Jump to content

Photo

Was anyone happy over Anders decision in Act III?


  • Please log in to reply
1207 replies to this topic

#1201
River5

River5
  • Members
  • 246 posts

schalafi wrote...

I liked the part where Elthina said something to Anders about hoping he would find a balm, (not exact quote), (pronounced bomb) for his soul. Clever play on words.


That, and also Anders telling you: "Just mix the ingredients up and... boom.  Justice and I are free."

And, since he fully expected to die for what he did...  The "Justice and I are free" kinda apply as well in a somewhat creepy, morbid way...

"There will be a boom, and then we'll both be free...  Just...  Not alive anymore...  But hey!  Wanna help?"

#1202
Keatons

Keatons
  • Members
  • 74 posts

River5 wrote...

I wasn't so much interested in how the Circle came to be (though it is good to understand history in order not to repeat it), but more about how things are working right now.  Who is pulling the strings?  Why are mages still locked up in towers?  How could they hope to be free?

What if a child was born into a human family that had decided to worship the creators (because they have chosen to adopt the system of belief of the Dalish since it makes more sense to them than the story of the Maker and Andraste), and at 8 years old, that child began showing signs of magic.

No matter what he or his family believe, that family will be forced to follow the Chantry's law, and the child will be taken away to the Circle.

What if a mage dreams about being a smith, having a wife, and raising a family...  What then?

If you believe in the freedom of choice, then nothing about the Circle "works".


I prefer to think the circle still exists not only because of the power of the chantry and templars, which I will admit to a large factor, but also because mages within the circle see the need for a system LIKE the circle, perhaps not as controlled as the current incarnation, but something similar with the core points of the circle, which I will explain in further detail later, and to paraphrase first enchanter irving, the circle is there to keep the mages in as much as it is to keep out those who would do them harm. I also seem to remeber a mage from Witch Hunt that hated going outside or leaving the circle becuase the outside world was ditry, and I mean that in a very literal way (ie Dirt and Mud), not for you specifically River, but for those who haven't played the DLC.


And not to be rude, but there are 2 major flaws in your example. 1) A human wouldn't worship the dalish gods because the dalish gods have been clearly stated to only protect the dalish, Vaterrals and most Dalish lore being an example of this, 'city elves' would have made a better example, and 2) The chantry forbids all worship of the creators. But disregarding that point, a mage has to be a mage due to the very nature of magic. As much as the circle takes away choice, most of the dreams of what mages want to be when they grow up is taken not by the circle, but by the simple fact that they have magic due the fact that it causes mages to be tempted by demons and an unprepared mage, say one trying to be a smith instead of a mage, maskes an all too easy target. While one could possibly find another apostate to train from, it is not a quarentee of survival, and though I will admit that neither is the circle, a lone abomination loose in a tower filled with templars is far less dangerous than one loose in say a small village or along a busy trading path. I'm not saying the circle is perfect by any means but merely that core principals of what the circle is supposed to be are worthwhile.

#1203
River5

River5
  • Members
  • 246 posts

Keatons wrote...

River5 wrote...

I wasn't so much interested in how the Circle came to be (though it is good to understand history in order not to repeat it), but more about how things are working right now.  Who is pulling the strings?  Why are mages still locked up in towers?  How could they hope to be free?

What if a child was born into a human family that had decided to worship the creators (because they have chosen to adopt the system of belief of the Dalish since it makes more sense to them than the story of the Maker and Andraste), and at 8 years old, that child began showing signs of magic.

No matter what he or his family believe, that family will be forced to follow the Chantry's law, and the child will be taken away to the Circle.

What if a mage dreams about being a smith, having a wife, and raising a family...  What then?

If you believe in the freedom of choice, then nothing about the Circle "works".


I prefer to think the circle still exists not only because of the power of the chantry and templars, which I will admit to a large factor, but also because mages within the circle see the need for a system LIKE the circle, perhaps not as controlled as the current incarnation, but something similar with the core points of the circle, which I will explain in further detail later, and to paraphrase first enchanter irving, the circle is there to keep the mages in as much as it is to keep out those who would do them harm. I also seem to remeber a mage from Witch Hunt that hated going outside or leaving the circle becuase the outside world was ditry, and I mean that in a very literal way (ie Dirt and Mud), not for you specifically River, but for those who haven't played the DLC.


