Aller au contenu

Photo

-Wider options for Romance in ME3, including Same-sex- *Update added*


6696 réponses à ce sujet

#3451
paptschik

paptschik
  • Members
  • 320 messages

Siansonea II wrote...

massive_effect wrote...

twincast wrote...

ReconTeam wrote...

Russalka wrote...
What is the purpose of you returning all the time and not trying to start a civil dialogue?


I wasn't aware an arrogance and "we don't owe you 'homophobes' any compromise" was civil dialouge? Sounds more like the words of over-entitled braggarts.

Wee~! Homophobic Troll Alert.


In other news, the Earth travels around the Sun.

Calling someone "homophobic" is civil dialogue?


Only if it's accurate. It cracks me up that people who are virulently opposed to anything related to homosexuality somehow bridle at being called homophobic. 


But, to be fair, in these discussions everyone that is NOT opposed to all things homosexual but still doesn't entirely agree, usually ends up being called a homophobe at least half a dozen times as well.
It's how it always ends up. Yes, one side has annoying, often angry and irrational homophobes.
The other side isn't perfect either and has people yelling "homophobe! gay-hater! burn at the stake!" even when it completely wrong.
It is how it is.

#3452
paptschik

paptschik
  • Members
  • 320 messages

Siansonea II wrote...

Phaelducan wrote...

No pretense at civility at this point. Although as a point of reference it does seem like that fight for the love side is getting pretty heavy with the rage....

Edit: Also cracks me up that anyone who would rather male shep not be bi-sexual is virulently anti-homosexual. Logic fail.


So, you think it's perfectly reasonable to prevent other people from playing a gay or bisexual Shepard, even though you can still play your Shepard the way you want? You really think that's reasonable and fair? What. Ever.:pinched:


But...I can't play my Shepard as a clumsy, slightly overweight guy that doesn't always succeed but in the end still saves the galaxy and gets the cute girl.
Where is my right to play as the likable, overweight guy?! HUH?!
I call fat-sism!

:P

#3453
Erani

Erani
  • Members
  • 1 535 messages

centauri2002 wrote...

Erani wrote...

Yeah, that was messed. However, the f/f romance with Silk Fox is one of my favorite BioWare romances ever.<3


I enjoyed it as well. I didn't even know I could do it the first time I played through so, when I found out, I had to play through again. :P

I know! I was clueless the first time as well.:lol:

Anyway, it'd be cool if Shiala were an f/f option. She's pretty and green(cute) and in ME2 she said she'd like to get to know Shepard better under different circumstances so...<3

Modifié par Erani, 19 mai 2011 - 12:02 .


#3454
Abispa

Abispa
  • Members
  • 3 465 messages

Phaelducan wrote...

No pretense at civility at this point. Although as a point of reference it does seem like that fight for the love side is getting pretty heavy with the rage....

Edit: Also cracks me up that anyone who would rather male shep not be bi-sexual is virulently anti-homosexual. Logic fail.


Just so long as Shepard has the option to continue banging a plucked chicken with a bucket on her head, I'm happy. Not that I take that option, 'cause I'm loyal to Ashley. It just comforts me to know that the option is there should I ever desire something... spicy.

#3455
CulturalGeekGirl

CulturalGeekGirl
  • Members
  • 3 280 messages

Phaelducan wrote...

No pretense at civility at this point. Although as a point of reference it does seem like that fight for the love side is getting pretty heavy with the rage....

Edit: Also cracks me up that anyone who would rather male shep not be bi-sexual is virulently anti-homosexual. Logic fail.


The premise is not that people want Shepard to be bisexual. They want his sexuality to be chosen by the player.

If you have a straight Shepard, your Shepard is straight, If you have a Shepard who is a colonist/ruthless infiltrator, your Shepard is not a earthborn/sole survivor/soldier.

Saying the option to decide determine your own Shepard's identity shouldn't be there is like saying the option to be a Paragon or a Renegade shouldn't be there. Putting in Paragon and Renegade options does not mean that every Shepard is a Paragade or Renegon. It means that every Shepard can determine his or her own identity, which is all that is being asked for.

Modifié par CulturalGeekGirl, 19 mai 2011 - 12:08 .


