Merril's VA can come back, but the character itself.. no thanks.. But the Arishok is dead! Oh wait this is BW, they'll just retcon and bring him back. So yeah, he can come back too.
Thank you!
Débuté par
Mike Laidlaw
, mai 26 2011 10:28
-
Ce sujet est fermé
- Show only BioWare posts
Retour en haut
#1227
Posté 28 mai 2011 - 04:17
PinkShoes
-
- Members
- 1 268 messages
Thanks for addressing peoples concerns a lot of people dont. This gives me hope that the DLC will be better and the future DA games will be better. I didnt hate DA2 i just thought you could of made it much better. You are bioware afterall you dont specialise in mediocre
#1228
Guest_Alistairlover94_*
Posté 28 mai 2011 - 04:17
Guest_Alistairlover94_*
Guest_Alistairlover94_*
-
- Guests
neppakyo wrote...
Merril's VA can come back, but the character itself.. no thanks.. But the Arishok is dead! Oh wait this is BW, they'll just retcon and bring him back. So yeah, he can come back too.
Not in my playthrough, he's not. I say good riddance to that weird nymphomaniac!
#1229
Posté 28 mai 2011 - 04:19
Persephone
-
- Members
- 7 989 messages
Alistairlover94 wrote...
neppakyo wrote...
Merril's VA can come back, but the character itself.. no thanks.. But the Arishok is dead! Oh wait this is BW, they'll just retcon and bring him back. So yeah, he can come back too.
Not in my playthrough, he's not. I say good riddance to that weird nymphomaniac!
You....betrayed Izzy?
And she ain't no nympho!
#1230
Guest_Alistairlover94_*
Posté 28 mai 2011 - 04:20
Guest_Alistairlover94_*
Guest_Alistairlover94_*
-
- Guests
Persephone wrote...
Alistairlover94 wrote...
neppakyo wrote...
Merril's VA can come back, but the character itself.. no thanks.. But the Arishok is dead! Oh wait this is BW, they'll just retcon and bring him back. So yeah, he can come back too.
Not in my playthrough, he's not. I say good riddance to that weird nymphomaniac!
You....betrayed Izzy?
And she ain't no nympho!
Ari>female Jack Sparrow
And besides, wouldn't want to make my homie Sten mad, now would we? Him and my canon Tabris are real tight.
Modifié par Alistairlover94, 28 mai 2011 - 04:24 .
#1231
Posté 28 mai 2011 - 04:22
grayjedi00
-
- Members
- 96 messages
PinkShoes wrote...
Thanks for addressing peoples concerns a lot of people dont. This gives me hope that the DLC will be better and the future DA games will be better. I didnt hate DA2 i just thought you could of made it much better. You are bioware afterall you dont specialise in mediocre
I agree.
#1232
Posté 28 mai 2011 - 04:24
neppakyo
-
- Members
- 3 074 messages
Persephone wrote...
You....betrayed Izzy?
And she ain't no nympho!
She will screw anything on two legs.. hell probably four legs too. I bet she stars in various Thedas donkey shows too.
#1233
Guest_simfamUP_*
Posté 28 mai 2011 - 04:25
Guest_simfamUP_*
Guest_simfamUP_*
-
- Guests
Ostagar2011 wrote...
Did you wonder why these was so extreme? Can you honestly say you understand reason for the strength of feeling for so many? Or are you still deluding yourself that it was all a big 4 chan raid / trolls from rpgcodex.net?Mike Laidlaw wrote...
I did not feel prepared to deal with some of the more personal attacks in a professional manner.When sales are in the doldrums and your own forums are out of control. Otherwise, my bet is you'd have told Woo to go 'end some lines', issue a few game bans and dish out some personal attacks of your own ("afraid of change", "old-timers", "elitists" - perhaps told a few to "suck it up princess", while you were at it?).Mike Laidlaw wrote...
Now, while I haven't been posting, we have been listening.Perhaps the phrase "I think the big key is to not adjust 180 degrees again, because we've done this. I think, as aMike Laidlaw wrote...
