Aller au contenu

Photo

Why everyone hates DA2 when TW2 made many of the same design decisions?


645 réponses à ce sujet

#326
erynnar

erynnar
  • Members
  • 3 010 messages

In Exile wrote...

Luvinn wrote...
I enjoyed DA2 also. I thought the companions were interesting, and it was fun to do their quests. Fenris, Anders and Merrill (rival path) were especially my favorite ones. I thought them to be deep and engaging. I just think the game could of been epic rather than just "enjoyable".


The Witcher 2 was epic at times (IMO) without needing to make it about any kind of evil antagonist. I'm thinking the battle in Act II specifically.

That being said, Dragon Age 2 (and Biwoare games in general) have a much greater scope in terms of the companions and integrating them into the story and plot. The Witcher 2, for all of its variability in plot, had far fewer NPCs you interat with and a comparable number of quests. It also had fewer areas, and in principle took place over 'less' space, even if it wasn't as localized.

IMO, there are three major differences between DA2 and TW2. The first is that TW2 doesn't feel like the alpha build of the game. That's a failure on Bioware's part, and the game clearly neeed a year more of development. At the same time, the fanbase had very, very different expectations for the two games. DA2 had a much more negative vibe because of how much it planned to depart (in terms of its vision) from DA:O than TW2 did from TW1. Third is execution. TW2 is just well-designed within its scope. They used the same design elements, but Bioware just didn't seem to know what to do with them, and they tried to make the same game they always did within their formula while switching gears entirely and they couldn't pull it off.


I agree about the companions, most definitely. If there is one thing about BioWare's forumula that I love, and I do miss in Witcher 2..is companions. Please BioWare, don't ever throw that out. You are one of my favs because of how you do that. Really, just love that about your games.:wub:

#327
Luvinn

Luvinn
  • Members
  • 502 messages
It's funny though, the thing i liked most about DA2, would seem out of place in TW2. Companions and your interaction seem to be key in Dragon Age and most other Bioware games. While The Witcher has its staple characters, namely Dandelion, Zoltan and Triss, i think the character of Geralt would be out of place if he had them constantly follow him around. I like the limited interaction you get with them though, like the quest with Dandelion and the succubus ("****ing idiot actually went in there!). But they don't overdo it, which fits Geralt's personality better i think.

#328
KnightofPhoenix

KnightofPhoenix
  • Members
  • 21 527 messages

Luvinn wrote...

It's funny though, the thing i liked most about DA2, would seem out of place in TW2. Companions and your interaction seem to be key in Dragon Age and most other Bioware games. While The Witcher has its staple characters, namely Dandelion, Zoltan and Triss, i think the character of Geralt would be out of place if he had them constantly follow him around. I like the limited interaction you get with them though, like the quest with Dandelion and the succubus ("****ing idiot actually went in there!). But they don't overdo it, which fits Geralt's personality better i think.


Agreed. I like both systems, both make sense in their given cotnexts and both add character.

Companions are certainly something I enjoy grealy in Bioware games. It makes their games more unique.
Games like Alpha Protocol and Witcher hwoever showed that they are not really necessary to have an amazing RPG experience. But they're certainly desirable and I wouldn't want them gone in Bioware games.

#329
Well

Well
  • Members
  • 765 messages

Skilled Seeker wrote...

Avalla'ch wrote...

DA2 was a vast departure from Origins, thus it gets the crap.
TW2 on the other hand, doesn't claim nor pretend to be Origins. It's a game on its own.


Neither does DA2. It isn't called DAO2. And the marketing for DA2 made it clear that there would be changes and what those changes would be. They also released a demo which is a good representation of the game.


The Demo just showed combat.So it wasnt a good representation of the game.Epic Fail on your point.

#330
erynnar

erynnar
  • Members
  • 3 010 messages

Luvinn wrote...

