Aller au contenu

Photo

Compatible with Kinect ? God sake tells me it's bull****...


516 réponses à ce sujet

#201
MarchWaltz

MarchWaltz
  • Members
  • 3 232 messages
It's ugly as ****, it has to be fake.

#202
MostSpartan 14

MostSpartan 14
  • Members
  • 6 messages

RunicDragons wrote...

IsaacShep wrote...

Someone With Mass wrote...

It's not like it's forced on anyone.


Seriously, people complaining about an OPTIONAL feature :blink:

What I am complaining about, (if this is true) is that they are wasting their time with this, instead of using their time to improve Mass Effect 3 and make it the best game ever made! B)


How do you know it's a waste of time when you haven't even seen it yet. No one has. Every Kinect game released so far has been Kinect only with no controller support as well. This could be some groundbreaking stuff. And I'm confident that Bioware wouldn't take the time to put it in if it wasn't something worth doing.

#203
Cheesy Blue

Cheesy Blue
  • Members
  • 1 381 messages
Remember when we used to all joke about Kinect for ME3? The irony here is amazing.

#204
shepskisaac

shepskisaac
  • Members
  • 16 374 messages

MarchWaltz wrote...

It's ugly as ****, it has to be fake.

The best part is that it's 100% real. Granted, it may be an early desing that will change in future, but it's completly legit.

#205
The-Person

The-Person
  • Members
  • 567 messages

MarchWaltz wrote...

It's ugly as ****, it has to be fake.

It's better then ME2 box art.

#206
RunicDragons

RunicDragons
  • Members
  • 697 messages

MostSpartan 14 wrote...

RunicDragons wrote...

IsaacShep wrote...

Someone With Mass wrote...

It's not like it's forced on anyone.


Seriously, people complaining about an OPTIONAL feature :blink:

What I am complaining about, (if this is true) is that they are wasting their time with this, instead of using their time to improve Mass Effect 3 and make it the best game ever made! B)


How do you know it's a waste of time when you haven't even seen it yet. No one has. Every Kinect game released so far has been Kinect only with no controller support as well. This could be some groundbreaking stuff. And I'm confident that Bioware wouldn't take the time to put it in if it wasn't something worth doing.

I know it's a waste of time, because I'm pretty sure no one will play Mass Effect 3 with Kinect, or Move.. Or something... We want a game, not an exercise. :blink:

#207
FsDxRAGE

FsDxRAGE
  • Members
  • 8 190 messages
That cover art isn't too awesome

#208
FsDxRAGE

FsDxRAGE
  • Members
  • 8 190 messages

Cheesy Blue wrote...

Remember when we used to all joke about Kinect for ME3? The irony here is amazing.

I was thinking the exact same goddamn thing :lol:

#209
MostSpartan 14

MostSpartan 14
  • Members
  • 6 messages

RunicDragons wrote...

MostSpartan 14 wrote...

RunicDragons wrote...

IsaacShep wrote...

Someone With Mass wrote...

It's not like it's forced on anyone.


Seriously, people complaining about an OPTIONAL feature :blink:

What I am complaining about, (if this is true) is that they are wasting their time with this, instead of using their time to improve Mass Effect 3 and make it the best game ever made! B)


How do you know it's a waste of time when you haven't even seen it yet. No one has. Every Kinect game released so far has been Kinect only with no controller support as well. This could be some groundbreaking stuff. And I'm confident that Bioware wouldn't take the time to put it in if it wasn't something worth doing.

I know it's a waste of time, because I'm pretty sure no one will play Mass Effect 3 with Kinect, or Move.. Or something... We want a game, not an exercise. :blink:


I know I will (if this is true) so you're wrong there. And according to the PS3 boxart, there won't be Move support so your wrong again. And third of all, it won't be exercise. It will still be played mainly with a controller. Kinect will just be there for smaller things like maybe Galaxy Map navigation or voice commands. You can sit down while your using it. If you call that exercise, you may need to work out a little more.

#210
dcal31

dcal31
  • Members
  • 574 messages

FsDxRAGE wrote...

Cheesy Blue wrote...

Remember when we used to all joke about Kinect for ME3? The irony here is amazing.

I was thinking the exact same goddamn thing :lol:


That's the danger of sarcasm. Some people actually think what your saying is a good idea.

#211
Haristo

Haristo
  • Members
  • 1 544 messages

MostSpartan 14 wrote...

RunicDragons wrote...

MostSpartan 14 wrote...

RunicDragons wrote...

IsaacShep wrote...

Someone With Mass wrote...

It's not like it's forced on anyone.


Seriously, people complaining about an OPTIONAL feature :blink:

What I am complaining about, (if this is true) is that they are wasting their time with this, instead of using their time to improve Mass Effect 3 and make it the best game ever made! B)


How do you know it's a waste of time when you haven't even seen it yet. No one has. Every Kinect game released so far has been Kinect only with no controller support as well. This could be some groundbreaking stuff. And I'm confident that Bioware wouldn't take the time to put it in if it wasn't something worth doing.

I know it's a waste of time, because I'm pretty sure no one will play Mass Effect 3 with Kinect, or Move.. Or something... We want a game, not an exercise. :blink:


I know I will (if this is true) so you're wrong there. And according to the PS3 boxart, there won't be Move support so your wrong again. And third of all, it won't be exercise. It will still be played mainly with a controller. Kinect will just be there for smaller things like maybe Galaxy Map navigation or voice commands. You can sit down while your using it. If you call that exercise, you may need to work out a little more.


still requests RAM and disk space... makes the game unstable and uglier... do not want.

