Well, first and formost: the "mages can do a lot of damage so they need to be locked up" argument is simply an excuse for the chantry to find a "common enemy". You don't need blood magic to control people - blackmail and drugs (like lyrium addiction) works just as well, you don't need to be abomination to be psychotic - insanity does that to all people, drugs do to, you don't need to be able to hurl fireballs to cause damage - poisonous gas and dvarven explosives work perfectly for that.
If we lock people up for what they potentially can do we'd all be in prison cells for live.
Mages have a vulnerability, but how bad it truly is? Trevinter imperium existed for thousands of years with all kind of mages running amock, and is still not overrun by abominations. Dalish elves had they keepers for even longer, and seams to be doing just fine.
Sure a magically gifted child needs guidance and education, but that is not the reason to separate them from they families completely - why not let parents visit their child and write letters? And once he or she passed her herowing why not let them return to their homes, inherent lands and titles and live their lives happily?
Mages are the bogyman that chantry uses to keep control, they are an excuse of the chantry for having an army of drug addicted fanatics on it's back and call - don't forget ALL templars are lyrium addicts, and can't live the order even if they want because the lurium windrow would destroy their minds, we so it in Origins very clearly. Does the chantry need tis many tamplars to hunt an occasional abomination? No. Do they need to take lyrium for that abomination hunt? No - Alistar is a living proof of that.
What they are needed for is for devine to threaten an exalted march every time someone disobeys her - a military tyranny of "bow to the chantly or die", that would be a bit to noticeable if there was no excuse of "having to guard circles of magai to protect the people".
Having sad that, I think that Meredith in a way is a victim of the system it self:
1. If sending a child to a circle did not mean loosing them and imprisoning them much less "apostates" would have existed, Merediths own sister would have gotten the education she needed and most likely did not become an abomination in the first place.
2. If the lyriul addiction was not involved she would likely be more stable herself and would have given up the dangerous artifact to the chantry just like a good sane templar should have done. The fact that she did not shows how little fait she actually has in a chantly law. The idol is pure lyriul, remember? Templars are not supposed to have lyrium that is not given to them by chantly decree. So it is likely that her lyrium addiction played a role in her attraction ot the idol.
3. The lyrium does not only bound Templars to the chantrly, but chantry to the templars as well - you can't dismiss the templar, to remove one for the order they would have to be dead. It is no wounder that the head of the chantlry was hesitant to deal with Meredith - it very well may have meant a death sentence for her if things did not go smoothly, since there is no option of "dishonorable discharge".
4. The well known "power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely" thing. Templars are given absolute power over mages, it is a position that is a prime set up for abuse, it's simply how a human mind works.
To summarize - I think that Meredith was a very well thought through and written character, she is a prime example of why the system should change, without pronouncing that every tamplar is corrupt - she embodies all the faults of the templars and chatry yet behind all of that there is a woman that had good intentions and probably a good heart once.
Modifié par Sshodan, 07 juillet 2011 - 01:38 .