It's funny though, the thing i liked most about DA2, would seem out of place in TW2. Companions and your interaction seem to be key in Dragon Age and most other Bioware games. While The Witcher has its staple characters, namely Dandelion, Zoltan and Triss, i think the character of Geralt would be out of place if he had them constantly follow him around. I like the limited interaction you get with them though, like the quest with Dandelion and the succubus ("****ing idiot actually went in there!). But they don't overdo it, which fits Geralt's personality better i think.


Oh I totally agree! I don't want CDProjeckt to start copying BioWare in that, nor do I want BioWare to copy WItcher. They each have things they do best.

#331
erynnar

erynnar
  • Members
  • 3 010 messages

Well wrote...

Skilled Seeker wrote...

Avalla'ch wrote...

DA2 was a vast departure from Origins, thus it gets the crap.
TW2 on the other hand, doesn't claim nor pretend to be Origins. It's a game on its own.


Neither does DA2. It isn't called DAO2. And the marketing for DA2 made it clear that there would be changes and what those changes would be. They also released a demo which is a good representation of the game.


The Demo just showed combat.So it wasnt a good representation of the game.Epic Fail on your point.


Thiis^

#332
Bryy_Miller

Bryy_Miller
  • Members
  • 7 676 messages

erynnar wrote...

Well wrote...

Skilled Seeker wrote...

Avalla'ch wrote...

DA2 was a vast departure from Origins, thus it gets the crap.
TW2 on the other hand, doesn't claim nor pretend to be Origins. It's a game on its own.


Neither does DA2. It isn't called DAO2. And the marketing for DA2 made it clear that there would be changes and what those changes would be. They also released a demo which is a good representation of the game.


The Demo just showed combat.So it wasnt a good representation of the game.Epic Fail on your point.


Thiis^


From day one, they always put the emphasis in the wrong place regarding the demos/presentations.

#333
TheTranzor

TheTranzor
  • Members
  • 185 messages

Bryy_Miller wrote...

erynnar wrote...

Well wrote...

Skilled Seeker wrote...

Avalla'ch wrote...

DA2 was a vast departure from Origins, thus it gets the crap.
TW2 on the other hand, doesn't claim nor pretend to be Origins. It's a game on its own.


Neither does DA2. It isn't called DAO2. And the marketing for DA2 made it clear that there would be changes and what those changes would be. They also released a demo which is a good representation of the game.


The Demo just showed combat.So it wasnt a good representation of the game.Epic Fail on your point.


Thiis^


From day one, they always put the emphasis in the wrong place regarding the demos/presentations.


That's because they were trying to attract the FPS players with a game that had speedy combat... and we all know how that's turned out.  Most of us DA:O fans would have prefered a demo that showed more of the RPG aspects of the game, perhaps gave a taste of the story (I for one am a fan of having a demo be kind of like a prologue to the story, but I digress), but at the least show both a little of the combat mechanics and and a little of the story/RPG elements.

#334
Addai

Addai
  • Members
  • 25 850 messages

Kileyan wrote...

I agree, this is when I knew DA2 wasn't going to be what I expect from Bioware. I remember that interview, I don't know if it was one of the main devs or just some marketing guy. He took us through a bit of the DAO mage tower, pointed out all the USELESS detail, and bragged about how they were going to remove all that stuff and with the time saved.........add more AWESOME.

Yeah, I remember that- one of those "you're doing what?!" moments in the run-up to DA2.  Definite fail.

Modifié par Addai67, 24 mai 2011 - 03:48 .


#335
kglaser

kglaser
  • Members
  • 7 341 messages
I confess, I didn't read this thread. I don't even know what "The Witcher" is.
Is it not enough to disparage DA2 on its own accord?
Straw Man defenses don't change the facts. DA2 was substandard (by BW standards, appalling). Why bring other games into it?

#336
erynnar

erynnar
  • Members
  • 3 010 messages

TheTranzor wrote...

Bryy_Miller wrote...

erynnar wrote...

Well wrote...

Skilled Seeker wrote...

Avalla'ch wrote...

