TriviaAeducan wrote...
AGREED!
I love you!
I think I'm totally going to make a FemShep in ME3 that resembles Gaga and has her attitude.
Guest_rynluna_*
TriviaAeducan wrote...
AGREED!
Guest_lightsnow13_*
TommyServo wrote...
Wereparrot wrote...
It's what you get for accusing me of homophobia. Right now, I'm not interested in any arguements for or against, so yes we must agree to disagree-what I take issue with is the far too abundant accusations of homophobia. So, having read my posts, please explain to me why they are homophobic, because personally I see nothing but reasoned dissent. What you make of that reason is up to you.
Please nix the quote pyramids.
As I recall, here's a summary of your reasoned dissent. Anyone, please feel free to correct me if I'm wrong:
"But you're retconning existing characters!"
Okay, what about new characters?
"But Shepard was never gay!"
Okay, what about FemShep?
"He was never gay!"
You're ignoring FemShep and Liara. And Kelly.
"They don't count!"
Okay, why?
"Because!"
Okay, why was Shepard explicitly straight?
"He couldn't romance a male."
Herp derp, really? We didn't realize that.
"He couldn't for two games."
But in both of those games, there's no explicit evidence that he is or is not, yes? Maybe he's just waiting for someone to reciprocate?
"...Shepard's not gay!"
...
rynluna wrote...
I love you!
I think I'm totally going to make a FemShep in ME3 that resembles Gaga and has her attitude.
Siansonea II wrote...
Gosh, none of that character change could be attributed to fusing with a spirit of Justice, could it? No?
SennenScale wrote...
Erani wrote...
SennenScale wrote...
If being all pro-Cerberus doesn't lock you out of their romance, I imagine it will be like a rivalmance or Slap Slap Kiss.
I wonder if cheating on Kaidan + pro-Cerberus will lock you out of the romance. He'd be 2Xpissed off.
If they can lock out Garrus because you didn't recruit him, they ought to be able to make Kaidan get p'od because of cheating and working with a terrorist organization/rogue black op.
Guest_rynluna_*
jlb524 wrote...
rynluna wrote...
I love you!
I think I'm totally going to make a FemShep in ME3 that resembles Gaga and has her attitude.
I'm curious how you will roleplay that one...
jeweledleah wrote...
actualy, according to a developer - Anders is bi-polar. he was in manic stage for Awakenings. which is honestly the first explanation that I've seen for his personality change that actualy makes sence, as well as the changes he wrought in character of Justice.
Erani wrote...
It'd be funny then if Kaidan were the m/m
option, technically we couldn't get locked out since there was no way to
cheat on him (unless Cerberus thing alone locks the romance)....Imagine
the outcry of "gay content gets special priviledges"! or "straight
romances get punished"! [smilie]../../../images/forum/emoticons/lol.png[/smilie]
[smilie]../../../images/forum/emoticons/devil.png[/smilie]
Modifié par SennenScale, 20 mai 2011 - 07:00 .
Guest_Autolycus_*
CaptainIsabela wrote...
Wereparrot wrote...
It's what you get for accusing me of homophobia. Right now, I'm not interested in any arguements for or against, so yes we must agree to disagree-what I take issue with is the far too abundant accusations of homophobia. So, having read my posts, please explain to me why they are homophobic, because personally I see nothing but reasoned dissent. What you make of that reason is up to you.
I infer homophobia. That is my right. We have agreed to disagree.
And I don't 'get' anything for 'accusing' you. As I said above, I infer homophobia, not accuse.
Guest_rynluna_*
Autolycus wrote...
Well if not lots of women ryn...you have just be content with Tali
TheMarshal wrote...
PlumPaul82393 wrote...
There is some holier-than-thou attitude in this thread. I think it's fair to say you don't want characters to be made bi if your worried that they'll change the character of a character. If they do it right it could work but if not...
What about their character do you believe will change if they are open to/have had s/s romances in the past but are in a heterosexual relationship at the present? I highly doubt you're expecting Garrus to go mincing about the Normandy wearing a fantastically over-the-top ascot and talking about theatre...
And what "truth" is that?Polliot wrote...
