FLYING GRENADE11 wrote...
I am no homophobe, my friend is in fact bi, but i simply dont want gay romance in Mass Effect 3 is that wrong.
If you don't want it, don't flirt with the available male LI or LIs.
FLYING GRENADE11 wrote...
I am no homophobe, my friend is in fact bi, but i simply dont want gay romance in Mass Effect 3 is that wrong.
Not at allFLYING GRENADE11 wrote...
I am no homophobe, my friend is in fact bi, but i simply dont want gay romance in Mass Effect 3 is that wrong.
Ghost Warrior wrote...
2. showing bisexuality/homosexuality as something normal and standard
Don't rage because of that one. True,those things exist in the real word but no matter how much would society approve it now or in the future,it will never become standard and you know it. It's wrong potraiting it as such.
Ghost Warrior wrote...
Look there are two main reasons why introducing S/S romance is a bad idea:
1. breaking the continuity
Now you say it's not how everyone sees it,but let's look at the facts:
ME1:male Shep can't romance other men
ME2:male Shep can't romance other men
ME3:male Shep can romance other men
And most characters show no indication of being bi,and now suddenly they are in bed with same-sex Shep? I don't buy it.
2. showing bisexuality/homosexuality as something normal and standard
Don't rage because of that one. True,those things exist in the real word but no matter how much would society approve it now or in the future,it will never become standard and you know it. It's wrong potraiting it as such.
And there is one reason for doing it:
- more choices
Important reason,I admit. But enough to be done at cost of those 2 above?
Modifié par centauri2002, 17 mai 2011 - 08:17 .
thatguy212 wrote...
Isn't it technically only considered bisexual if you count alternate universes? (gay if maleshep, straight if femaleshep) so there could sorta be a gay-exclusive romance
The fact that is not.Village Idiot wrote...
What's wrong with making it seem normal?
Eradyn wrote...
Because sexual orientation does not change.
It isn't a choice, it's what you are born as. You don't wake up one day
saying, "gee, today I think I'll be gay, just for the hell of it." You
are what you are. You can no more "convert" a heterosexual to
homosexuality than you can a homosexual to heterosexuality. We're
talking sexual orientation here, not someone's favorite movie or their
maturing taste in literature.
Walrusninja wrote...
If Wrex is gay or something, that
would make no sense whatsoever. As has been said, the Krogan are very
matter-of-fact about relationships and very practical, it's not some
soppy fan-fiction. The Krogan just wouldn't even get into this sort of
conversation, it would be utterly our of character.
Clonedzero wrote...
its a pretty safe assumption though. whats
so bad about going "oh he's obviously into women i guess he's
straight". theres no indication he's bi so why would they think that?
always assuming people are bi just because they dont say they arent is well dumb.
its using logic.
man A shows interest in women. he also shows zero signs of being interested in men.
logical conclusion? he is straight.
man B shows interest in women. he also shows interest in men.
logical conclusion? he is bi.
man C shows no interest in women. he shows interest in men.
logical conclusion? he is gay.
all
of those are completely reasonable and logical. will it be accurate
every single time? nah but for a vast majority of the time its a same
way to figure it out.
M-Sinistrari wrote...
Case in
point, I've repeatedly said around the forums that the Garrus/Tali
romance shift makes absolutely no sense to me. With how many
playthroughs I've done on both games, it does feel to me like something
spackled in and limits my Sheps dialogs with them since I don't want a
romance with them. Now to a Garrus fan or a Talimancer, I must be
clearly blind to not see the little innuendos they do. Really, I could
sit down with one of them at a table and go over every bit in game with
them pointing and saying "SEE!" and I'm still not going to see what they
do, even elaborating how we respectively see things will likely result
in each of us thinking the other's crazy.
Now, does my not seeing
what they do just mean my perspective's different or am I
misinterpreting? The first is common to everyone, the second implies
that I'm wrong.
Everyone doesn't like it when they're wrong on
something, but just having a differing perspective is something that we
can engage in thoughtful discussion on. I think part of the temper
flarings going on in the thread is from the presuming people are
interpreting wrong than just having a differing perspective.
The Narrator wrote...
fundementaly this is about messing with characters to fit roles, and adding politics to games, most likely to search for demographics.
Maybe im wrong but i see no way anders was already bisexual in awakenings, and his mixing with a spirit with no physical attachment wouldn't exactly increase his opinions on the subject of sex.
