horizon011 wrote...
how is this cool ?? most people i know hate gays and avoid anything gay
Just like most people I know are open-minded about this sort of thing.
horizon011 wrote...
how is this cool ?? most people i know hate gays and avoid anything gay
Well. This is inaccurate. From Casey's tweets it seems like they developed the game and the characters and where they want them to be. Then they discussed the romance options. Lets say Vega was this "token character" - based on Casey's tweets - he was already going to be there and a main character.SalsaDMA wrote...
centauri2002 wrote...
I fail to see how the general customer group is going to feel any negative impact because of this inclusiveness. That is, if ninjamancing is not present in ME3, which we all hope it won't be.
Including stuff means exluding other stuff. Resources (both time and money) aren't limitless, after all. Especially at this point in time of the games development.
Token guy getting included while previous fan-favourites get booted to a cameo role = people getting less game because of it.
Previous fan favourites getting re-written to cater to the vocalists = people liking the characters as they were getting disregarded because of it.
doesn't matter how you play it out. Including it means you are excluding something or someone else, and that means it negatively affects other customers.
horizon011 wrote...
how is this cool ?? most people i know hate gays and avoid anything gay
Modifié par TommyServo, 18 mai 2011 - 06:10 .
Guest_Nyoka_*
SalsaDMA wrote...
And showcasing of scripts affecting enviroments were described as 'the player will feel anything can happen at anytime' which is the very opposite of scripted events...
Colour me un-impressed
"You could always tell when a fight was coming" says Hudson about ME2
"You would walk into a room filled with low cover and before we could
get dramatic about it you already knew a fight was coming. So now we're
building environments that don't have crates and sandbags and that kind
of cover; we have environments that have natural opportunities to take
cover. And it helps that Shepard can climb and fall and SWAT turn and
leaps across gaps and stuff like that. It allows you to look around
your environment and solve problems in that space and makes combat less
predictable"
"I think Lair of the Shadow Broker is a good look at how we design
levels now" says Hudson ... "It's all about sudden shifts in the action.
There's a section on Earth where you're running a narrow walkway and
there's a war going on all around you and a ship is in the distance.
Suddenly its nuclear core blows up and its such a shockwave that it
knocks you off the walkway and you end up sliding down the glass face of
a knocked over high-rise and then you kind of roll and catch yourself
and all that happens in a moment of gameplay. You have control
throughout and that's when you'll realize anything could happen at any
time"
Modifié par Nyoka, 18 mai 2011 - 06:21 .
Nyoka wrote...
I don't get how a thread in the forum can be irritating. Can't you just not read it? It's not like the thread opens automatically on your computer and takes over your monitor. You have to click on the name, voluntarily, to enter.
Society changes, buddy. 60 years ago you and your bros would be saying the same about blacks.horizon011 wrote...
how is this cool ?? most people i know hate gays and avoid anything gay
I have a Shepard who is gay since ME1.Phaelducan wrote...
I'm not upset that he can be gay, I'm irritated that he wasn't able to be gay for two games (which was not an oversight, it was a dev decision), and now he is because if incessant whining.
As to remaining straight, I've played a gay protagonist in Dragon Age 1 and 2, as well as in Fallout: NV. The difference is that they were gay since the origin of the character. They started that way, they didn't just all of a sudden have a switch thrown (a toggle, if you will?) and have it be an option.
That's why it's so stupid, Shep was one way, now he/she's another, and the ONLY reason they are the new way is because of the complaining of a vocal minority.
The whole "my shep was always gay" argument is ludicrous. Shep wasn't gay in 1 and 2, and only delusional thinking indicates otherwise. No more logical than Mario being gay.
SalsaDMA wrote...
Including stuff means exluding other stuff. Resources (both time and money) aren't limitless, after all. Especially at this point in time of the games development.
Token guy getting included while previous fan-favourites get booted to a cameo role = people getting less game because of it.
Previous fan favourites getting re-written to cater to the vocalists = people liking the characters as they were getting disregarded because of it.
doesn't matter how you play it out. Including it means you are excluding something or someone else, and that means it negatively affects other customers.
horizon011 wrote...
how is this cool ?? most people i know hate gays and avoid anything gay
Its like the fashion or art industry. A painting can look like a blob a 3 year old made but its still GOOD ART OMG.horizon011 wrote...
how is this cool ?? most people i know hate gays and avoid anything gay
horizon011 wrote...
how is this cool ?? most people i know hate gays and avoid anything gay
horizon011 wrote...
Not being a troll so please just someone inform me on how this is please ? help me understand what there thinking?!
Phaelducan wrote...
The whole "my shep was always gay"
argument is ludicrous. Shep wasn't gay in 1 and 2, and only delusional
thinking indicates otherwise. No more logical than Mario being gay.