#3456
Inquisitor Recon

Inquisitor Recon
  • Members
  • 11 831 messages

Russalka wrote...
And instead of trying to start civil
conversation, you revert back to the same old position of everyone being
bad. How are you any better than us then? According to you, we are
unreasonable, but it seems you are too.


Well maybe that is because I run into the same handful of people, such as...

Siansonea II wrote...
Now, now, no need for name calling. My being spoiled and arrogant has nothing to do with the fact that I support the inclusion of same-sex content. It's just a natural by-product of being awesome and attractive. But that's neither here nor there, the fact remains that now that you're on the other side of the fence, you're singing a different tune than you were before. Before this announcement, you were the "spoiled and arrogant" one, because BioWare's stance at that time supported your viewpoint that people who want something you dislike don't matter. Now that you're on the receiving end of what you view as "discrimination" (as if...) you don't like it. Instead of having an epiphany about how others might have felt, etc., etc., you choose to feel like a victim. For those of us who remember the glee with which you derided the idea, and the way you exulted over the exclusion of this content, well, it makes it hard for us to feel sorry for you. That's all I'm saying.

I don't think the supporters of inclusion have been behaving inappropriately, actually. We had our Fight For The Love thread, and we were happily celebrating—and it got locked. Then we got sent here, and we were happily discussing the possibilities, and then the anti-gay crowd started shouting down our ideas with calls of "Retcon!" and "Decreased Sales!" and other such pretexts which could be easily swept aside if all agreed to use reason and logic to discuss them. Those things evaporate pretty quickly when exposed to the light of reason. But instead of using your previously favorite trump card "It's BioWare's call—deal with it", we choose to laboriously go through the process of showing the flaws in the logic being presented as if it were something to seriously consider. Out of respect, and out of a desire to help those who simply don't know any better. But that part, at least, seems to be a losing battle. People don't say the things your fellows are saying if they want to engage in a reasoned discussion. They just want to hate loudly enough to get BioWare to overturn their decision. Well, I would wish you luck with that, but in truth I hope you fail.


Yes I suppose narcissism would make one think that. I was never spoiled or arrogant for opposing your little cause. I saw ever reason for Bioware not to add such content and it is a decision that I continue to oppose. Meanwhile your group always liked to pretend it had the moral high ground, you used the usual empty phrases, said "it doesn't effect anybody else", and played the usual act. The constant claim that Bioware was discriminating by not providing what you wanted was always a favorite of mine. Of course anybody who opposed you happened to be "homophobes" but that was just another means to an end. Yet now that you have what you want, your hypocrisy is pretty clear. Despite whatever excuses you'll invent, you never cared about other players who didn't want to deal with nonsense like this. You won't admit it, but you don't want to agree to any sort of compromise out of spite. So you claim some sort of selection at the start of the game, or some sort of DLC would be "offensive." You make empty comparisons to race or Cerberus. Many of your supporters are perfectly fine with characters being retconned, hitting on Shepard, and so on. If everybody just happens to become bisexual, your response is for the "homophobes" to "deal with it". This is a far cry from how you portrayed yourselves previously.

If you want to pat each other on the back all day go to your private group, there was never any reason or logic behind your claims anyway. You wanted this out of personal interests and nothing more. Yet unlike the Talimancers or any other group, you could bludgeon your way through to Bioware thanks to today's culture of politically correct insanity and playing off of "white straight guilt." I'll commend you for this, as people prove as gullible as ever. Now you'll complain about "haters" to say "see we shouldn't compromise with those people." We always hoped the other's cause would fail, that's the way this works. Now I can only hope Bioware shows some common sense and allows players to make their choice at the start of the game. Or at least they could show the integrity to not make everybody bisexual, something which at least half of you seem to dearly want.

#3457
Abispa

Abispa
  • Members
  • 3 465 messages

paptschik wrote...

Siansonea II wrote...

Phaelducan wrote...

No pretense at civility at this point. Although as a point of reference it does seem like that fight for the love side is getting pretty heavy with the rage....

Edit: Also cracks me up that anyone who would rather male shep not be bi-sexual is virulently anti-homosexual. Logic fail.


So, you think it's perfectly reasonable to prevent other people from playing a gay or bisexual Shepard, even though you can still play your Shepard the way you want? You really think that's reasonable and fair? What. Ever.:pinched:


But...I can't play my Shepard as a clumsy, slightly overweight guy that doesn't always succeed but in the end still saves the galaxy and gets the cute girl.
Where is my right to play as the likable, overweight guy?! HUH?!
I call fat-sism!