Politics and entertainment i think we can all agree should usually stay apart, it makes good works bad to some, and worse to others. It makes musicians hated and contreversy stem and can make peoples favorite artists, musicians, ect, ect, objectionable to their ideolgy, whatever that may be, so, Its bad, to clarify.
its popular and they may be searching for that, or it could be a return to old ways, with bad timing do to the times. Im probably wrong here, because i won't lie i started playing Bioware games at KOTOR and have yet to go farther back.
Sorry if i offended anyone, which i probably did.
If so, know that in the future, Im never gonna give you up, never gonna let you down, never gonna run around and hurt you never gonna make you cry never gonna tell a lie and desert you.
James2912 wrote...
I agree with Culturalgeekgirl in that
ME's romance adds valuable drama to the game, it adds to the I'm
starring in an epic sci fi movie adventure feeling. However it seems
that since ME1 the romance section of the game has been growing
exponentially, which to me is scary and unnecessarily especially since
ME2 squadmate and friendship interaction was cut so much and tied so
strongly to romance. It makes me wonder whats going to happen in ME3.
Will I be able to talk to garrus or will he be to busy doing
calibrations because I'm not intersted in effing him? Thats stupid! More
friendship less LI's!
Modifié par WizenSlinky0, 17 mai 2011 - 08:25 .
James2912 wrote...
Ryzaki wrote...
C9316 wrote...
I look at this thread look back and think to myself "Gee, and Bioware didn't even have to give us what we got now, heck they should've made it where you couldn't romance anyone just so people wouldn't have to rant about not being accomodated."
They might've been able to work on some decent character development outside screwing someone in that case as well. Hi Jack. <_<
Edit: @James: And you know what fine. Sorry for asking for 2 bi male LIs. I'll be sure never to ask for more than I deserve again.
Sorry I completely misunderstood what you were saying two is perfectly reasonable.
Ghost Warrior wrote...
Look there are two main reasons why introducing S/S romance is a bad idea:
1. breaking the continuity
Now you say it's not how everyone sees it,but let's look at the facts:
ME1:male Shep can't romance other men
ME2:male Shep can't romance other men
ME3:male Shep can romance other men
And most characters show no indication of being bi,and now suddenly they are in bed with same-sex Shep? I don't buy it.
2. showing bisexuality/homosexuality as something normal and standard
Don't rage because of that one. True,those things exist in the real word but no matter how much would society approve it now or in the future,it will never become standard and you know it. It's wrong potraiting it as such.
And there is one reason for doing it:
- more choices
Important reason,I admit. But enough to be done at cost of those 2 above?
You know that 12 is not a representative sample of the general population, right? You could have a hundred gays on one ship and it wouldn't matter for diddlysquat because it's a hundred out of trillions.Ghost Warrior wrote...
The fact that is not.Village Idiot wrote...
What's wrong with making it seem normal?
Whether some people approve it,and others not doesn't matter. It is not normal(standard),it is in significant minority.
Making multiple people bi on a 12 men team is wrong.
LiquidGrape wrote...
Okay, enough of this base, contemptible nonsense.
Here are the facts:
1) The inclusion of potential same sex romances increases the amount of options.
2) We like options.
3) Being the player, you have agency over what options you respond to, and which you do not.
4) You do not have to respond to the same sex option.
5) BioWare has made the decision, and no amount of knee-jerk reactionary whinging is going to change that fact.
6) You either buy the game or you do not.
7) You have that option too.
[Disclaimer:] This is aimed at no one particular person. It's simply a response to a prevalent gist in the discussion.
Modifié par James2912, 17 mai 2011 - 08:28 .
Ghost Warrior wrote...
The fact that is not.Village Idiot wrote...
What's wrong with making it seem normal?
Whether some people approve it,and others not doesn't matter. It is not normal(standard),it is in significant minority.
Making multiple people bi on a 12 men team is wrong.
Modifié par Walrusninja, 17 mai 2011 - 08:33 .
I never hid behind anything. Continuity is my first and main reason,that second point is just another.ReveurIngenu wrote...
Oh, wow, you just discredited yourself by showing your obvious bias against gays. It's clear that you use the "continuity" argument to mask your homophobia.
Homosexuality has more chances of becoming standard and accepted because countries all over the world are becoming more tolerant and open. I can cite the numerous countries legalizing gay marriages, the abolition of Don't Ask Don't Tell, the banalization of lesbian acts in "straight porn," as well as numerous other examples. Just because you don't like it doesn't mean it won't become socially accepted in the world one day.
"It's wrong portraying it as such."
Wow, talk about finally showing your true opinions on the matter. It certainly isn't about continuity, but about "being wrong". No point in hiding behind that argument anymore. How do you feel knowing your poll about whether or not people approve same sex relationships has over a 50 percent approval rating (don't have the exact numbers)?
