GavrielKay wrote...
Jedi Master of Orion wrote...
So all the people inside are guilty by association of somebody else's crimes?
Well,
I'm not sure which part you were writing this about, but it could work
for either the Chantry explosion or the Right of Tranquility.
At least the Chantry explosion was committed by an underdog who's waited 1000 years for something to change peacefully.
I was talking about the Chantry explosion. But it applies to the Right of Annulment as well.
That's why I killed Anders and defended the mages. It doesn't matter to me if an atrocity is commited by an underdog or an overlord, it's still bad. Saying Anders waited a thousand years, isn't exactly true.
Plaintiff wrote...
If war were a punishable crime, I'd say most chantry priestess could be tried as accessories. As a group they are sort of required to support any action taken by the Divine, however bloodthirsty and hamfisted, and they justify it to others with their religious rhetoric and actually encourage them to join in. You really think going around telling people it's okay to kill another group of people is in any way okay?
The Chantry is not a monolithic hivemind. Every individual still has their own opinions and actions. The priesthood isn't required to all have the same opinion. What evidence is there that the the pristesses in the game have been going around doing that anyway? Besides, if you hold them all responsible for all the Chantry's actions then, all the mages could be held responsbile for Anders terrorism and even for all the endless depravities of the Tevinter Imperium if you want to go broad enough. Or you could go around saying that murdering preists is OK because it's punishment for the crusades.
Plaintiff wrote...
You could argue that they're only doing it because they're instructed to do so by a superior, but that excuse didn't work for the German and Japanese infantrymen who faced execution after World War 2 for violations of the Geneva convention, mostly involving abuses of prisoners and civilians. Although some perpetrators of the My Lai massacre got away with that line, so I guess it's not a hard and fast rule.
Not every member of the Chantry is a solider. Only the Templars are. If you hold them all responsbile it's like holding every single member of a nation directly responsible for the actions of their leader. So therefore every Japanese person is responsible for Pearl Harbor and every American is responsible for the Japanese interment camps. Every country in history has morally dubious incidents in their past. Is it OK to kill every civilian member of that country who spoke out in support of their country despite that?
Plaintiff wrote...
Still, it amuses me that the Chantry overall, for all its talk, seems to have actually exhibited far greater disregard for the lives of innocents than Anders ever did. He at least acknowledges the loss of inncoent lives brought about by his actions. The official stance of the Chantry is that anyone who disagrees with them too much simply forfeits their right to exist.
Even if he does acknowledge innocent lives lost, Anders murders them anyway. That doesn't mean much. Even Meredith acknowledges that not all mages are evil. She imprisons them anyway.
Anders is one person. The Chantry is many people. I generally think individuals should be held responsible for their own actions and not those of anyone else who happens to have the same profession.
Modifié par Jedi Master of Orion, 25 mai 2011 - 05:16 .