DA2 was a vast departure from Origins, thus it gets the crap.
TW2 on the other hand, doesn't claim nor pretend to be Origins. It's a game on its own.


Neither does DA2. It isn't called DAO2. And the marketing for DA2 made it clear that there would be changes and what those changes would be. They also released a demo which is a good representation of the game.


The Demo just showed combat.So it wasnt a good representation of the game.Epic Fail on your point.


Thiis^


From day one, they always put the emphasis in the wrong place regarding the demos/presentations.


That's because they were trying to attract the FPS players with a game that had speedy combat... and we all know how that's turned out.  Most of us DA:O fans would have prefered a demo that showed more of the RPG aspects of the game, perhaps gave a taste of the story (I for one am a fan of having a demo be kind of like a prologue to the story, but I digress), but at the least show both a little of the combat mechanics and and a little of the story/RPG elements.


Still the awesome button I see. Yeah me too. The demo didn't have anything but combat. I like to know a little taste of the story too.

#337
erynnar

erynnar
  • Members
  • 3 010 messages

Addai67 wrote...

Kileyan wrote...

I agree, this is when I knew DA2 wasn't going to be what I expect from Bioware. I remember that interview, I don't know if it was one of the main devs or just some marketing guy. He took us through a bit of the DAO mage tower, pointed out all the USELESS detail, and bragged about how they were going to remove all that stuff and with the time saved.........add more AWESOME.

Yeah, I remember that- one of those "you're doing what?!" moments in the run-up to DA2.  Definite fail.


Holy crap? Really? Yeah, cuz the little details are so....boring? WTF? So instead details, books I could read, little treasures here and there, and no descriptions for the items, and I got what for it? Recycled dungeons and ninja waves of enemies? Oh dear.

#338
KnightofPhoenix

KnightofPhoenix
  • Members
  • 21 527 messages

erynnar wrote...

Addai67 wrote...

Kileyan wrote...

I agree, this is when I knew DA2 wasn't going to be what I expect from Bioware. I remember that interview, I don't know if it was one of the main devs or just some marketing guy. He took us through a bit of the DAO mage tower, pointed out all the USELESS detail, and bragged about how they were going to remove all that stuff and with the time saved.........add more AWESOME.

Yeah, I remember that- one of those "you're doing what?!" moments in the run-up to DA2.  Definite fail.


Holy crap? Really? Yeah, cuz the little details are so....boring? WTF? So instead details, books I could read, little treasures here and there, and no descriptions for the items, and I got what for it? Recycled dungeons and ninja waves of enemies? Oh dear.


Yea I didn't know aobut that and I would be shocked, but I am not surprised really.

#339
erynnar

erynnar
  • Members
  • 3 010 messages

KnightofPhoenix wrote...

erynnar wrote...

Addai67 wrote...

Kileyan wrote...

I agree, this is when I knew DA2 wasn't going to be what I expect from Bioware. I remember that interview, I don't know if it was one of the main devs or just some marketing guy. He took us through a bit of the DAO mage tower, pointed out all the USELESS detail, and bragged about how they were going to remove all that stuff and with the time saved.........add more AWESOME.

Yeah, I remember that- one of those "you're doing what?!" moments in the run-up to DA2.  Definite fail.


Holy crap? Really? Yeah, cuz the little details are so....boring? WTF? So instead details, books I could read, little treasures here and there, and no descriptions for the items, and I got what for it? Recycled dungeons and ninja waves of enemies? Oh dear.


Yea I didn't know aobut that and I would be shocked, but I am not surprised really.


I guess yes, surprise wouldn't be what I'm feeling about that. Yeah, not surprise.<_<

#340
NedPepper

NedPepper
  • Members
  • 922 messages

Dragoonlordz wrote...

RinpocheSchnozberry wrote...

It's jealous girlfriend syndrome.