No,you think that logic is on your side. I very much disagree. And I personally find you one of the most offensive and unreasonable people here.Siansonea II wrote...
PlumPaul82393 wrote...
There is some holier-than-thou attitude in this thread. I think it's fair to say you don't want characters to be made bi if your worried that they'll change the character of a character. If they do it right it could work but if not...
Yeah...and the anti-gay folks are being SO respectful. What was that one from yesterday "s/s fanatics?" Hmmm, yeah, not respectful. When people come in and say "I don't mean to offend but [insert blatantly offensive statement here]", you can't claim the high road on a technicality.
This is typical, by the way. You can't beat us with logic, because logic is clearly on our side, so you call us "holier-than-thou". This is often code for "they're right, and they know it".
Also,it's not our fault that you get offended by the truth.
jeweledleah wrote...
as for same sex romances specificaly with existing LI's.
personal opinion and personal concern - implementation of said relationships
revealing that they are actualy bisexual - not a retcon.
starting same sex relationships with no explanation of why those relationships haven't happpened before - eeeh, a bit of a retcon. (and IMO, "I was in love with you all along" subplot - cheesy retcon)
basicaly there are certain plot possibilities that will make me grit my teeth in frustration, bang my head on desk a few times at the ridiculousnes/cheesiness/etc of them and then I'll just sigh, accept their existance, and basicaly never play through them to completion, although it will most certainly affect how I see characters and as a consequence, what sort of endings/actions I will end up pursuing with them in general.
Guest_Nyoka_*
Modifié par Nyoka, 20 mai 2011 - 07:12 .
jeweledleah wrote...
Siansonea II wrote...
Gosh, none of that character change could be attributed to fusing with a spirit of Justice, could it? No?
actualy, according to a developer - Anders is bi-polar. he was in manic stage for Awakenings. which is honestly the first explanation that I've seen for his personality change that actualy makes sence, as well as the changes he wrought in character of Justice. still doesn't change the fact that they basicaly retconned every possible awakening epilogue, but that's neither here nor there.
as for same sex romances specificaly with existing LI's.
personal opinion and personal concern - implementation of said relationships
revealing that they are actualy bisexual - not a retcon.
starting same sex relationships with no explanation of why those relationships haven't happpened before - eeeh, a bit of a retcon. (and IMO, "I was in love with you all along" subplot - cheesy retcon)
basicaly there are certain plot possibilities that will make me grit my teeth in frustration, bang my head on desk a few times at the ridiculousnes/cheesiness/etc of them and then I'll just sigh, accept their existance, and basicaly never play through them to completion, although it will most certainly affect how I see characters and as a consequence, what sort of endings/actions I will end up pursuing with them in general.
TommyServo wrote...
"But Shepard was never gay!"
Okay, what about FemShep?
"He was never gay!"
You're ignoring FemShep and Liara. And Kelly.
"They don't count!"
Okay, why?
"Because!"
Okay, why was Shepard explicitly straight?
"He couldn't romance a male."
Herp derp, really? We didn't realize that.
"He couldn't for two games."
But in both of those games, there's no explicit evidence that he is or is not, yes? Maybe he's just waiting for someone to reciprocate?
"...Shepard's not gay!"
TommyServo wrote...
The first justification they used was "retcon!" While I don't think this is necessarily the case, I would accept it as a valid concern. Then when Casey tweeted that they would be adding new LIs, it became "Well, Shepard's never been gay." It was telling. Basically, they're uncomfortable with it for some reason, even when there's nothing contradictory whatsoever in it's implementation, and they're couching this in "concern for story." Wereparrot especially, was grasping at straws.
ExtremeOne wrote...
TommyServo wrote...
The first justification they used was "retcon!" While I don't think this is necessarily the case, I would accept it as a valid concern. Then when Casey tweeted that they would be adding new LIs, it became "Well, Shepard's never been gay." It was telling. Basically, they're uncomfortable with it for some reason, even when there's nothing contradictory whatsoever in it's implementation, and they're couching this in "concern for story." Wereparrot especially, was grasping at straws.