All I have to say is "Deal with it," because Bioware knows that they will not be cut any slack from the community if the gay romances seem second-rate or like something abnormal. Gay romances in ME3 will be as normal as straight romances (just as in DAII) and in real life, gay rights will only increase with time as well as social acceptance of them. Don't like it? Not our problem. Deal with it.<_<
Well saidWalrusninja wrote...
Alright. I doubt anyone will read my guff, but I'll try to share it anyways.
I think the problem here is as follows:
Homosexuality, and the likes really, are VERY raw subjects. As has been seen here, when you get down to it, we still don't even know the facts of the subject ie. are you born gay, straight etc. is it a decision? (anyone who even trys to argue that one out ..... just don't start, anyone who does will be ignored entirely fro argueing theories). So there's only so far this can go before it errupts into "my opinion over yours".
I think the community looking for the relationship variety, really should be grateful to Bioware for what they've managed to achieve. I think Bioware however need to be careful not to segregate the community and incite hate, and really should just cut the focus on romance and focus on the story but hey, I admire their guts for trying.
It's more a society problem than a problem just on here. The ideas of sexuality are spreading, but there's a LOT of "oh if you disagree you're an intollerant homophobe" goes on too. That really helps nobody, in fact, it incites hatred and divison, fairly so. This is a culture-shock, massive, massive change, deal with that. It's something that'll grow over time and through acceptance and open mindedness ON BOTH SIDES. It isn't a matter of "hi, the government is cool with us now so accept us or we'll look down on you". Hundreds of years of values and ideals are being questioned and sorted here, that isn't easy.
I admire anyone who truly believes in what they are doing. I admire the old school thinkers who are sticking to their roots and their ideals, why shouldn't they? And I admire gays etc. who are genuine about it and just trying to understand the world they live in and who they are. Both are valid, so stop trying to stamp on each other. This may sound brutal, but gays etc. especially need to be careful. As a minority, you need to strive and fight for the respect you desire, that's just the way it is. Forcing it breaks things and widens the gap. That does not mean "Gay Pride" parades, the exact opposite
Oh yeah, I have absolutely NO respect whatsoever, for non-gays etc. "standing up for" gays etc. In doing so, you not only show that you don't believe they are capable of standing up for themselves, which they totally are but you're also stupidly getting wound up on one of the "sides" and making the whole situation worse. It's like me saying "the elderly are strong and should be respected! they can speak for themselves! ... which .... is why I'm here speaking on their behalf!" - it makes no sense. You're showing respect with words and a lack of it with actions, cut it out, fakes.
SO. Bioware, please add at least 1 option for each. To my mind Liara is a definate and always should be, Kaiden always struck me as gay, he just did, I dunno why, I think it'd fit his personality. Ash, well, no. She's stubborn and kind of "by the books" it wouldn't fit her attitude.
Basically - yes, do this Bioware, but do it well. And DO NOT set everyone to Bi. Otherwise it just becomes a joke really. The majority of the world is straight and pretty solid in that, that's just the way it is. Making all the characters suddenly 100% sexually open breaks the characters developed so far especially seeing as we're about to go to full out war, it's not exactly time to settle down and start a family:)
Don't break the old characters, nerves are still raw on the subject, accept it or not, this would damage the characters for many. For me personally it would simply damage continuity and feel like a cheap publicity stunt.
New characters - go mad!
Failing all that, please, just focus on the damn story : /
Ghost Warrior wrote...
The fact that is not.Village Idiot wrote...
What's wrong with making it seem normal?
Whether some people approve it,and others not doesn't matter. It is not normal(standard),it is in significant minority.
Making multiple people bi on a 12 men team is wrong.
Modifié par TommyServo, 17 mai 2011 - 08:38 .
Guest_makalathbonagin_*
Oh look more poorly veiled political correctness and victim mentality, seems like you can't even breathe without offending someone.TommyServo wrote...
Just "telling it like it is," eh?
Dude, shut up. I'm amazed that you don't realize how offensive that is, along with your previous statement. It's poorly veiled homophobia and arrogance.
Walrusninja wrote...
Oh yeah, I have absolutely NO respect whatsoever, for non-gays etc. "standing up for" gays etc. In doing so, you not only show that you don't believe they are capable of standing up for themselves, which they totally are but you're also stupidly getting wound up on one of the "sides" and making the whole situation worse. It's like me saying "the elderly are strong and should be respected! they can speak for themselves! ... which .... is why I'm here speaking on their behalf!" - it makes no sense. You're showing respect with words and a lack of it with actions, cut it out, fakes.
Modifié par centauri2002, 17 mai 2011 - 08:39 .