And not to be rude, but there are 2 major flaws in your example. 1) A human wouldn't worship the dalish gods because the dalish gods have been clearly stated to only protect the dalish, Vaterrals and most Dalish lore being an example of this, 'city elves' would have made a better example, and 2) The chantry forbids all worship of the creators. But disregarding that point, a mage has to be a mage due to the very nature of magic. As much as the circle takes away choice, most of the dreams of what mages want to be when they grow up is taken not by the circle, but by the simple fact that they have magic due the fact that it causes mages to be tempted by demons and an unprepared mage, say one trying to be a smith instead of a mage, maskes an all too easy target. While one could possibly find another apostate to train from, it is not a quarentee of survival, and though I will admit that neither is the circle, a lone abomination loose in a tower filled with templars is far less dangerous than one loose in say a small village or along a busy trading path. I'm not saying the circle is perfect by any means but merely that core principals of what the circle is supposed to be are worthwhile.


Really?  What is to stop a human from believing in the creators, embrace the Dalish lore, and see elves as a superior race?  Or, then again, adapting the Dalish Faith in order to include a place for humans.  Or, to start worshipping their own paragons.  Or to simply believe in something else entirely!

Some people are willing to believe in pretty crazy stuff you know, even if it doesn't make much sense.  But what one chooses to believe in should always be his or her choice.

"The Chantry forbids all worship of the creators"  My point, exactly!  Lol!  People don't have the choice but to adhere to the Chantry's teachings, or suffer the consequences.

If you return to my first post, I was never in favor of mages NOT receiving any training from the Circles.

I'm doing some "copy/paste" (with adding a thing or two), because I don't feel like composing all my arguments again.  Lol!

I was basically saying that, when their powers manifest, young mages could be immediately assigned as apprentices to a master (preferably accredited by the Circles) that would teach them how to use and control their powers.

Circles of Magi could be converted as teaching institutions, instead of prisons.

Laws could be put in place to regulate the use of magic, and people (mages and/or non mages) could be assigned to enforce them.  I'm not suggesting Templars, because I would never leave magic regulation to any religious organisation.  People tend to get carried away when they believe they are doing some god's will.

Also, I'm refering to Circles of Magi as an independant organization, working in collaboration with the King, or the country's ruler.  Not as being a faction of the Chantry that must answer to the Grand Clerics.

Freedom for the mages does not mean them being allowed to do whatever they want with their powers!

Freedom for the mages is basically allowing them to share the same rights as any other individuals. People who don't have magic must also abide by certain laws. It should be no different for them. After all, if it isn’t right
to kill a person using a spear, or control them through extortion, it shouldn’t be any more right to do so through the use of magic.

Making apprenticeship mandatory for all mages (and keeping official records) is one thing. But locking them up and taking their families/lives/minds/dreams away from them is another entirely.

And if there were some severe laws against committing hate crimes against mages, they would be protected from the population just as well.

As for a mage becoming a smith, why not?  Once his magical training is completed, what's to prevent him from learning other skills?  He could even integrate a bit of magic into his creations.

And why shouldn't he fall in love, marry, and start a family?  Better yet!  If one of his children turn out to have the magic gift too, that father would be able to help his child learn to control his powers, and resist the lure of demons.  A loving, suportive parent that understands what the child is going through would be a great asset to that child's teachers.

I'm not even opposed to have young, untrained children remain in the Circles for a while (like a boarding school) while being allowed to receive frequent visits from their parents and friends, write to them...  Have places where the parents can stay with them until the child adapts to this new environment (if he or she is very young, or afraid), etc.

"With great power comes great responsibility"  :P  Mages need to be educated, and learn to treat their gifts with caution and respect.  Just as the rest of the population needs to be educated about mages and magic (not just about the risks of magic, but its wonders and benefits as well!), and learn to treat mages with understanding, compassion, and respect.

#1204
Incantrix

Incantrix
  • Members
  • 904 posts
At first I was a bit shocked, but then I thought about it and realized that what he did was pretty important for mages across thedas. Hence the reason I allowed my mage M!hawke to continue his romance with Anders.

Tbh, my Hawke didn't like the chantry at all in the first place, it's just that there were innocents that were in the building...and he was a big ole carebear. Well, now he and Anders can live together as Mage hippies.