BioWare and the "old school" players were huggy buddies for years, all the way back to when computers were a novelty and you might have to ride your bike for ten minutes to watch your friend with a computer play a game.  Fast forward to today, and BioWare sees all these new players coming to games.  They're like "Hey, we should see if these new gamers might enjoy RPGs too!"  The "old school" players immediately threw their boobs out and brushed their hair back and said "But but but!  Aren't we good enough for you?"  BioWare was like "Yes, of course, but what if a couple tiny mechanic changes got more people into RPGs?  Isn't that good?"

The "old school" players were devestated.  They listened to Tom Waites for weeks.  They put on black nail polish.  Then, when DA2 cames out and had some notable flaws (recycled areas and no unified party management screen, FTL) the jilted players were ecstatic.

Go back through some of the old hate threads.  Many of them come down to "We sure taught BioWare their lesson this time!"

That's why people hate DA2.  The funny part is, DA2 actually takes some elements from the original Witcher.  Button=Awesome descibres Witcher perfectly.  A voiced character is also win.  Happily, the terrible crafting, UI, nonsensical story, and the embarassing adolescent masterbatory aids were not borrowed.


Most of the intial sales comes from those "old school players" if I was to agree with your way, way off assumption that it was old school players that liked DAO, but even that is a fallacy because not everyone who loves origins was from this pure fantasy "old school" you keep pointing fingers at.

The new players that you claim Bioware wants to attract come from two possible sources one of which is alternative genres (which they will not attract because if they were going to be drawn in the they would already be here with ME series). Maybe to assume they want the FPS crowd instead in which case they will fail on epic proportions as FPS players want FPS games, everyone else who owns multiple genres already would have been in the franchise and fanbase if RPGs interested them or if action/RPGs was liked by them aka in the DA or ME franchise fanbase. Could it be that this new playerbase instead means the younger gamer, you now the ones too underage to buy or play the game in the first place? Maybe thats the audience they targetted eh?

DA2 is epically bad due to it's own flaws on top of the fact its a sequel not just because of that.

I still find it hilarious your so diluded though that you believe the DAO fanbase was made up of "old school" players, sorry to break the news to you the same age groups liked that are same ones who like and hate DA2. The fact you use the DA2 button awesome to describe what is a more deep and less button awesome series like TW shows how incredably neive and stuck in a glass bubble world you really are.


I'm going to use a personal example as to why I think you're wrong.  I know a NUMBER of people who played both Dragon Age Origins and Dragon Age 2 WHO DO NOT COME ON THESE BOARDS.  They LOVE both games.  I was talking to a buddy last night (who is on his third play through and wondering why there's no DLC).  I explained to him the backlash from a certain portion of the fanbase.  He's annoyed and flabbergasted that a vocal MINORITY can get to Bioware so much that they have delayed DLC and his enjoyment of the game.

I'm the one who said PC elitists, but I'm not talking about all people who prefer to play on the PC rather than consoles.  I'm talking about the people ON THIS BOARD who go out of their way to insult Bioware, ANYONE who may like DA2, and go on and on about how EA destroyed the "magic" of Bioware and the small developer that made The Witcher is the last hope for RPG fans.  Bioware sold out.  EA is a big corporate jerk who wants to destroy RPGs.  Et cetera, et cetera.

You speak for yourselves.  There are people who love these games and who have played Bioware console games since KOTOR.  My cousin is what I call a PC guy.  I jokingly refer to him as the elitist.  He has played Bioware games since Baldur's Gate.  He's raved about them for years.  And while he does occasionally moan about how the PC audience is being ignored, he never feels the need to come on here and cry and moan.  (He also got me into Bioware, despite my indifference for D&D role playing.)

He wasn't sure about DA2.  He had heard that they made too many changes.  So, he came over to watch me play and he was starting to get into it.  He said: "I'm not going to buy this on the PC...it seems like a great console RPG and I haven't played a console game in a while."  He bought it, he's played it and enjoyed it.  He's about as old school D &D as you can get.  But he also grew up on Nintendo and Sega just like the rest of us.  He doesn't come close to that venomous personality you see here.  He is the definition of A GAMER.  He spends every dollar he makes on his computer to make sure it is always top of the line.  He built it and spent a FORTUNE for the purpose of gaming.