Following the launch of DA II, I did some interviews and some of you interpreted my statements to mean I was blind to the concerns that have been voiced repeatedly on these forums. That was never my intent, nor the message I wanted to convey.
team, we're quite happy with what we've done with Dragon Age II" - might have contributed to the "misunderstanding". There was so much wrong with DA2, it needed a radical adjustment. Yet you were out talking little tweaks, seeing nothing wrong with the direction.Did it? Or did DA2 just move an epic, complex, mature, classic RPG into the casual action adventure genre? And you even managed to bungle the implementation of that... Besides, were 4 million copies of DA:O too little "potential"? At what point in the sales charts will you stop diluting into the lowest common denominator? 6 million? 25 million?Mike Laidlaw wrote...
From my perspective, as someone looking to the future and the DA franchise, I think that DA II moved us into a space that has more potential.News at 11 - when you cut out a ton of RPG conventions to attract more casual gamers, you aren't doing RPG's any favors. If you want to do something for RPG fans, remove that acronym from DA3 (if as you say, you believe DA2 direction is the "future") - your silly game will shame it.Mike Laidlaw wrote...
A larger potential audience? Sure, who wouldn’t want more players diving into the experience of playing an RPG?
TL;DR - this mess required bold leadership, courage and vision to fix. Nothing I 've read so far shows that you have an ounce of any. Which is a pity, because you were once a great developer - it's a shame to see you slide into DA2 mediocrity. Hope your new audience buys a lot of your future products to have made all this grief worth it.
Though I understand your dissapointment with DA2, replying with such hostility is juvenile. This is no way to debate a concern. And it seems you want to pick a fight with him.
Modifié par simfamSP, 28 mai 2011 - 04:28 .
#1234
Guest_Alistairlover94_*
Posté 28 mai 2011 - 04:26
Guest_Alistairlover94_*
Guest_Alistairlover94_*
-
- Guests
neppakyo wrote...
Persephone wrote...
You....betrayed Izzy?
And she ain't no nympho!
She will screw anything on two legs.. hell probably four legs too. I bet she stars in various Thedas donkey shows too.
I bet she engages in some Falanu Hlaalu type of activities. If ya know what I mean?
#1235
Guest_Mash Mashington_*
Posté 28 mai 2011 - 04:26
Guest_Mash Mashington_*
Guest_Mash Mashington_*
-
- Guests
oh just leave Isabela alone
#1236
Posté 28 mai 2011 - 04:28
neppakyo
-
- Members
- 3 074 messages
Mash Mashington wrote...
oh just leave Isabela alone
Why? She is such a cliche w.hore.
#1237
Guest_Alistairlover94_*
Posté 28 mai 2011 - 04:30
Guest_Alistairlover94_*
Guest_Alistairlover94_*
-
- Guests
neppakyo wrote...
Mash Mashington wrote...
oh just leave Isabela alone
Why? She is such a cliche w.hore.
Here we are: http://tvtropes.org/...ithAHeartOfGold
#1238
Posté 28 mai 2011 - 04:31
Persephone
-
- Members
- 7 989 messages
neppakyo wrote...
Mash Mashington wrote...
oh just leave Isabela alone
Why? She is such a cliche w.hore.
As a woman myself....that REALLY incenses me. A woman who makes no excuses for her sexuality and the fact that she'll be with whomever she chooses is not a w.hore. She is not taking money for it, nor is she getting it on with everyone. And men like her are usually patted on the shoulder for "scoring" while women who are like her are called names and treated like cheap trash. *Bristling*
#1239
Guest_Mash Mashington_*
Posté 28 mai 2011 - 04:31
Guest_Mash Mashington_*
Guest_Mash Mashington_*
-
- Guests
i am truly amazed by your ability to navigate TV Tropes
#1240
Guest_simfamUP_*
Posté 28 mai 2011 - 04:32
Guest_simfamUP_*
Guest_simfamUP_*
-
- Guests
neppakyo wrote...