Modifié par SennenScale, 18 mai 2011 - 06:13 .
SalsaDMA wrote...
centauri2002 wrote...
I fail to see how the general customer group is going to feel any negative impact because of this inclusiveness. That is, if ninjamancing is not present in ME3, which we all hope it won't be.
Including stuff means exluding other stuff. Resources (both time and money) aren't limitless, after all. Especially at this point in time of the games development.
Token guy getting included while previous fan-favourites get booted to a cameo role = people getting less game because of it.
Previous fan favourites getting re-written to cater to the vocalists = people liking the characters as they were getting disregarded because of it.
doesn't matter how you play it out. Including it means you are excluding something or someone else, and that means it negatively affects other customers.
Modifié par centauri2002, 18 mai 2011 - 06:11 .
bald man in a boat wrote...
You can RP anything you want. You can be gay Mario if you think that's how he rolls. What you can't do is say "Shep always was gay, I just couldn't actually be gay within the parameters of the programming" (well you can say it, clearly you are saying that, but that's childish).
Congrats on calling a demographic of players childish.
Modifié par horizon011, 18 mai 2011 - 06:13 .
Phaelducan wrote...
Wittand25 wrote...
Sorry that does not apply at all. since everyone has their own game and does not get information on other player´s games. So your straight Shepard, who by the way can actually make clear that he is straight for the first time by saying no to the male LI, will not affected by my gay one who romances a male LI.Phaelducan wrote...
I'll see your parable, and raise you the same parable which actually applies.
Say I go to "Jack's House of Dead Cow + Sauce." They serve dead cow... with some sauce. Say I've gone there for 3 years because sometimes... I like the idea of a carnivorous dining experience, where I know I won't hear some Vegan next to me complaining that they don't have any Soy or Seytan or w/e the heck they want for a meat substitute.
Now... "Jack's House of Dead Cow + Sauce" decides that because a small group of Vegans has picketted outside their restaurant for long enough to be irritating enough to the management that they are going to add tofu and soy options.
That's their right, it's their restaurant. However, can they really be surprised if some of their already established client base thinks it's a stupid idea to cave?
Would I stop eating there? No, I like the food. Will I still enjoy it when I'm sitting there face deep in greasy BBQ ribs and some yahoo at the next table loudly proclaims "I'm glad they finally saw the sense in putting this tofu burger on the menu!"?
Nope, not as much.
You are upset about something that you will only see if you want it to see. Pick the "No thanks, I am straight" response and your Shepard will remain straight.
I'm not upset that he can be gay, I'm irritated that he wasn't able to be gay for two games (which was not an oversight, it was a dev decision), and now he is because if incessant whining.
As to remaining straight, I've played a gay protagonist in Dragon Age 1 and 2, as well as in Fallout: NV. The difference is that they were gay since the origin of the character. They started that way, they didn't just all of a sudden have a switch thrown (a toggle, if you will?) and have it be an option.
That's why it's so stupid, Shep was one way, now he/she's another, and the ONLY reason they are the new way is because of the complaining of a vocal minority.
The whole "my shep was always gay" argument is ludicrous. Shep wasn't gay in 1 and 2, and only delusional thinking indicates otherwise. No more logical than Mario being gay.
Implying being anti gay is somehow the same as being racist. Wow im not agianst gay people but thats insulting towards people who have a different opinion than you or meMACharlie1 wrote...
Society changes, buddy. 60 years ago you and your bros would be saying the same about blacks.horizon011 wrote...
how is this cool ?? most people i know hate gays and avoid anything gay
centauri2002 wrote...
Can I ask that we steer the topic of conversation away from peoples' opinions on sexuality in the real world to the manner in which same sex romances are implemented within the game itself? Whether that be from a gameplay perspective or a story one. This forum isn't for political debate.
Sphynx118 wrote...
Implying being anti gay is somehow the same as being racist. Wow im not agianst gay people but thats insulting towards people who have a different opinion than you or me
Modifié par Russalka, 18 mai 2011 - 06:14 .
Russalka wrote...
SalsaDMA wrote...
Including stuff means exluding other stuff. Resources (both time and money) aren't limitless, after all. Especially at this point in time of the games development.
Token guy getting included while previous fan-favourites get booted to a cameo role = people getting less game because of it.
Previous fan favourites getting re-written to cater to the vocalists = people liking the characters as they were getting disregarded because of it.
doesn't matter how you play it out. Including it means you are excluding something or someone else, and that means it negatively affects other customers.
Let's have a witch hunt for every detail you think wastes resources, then.
Not making yourself look any less like a loser here dude. Way to go personal. Chillbald man in a boat wrote...
horizon011 wrote...
how is this cool ?? most people i know hate gays and avoid anything gay
Then most people you know are losers, bigots and insecure pieces of sh!t. Get new friends.