17599 réponses à ce sujet

[100k]

Kyle Kabanya wrote...

MP DLC = Lame

SP DLC = meaningless until EC comes out

That's why MP was introduced into ME3. They wanted more options for DLC, but the MP has become as stale as Horde or Zombies. Enough with the MP DLC. They haven't been able to create any SP DLC, because they have to redo the **** ending.

EA = fail
EA + Bioware = artistic integrity / garbage

Agreed. I wanted SP DLC so badly, but it looks like the soonest we'll get some will probably be August, and that'll just be the EC. 

I knew this would happen. I knew that, with the introduction of MP, there would be mostly MP DLC. 

<_<

[macrocarl]

It's possible that when they called in everyone for EC VO they did some extra stuff for SP DLC as well and after the EC comes out and nerdrage settles down they'll have additional DLC come out sooner than later.

[Kyda]

Fingertrip wrote...

You sure you're not mixing up his enthusiasm and announcement on the Baldurs Gate Enhanced Edition? 

... what?!... oh my god! oh my god! oh my god!!!! *runs to google it"

[xsdob]

Now to use my conjuration spells to revive this thread back to the frong page.

From mike gambles twitter, him weighing in on the fans outlook on big reviewers.

‏@siminspace@GambleMike Reviews aren't what they were. I don't buy anything until I've assessed the general vibe of the players these days.
‏
@GambleMike@siminspace
I agree. it would be folly to only rely on one source when making purchase decisions.

And about some of the problems fans have been going through with tech issues.


[/b]@masseffect@GambleMike@scyllacosta@bioware@EA
So are we screwed or what? It's been over two months now.http://social.bioware.com/forum/1/topic/345/index/9684873/[

@GambleMike@JustinSaneV2 @masseffect @scyllacosta @bioware @EA team are still looking at it. We were discussing it up to today.

Also he's looking forward to max payne 3.

Now onto the patrick's weekes update.

Here is him responding to what might be the biggest mass effect 3 plothole evah.

@JoshDonaghy@PatrickWeekes I found a plot hole about ME3: In London there was no rain or wet footpaths, unless Reapers are a cloud deterrent I call ####
[/b]
@PatrickWeekes@JoshDonaghy [b]Excellent point. I'll ask if the EC can include some fog and a "sneaks through all layers of clothing" drizzle.

A lot of other activity and stuff from weekes but it looks more like personal stuff so I won't post it.

Modifié par xsdob, 15 mai 2012 - 07:01 .

[SKiLLYWiLLY2]

Jeez, you lot are a whiny bunch lol. Get over your SP DLC demands.

[xsdob]

SKiLLYWiLLY2 wrote...

Jeez, you lot are a whiny bunch lol. Get over your SP DLC demands.

[CDRSkyShepard]

I'm just gonna leave this here.

[charmingcharlie]

Fallout 3 has unavoidable plot instances eh ? Now what is that old saying that involves "living in glass houses" and "throwing stones" ?

[CDRSkyShepard]

Unavoidable plot instances? Now that is a shame, it really is...

Glass houses indeed. ;D

[TheCrimsonSpire]

I'm guessing this is supposed to be a quick jab at the ME3 dilemma. So, what she's agreeing with us now?

[Iakus]

CDRSkyShepard wrote...

I'm just gonna leave this here.

Not sure if serious...

[CDRSkyShepard]

TheCrimsonSpire wrote...

I'm guessing this is supposed to be a quick jab at the ME3 dilemma. So, what she's agreeing with us now?

I'm pretty sure there is no ME3 underlying context here at all, which makes it even more amusing.

[tamperous]

Her tweets have amused me for months, either she's got the greatest ironic wit of all video game personalities or she should be delivering the keynote at this year's World Blonde Convention.

I keep giving her the benefit of the doubt if only because so many grown men are willing to hide behind Ashley's armor and her tweets.

[Kyda]

Well, she doesn´t work for that other game developer company so she can be completely honest about her feelings. We can´t expect that for ME3, even if she didn´t exactly liked something it is not like she has the liberty of saying it. People usually try to keep their jobs if they are good ones.

[Tazzmission]

SKiLLYWiLLY2 wrote...

Jeez, you lot are a whiny bunch lol. Get over your SP DLC demands.

even though im one of the i want sp dlc i do have to agree that they took that tweet way out of context mainly because nothing has really supported it to be true at all


same with the jessica tweet and fallout comment

[Icinix]

CDRSkyShepard wrote...