:P


Seriously, I AM unhappy by the lack of body shape choices. Why not a less chisled look for male Shepard? Or a female Shepard who looks like one of the Williams sisters? Sneaky sniper skinny Goth girl?

#3458
Centauri2002

Centauri2002
  • Members
  • 2 086 messages

Erani wrote...
I know! I was clueless the first time as well.:lol:

Anyway, it'd be cool if Shiala were an f/f option. She's pretty and green(cute) and in ME2 she said she'd like to get to know Shepard better under different circumstances so...<3


That would be a good option! I'm still holding out for Aria~ My little RenShep needs a badass LI, dammit!

#3459
SilentNukee

SilentNukee
  • Members
  • 1 665 messages
Posted Image

I wish I could of been more precise, but stupid Twitter only has like a 150 word limit? Anyway, I'm guessing with that response that no matter what happened in ME1-2 (Assuming they're not dead), ME3 alone opens up that possibility. (I'm assuming even if you were a total jerk to that person, it won't matter in ME3 'cuz you can build it up again.)
This was assumed by many anyway, but it would of been nice to have it triggered base by previous conversation choices of ME1/2.

Edit: ...I wrote the word "assume" way too many times in that paragraph. :[

Modifié par SilentNukee, 19 mai 2011 - 12:13 .


#3460
Phaelducan

Phaelducan
  • Members
  • 960 messages

Siansonea II wrote...

Phaelducan wrote...

No pretense at civility at this point. Although as a point of reference it does seem like that fight for the love side is getting pretty heavy with the rage....

Edit: Also cracks me up that anyone who would rather male shep not be bi-sexual is virulently anti-homosexual. Logic fail.


So, you think it's perfectly reasonable to prevent other people from playing a gay or bisexual Shepard, even though you can still play your Shepard the way you want? You really think that's reasonable and fair? What. Ever.:pinched:


I'm preventing two things. Jack and *&&*. I do, however, think Bioware is making a mistake by changing it's gameplan. I played a lesbian shep. I also played a lesbian warden, and a gay warden. I also played a lesbian Hawke and a gay Hawke. With that said, I don't think male shep needs to be flagged for gayness. The story doesn't need it, it didn't have it for two games, and nothing in ANY of the dialog from ME1 or 2 gives any hint whatsoever that he is/could be gay. The mere idea that simply because he doesn't tag any of the female LI is evidence that he is/could be gay is preposterous, even more so because there is no possible way for male shep to pursue a male LI in either of the first two games.

Compounding all of it is the further evidence that at one point Bioware put development time into enabling a gay man-shep, but took it out on purpose. 

My Shep is one of, I don't know, 8 or 9 versions I messed around with, it just so happens none of them were both male and gay. That doesn't  make me homophobic, it makes me someone who invested a lot of play-hours into a character who was never gay, and I don't care for the decision to put a bunch of time and energy into new options "just in case" I want to make him gay next time around.

It's just silly.

#3461
Jaron Oberyn

Jaron Oberyn
  • Members
  • 6 755 messages
Hold on, didn't the developers confirm that there were no new romances? Now they're saying the opposite?

-Polite

#3462
TheMarshal

TheMarshal
  • Members
  • 2 339 messages
@SilentNukee - Who's truffle?

#3463
Guest_mrsph_*

Guest_mrsph_*
  • Guests
Truffle is Christian Norman

#3464
paptschik

paptschik
  • Members
  • 320 messages

Abispa wrote...

paptschik wrote...

Siansonea II wrote...

Phaelducan wrote...

No pretense at civility at this point. Although as a point of reference it does seem like that fight for the love side is getting pretty heavy with the rage....

Edit: Also cracks me up that anyone who would rather male shep not be bi-sexual is virulently anti-homosexual. Logic fail.


So, you think it's perfectly reasonable to prevent other people from playing a gay or bisexual Shepard, even though you can still play your Shepard the way you want? You really think that's reasonable and fair? What. Ever.:pinched:


But...I can't play my Shepard as a clumsy, slightly overweight guy that doesn't always succeed but in the end still saves the galaxy and gets the cute girl.
Where is my right to play as the likable, overweight guy?! HUH?!
I call fat-sism!

