marshalleck wrote...
Rm80 wrote...
But even so.... we should have known better, TIM is not to be trusted...
Sure, not to be trusted because he may have goals and ambitions of his own and he is not above using people to those ends. But because the story has completely flipped and TIM is now in bed with Harbinger? It's pretty lame writing.
Rm80 wrote...
marshalleck wrote...
Rm80 wrote...
But even so.... we should have known better, TIM is not to be trusted...
Sure, not to be trusted because he may have goals and ambitions of his own and he is not above using people to those ends. But because the story has completely flipped and TIM is now in bed with Harbinger? It's pretty lame writing.
In my world people who kills other people for their goals and ambitions are not to be trusted...im wierd in that way
charmingcharlie wrote...
I don't understand why people never figured out that keeping the collector base was a pretty bad idea ? Just look at the Citadel and the Relays ohhhhh nice advanced tech ........ oh wait a minute it's actually a honey coated trap to ensure the Reapers can harvest advanced civilisations with the greatest of ease. There is no telling what fail safes and traps the Collector Base has. However if you destroy the base you take it out of the equation altogether and deny the Reapers another resource.
Anyway as another person said when you make decisions in the game they will have consequences (hell we have been asking for this for nearly 3 games now). I have no doubt a fair few paragon choices will come around and bite people in the proverbial rear end as well. I mainly do Paragon playthroughs and I accept that some of the paragon choices whilst appearing to be "right" at the time may lead to problems in the future.
At the end of the day if you don't like the way a decision plays out then you will be able to alter that decision using the interactive comic that will be included with Mass Effect 3.
Miscommunication. The point I'm making is simple. Cerberus is the enemy. Cereberus was given the collecter base (for those who decided to keep it). Therefore, this decision benefits Cerberus. Whereas those who chose to destroy the base didn't benefit Cerberus. I'm not saying that I know whether this decision is actually going to affect gameplay and all Cerberus enemies are going to have higher stats or anything. I'm just pointing out that from an in-game perspective, this is very dissapointing. To see that the fruits of my decision has had a negative result when I expected a positive one. Whereas the fruits of the other decision have a positive result.noisecode wrote...
Perfect-Kenshin wrote...
I haven't played the game, but I have read information which was provided by the develepors.noisecode wrote...
Perfect-Kenshin wrote...
Seriously? I didn't blow up the collecters base, thinking that it was going to be a good decision given that the technology could be used to better mankind and better understand how to take out the Reapers, only to now learn that it''s just going to be make antagonists stronger in Mass Effect 3. What the hell, Bioware. If you intended to PUNISH players who made a certain decision, why even allow us to make that decision at all?
You havent played the game = you have no evidence that you are being punished.......... in other words assumptions.
http://jebelkrong.blogspot.com/
You can read it for yourself. It clearly indicates that those who decided to keep the base are helping their enemies in Mass Effect 3.
YOU HAVE NO IDEA HOW ITS GOING TO TURN OUT.... That's what I'm saying.......... in other words, maybe the cerberus troops in the game will be better equiped but maybe the technology from the base allows you to stop the reapers in a different way towards the end of the game........
The above is speculation, and illustrates how NEITHER YOUR OR ME know whats really going to happen.
so relax.
Modifié par Perfect-Kenshin, 10 mai 2011 - 06:35 .
Someone With Mass wrote...
What's stopping the Reapers from taking back their glorified blender in ME3, anyway?
If I spared it, that is.
Da Mecca wrote...
You should have seen this coming honestly.
Guest_Arcian_*
What are you, daft? They're extinct in renegade playthroughs. You can't huskify ghosts.marshalleck wrote...
You can pretty much assume Paragons will never have one of their decisions subverted like this. And don't start with the Rachni, because they're almost certain to be an enemy in Renegade games too.
Modifié par Narosian, 10 mai 2011 - 06:44 .
That's fully understandable. I agree that decisions should have consequences. I just dislike this trend where one kind of decision generally lacks consequences (i.e. Paragon decisions are the "correct" decisions to make). When I replay Mass Effect 2, I'm going to be blowing up the base. It's unfortunate that I have to game the system rather than simply be content with the decision I wanted to make.Cheesy Blue wrote...
Perfect-Kenshin wrote...
If you intended to PUNISH players who made a certain decision, why even allow us to make that decision at all?
Well, if decisions didn't have consequences it wouldn't be very exciting would it? As for keeping the base, some decisions are right and wrong. You just made the wrong decision and you will feel the Reapercussions of that in ME3. Best solution, go back in another playthrough and blow that base up!
Modifié par Perfect-Kenshin, 10 mai 2011 - 06:46 .
Perfect-Kenshin wrote...
And I'm relaxed just fine. If your all-caps post serves as an indication, I'd say it's you who needs to calm down.
Arcian wrote...
What are you, daft? They're extinct in renegade playthroughs. You can't huskify ghosts.marshalleck wrote...
You can pretty much assume Paragons will never have one of their decisions subverted like this. And don't start with the Rachni, because they're almost certain to be an enemy in Renegade games too.
Seboist wrote...
Arcian wrote...
What are you, daft? They're extinct in renegade playthroughs. You can't huskify ghosts.marshalleck wrote...
You can pretty much assume Paragons will never have one of their decisions subverted like this. And don't start with the Rachni, because they're almost certain to be an enemy in Renegade games too.
No but you can clone those Cerberus Rachni from the ME1 side missions. I don't doubt they'll appear one way or another given BW's track record of "choice" in ME2.
Modifié par noisecode, 10 mai 2011 - 06:56 .
Modifié par aimlessgun, 10 mai 2011 - 06:57 .
Slidell505 wrote...
Renegade choices always come back to bite you in the ass. Bioware apparently thinks renegade is another way of saying "wrong".
Seboist wrote...
Slidell505 wrote...
Renegade choices always come back to bite you in the ass. Bioware apparently thinks renegade is another way of saying "wrong".
Yeah, as evidenced by the lack of the human dominated council showing up and every criminal turning out reformed after Paragon Shepard "talk-jutsued" them into submission.
Retour en haut