TheCrimsonSpire wrote...

I'm guessing this is supposed to be a quick jab at the ME3 dilemma. So, what she's agreeing with us now?

I'm pretty sure there is no ME3 underlying context here at all, which makes it even more amusing.

Better yet, Fallout 3 expanded upon the ending in a meaningful way! YAY!

[xsdob]

I don't get it. What's the giant "let's take a **** on bioware" thing this time? Cause I'm really not seeing it.

Modifié par xsdob, 15 mai 2012 - 10:07 .

[CDRSkyShepard]

xsdob wrote...

I don't get it. What's the giant "let's take a **** on bioware" thing this time? Cause I'm really not seeing it.

I just think it's rather ironic that Jessica is disappointed with unavoidable plot points in Fallout 3, but doesn't address concerns with anything more than a hand-wave over the exact same concerns with ME3.

[Valikdu]

/looks at thread name

Does anyone even care anymore about what Casey Hudson says?

Modifié par Valikdu, 15 mai 2012 - 10:29 .

[xsdob]

CDRSkyShepard wrote...

xsdob wrote...

I don't get it. What's the giant "let's take a **** on bioware" thing this time? Cause I'm really not seeing it.

I just think it's rather ironic that Jessica is disappointed with unavoidable plot points in Fallout 3, but doesn't address concerns with anything more than a hand-wave over the exact same concerns with ME3.

What concerns? I didn't find any that stuck out in my playthrough.

Actually I didn't find any in fallout 3 either. I didn't like that game as much as mass effect 3 though.

What makes one of these things bad again?

[CDRSkyShepard]

xsdob wrote...

CDRSkyShepard wrote...

xsdob wrote...

I don't get it. What's the giant "let's take a **** on bioware" thing this time? Cause I'm really not seeing it.

I just think it's rather ironic that Jessica is disappointed with unavoidable plot points in Fallout 3, but doesn't address concerns with anything more than a hand-wave over the exact same concerns with ME3.

What concerns? I didn't find any that stuck out in my playthrough.

Actually I didn't find any in fallout 3 either. I didn't like that game as much as mass effect 3 though.

What makes one of these things bad again?

The fact we have no control over several plot points (can't speak for Fallout, never played it):

- Relays being destroyed
- Fleet stuck in orbit of Earth with only FTL
- Normandy crashes
- You have to build the Crucible no matter what (HUGE pet peeve of mine)

In ME2, besides the two big choices, you had a full range of control over who can live and die in the SM. The only thing you can control in ME3 besides the big decision is whether Earth is totally decimated, somewhat decimated, or not as decimated. That's it. Everything else is unavoidable.

It's a bad plan because ME2 had an endgame that was very flexible. They took a huge step backwards with ME3. How is that not a bad plan?

[xsdob]

CDRSkyShepard wrote...

xsdob wrote...

CDRSkyShepard wrote...

xsdob wrote...

I don't get it. What's the giant "let's take a **** on bioware" thing this time? Cause I'm really not seeing it.

I just think it's rather ironic that Jessica is disappointed with unavoidable plot points in Fallout 3, but doesn't address concerns with anything more than a hand-wave over the exact same concerns with ME3.

What concerns? I didn't find any that stuck out in my playthrough.

Actually I didn't find any in fallout 3 either. I didn't like that game as much as mass effect 3 though.

What makes one of these things bad again?

The fact we have no control over several plot points (can't speak for Fallout, never played it):

- Relays being destroyed
- Fleet stuck in orbit of Earth with only FTL
- Normandy crashes
- You have to build the Crucible no matter what (HUGE pet peeve of mine)

In ME2, besides the two big choices, you had a full range of control over who can live and die in the SM. The only thing you can control in ME3 besides the big decision is whether Earth is totally decimated, somewhat decimated, or not as decimated. That's it. Everything else is unavoidable.

It's a bad plan because ME2 had an endgame that was very flexible. They took a huge step backwards with ME3. How is that not a bad plan?

I don't see the problem of following events and chooseing my characters reaction to them. I thought that's what makes an rpg an rpg, controling your character and not so much the story.

Besides, you can only control it through metagaming of not doing missions, which is a big no-no for me on a personal level. Denying yourself content is much differnet than having complete control over the story. I hope I'm just not fully understanding what your saying because otherwise I really know I'm not meant ot be an rpg fan at all.

Modifié par xsdob, 15 mai 2012 - 10:48 .

[xsdob]

I can see where this is going so let's both agree to disagree.

Okay.