:P


Seriously, I AM unhappy by the lack of body shape choices. Why not a less chisled look for male Shepard? Or a female Shepard who looks like one of the Williams sisters? Sneaky sniper skinny Goth girl?


I would like more options as well. I mean, I know a "me" is unreasonable, I'm fat, a fat Shepard makes no sense, he/she is a soldier and I don't plan to make Shepard like me anyway (I only have two Shepards so far anyway...one is intended as a half-asian half-caucasian male, the other is a female..both things i am definitely NOT..not sure what my third Shep will be like once I'm done replaying ME2 this week)...but a little variety would be nice. Even if we'd only get three or so body types per gender to pick from.

#3465
MACharlie1

MACharlie1
  • Members
  • 3 437 messages

PoliteAssasin wrote...

Hold on, didn't the developers confirm that there were no new romances? Now they're saying the opposite?

-Polite

Magazine misquoted Casey and things changed in development. B)

#3466
SilentNukee

SilentNukee
  • Members
  • 1 665 messages

TheMarshal wrote...

@SilentNukee - Who's truffle?


She's pretty much the lead gameplay designer who's also very thrilled for s/s romances. :P

#3467
The Uncanny

The Uncanny
  • Members
  • 25 783 messages
Can we all try to stay civil in expressing our viewpoints please. Thanks.

#3468
CulturalGeekGirl

CulturalGeekGirl
  • Members
  • 3 280 messages

Phaelducan wrote...

Siansonea II wrote...

Phaelducan wrote...

No pretense at civility at this point. Although as a point of reference it does seem like that fight for the love side is getting pretty heavy with the rage....

Edit: Also cracks me up that anyone who would rather male shep not be bi-sexual is virulently anti-homosexual. Logic fail.


So, you think it's perfectly reasonable to prevent other people from playing a gay or bisexual Shepard, even though you can still play your Shepard the way you want? You really think that's reasonable and fair? What. Ever.:pinched:


I'm preventing two things. Jack and *&&*. I do, however, think Bioware is making a mistake by changing it's gameplan. I played a lesbian shep. I also played a lesbian warden, and a gay warden. I also played a lesbian Hawke and a gay Hawke. With that said, I don't think male shep needs to be flagged for gayness. The story doesn't need it, it didn't have it for two games, and nothing in ANY of the dialog from ME1 or 2 gives any hint whatsoever that he is/could be gay. The mere idea that simply because he doesn't tag any of the female LI is evidence that he is/could be gay is preposterous, even more so because there is no possible way for male shep to pursue a male LI in either of the first two games.

Compounding all of it is the further evidence that at one point Bioware put development time into enabling a gay man-shep, but took it out on purpose. 

My Shep is one of, I don't know, 8 or 9 versions I messed around with, it just so happens none of them were both male and gay. That doesn't  make me homophobic, it makes me someone who invested a lot of play-hours into a character who was never gay, and I don't care for the decision to put a bunch of time and energy into new options "just in case" I want to make him gay next time around.

It's just silly.


Because you didn't appear to read it the first time, here's the  link and quote again

Posted ImagePosted: Tuesday, 29 September 2009 05:56AM


I didn't work on ME1 but I would venture to say that most of the
developers feel that Liara/Femshep is an F/F relationship. I don't know
if the "she's an asari" thing was ever intended to take away from the
F/F aspect (since I wasn't around when the idea was put together) but
nevertheless, she was intended as the gay female love interest.

As
far as M/M love interests... I can say that it was planned, but as far
as I know it was cut due to time constraints. Quite frankly the demand
is small. I'm not defending it, but the choice is between a level that
everyone will enjoy and a romance that only a minority will enjoy. We
did it in Jade so we're not afraid of it; there just isn't enough time.

Sorry to all the gay ME fans Posted Image

-Thomas
  Posted Image
  Posted Image

#3469
Erani

Erani
  • Members
  • 1 535 messages

centauri2002 wrote...

Erani wrote...
I know! I was clueless the first time as well.:lol:

Anyway, it'd be cool if Shiala were an f/f option. She's pretty and green(cute) and in ME2 she said she'd like to get to know Shepard better under different circumstances so...<3


That would be a good option! I'm still holding out for Aria~ My little RenShep needs a badass LI, dammit!


