J0HNL3I wrote...
WIN FOR XBOX!!!!!!
pfft you still have to pay. Win for PC. I
J0HNL3I wrote...
WIN FOR XBOX!!!!!!
Ringo12 wrote...
J0HNL3I wrote...
WIN FOR XBOX!!!!!!
pfft you still have to pay. Win for PC. ISteam.
lionalio87 wrote...
Puff, my oh my, I'm going to get the PS3 console but i'm still wondering which console is better, PS3 or XBOX 360, now I have only 1 candidate: XBOX. Never heard XBOX has anything like this before. Screw you, PS3, better luck next time!!!
Let me quote you a quote from CelrathFiery Phoenix wrote...
It's not a hack.
Celrath wrote...
Actualy your wrong Sony is not admitting they where hacked again but there was a scam going around before they took it down again
Read about it Here
So facepalm to you Mister Lightning.
And for the the record exploting and explot is a hack.
GreedIgnored wrote...
And for the the record exploting and explot is a hack.
Modifié par Godak, 19 mai 2011 - 05:37 .
Guest_Celrath_*
Godak wrote...
GreedIgnored wrote...
And for the the record exploting and explot is a hack.
No, it is not.
This was a terriblly stupid oversight on Sony's part, but it was not a hack. See, hacking is the act of forcing your way into a computer or a network. An exploit made possible by a hack is not a hack in and of itself.
k)Modifié par Celrath, 19 mai 2011 - 06:38 .
Guest_SkyeHawk89_*
Celrath wrote...
[/b]b. To gain access to (a computer file or network) illegally or without authorization: hacked the firm's personnel database.
Guest_Celrath_*
Answer: Hell Yes they are!Godak wrote...
Celrath wrote...
[/b]b. To gain access to (a computer file or network) illegally or without authorization: hacked the firm's personnel database.
The hackers used compromised information that they gained from the previous hack. Entering that compromised information is not a hack, as they had all the information Sony required for authorization.
Question: if someone found my online banking information on a piece of paper and they proceeded to use that information to access my online banking account, are they a hacker?
Modifié par Celrath, 19 mai 2011 - 07:25 .
Guest_Luna Siwora_*
Guest_Strangely Brown_*
The are not authorized to use the information that they have illegally obtained and are therefore hacking by definiton.Godak wrote...
Celrath wrote...
[/b]b. To gain access to (a computer file or network) illegally or without authorization: hacked the firm's personnel database.
The hackers used compromised information that they gained from the previous hack. Entering that compromised information is not a hack, as they had all the information Sony required for authorization.
Question: if someone found my online banking information on a piece of paper and they proceeded to use that information to access my online banking account, are they a hacker?
Celrath wrote...
Answer: Hell Yes they are!
In fact that is the main source of identity theft in the US
Celrath wrote...
But
that is besides the point, other hackers not the ones from the original
hack also used other means of obtaining that information, like phishing
scams. So yeah that's clearly a hack
Strangely Brown wrote...
The are not authorized to use the information that they have illegally obtained and are therefore hacking by definiton.
Guest_Strangely Brown_*
Godak wrote...
Strangely Brown wrote...
The are not authorized to use the information that they have illegally obtained and are therefore hacking by definiton.
The only information required to make use of this exploit is one's birthdate and email address. There are many legal ways to obtain that data, though it is especially worrying because of the recent hack that allowed that information to get into the wrong hands.
"Sony's Senior Director of Corporate Communications & Social Media,
Patrick Seybold, told 1UP that it did indeed take down the PSN and
Qriocity password reset page as a result of the issue. 'We temporarily
took down the PSN and Qriocity password reset page,' Seybold said. 'Contrary to some reports, there was no hack involved. In the process
of resetting of passwords there was a URL exploit that we have
subsequently fixed.'"
If a company actually comes out and says "There was no hack, we f'd up," I'm tempted to agree with them.
*UPDATE* To clarify, Sony's Patrick Seybold explains on the PlayStation Blog that there was no hacking or hackers involved here. "We temporarily took down the PSN and Qriocity password reset page," he writes. "Contrary to some reports, there was no hack involved. In the process of resetting of passwords there was a URL exploit that we have subsequently fixed."
He recommends that anyone still needing to change their password do so through a PS3 console. It can be done through web-related means once the websites go back up.
Modifié par asindre, 19 mai 2011 - 08:12 .
Strangely Brown wrote...
That doesn't matter.
Strangely Brown wrote...
Even if they obtained your information legally, unless you personally authorized them to use the information it is fraud and is also hacking (accessing a computer through illegal means and without authorization).
Guest_Celrath_*
asindre wrote...
It wasn't hacked...*UPDATE* To clarify, Sony's Patrick Seybold explains on the PlayStation Blog that there was no hacking or hackers involved here. "We temporarily took down the PSN and Qriocity password reset page," he writes. "Contrary to some reports, there was no hack involved. In the process of resetting of passwords there was a URL exploit that we have subsequently fixed."
He recommends that anyone still needing to change their password do so through a PS3 console. It can be done through web-related means once the websites go back up.
Celrath wrote...
They were informed of the exploit through a web site who had someone who use the exploit demonstrate it for the website. So as much as Sony likes to say they weren't hacked, like any company would at this point. That doesn't make it true. Plus the web site the originally broke the story isn't that big so it will most likely get buried by the Sony PR machine.
Guest_Strangely Brown_*
I love it when sentences are isolated and removed from context. Although I guess it was vague. I was referiing to the means by which they obtained the information.Godak wrote...
Strangely Brown wrote...
That doesn't matter.
What a rousing argument.
Yes it is fraud and by pretending to be someone they are not in order to access that persons account is the same as accessing a computer without authorization and therefore is a hack.Godak wrote...
Strangely Brown wrote...
Even if they obtained your information legally, unless you personally authorized them to use the information it is fraud and is also hacking (accessing a computer through illegal means and without authorization).
They are not accessing a computer or a computer network illegally, they are pretty much going to Sony and claiming that they are someone they are not. Access to the network itself is not illegal, but claiming to be someone on the network who you are not IS illegal. Fraud.
Modifié par Strangely Brown, 19 mai 2011 - 08:32 .
Strangely Brown wrote...
I was referiing to the means by which they obtained the information.
Strangely Brown wrote...
Yes it is fraud and by pretending to be someone they are not in order to access that persons account is the same as accessing a computer without authorization and therefore is a hack.
Strangely Brown wrote...
Anyways, this topic is now totally derailed.
Modifié par Godak, 19 mai 2011 - 08:41 .
Guest_Strangely Brown_*
Godak wrote...
Strangely Brown wrote...
I was referiing to the means by which they obtained the information.
I know. And it DOES matter. That's why I found your statement so...odd.Strangely Brown wrote...
Yes it is fraud and by pretending to be someone they are not in order to access that persons account is the same as accessing a computer without authorization and therefore is a hack.
You are relying so strongly on that dictionary definition of hacking. How about I pull out a definition of my own?
"In computer networking, hacking is any technical effort to manipulate the normal behavior of network connections and connected systems." - Bradley Mitchell
Empahsis added.
No technical manipulation was necessary for this exploit.Strangely Brown wrote...
Anyways, this topic is now totally derailed.
I think the general consensus is that Sony royally screwed up...again.
Strangely Brown wrote...
Well then it all comes down to how you define a hack I guess.<_<