#1205
Vit246

Vit246
  • Members
  • 1,457 posts

Incantrix wrote...
Tbh, my Hawke didn't like the chantry at all in the first place, it's just that there were innocents that were in the building...and he was a big ole carebear.


Define "innocents".

The Templars? They are the military arm of the Chantry with the unrestricted power of life and death over mages.

Members of the Chantry? These are the same people who preach that all mages are cursed, evil, and to be feared no matter what. The Grand Cleric is the supreme religious authority in Kirkwall that the Templars are ultimately subordinate to. She had full knowledge of what the Templars under Meredith's command were doing to mages and possessed the authority and power to do something about it, but she did not.

Granted, players could not explore the entire Chantry building, but all we ever see are templars and chantry clergy.

Edited by Vit246, 10 June 2011 - 04:34 PM.


#1206
River5

River5
  • Members
  • 246 posts

Vit246 wrote...

Incantrix wrote...
Tbh, my Hawke didn't like the chantry at all in the first place, it's just that there were innocents that were in the building...and he was a big ole carebear.


Define "innocents".

The Templars? They are the military arm of the Chantry with the unrestricted power of life and death over mages.

Members of the Chantry? These are the same people who preach that all mages are cursed, evil, and to be feared no matter what. The Grand Cleric is the supreme religious authority in Kirkwall that the Templars are ultimately subordinate to. She had full knowledge of what the Templars under Meredith's command were doing to mages and possessed the authority and power to do something about it, but she did not.

Granted, players could not explore the entire Chantry building, but all we ever see are templars and chantry clergy.


If you take every single templar, Grand Cleric, holy sister,
mage that has accepted living under the Chantry’s rules, common folk
following the Chant of Light, etc. None of them are inherently evil.
They are basically people that have accepted the world in the way that
it was presented to them, and believe that their social structure is
basically the natural (or rightful) order of things.

However, if you take the Chantry as a whole, it is a source of
oppression, and tyranny. It is the Chantry as a political and social
power that Anders was targeting (not individuals), and has managed to
weaken by making them lose control over both the Circles, and the
Templars.

So, were the people in the Chantry "innocents"...  As being part of that "whole" (Chantry), my answer would be "no"...  As individuals, however, they probably had no intentions to cause harm to anyone, and were inherently "good" people.

As you travel across town, you keep meeting people that are about to be murdered by Templars simply for the crime of having provided food and shelter for the night to an apostate relative.  And yet, I haven't read many threads saying how terrible it is that the Templars are willing to sacrifice innocent lives in order to dissuade the population from providing any assistance to apostates (maleficars or not).

#1207
Keatons

Keatons
  • Members
  • 74 posts

River5 wrote...

As you travel across town, you keep meeting people that are about to be murdered by Templars simply for the crime of having provided food and shelter for the night to an apostate relative.  And yet, I haven't read many threads saying how terrible it is that the Templars are willing to sacrifice innocent lives in order to dissuade the population from providing any assistance to apostates (maleficars or not).



While those measures are indeed a tad draconian for my tastes, you neglec to mention the large number of apostates and maleficar that attack not only Hawke, but others (i.e. Huon and Quentin), the former going so far as to kill his wife.There is also that Meredith mentions that most of the escapees in On the Loose came in quietly, though neglects to mention what happens to them (unless I rembered that incorrectly). I personally believe that templars are supposed to bring in Apostates alive and kill maleficars, though whether that is followed depends not only on the mages willlingness to comply, but the templar(s) present, and how their higher ups believe mages should be treated. This somewhat explains the more extreme methods of Kirkwall under the increasingly paranoid and insane Meredith, while the Fereldon circle under Greagoir allows mages such as Anders to escape multiple times and allowing him to continue living and also not make him tranquil, which as said in Dragon Age II, is supposed to be against chantry law.

#1208
Feanor_II

Feanor_II
  • Members
  • 916 posts
Not at all, it was like throwing a match to a pool full of gasoline, TNT and nitroglycerine, I really felt simpathy for him but after that I felt like stabing him... And so I did!

I never liked the Chantry but I don't think that sarting a total war and breaking all rules could do any good in this situation, with mages going maverick and templars genocide with the rest of the society was caught in the middle of this clash.

Edited by Feanor_II, 10 June 2011 - 11:30 PM.