Mr. MannlyMan wrote...
I honestly don't see what your problem with gender-specific dialogue is, Phaedon.
Do you visualize femShep struggling to move a crate while maleShep
tosses it aside? A krogan belittling femShep for her tiny frame, but not
maleShep? FemShep getting her ass saved by the creaky-legged Joker,
while Joker gets his creaky ass saved by the heroic, masculine maleShep?
Is that your idea of gender acknowledgement?
Gender-specific dialogue =/= Complete Non-Gender-blindness
If you want to somehow make FemShep different than MaleShep, you have to come up with things that are unique to her. 'Ma'am' or 'lady', or perhaps a bit of flirting should cause no trouble, anything else? I am sure it would.
And the
real issue in Patrick's article was about whether people would be put off by gender-specific situations, not necessarily by blatant sexism. For the record, I didn't think that Wrex's comment in ME1 about how he thought that fighting with female soldiers "gave the fight a different flavor" was sexist or misogynistic. Were female players really put off by this?
That is not the type of dialogue I have a problem with.
What if we ran into a cocktail waitress? For femSheps, she could mention how cool it is that the first human Spectre turned out to be a woman; for maleShep, she could just flirt with him. Honestly, I have a couple of good gamer friends who are women, and they've never complained about the way ME1 or ME2 acknowledged genders (except for the "skankwrap" dress Kasumi gives femSheps).
See above, I don't have a problem by the writers including those as they go on, but, hammering them in, yes I do. Picking a gender for your Shepard is not the kind of choice that picking your background is. Wouldn't you have a problem with NPCs treating coloured people, or people with specific hair colour differently? I know I would.
I think Patrick's overthinking what the fans want here... just be relatively sensitive about it, insert some gender-specific dialogue where appropriate (not everywhere, obviously), and move on, dude! Most people, male and female, tend to like it when NPCs react directly to their Shepard's actions or sex; gender is a very non-descriptive trait, yet it greatly adds to the experience. Harkin wasn't a sexist or misogynist; he was just an ass, and you had full control over how you dealt with him (try to ignore him, tell him off?). Moments like that, that are that personal to the main character, that are that up-close and direct, make the characters seem more real. It gives the character credence, reinforces an emotional connection... which is really what the character of Shepard should be about in ME3: not striving to be utterly PC for the sake of sparing some people's feelings, but creating and playing a character that feels as user-defined and personal to the player as possible.
Now that you mention, I did have a problem with there being no way for Harkin to look more of an ass to MaleShep, yes.
where appropriate
Where it fits, not for the sake of unique content.
BickDutt wrote...
Only 50% of women players are women? Damn, I should probably check next time I get a gamer girlfriend!
Joking asides, I highly doubt 50% of ME players are female, Phaedon. Regardless, I don't see why including very real and mature subjects such as sexism and racism should be a problem. The TV series "The Wire", which is regarded by many critics as the greatest series of the last 20 years, has very racially sensitive language. A great work of art doesn't bury its head in the sand in the face of those issues. Sci-Fi has always been about exploring the relation between technology and our humanity. I think the old adage stands, technology might have evolved but we're still the same old humans as were 50 000 years ago.
Of course, not every product has to be a great work of philosophy or activism, I don't think we'll remember Mass Effect as a great study on postmodernism.
Exactly. The point of the writer, which everyone seems to be ignoring, that it is the players who are treated in a different way, and not a character in a TV series. And as the LiveJournal and Twitter comments seem to show, there is a problem, for some players at least.
For me, it wouldn't make any difference, other than the fact that the writers could appear discriminatory, or that options connected to customization have an impact on the content.
Gatt9 wrote...
You're still assigning your personal beliefs as cultural truths.
There are many societies on earth that are both as advanced as America and Sexist. Nor is there any indication of that changing anytime soon.
Racism isn't extinct either. Wars rage across the globe solely because of Race.
Err, thank you?
That's what I said?
Humans will always try to find things that they are different in, to fight for. Be it race, religion, political ideas etc.
Saying that there is as much racism, or that you can talk openly in a discriminatory manner in socially advanced communities today is just...I don't know, naive?
Asari, Humans, Turians and Quarians? Socially advanced societies with no sexism, or so it would appear at least. An 180 degrees turn would be rather weird, in the third chapter don't you agree?
The Salarians and Krogan seem to have independence, regardless of gender, and the rest of the races, have never mentioned anything till now. The vorcha could always be retconned for the sake of gender-unique dialogue, bt which else?
What you believe, and what is real, are two very different things. Advanced society does not in any way, shape, or form, imply a lack of sexism. It's entirely possible to be extremely advanced and extremely sexist.
Which apparently Bioware believes to be true as we can tell from the fact that every planet has a strip club filled with female dancers, and people of all races watching them.
See above.
I'd like to think that both of us live in societies that discrimination is against the law, and people who are openly discriminatory are frowned upon. Very.
And we in the 2010s, not the 2180s.
Unless you are saying that we haven't socially evolved since the 1840s.