Yes! Aria would be a great option. She's bad*ss and sexy. Also, Carrie-Anne Moss' voice :wub:

#3470
Siansonea

Siansonea
  • Members
  • 7 282 messages

paptschik wrote...

Siansonea II wrote...

massive_effect wrote...

twincast wrote...

ReconTeam wrote...

Russalka wrote...
What is the purpose of you returning all the time and not trying to start a civil dialogue?


I wasn't aware an arrogance and "we don't owe you 'homophobes' any compromise" was civil dialouge? Sounds more like the words of over-entitled braggarts.

Wee~! Homophobic Troll Alert.


In other news, the Earth travels around the Sun.

Calling someone "homophobic" is civil dialogue?


Only if it's accurate. It cracks me up that people who are virulently opposed to anything related to homosexuality somehow bridle at being called homophobic. 


But, to be fair, in these discussions everyone that is NOT opposed to all things homosexual but still doesn't entirely agree, usually ends up being called a homophobe at least half a dozen times as well.
It's how it always ends up. Yes, one side has annoying, often angry and irrational homophobes.
The other side isn't perfect either and has people yelling "homophobe! gay-hater! burn at the stake!" even when it completely wrong.
It is how it is.


I don't disagree with that, but it seems like there is a bit of a double standard around here. We who support the initiative are expected to act calm, serene and fair, regardless of how offensive and vulgar the anti-gay group behaves. We are expected to answer their insulting questions and preposterous proclamations with roses and bunnies and rainbow cookies no matter how awful they behave. Well, I'd like to aspire to that standard, but in truth, I can't act like people who are behaving badly aren't behaving badly. I don't think it's productive to treat hateful people as if they are making reasonable, logical points, unless they happen to actually be making reasonable, logical points. I do try, BOY do I try, to give them the benefit of the doubt, but all too often it's pretty obvious that they only come in here to poke at us and bully us with hate rhetoric. What do you do with that? There is no classy way to deal with people who are being hateful. I report the ones who are reportable, but there are some crafty ones who know how to walk the fine line, and proclaim innocence whenever they're called on their disruptive behavior. I try to dump as much logic, reason, math, and common sense onto them as I can, but they just ignore that stuff. You can't reason with someone whose argument is based on an irrational fear or hatred of a group of individuals.

#3471
Centauri2002

Centauri2002
  • Members
  • 2 086 messages

Phaelducan wrote...

I'm preventing two things. Jack and *&&*. I do, however, think Bioware is making a mistake by changing it's gameplan. I played a lesbian shep. I also played a lesbian warden, and a gay warden. I also played a lesbian Hawke and a gay Hawke. With that said, I don't think male shep needs to be flagged for gayness. The story doesn't need it, it didn't have it for two games, and nothing in ANY of the dialog from ME1 or 2 gives any hint whatsoever that he is/could be gay. The mere idea that simply because he doesn't tag any of the female LI is evidence that he is/could be gay is preposterous, even more so because there is no possible way for male shep to pursue a male LI in either of the first two games.

Compounding all of it is the further evidence that at one point Bioware put development time into enabling a gay man-shep, but took it out on purpose. 

My Shep is one of, I don't know, 8 or 9 versions I messed around with, it just so happens none of them were both male and gay. That doesn't  make me homophobic, it makes me someone who invested a lot of play-hours into a character who was never gay, and I don't care for the decision to put a bunch of time and energy into new options "just in case" I want to make him gay next time around.

It's just silly.


I'm fairly sure sexuality doesn't add to the story much at all, apart from dictating who you can choose to romance. Let's face it, romances are all about personal preference no matter how you look at it. They barely add much to the story and they don't take up a lot of screen time. Adding in gay romances is all about personal preferences. They're just adding in extra options. That's all. 

As long as nothing is forced on other players, I don't see anything wrong with this added choice.

#3472
billywaffles

billywaffles
  • Members
  • 279 messages
It somehow amuses me just to think about how the hell is bioware going to make the transition between straight shepard to gay shepard.

#3473
MACharlie1

MACharlie1
  • Members
  • 3 437 messages

billywaffles wrote...

It somehow amuses me just to think about how the hell is bioware going to make the transition between straight shepard to gay shepard.

Transition? me non comprende...:?

