Without making this too much of a console vs pc post(I'm merely offering observations), pc's are generally better than consoles about 6 months after their release. So when a console doesn't get an update and remains that way for years, it's exactly the same as a pc that doesn't get upgraded. But while pc's can be upgraded here and there, there's no working around it with consoles, so if it's old, it really is holding everyone back.
As Neppakyo has been saying, cross platform games are sometimes limited on the computer because the consoles can't keep up. I am following Battlefield 3 with great interest, not only because DICE said their main focus is the pc platform, they're developing for the pc first and foremost, then taking what they can to the consoles. This sounds so sensible, but as I've never made a game I wouldn't really know.
People like to say pc gamers are whingers and whiners, entitled, this and that, and generally making what they think are clever remarks. That's not to say some pc gamers are any better at times. But the sheer number of useless ports that have polluted the pc scene has obviously made most pc gamers regard cross platform games with a great degree of cynicism. A famous
example, it wasn't until gigs worth of patches came out before the game was playable. If you're saying that when you buy a product that doesn't work as it should, you just shelve it and move on without saying anything, then I'd call you a liar.
edit : Brockololly, that didn't seem to help Lionhead and Fable 3.
Modifié par Kilshrek, 02 juin 2011 - 02:31 .