I'm going to repost this (once) simply because it got left at the very end of the page and its an issue I think is being buried under people arguing whether or not their Shepard is gay or not (which is the thread beginning to circle itself):
My larger concern and it has nothing to do with some kind of a fear of being hit on by a dude (which is childish), or my Shepard somehow turning gay (which is ridiculous) but rather what kind of impact is this going to have IF characters already engaged in a romance turn out to be Shep-sexual (a term and concept which is ****ing stupid).
Because nobody seems to have addressed how this can possibly work out because as it stands any person romancing let's say Jack or Tali or Garrus is going to have to play catchup to the Shepards that already romanced them in ME2. The thing is does that mean Bioware is going to have to record voice work for a character that now needs a non-romantic path/ a romantic path and now a s/s path for players essentially showing up late? None of those paths are going to suffer or becoming generic and vague like we saw in DA2, especially when you consider that they are optional characters that might not even be present?
My concern is losing the specificity of things like Garrus complimenting a FemShep according to Turian standards of femininity or basic crap like Tali actually using male pronouns or gender specific body language in cutscenes in exchange for DA2's nonsense. Especially when we could potentially use either characters like Samara who are already set up for s/s or use newcomers like James Vega to fill those roles without compromising what we already have in place.
Modifié par InvaderErl, 16 mai 2011 - 04:45 .