Mesina2 wrote...
But the reason why random colonist/Shiala was there is because of the spores.
The random colonist/Shiala weren't just there for themselves personally, but on behalf of all the colonists who were infected. You don't need to suffer the same malady as someone to stand up for them elsewhere.
Also why Paragon Shepard wouldn't get one of them? They are alive in every playthrough.
There's no reason Paragon Shepard couldn't get them: Shiala isn't necessary for a cameo. Shiala could be a simple email, or Shiala could be additional flavor in case you did save her. Get Elizabeth if you don't save Shiala, see Shiala if you did save her (with the rational/wave being the same reason why Shiala is there instead of a random colonist).
Factually incorrect: the counterpart of the 'Rachni Ships spotted' news segment is one in which the resurrection, and subsequent destruction, of the Rachni is on the galactic news channels.
The Volus doesn't have to be the person to come back... even though him being crazy isn't actually a reason to disqualify him either. Crazy people thrive in the Mass Effect universe in surprising ways.
Well they FAILED to cover it up.
Also we get email from that Volus ONLY if you talked to him in ME1.
Failed coverup or not is irrelevant. There is no mystery about whether there were Rachni on Noveria. That's more than enough basis for someone else, Noveria corporate suit or private citizen, to stand around for a 'thank Shepard for killing them' dialogue.
And again, arguing against the Volus is tilting at windmills: the Volus doesn't need to the returning character. There doesn't need to be a returning character: the Rachni Ambassador wasn't a returning character either.
Why?
To give the same insight into Okeer and the Grunt-creation process that Rana did. That's relevant semi-interesting info that doesn't simply not-exist if Rana bites the dust.
Frankly, it wouldn't even be unreasonable just to have a datapad with the same information lying around in the chamber. Save Rana and she'll tell it to you: hack the data pad and you can read it yourself. No absence of data.
Matsue is charge of the security, NOT detective.
Same for Lorik, from who we get email even when Gianna is alive.
The two are quite often closely linked. Moreover, you're needlessly fixating on what, Gianna's approach was. If it was, say, Lorik, then Lorik's appearance could be him sitting at the table trying to get through the paperwork/contact sources to resolve the situation, and then sees Shepard and takes the opportunity to ask Shepard to help. The quest giver doesn't actually need to be the dective in order to give the quest: heck, the quest giver doesn't even need to be in the same spot. Lorik could be in the other market section. Or at the bar, like old times. Or sitting outside Liara's office, hoping Liara could help.
And he betrayed SB. Just a petty criminal with painted target on his head.
Which doesn't change that Fist's death can be used as a catalyst for some other remark by Bailey or some other source. Such as, for example, that if you kill Fist, C-SEC was able to find some stuff later (data on other criminals, Shadow Broker files) that Fist otherwise could have taken with him/deleted as he was fleeing. Or it could be as simple as the corrupt politician/gang leader/Mouse from Thane's Loyalty Mission making some mention about how Fist's death opened up a power vacuume in which what's-his-name was able to step in.
It's not at all hard to write up some basis for an alternative mention of Fist if you killed him.
I disagree?
And?
Modifié par Dean_the_Young, 12 mai 2011 - 08:09 .
Retour en haut
