GavrielKay wrote...
Silfren wrote...
...But don't sit there and try to claim that an angry mob's demand makes it necessary to slaughter innocent people. Between the Guard and her templars, Meredith could easily have maintained order among the populace.
The lynch mob is actually one of the worst "justifications" for calling the RoA. I'm surprised the writers even put it in there.
1) There's the fact that, as you point out, Meredith had asked for permission to do the RoA long before that night.
2) Meredith doesn't give a darn about public outcries when she prevents the appointment of a proper Viscount
3) The mages in the circle were Meredith's responsibility, not the lynch mob. She had a duty to protect the innocent mages from the mob, not the other way around.
4) Going along with the whims of a bloodthirsty crowd is pretty much never the "right" thing to do
There are probably more reasons, but I think the whole thing is ridiculous based on the first point anyway.
It doesn't surprise me that the writers put that justification in Meredith's mouth. It actually makes sense to me, being a natural human reaction. Not a just one, not one based in logic, but it's nevertheless a predictable response. She isn't wrong that the people would scream for blood and would probably want to storm the Circle and rip apart the mages. But since when do we give in to that sort of thing and call it justice?
I've said elsewhere that since Elthina had blocked Meredith's request for Annulment once, I believe wholeheartedly that eventually, had Anders not done the job himself, Elthina would have met with an
accident. Whether spurred by the idol or just her own deep-seated hatred for mages, Meredith is exactly the sort of personality I could see arranging for the Grand Cleric's assassination both to remove the obstacle blocking the Right and to justify it in the mind of the populace. Which doesn't have anything to do with the story that actually happened, except that I think Meredith was secretly grateful to Anders, in a sick sort of way, for saving her the trouble.
We see that the poorest of Kirkwall love Anders for his unconditional healing, and then there are those who've lost loved ones to Tranquility or some other fate. I'm disinclined to believe that all of these people would have suddenly reviled Anders for destroying the Chantry. People are never that unified, even if supporters of Chantry-jenga would be a small number. Anyway, we saw a mob's willingness to fight and die for his sake. What if someone had killed him in such a spectacular and public way? Would anyone be willing to slaughter the templars in answer to their demand for blood?
Modifié par Silfren, 26 mai 2011 - 08:58 .