It is a retcon but I can deal with it by not buying ME 3 . This is a case of fan service is more important than creating Shepard's story. But how dare you talk down to us that have a legit issue with this content being added to the game . Shepard was straight in both games unless you include Liara but she does not matter she is a stupid alien . They lost a ME 3 player in me and I will never buy any of their games again .
Siansonea II wrote...
That comic is funneh.
AngelicMachinery wrote...
ExtremeOne wrote...
TommyServo wrote...
The first justification they used was "retcon!" While I don't think this is necessarily the case, I would accept it as a valid concern. Then when Casey tweeted that they would be adding new LIs, it became "Well, Shepard's never been gay." It was telling. Basically, they're uncomfortable with it for some reason, even when there's nothing contradictory whatsoever in it's implementation, and they're couching this in "concern for story." Wereparrot especially, was grasping at straws.
It is a retcon but I can deal with it by not buying ME 3 . This is a case of fan service is more important than creating Shepard's story. But how dare you talk down to us that have a legit issue with this content being added to the game . Shepard was straight in both games unless you include Liara but she does not matter she is a stupid alien . They lost a ME 3 player in me and I will never buy any of their games again .
Weren't you not buying the game anywhere? What with cerberus being evulz?
So you are not going to buy a game because people have the option of choosing a s/s romance? If you don't want to have a s/s romance, then your Shepard is not gay. Why should it matter what other people chose to do?ExtremeOne wrote...
TommyServo wrote...
The first justification they used was "retcon!" While I don't think this is necessarily the case, I would accept it as a valid concern. Then when Casey tweeted that they would be adding new LIs, it became "Well, Shepard's never been gay." It was telling. Basically, they're uncomfortable with it for some reason, even when there's nothing contradictory whatsoever in it's implementation, and they're couching this in "concern for story." Wereparrot especially, was grasping at straws.
It is a retcon but I can deal with it by not buying ME 3 . This is a case of fan service is more important than creating Shepard's story. But how dare you talk down to us that have a legit issue with this content being added to the game . Shepard was straight in both games unless you include Liara but she does not matter she is a stupid alien . They lost a ME 3 player in me and I will never buy any of their games again .
mopotter wrote...
If it's characters i already have in my previous games, I'll skip it all together even if i have not romanced them in a previous game (Tali/Garrus). I like my characters to be consistent no matter how many games I play and no matter which sex I'm playing.
Having one of the previous characters change in ME3 does not work for me. Having new characters does.
Nyoka wrote...
I have brought up the VS thing for one reason.
Look at what people have been saying about what should affect the reconciliation, how would the VS react to different circumstances... and now imagine the VS is Kaidan and Shepard is a man.
See? All those messages apply in any case, all are equally valid regardless of whether Shepard's relationship with the VS is a heterosexual relationship or a gay relationship. s/s relationships are no different to non s/s relationships. What matters to the former matters just as much to the latter.
There's no need to be afraid of teh gay, there's no reason to expect over the top melodramatic scenes, there's nothing indicating s/s relationships are in any way different in the game in terms of how they are depicted, how the NPC react to Shepard, etc. If you guys think current relationships aren't terrible, then things will turn out just fine, so maybe now you'll be able to relax a little, mkay?
Modifié par jeweledleah, 20 mai 2011 - 07:32 .
ExtremeOne wrote...
AngelicMachinery wrote...
ExtremeOne wrote...
TommyServo wrote...
The first justification they used was "retcon!" While I don't think this is necessarily the case, I would accept it as a valid concern. Then when Casey tweeted that they would be adding new LIs, it became "Well, Shepard's never been gay." It was telling. Basically, they're uncomfortable with it for some reason, even when there's nothing contradictory whatsoever in it's implementation, and they're couching this in "concern for story." Wereparrot especially, was grasping at straws.
It is a retcon but I can deal with it by not buying ME 3 . This is a case of fan service is more important than creating Shepard's story. But how dare you talk down to us that have a legit issue with this content being added to the game . Shepard was straight in both games unless you include Liara but she does not matter she is a stupid alien . They lost a ME 3 player in me and I will never buy any of their games again .
Weren't you not buying the game anywhere? What with cerberus being evulz?
The story of ME 3 was something that I could have over looked and just went with it . But this issue is something that I do not like at all .