My point: I was never saying ALL PC gamers are elitist.  But in the arguments about this game on multiple boards, the comments "DA2 SUCKS...WITCHER 2 is the real RPG game!" are everywhere.  I didn't even know what The Witcher was until I came onto a DRAGON AGE board.  You can all see these harsh comparisons in mutliple threads.  Usually followed by EA  is the devil.  This is YOUR rhetoric  and you know who you are.  There are people who are very disappointed in DA 2 and then there are those who have an agenda and had one from the very beginning.  The proof is all over the gaming internet community.  My other point: DA 2 is not NEARLY AS DISASTROUS as some of you want it to be.  It's hyperbolic exaggeration to the extreme.  But The Witcher?  How dare anyone say anything negative about it?  It's just....nonsense.

For the record, my cousin doesn't like The Witcher.  Why?  He doesn't like playing a fixed protagonist and doesn't consider it a "real RPG."  I find that to be quite amusing.

Am I discounting that some people were let down by DA 2? No.  That's not my point.  My point is that there is a group that takes the PC elitist mentality in holding The Witcher up as some sacred RPG underdog and that Bioware is nothing but a shell of a company, twisting on the strings of the evil, greedy puppeteer known as EA.  That conversation has been going on before DA 2 ever came out, and we all know it.

#341
erynnar

erynnar
  • Members
  • 3 010 messages
Aw, sweetie, we know! Thanks for explaining. *hugs Ned*

Hehe, I don't see them as some underdog, rather a really smart German Shepherd that is going to out do the hell out of DA2, which is like a puppy that wet on the carpet and chewed my shoes. One is cute and fun, until you find that little surprise of poo it left in the bottom of the closet in the back corner of it.

And no, I know you don't think we're all elitist. That, was my fault, for taking it that way. You are not to blame for that Ned.

#342
Persephone

Persephone
  • Members
  • 7 989 messages

nedpepper wrote...

Dragoonlordz wrote...

RinpocheSchnozberry wrote...

It's jealous girlfriend syndrome.

BioWare and the "old school" players were huggy buddies for years, all the way back to when computers were a novelty and you might have to ride your bike for ten minutes to watch your friend with a computer play a game.  Fast forward to today, and BioWare sees all these new players coming to games.  They're like "Hey, we should see if these new gamers might enjoy RPGs too!"  The "old school" players immediately threw their boobs out and brushed their hair back and said "But but but!  Aren't we good enough for you?"  BioWare was like "Yes, of course, but what if a couple tiny mechanic changes got more people into RPGs?  Isn't that good?"

The "old school" players were devestated.  They listened to Tom Waites for weeks.  They put on black nail polish.  Then, when DA2 cames out and had some notable flaws (recycled areas and no unified party management screen, FTL) the jilted players were ecstatic.

Go back through some of the old hate threads.  Many of them come down to "We sure taught BioWare their lesson this time!"

That's why people hate DA2.  The funny part is, DA2 actually takes some elements from the original Witcher.  Button=Awesome descibres Witcher perfectly.  A voiced character is also win.  Happily, the terrible crafting, UI, nonsensical story, and the embarassing adolescent masterbatory aids were not borrowed.


Most of the intial sales comes from those "old school players" if I was to agree with your way, way off assumption that it was old school players that liked DAO, but even that is a fallacy because not everyone who loves origins was from this pure fantasy "old school" you keep pointing fingers at.

The new players that you claim Bioware wants to attract come from two possible sources one of which is alternative genres (which they will not attract because if they were going to be drawn in the they would already be here with ME series). Maybe to assume they want the FPS crowd instead in which case they will fail on epic proportions as FPS players want FPS games, everyone else who owns multiple genres already would have been in the franchise and fanbase if RPGs interested them or if action/RPGs was liked by them aka in the DA or ME franchise fanbase. Could it be that this new playerbase instead means the younger gamer, you now the ones too underage to buy or play the game in the first place? Maybe thats the audience they targetted eh?

