108 réponses à ce sujet

[Wittand25]

naledgeborn wrote...

Wittand25 wrote...

naledgeborn wrote...

Making a point.

Really? Does suspiciously look like whining about how a game should be made. Just saying.

Read it again. If it's too straining to comprehend might I suggest you utilize this site at your own leisure. 
http://dictionary.reference.com/

Your behaviour is no different from the behaviour of most supporters of s/s content.
So if we are whining so are you.

Modifié par Wittand25, 27 mai 2011 - 06:21 .

[Blacklash93]

SalsaDMA wrote...
But that's not exactly what they are doing now, is it? :innocent:

No, they still are. Things just get feisty. On both sides.

You obviously haven't followed the 'twitter thread'...

A fair amount of people have perfectly valid questions to ask on twitter? Oh noes! Devs responding to sizeable feedback? Double noes!

Modifié par Blacklash93, 27 mai 2011 - 06:38 .

[naledgeborn]

AngelicMachinery wrote...

Don't forget your ball.

Oooww. My bruised ego. How will I ever recover?

[Turran]

Guys this thread has been MAJORLY derailed, please stick to the original post?
This has nothing to do with s/s romances in ME and if it is 'right or wrong'. Both sides need to just take the bigger man position and stop with this petty and rather silly squabbling. It is tiring for everyone to read and it is just making you look immature and boring at the end of the day. :/

[Blacklash93]

Turran wrote...

Guys this thread has been MAJORLY derailed, please stick to the original post?

The thing is that the argument of the OP is childish. No one is entitled to content because something or other was also included nor is Bioware responsible to put it in.

Then, while agreeing with the OP, others put down the gay community for allegedly doing the exact same thing. As if it's only okay when they do it.

Modifié par Blacklash93, 27 mai 2011 - 06:58 .

[Turran]

^ I agree with what the OP Has said and suggested, I must admit saying "They got it why can't we have this?!" is an almost child-like way of arguing, but his suggestion is still a good one.
People who are insulting the gay community on these forums really are NOT worth your time and energy to deal with.

[AngelicMachinery]

naledgeborn wrote...

AngelicMachinery wrote...

Don't forget your ball.

Oooww. My bruised ego. How will I ever recover?

Don't worry,  I'm sure it'll feel better when the option for turning down gay characters is "No ******."

[SalsaDMA]

AngelicMachinery wrote...

1) Pedophilia is illegal and well is molestation.
2) Bestiality is also illegal, and involves sex with an unthinking animal
3) A black female character would be awesome, it should be done.
4) Outside of the volus there are no fat people in ME, genetic modification has removed it.
5) Polyamory could be fun, make it so.
6) Less uncanny valley sex is always good.

Also, equating homosexuality to bestiality and pedophilia is quite obviously trolling.

You are steering off topic, but regarding your 'points':
1 and 2: depends on the localization and the laws governing it. No, your laws are not universal, sorry to say so.
4: So discriminating and gene-purging fat people is ok? Talk about double standards.
Rest of points: no comments.

[javierabegazo]

After veering totality off topic, and into the range of real world issues and politics with quite offensive remarks, this thread is locked.