Like my previous poll on character design, outfits, and appearance, this is an attempt to create an objective, unbiased poll on same-sex relationships. I came up with this very quickly, so I have not spent enough time ensuring that the options are loaded or biased. However, I am sufficiently sure that the nature of the question itself does not lead respondents into a particular answer.
This poll's choices take the views I see most often, but there is an "other" category in which respondents can describe their opinion if it is not represented in the options.
http://social.biowar...95/polls/20093/
Poll on same-sex relationships [Link included]
Débuté par
TheKillerAngel
, mai 16 2011 07:07
#1
Posté 16 mai 2011 - 07:07
#2
Posté 16 mai 2011 - 07:19
I think some of the wording is a whisker loaded but it's not something that offends me personally.
I prefer the option of:
I am for some same sex relationships. However I do not want characters with an established sexual preference changed.
One other thing I'd like to throw out:
I would prefer if some characters were straight only [at least one or two per gender]. I would prefer if some characters were open to bi [at least one or two per gender]. I would also prefer if some characters [at least one or two per gender] were strictly homosexual.
To me the above [while a lot of work!!!!] is a tip of the hat towards "reality". OK asking for realism in a game is streching it but that's my opinion.
I prefer the option of:
I am for some same sex relationships. However I do not want characters with an established sexual preference changed.
One other thing I'd like to throw out:
I would prefer if some characters were straight only [at least one or two per gender]. I would prefer if some characters were open to bi [at least one or two per gender]. I would also prefer if some characters [at least one or two per gender] were strictly homosexual.
To me the above [while a lot of work!!!!] is a tip of the hat towards "reality". OK asking for realism in a game is streching it but that's my opinion.





Retour en haut