DA2 is epically bad due to it's own flaws on top of the fact its a sequel not just because of that.

I still find it hilarious your so diluded though that you believe the DAO fanbase was made up of "old school" players, sorry to break the news to you the same age groups liked that are same ones who like and hate DA2. The fact you use the DA2 button awesome to describe what is a more deep and less button awesome series like TW shows how incredably neive and stuck in a glass bubble world you really are.


I'm going to use a personal example as to why I think you're wrong.  I know a NUMBER of people who played both Dragon Age Origins and Dragon Age 2 WHO DO NOT COME ON THESE BOARDS.  They LOVE both games.  I was talking to a buddy last night (who is on his third play through and wondering why there's no DLC).  I explained to him the backlash from a certain portion of the fanbase.  He's annoyed and flabbergasted that a vocal MINORITY can get to Bioware so much that they have delayed DLC and his enjoyment of the game.

I'm the one who said PC elitists, but I'm not talking about all people who prefer to play on the PC rather than consoles.  I'm talking about the people ON THIS BOARD who go out of their way to insult Bioware, ANYONE who may like DA2, and go on and on about how EA destroyed the "magic" of Bioware and the small developer that made The Witcher is the last hope for RPG fans.  Bioware sold out.  EA is a big corporate jerk who wants to destroy RPGs.  Et cetera, et cetera.

You speak for yourselves.  There are people who love these games and who have played Bioware console games since KOTOR.  My cousin is what I call a PC guy.  I jokingly refer to him as the elitist.  He has played Bioware games since Baldur's Gate.  He's raved about them for years.  And while he does occasionally moan about how the PC audience is being ignored, he never feels the need to come on here and cry and moan.  (He also got me into Bioware, despite my indifference for D&D role playing.)

He wasn't sure about DA2.  He had heard that they made too many changes.  So, he came over to watch me play and he was starting to get into it.  He said: "I'm not going to buy this on the PC...it seems like a great console RPG and I haven't played a console game in a while."  He bought it, he's played it and enjoyed it.  He's about as old school D &D as you can get.  But he also grew up on Nintendo and Sega just like the rest of us.  He doesn't come close to that venomous personality you see here.  He is the definition of A GAMER.  He spends every dollar he makes on his computer to make sure it is always top of the line.  He built it and spent a FORTUNE for the purpose of gaming.

My point: I was never saying ALL PC gamers are elitist.  But in the arguments about this game on multiple boards, the comments "DA2 SUCKS...WITCHER 2 is the real RPG game!" are everywhere.  I didn't even know what The Witcher was until I came onto a DRAGON AGE board.  You can all see these harsh comparisons in mutliple threads.  Usually followed by EA  is the devil.  This is YOUR rhetoric  and you know who you are.  There are people who are very disappointed in DA 2 and then there are those who have an agenda and had one from the very beginning.  The proof is all over the gaming internet community.  My other point: DA 2 is not NEARLY AS DISASTROUS as some of you want it to be.  It's hyperbolic exaggeration to the extreme.  But The Witcher?  How dare anyone say anything negative about it?  It's just....nonsense.

For the record, my cousin doesn't like The Witcher.  Why?  He doesn't like playing a fixed protagonist and doesn't consider it a "real RPG."  I find that to be quite amusing.

Am I discounting that some people were let down by DA 2? No.  That's not my point.  My point is that there is a group that takes the PC elitist mentality in holding The Witcher up as some sacred RPG underdog and that Bioware is nothing but a shell of a company, twisting on the strings of the evil, greedy puppeteer known as EA.  That conversation has been going on before DA 2 ever came out, and we all know it.