Mash Mashington wrote...
oh just leave Isabela alone
Why? She is such a cliche w.hore.
Anders is an emo
Fenris is Anders
Merril's annoying
Varric is cocky
Carver is a dick
Bethany is shallow
....
Yep, there are many opinions on the various characters. I think that's a sign that Bioware are doing a great job. And there was no sarcasm intended.
#1242
Guest_Alistairlover94_*
Posté 28 mai 2011 - 04:33
Guest_Alistairlover94_*
Guest_Alistairlover94_*
-
- Guests
Mash Mashington wrote...
i am truly amazed by your ability to navigate TV Tropes
Why thank you!
#1243
Posté 28 mai 2011 - 04:33
Persephone
-
- Members
- 7 989 messages
Never mind that being sexually active and making no excuses for it does not justify betraying her & handing her over to someone who will torture/brainwash/kill her.
#1244
Posté 28 mai 2011 - 04:35
LiquidGrape
-
- Members
- 2 942 messages
Just so you know, people making crude allusions to bestiality and resorting to base expressions are reported. So are people encouraging that kind of behaviour.
#1245
Posté 28 mai 2011 - 04:36
Persephone
-
- Members
- 7 989 messages
Alistairlover94 wrote...
neppakyo wrote...
Mash Mashington wrote...
oh just leave Isabela alone
Why? She is such a cliche w.hore.
Here we are: http://tvtropes.org/...ithAHeartOfGold
No here we are: Isabela is NOT a hooker. Women who change partners frequently aren't w.hores, s.luts or hookers.
#1246
Posté 28 mai 2011 - 04:37
neppakyo
-
- Members
- 3 074 messages
LiquidGrape wrote...
Just so you know, people making crude allusions to bestiality and resorting to base expressions are reported. So are people encouraging that kind of behaviour.
U mad bro?
And perse, i meant it in the Pretty in pink way. Like the link ali posted.
#1247
Guest_simfamUP_*
Posté 28 mai 2011 - 04:39
Guest_simfamUP_*
Guest_simfamUP_*
-
- Guests
Persephone wrote...
Never mind that being sexually active and making no excuses for it does not justify betraying her & handing her over to someone who will torture/brainwash/kill her.
I find it funny that there are some people who are urging for more nudity and sex. But the very same people are caling Isabella a ****?
An independant woman isn't a ****. Even though she is sexually active it doesn't make her one. To me she is a very fragile thing. Sure, she might be tough - but her emotions are at dismay. Consider her backround and her past.
And if certain choices are picked. She eventually finds love. So no. She is not a ****, or ****, ****, tart, or what ever you wish to name her.
#1248
Posté 28 mai 2011 - 04:39
Persephone
-
- Members
- 7 989 messages
neppakyo wrote...
LiquidGrape wrote...
Just so you know, people making crude allusions to bestiality and resorting to base expressions are reported. So are people encouraging that kind of behaviour.
U mad bro?
And perse, i meant it in the Pretty in pink way. Like the link ali posted.
I know how you meant it. No matter what color you dress it up in, I'll never laugh at sexism.
#1249
Posté 28 mai 2011 - 04:39
Merced652
-
- Members
- 1 661 messages
Persephone wrote...
Alistairlover94 wrote...
neppakyo wrote...
Mash Mashington wrote...
oh just leave Isabela alone
Why? She is such a cliche w.hore.
Here we are: http://tvtropes.org/...ithAHeartOfGold
No here we are: Isabela is NOT a hooker. Women who change partners frequently aren't w.hores, s.luts or hookers.
I disagree.
#1250
Guest_simfamUP_*
Posté 28 mai 2011 - 04:40
Guest_simfamUP_*
Guest_simfamUP_*
-
- Guests
LiquidGrape wrote...
Just so you know, people making crude allusions to bestiality and resorting to base expressions are reported. So are people encouraging that kind of behaviour.
I find it ironic that your avatar is a mouse.
