Is this intentional? If so, what is the reason behind it? I don't see how they're related in any way besides the fact that they both occur in the Deep Roads.
Fool's Gold/Finding Nathaniel - mutual exclusivity
Débuté par
Matt 2108
, mai 12 2011 10:14
Retour en haut
#2
Posté 12 mai 2011 - 10:17
Luke Barrett
-
- BioWare Employees
-
- 1 638 messages
Yes. No idea. I also don't see why but that was the design decision; presumably for a reason that wasn't arbitrary.
#3
Posté 13 mai 2011 - 06:10
StarkeyKing
-
- Members
- 27 messages
has it got to do with Awakenings?? i noticed that my last three playthrus(all with awakenings saves) have had Finding Nate quest..and the play thru im at right now with no AWakenings save, is Fool's Gold
#4
Posté 14 mai 2011 - 04:51
MrProliferation
-
- Members
- 149 messages
I would assume that it is to not give people who did Awakenings, or choose the pre-built background, a "bonus" quest of sorts. If everyone got Fool's Gold and then there was the possibility of Finding Nathaniel too, that would mean some people would be lacking a quest.
#5
Posté 20 mai 2011 - 07:53
Onime no Kai
-
- Members
- 10 messages
I just assumed, as the poster above said, it was basically included to "balance out" the quest opportunities for people who won't get Finding Nathaniel.
The thing I don't understand about those quests is: why in the heck did they put Varric's last armor upgrade in a quest not everyone can access?!? O.o I assumed it was an oversight/error of some kind rather than intentional; but I've seen this asked in other forums and the only answer I've seen anyone come up with is "because actions have consequences derrrrp". Which I'd be totally fine with as an answer if there were *any* sort of logical connection between those two things, but there's just...not. I guess it's not that big a deal, but it makes no sense darn it.
The thing I don't understand about those quests is: why in the heck did they put Varric's last armor upgrade in a quest not everyone can access?!? O.o I assumed it was an oversight/error of some kind rather than intentional; but I've seen this asked in other forums and the only answer I've seen anyone come up with is "because actions have consequences derrrrp". Which I'd be totally fine with as an answer if there were *any* sort of logical connection between those two things, but there's just...not. I guess it's not that big a deal, but it makes no sense darn it.