So well said. *Persephone approves +100*

#343
Morroian

Morroian
  • Members
  • 6 396 messages

erynnar wrote...

KnightofPhoenix wrote...

erynnar wrote...

Addai67 wrote...

Kileyan wrote...

I agree, this is when I knew DA2 wasn't going to be what I expect from Bioware. I remember that interview, I don't know if it was one of the main devs or just some marketing guy. He took us through a bit of the DAO mage tower, pointed out all the USELESS detail, and bragged about how they were going to remove all that stuff and with the time saved.........add more AWESOME.

Yeah, I remember that- one of those "you're doing what?!" moments in the run-up to DA2.  Definite fail.


Holy crap? Really? Yeah, cuz the little details are so....boring? WTF? So instead details, books I could read, little treasures here and there, and no descriptions for the items, and I got what for it? Recycled dungeons and ninja waves of enemies? Oh dear.


Yea I didn't know aobut that and I would be shocked, but I am not surprised really.

I guess yes, surprise wouldn't be what I'm feeling about that. Yeah, not surprise.<_<


That was David SIlverman, marketing guy not dev, and yes he comes across really badly, everyone hated that interview. If you want to know why Bioware marketing is so bad he's probably the reason. And some of the detail he was talking about in that interview was still in DA2 so he was talking out of his arse.

Modifié par Morroian, 24 mai 2011 - 05:34 .


#344
erynnar

erynnar
  • Members
  • 3 010 messages
Because Ned is fantastic.

But I do have to disagree that were the minority. Not saying it's not possible. but sales just don't bear that out. I keep hearing that, but I just don't see that that is true.

Of course, the people who posted complaints about DAO, while I was happily off whiling away the golden hours playing, are supposedly the reason why DA2 happened, and DAO was gutted to hell and back. So, you know, *shrugs*

#345
erynnar

erynnar
  • Members
  • 3 010 messages

Morroian wrote...

erynnar wrote...

KnightofPhoenix wrote...

erynnar wrote...

Addai67 wrote...

Kileyan wrote...

I agree, this is when I knew DA2 wasn't going to be what I expect from Bioware. I remember that interview, I don't know if it was one of the main devs or just some marketing guy. He took us through a bit of the DAO mage tower, pointed out all the USELESS detail, and bragged about how they were going to remove all that stuff and with the time saved.........add more AWESOME.

Yeah, I remember that- one of those "you're doing what?!" moments in the run-up to DA2.  Definite fail.


Holy crap? Really? Yeah, cuz the little details are so....boring? WTF? So instead details, books I could read, little treasures here and there, and no descriptions for the items, and I got what for it? Recycled dungeons and ninja waves of enemies? Oh dear.


Yea I didn't know aobut that and I would be shocked, but I am not surprised really.

I guess yes, surprise wouldn't be what I'm feeling about that. Yeah, not surprise.<_<


That was David SIlverman, marketing guy not dev, and yes he comes across really badly, everyone hated that interview. If you want to know why Bioware marketing is so bad he's probably the reason. And some of the detail he was talking about in that interview was still in DA2 so he was talking out of his arse.


Again, not surprised...but geeze, either put a muzzle on that guy, or something...*facepalm*

#346
Zanallen

Zanallen
  • Members
  • 4 425 messages
David Silverman is also the button = awesome guy.

#347
Persephone

Persephone
  • Members
  • 7 989 messages

erynnar wrote...

Because Ned is fantastic.

But I do have to disagree that were the minority. Not saying it's not possible. but sales just don't bear that out. I keep hearing that, but I just don't see that that is true.

Of course, the people who posted complaints about DAO, while I was happily off whiling away the golden hours playing, are supposedly the reason why DA2 happened, and DAO was gutted to hell and back. So, you know, *shrugs*


People posting on a forum/the online fanbase are a minority. Whether they like the game or not. I cannot speak for the world. But I can speak for the people I know (Most of them love both games). I also have no insight into actual Sales except hearsay based on estimates. Bioware/EA have the numbers and they'll react accordingly. If the reaction is a game that isn't my thing, too bad for me. If it's a game I love, yay. ATM I'm enjoying TW2, looking forward to ME3, not buying TOR and waiting for the DAII 1.03 patch & more Mods for another runthrough.