#3474
Abispa

Abispa
  • Members
  • 3 465 messages
Well, since we're arguing about stuff that'll make ME3 seem silly and catering to simple minded fans, why not complain about how Bioware expects us to accept the fantasy that the only way for Shepard to stop an invasion of god-like machines is for him and two buddies to charge into battle with armed with machine guns and rocket launchers plus one or two cinematic cut scenes where Joker flies the ship and does something cool?

#3475
Siansonea

Siansonea
  • Members
  • 7 282 messages

ReconTeam wrote...

Russalka wrote...
And instead of trying to start civil
conversation, you revert back to the same old position of everyone being
bad. How are you any better than us then? According to you, we are
unreasonable, but it seems you are too.


Well maybe that is because I run into the same handful of people, such as...

Siansonea II wrote...
Now, now, no need for name calling. My being spoiled and arrogant has nothing to do with the fact that I support the inclusion of same-sex content. It's just a natural by-product of being awesome and attractive. But that's neither here nor there, the fact remains that now that you're on the other side of the fence, you're singing a different tune than you were before. Before this announcement, you were the "spoiled and arrogant" one, because BioWare's stance at that time supported your viewpoint that people who want something you dislike don't matter. Now that you're on the receiving end of what you view as "discrimination" (as if...) you don't like it. Instead of having an epiphany about how others might have felt, etc., etc., you choose to feel like a victim. For those of us who remember the glee with which you derided the idea, and the way you exulted over the exclusion of this content, well, it makes it hard for us to feel sorry for you. That's all I'm saying.

I don't think the supporters of inclusion have been behaving inappropriately, actually. We had our Fight For The Love thread, and we were happily celebrating—and it got locked. Then we got sent here, and we were happily discussing the possibilities, and then the anti-gay crowd started shouting down our ideas with calls of "Retcon!" and "Decreased Sales!" and other such pretexts which could be easily swept aside if all agreed to use reason and logic to discuss them. Those things evaporate pretty quickly when exposed to the light of reason. But instead of using your previously favorite trump card "It's BioWare's call—deal with it", we choose to laboriously go through the process of showing the flaws in the logic being presented as if it were something to seriously consider. Out of respect, and out of a desire to help those who simply don't know any better. But that part, at least, seems to be a losing battle. People don't say the things your fellows are saying if they want to engage in a reasoned discussion. They just want to hate loudly enough to get BioWare to overturn their decision. Well, I would wish you luck with that, but in truth I hope you fail.


Yes I suppose narcissism would make one think that. I was never spoiled or arrogant for opposing your little cause. I saw ever reason for Bioware not to add such content and it is a decision that I continue to oppose. Meanwhile your group always liked to pretend it had the moral high ground, you used the usual empty phrases, said "it doesn't effect anybody else", and played the usual act. The constant claim that Bioware was discriminating by not providing what you wanted was always a favorite of mine. Of course anybody who opposed you happened to be "homophobes" but that was just another means to an end. Yet now that you have what you want, your hypocrisy is pretty clear. Despite whatever excuses you'll invent, you never cared about other players who didn't want to deal with nonsense like this. You won't admit it, but you don't want to agree to any sort of compromise out of spite. So you claim some sort of selection at the start of the game, or some sort of DLC would be "offensive." You make empty comparisons to race or Cerberus. Many of your supporters are perfectly fine with characters being retconned, hitting on Shepard, and so on. If everybody just happens to become bisexual, your response is for the "homophobes" to "deal with it". This is a far cry from how you portrayed yourselves previously.

If you want to pat each other on the back all day go to your private group, there was never any reason or logic behind your claims anyway. You wanted this out of personal interests and nothing more. Yet unlike the Talimancers or any other group, you could bludgeon your way through to Bioware thanks to today's culture of politically correct insanity and playing off of "white straight guilt." I'll commend you for this, as people prove as gullible as ever. Now you'll complain about "haters" to say "see we shouldn't compromise with those people." We always hoped the other's cause would fail, that's the way this works. Now I can only hope Bioware shows some common sense and allows players to make their choice at the start of the game. Or at least they could show the integrity to not make everybody bisexual, something which at least half of you seem to dearly want.


I have read your response. I disagree with many of your conclusions.

It's funny how you expect me to be accommodating toward you, and yet you have never been accommodating toward me, and yet you are calling ME a hypocrite. That is very interesting. And that's all I have to say about that.