AshiraShepard wrote...
Girl on Girl is Hot.
Man on Man is Ew.
Aren't double standards just hilarious?
Well, personally, I find m/m and m/f pretty "bleh" too but I'm not going to stop someone else from playing that in their games.
AshiraShepard wrote...
Girl on Girl is Hot.
Man on Man is Ew.
Aren't double standards just hilarious?
centauri2002 wrote...
Well, personally, I find m/m and m/f pretty "bleh" too but I'm not going to stop someone else from playing that in their games.
Modifié par AshiraShepard, 28 mai 2011 - 02:11 .
Comsky159 wrote...
As long as I don't have to deal with it in my game and they don't butcher any characters for the sake of the gay agenda then I'm fine with it.
I am wary of Bioware in this area ever since the gay agenda ruined DA2 romance for me by branding almost every character.
Come on, man. It's not an "agenda."Comsky159 wrote...
As long as I don't have to deal with it in my game and they don't butcher any characters for the sake of the gay agenda then I'm fine with it.
I am wary of Bioware in this area ever since the gay agenda ruined DA2 romance for me by branding almost every character.
marshalleck wrote...
Comsky159 wrote...
As long as I don't have to deal with it in my game and they don't butcher any characters for the sake of the gay agenda then I'm fine with it.
I am wary of Bioware in this area ever since the gay agenda ruined DA2 romance for me by branding almost every character.
Bioware should just stop doing romances. People take this **** waaay too seriously.
Crimmsonwind wrote...
Come on, man. It's not an "agenda."Comsky159 wrote...
As long as I don't have to deal with it in my game and they don't butcher any characters for the sake of the gay agenda then I'm fine with it.
I am wary of Bioware in this area ever since the gay agenda ruined DA2 romance for me by branding almost every character.
Comsky159 wrote...
As long as I don't have to deal with it in my game and they don't butcher any characters for the sake of the gay agenda then I'm fine with it.
I am wary of Bioware in this area ever since the gay agenda ruined DA2 romance for me by branding almost every character.
Modifié par Erani, 28 mai 2011 - 02:17 .
Comsky159 wrote...
As long as I don't have to deal with it in my game and they don't butcher any characters for the sake of the gay agenda then I'm fine with it.
I am wary of Bioware in this area ever since the gay agenda ruined DA2 romance for me by branding almost every character.
AngelicMachinery wrote...
marshalleck wrote...
Comsky159 wrote...
As long as I don't have to deal with it in my game and they don't butcher any characters for the sake of the gay agenda then I'm fine with it.
I am wary of Bioware in this area ever since the gay agenda ruined DA2 romance for me by branding almost every character.
Bioware should just stop doing romances. People take this **** waaay too seriously.
I wouldn't mind the removal of romances entirely as long as they beefed up party dialogue a bit. As is though, I think the inclusion of it means it should well be inclusive...
Modifié par Ryzaki, 28 mai 2011 - 02:16 .
I agree it should be inclusive if they're going to do it. But I am sick of natural interaction with characters taking a backseat to forced, shallow, and insipid "romance" subplots that usually amount to nothing more than say something nice four time, **** the NPC in question (while wearing ugly granny panties or even fully clothed, since Bioware is afraid of having sex featured in sex scenes), unlock achievement, the end.AngelicMachinery wrote...
marshalleck wrote...
Comsky159 wrote...
As long as I don't have to deal with it in my game and they don't butcher any characters for the sake of the gay agenda then I'm fine with it.
I am wary of Bioware in this area ever since the gay agenda ruined DA2 romance for me by branding almost every character.
Bioware should just stop doing romances. People take this **** waaay too seriously.
I wouldn't mind the removal of romances entirely as long as they beefed up party dialogue a bit. As is though, I think the inclusion of it means it should well be inclusive...
Modifié par marshalleck, 28 mai 2011 - 02:19 .
marshalleck wrote...
I agree it should be inclusive if they're going to do it. But I am sick of natural interaction with characters taking a backseat to forced, shallow, and insipid "romance" subplots that usually amount to nothing more than say something nice four time, **** the NPC in question (while wearing ugly granny panties or even fully clothed, since Bioware is afraid of having sex featured in sex scenes), unlock achievement, the end.AngelicMachinery wrote...
marshalleck wrote...
Comsky159 wrote...
As long as I don't have to deal with it in my game and they don't butcher any characters for the sake of the gay agenda then I'm fine with it.
I am wary of Bioware in this area ever since the gay agenda ruined DA2 romance for me by branding almost every character.
Bioware should just stop doing romances. People take this **** waaay too seriously.
I wouldn't mind the removal of romances entirely as long as they beefed up party dialogue a bit. As is though, I think the inclusion of it means it should well be inclusive...
marshalleck wrote...
I agree it should be inclusive if they're going to do it. But I am sick of natural interaction with characters taking a backseat to forced, shallow, and insipid "romance" subplots that usually amount to nothing more than say something nice four time, **** the NPC in question (while wearing ugly granny panties or even fully clothed, since Bioware is afraid of having sex featured in sex scenes), unlock achievement, the end.
ME1's scene was just fine. I don't know why Bioware are so terrified of it.AngelicMachinery wrote...
marshalleck wrote...
I agree it should be inclusive if they're going to do it. But I am sick of natural interaction with characters taking a backseat to forced, shallow, and insipid "romance" subplots that usually amount to nothing more than say something nice four time, **** the NPC in question (while wearing ugly granny panties or even fully clothed, since Bioware is afraid of having sex featured in sex scenes), unlock achievement, the end.
Uncanny Valley sex just gives me nightmares...
Chilcek wrote...
Are they gonna do this with ME3? When you are a male, and you find out that most of the male party members are attracted to you? That just a big turn off......
marshalleck wrote...
ME1's scene was just fine. I don't know why Bioware are so terrified of it.AngelicMachinery wrote...
marshalleck wrote...
I agree it should be inclusive if they're going to do it. But I am sick of natural interaction with characters taking a backseat to forced, shallow, and insipid "romance" subplots that usually amount to nothing more than say something nice four time, **** the NPC in question (while wearing ugly granny panties or even fully clothed, since Bioware is afraid of having sex featured in sex scenes), unlock achievement, the end.
Uncanny Valley sex just gives me nightmares...
Chilcek wrote...
Any moderators can lock down my threads? Javier? Woo?
Modifié par SkittlesKat96, 28 mai 2011 - 02:53 .
Guest_yorkj86_*
Mudzr wrote...
Finally, if a large amount of bisexuals being on your ship (because let's face it, have designated s/s squadmates is going to generate uproar anyway) seems unrealistic, well firstly, it isn't really that unrealistic, expecially in a time where pansexuality seems to be fully accepted.
yorkj86 wrote...
Mudzr wrote...
Finally, if a large amount of bisexuals being on your ship (because let's face it, have designated s/s squadmates is going to generate uproar anyway) seems unrealistic, well firstly, it isn't really that unrealistic, expecially in a time where pansexuality seems to be fully accepted.
Neither bisexuality nor pansexuality are "evolutions" of heterosexuality or bisexuality. They are simply other sexual orientations. Secondly, unless human biology itself is changing, proportions of the different sexual orientations will not change.
Modifié par AngelicMachinery, 28 mai 2011 - 02:53 .