#348
JabbaDaHutt30

JabbaDaHutt30
  • Members
  • 1 008 messages

Persephone wrote...

erynnar wrote...

Because Ned is fantastic.

But I do have to disagree that were the minority. Not saying it's not possible. but sales just don't bear that out. I keep hearing that, but I just don't see that that is true.

Of course, the people who posted complaints about DAO, while I was happily off whiling away the golden hours playing, are supposedly the reason why DA2 happened, and DAO was gutted to hell and back. So, you know, *shrugs*


People posting on a forum/the online fanbase are a minority. Whether they like the game or not. I cannot speak for the world. But I can speak for the people I know (Most of them love both games). I also have no insight into actual Sales except hearsay based on estimates. Bioware/EA have the numbers and they'll react accordingly. If the reaction is a game that isn't my thing, too bad for me. If it's a game I love, yay. ATM I'm enjoying TW2, looking forward to ME3, not buying TOR and waiting for the DAII 1.03 patch & more Mods for another runthrough.


Well, I'm seeing a lot 'minorities' with negative feedback both on this and other sites, or in the comment sections of Dragon Age related videos. I use that sample size to try and come to my own conclusion, and  the result is a pretty mixed reception.

Modifié par JabbaDaHutt30, 24 mai 2011 - 06:14 .


#349
TheTranzor

TheTranzor
  • Members
  • 185 messages

erynnar wrote...

Aw, sweetie, we know! Thanks for explaining. *hugs Ned*

Hehe, I don't see them as some underdog, rather a really smart German Shepherd that is going to out do the hell out of DA2, which is like a puppy that wet on the carpet and chewed my shoes. One is cute and fun, until you find that little surprise of poo it left in the bottom of the closet in the back corner of it.

And no, I know you don't think we're all elitist. That, was my fault, for taking it that way. You are not to blame for that Ned.


Don't lie... you're a whiny PC Elitist, and you know it.   Posted Image



A loveable whiny PC Elitist, of course.   Posted Image
 

Signed,
-Idiot Console Jockey



On a more serious note, I'll probably pick up TW2 sometime in the near future so I can see what everyone's talking about... never played TW1, so I might start there.  I normally don't play PC games (not since I was an MMO junkie back in the day), but sounds like it's at least worth a try.

#350
Persephone

Persephone
  • Members
  • 7 989 messages

JabbaDaHutt30 wrote...

Persephone wrote...

erynnar wrote...

Because Ned is fantastic.

But I do have to disagree that were the minority. Not saying it's not possible. but sales just don't bear that out. I keep hearing that, but I just don't see that that is true.

Of course, the people who posted complaints about DAO, while I was happily off whiling away the golden hours playing, are supposedly the reason why DA2 happened, and DAO was gutted to hell and back. So, you know, *shrugs*


People posting on a forum/the online fanbase are a minority. Whether they like the game or not. I cannot speak for the world. But I can speak for the people I know (Most of them love both games). I also have no insight into actual Sales except hearsay based on estimates. Bioware/EA have the numbers and they'll react accordingly. If the reaction is a game that isn't my thing, too bad for me. If it's a game I love, yay. ATM I'm enjoying TW2, looking forward to ME3, not buying TOR and waiting for the DAII 1.03 patch & more Mods for another runthrough.


Well, I'm seeing a lot 'minorities' with negative feedback both on this and other sites, or in the comment sections of Dragon Age related videos. I use that sample size to try and come to my own conclusion, and  the result is a pretty mixed reception.


I'm not denying the mixed reception at all. The game is definitely polarizing as there seems to be no middle ground at all.

And.......why did you put my Warden in your sig, if I might ask?:?