hourly basis and...
0/10, are you even trying?
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
Arcian wrote...
Listen, you're an ignorant douchebag who violates common sense on an hourly basis and...
Guest_Arcian_*
Yet again.Saphra Deden wrote...
Arcian wrote...
Listen, you're an ignorant douchebag who violates common sense on an hourly basis and...
0/10, are you even trying?
Really???...Saphra Deden wrote...
Arcian wrote...
Opinions, opinions everywhere.
Not opinons, facts.
Arcian wrote...
Listen, you're an ignorant douchebag who violates common sense on an hourly basis and pulls baseless arguments out of your posterior like they were post-its, so I'm gonna go right ahead and not senselessly argue with you for 12 hours and make you feel good about yourself for inciting rage on the internet. I'll laugh when it turns out you're wrong in ME3, but that's about it.Saphra Deden wrote...
Arcian wrote...
Opinions, opinions everywhere.
Not opinons, facts.
Modifié par Dean_the_Young, 11 mai 2011 - 03:12 .
Every Geth we've met in ME1 and ME2 has been a warmachine. 'Killbot' is what all those platforms, including Legion, are made to do.atheelogos wrote...
No they are not.Saphra Deden wrote...
Nashiktal wrote...
I agree. Its just unfortunate that the geth are sentient, and not kill-bots like they were in ME1, or i'd probably be more inclinded to agree with her.
They are killbots.
Dean_the_Young wrote...
Every Geth we've met in ME1 and ME2 has been a warmachine. 'Killbot' is what all those platforms, including Legion, are made to do.atheelogos wrote...
No they are not.Saphra Deden wrote...
Nashiktal wrote...
I agree. Its just unfortunate that the geth are sentient, and not kill-bots like they were in ME1, or i'd probably be more inclinded to agree with her.
They are killbots.
See bolded word for relevant detail.Reapinger wrote...
Dean_the_Young wrote...
Every Geth we've met in ME1 and ME2 has been a warmachine. 'Killbot' is what all those platforms, including Legion, are made to do.atheelogos wrote...
No they are not.Saphra Deden wrote...
Nashiktal wrote...
I agree. Its just unfortunate that the geth are sentient, and not kill-bots like they were in ME1, or i'd probably be more inclinded to agree with her.
They are killbots.
Uhhhh so all those memory platforms on the geth base were killbots too?
Dean_the_Young wrote...
Every Geth we've met in ME1 and ME2 has been a warmachine. 'Killbot' is what all those platforms, including Legion, are made to do.
DPSSOC wrote...
Were I to choose a side I thought best for the future of the Quarians I'd side with Koris. The reason being if Koris' plan to make peace with the Geth fails you can still fall back on Gerrel or Xen's idea. If however you lead with Gerrel or Xen's idea and they fail the Quarians are pretty much screwed.
Guest_Arcian_*
No, just Charlie Sheen being himself. While not giving a damn.Dean_the_Young wrote...
Arcian wrote...
Listen, you're an ignorant douchebag who violates common sense on an hourly basis and pulls baseless arguments out of your posterior like they were post-its, so I'm gonna go right ahead and not senselessly argue with you for 12 hours and make you feel good about yourself for inciting rage on the internet. I'll laugh when it turns out you're wrong in ME3, but that's about it.Saphra Deden wrote...
Arcian wrote...
Opinions, opinions everywhere.
Not opinons, facts.
If that's supposed to be representative of you, indeed it doesn't seem you give a damn but it does make you look like an idiot. Pretty sure that's not what you're trying to go with, despite your text, but then you did choose the picture. Maybe there's a double-fake irony in there?
Dean_the_Young wrote...
Execution is not equivalent to being kicked out, nor have the worst banana republics even needed due process to kill someone. You have abandoned all sense of proportionality.jamesp81 wrote...
The punishment was exile. The punishment was exile because 1) the Quarians don't have the death penalty and 2) they can't afford to house prisoners or life sentences. If they did have the death penalty, I'm quite certain they'd have imposed it in the case of a guilty verdict. What they did is morally equivalent to attempting to put someone to death, who was innocent, for politlcal reasons. They are not going to find that I'm OK with that since no harm no foul. Or, to paraphrase Shepard when he talked to Ronald Taylor, there's no way he's going to let this slide. A price will be paid.It wasn't a capital offense, and the entire direction of the Migrant Fleet, whether it would throw itself onto the sword of war or would risk making itself stationary by settling a colony world. The fates of millions were tied up in how the fate of one person was resolved. That's every reason for the leaders to counter what one started.It doesn't matter if you think my final argument is petty. Shepard can supply some damned good reasons for recruiting a few shady individuals. The Admiralty board has not rendered a single solitary reason, of any kind, why they were charging an innocent person with a capital offense.
Sure it will: pettyness is part of how Shepard will be remembered by when he then turns around and begs the Quarians to help liberate Earth.And it's really not going to matter if my argument is petty when I hit the button that blows Koris and Xen out the airlock.
Modifié par jamesp81, 11 mai 2011 - 03:09 .
Someone With Mass wrote...
Xen's plan just sounds moronic, so I'm going to try and convince the admirals to approach it from a different angle.
Only by culture. A capital offense is one in which the death penalty is applied: a culture without the death penalty (such as, for example, various European nations) do not conclude treason as a capital offense because they have no capital offenses.jamesp81 wrote...
I have not lost proportionality. This is merely your mistaken opinion. Treason is a capital offense. Period.
This is horrific historical nearsightedness at it's worst: the worst banana republics were just as often to forgo any sort of trial at all, while there would be no variation from the prior intent of conviction. The fact that there was a trial, and the fact that it was not pre-concluded against Tali from the start, are both incredibly significant distinctions from the worst banana republics.Furthermore, a show trial held to advance political agendas under color of law can not, in any way, be considered due process. Banana republic comparison stands. They were a bit more civilized in their tyranny than most dictators, but it was still a show trial worthy of the same.
Quantity is a quality, and this ignores all aspects and utility of logistical lift.As for the Quarians liberating Earth, how are they going to do that? The Migrant Fleet is largely composed of old, worn out tramp freighters and whatever fourth hand ships the Quarians could beg, borrow, or buy. It is not a viable combat force; it's a defensive huddle that's totally unfit for combat. It's barely fit for habitation. The whole preventing war between the Quarians and the Geth situation is about securing Geth assistance, since they do have a proper fleet.
It was hardly a significant crime to the greater whole, nor is it outweighed by far more serious injustices Shepard is both party and part of... such as the entire Spectre system.The Quarian Admiralty board perpetrated a pretty significant crime against one of its own people. That is not in doubt. They're ranking pretty high on my **** list, and for good reason.
Someone With Mass wrote...
I've never understood how they expect to win a war against the same machine race that drove them away in the first place, when their numbers were in the billions, not millions.