#212
MostSpartan 14

MostSpartan 14
  • Members
  • 6 messages

Haristo wrote...

MostSpartan 14 wrote...

RunicDragons wrote...

MostSpartan 14 wrote...

RunicDragons wrote...

IsaacShep wrote...

Someone With Mass wrote...

It's not like it's forced on anyone.


Seriously, people complaining about an OPTIONAL feature :blink:

What I am complaining about, (if this is true) is that they are wasting their time with this, instead of using their time to improve Mass Effect 3 and make it the best game ever made! B)


How do you know it's a waste of time when you haven't even seen it yet. No one has. Every Kinect game released so far has been Kinect only with no controller support as well. This could be some groundbreaking stuff. And I'm confident that Bioware wouldn't take the time to put it in if it wasn't something worth doing.

I know it's a waste of time, because I'm pretty sure no one will play Mass Effect 3 with Kinect, or Move.. Or something... We want a game, not an exercise. :blink:


I know I will (if this is true) so you're wrong there. And according to the PS3 boxart, there won't be Move support so your wrong again. And third of all, it won't be exercise. It will still be played mainly with a controller. Kinect will just be there for smaller things like maybe Galaxy Map navigation or voice commands. You can sit down while your using it. If you call that exercise, you may need to work out a little more.


still requests RAM and disk space... makes the game unstable and uglier... do not want.


Okay, that's pretty much the only justifiable response as to why it shouldn't be there. Yeah, that could be an issue. But this is Bioware we're talking about. Maybe I'm putting too much faith in them, but they aren't going to add a feature if it affects the game's preformance that much. Features get cut from games all the time because they make the game too unstable. This would be no different. If it doesn't work we'll, they'll cut it out. They won't release an unstable game.

Modifié par MostSpartan 14, 02 juin 2011 - 02:47 .


#213
RunicDragons

RunicDragons
  • Members
  • 697 messages
Comment Deleted... :devil:

Modifié par RunicDragons, 02 juin 2011 - 02:51 .


#214
Highlor3

Highlor3
  • Members
  • 103 messages
http://www.youtube.c...etailpage#t=31s

#215
ImmortalArbiter

ImmortalArbiter
  • Members
  • 22 messages
First the mess that was Dragon Age 2, and now this! Granted, this isn't nearly a big a deal as what Dragon Age 2 was, but I really hope that this will not have any impact for people that don't want Kinect (especially for Achievements).

I really hate this direction Microsoft is moving towards. Casual gaming and turning the 360 into more of a central entertainment device, instead of focusing on the hardcore gamers.

#216
Paul Sedgmore

Paul Sedgmore
  • Members
  • 907 messages

IsaacShep wrote...

Someone With Mass wrote...

It's not like it's forced on anyone.


Seriously, people complaining about an OPTIONAL feature :blink:

The problem a lot of people have with Kinect is that due to cut-backs from the original design it uses the consoles resources which means those resources can't be used by the game causing downgraded graphics and/or gameplay. There is also a possibility that even when not using this feature that those resources are still being held in reserve.

#217
Clonedzero

Clonedzero
  • Members
  • 3 153 messages

MostSpartan 14 wrote...


I know I will (if this is true) so you're wrong there. And according to the PS3 boxart, there won't be Move support so your wrong again. And third of all, it won't be exercise. It will still be played mainly with a controller. Kinect will just be there for smaller things like maybe Galaxy Map navigation or voice commands. You can sit down while your using it. If you call that exercise, you may need to work out a little more.

supporting kinect but not move would be a bad buisness move. it'd alienate the PS3 crowd. though i doubt anyone would actually care. it'd still be a symbolic alienation of their userbase.

you have no idea what it would be used for. having it for menu useage like the galaxy map would be horrible, you sound like you have a kinect, have you seen a GOOD kinect menu? i think not...

the best thing they could do is use voice commands, which again, arent necessary or even enriching gameplay in any real way. so why would they bother?

i really hope this is a box art mistake because well, ME3 literally has nothing to gain from having kinect support.

#218
ImmortalArbiter

ImmortalArbiter
  • Members
  • 22 messages
Actually, I decided to check out a game that popped into my head as being "Better With Kinect" - Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, and much to my dismay I saw that there were Kinect achievements for the game. This game was also published by EA.

PLEASE BIOWARE NO KINECT ACHIEVEMENTS!!!!

Sorry for the caps, but seriously, that would be horrible. "Hey, to complete the series that you started 4+ years ago, you have to go buy a $150 peripheral for a 5GS achievement!"

Modifié par ImmortalArbiter, 02 juin 2011 - 02:57 .


#219
Clonedzero

Clonedzero
  • Members
  • 3 153 messages
personally im more comforted in thinking the cover artist for that page made a mistake. i have enough faith in bioware to think they wouldnt be dumb enough to buy into motion controls.

#220
IrishSpectre257

IrishSpectre257
  • Members
  • 886 messages

ImmortalArbiter wrote...

Actually, I decided to check out a game that popped into my head as being "Better With Kinect" - Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, and much to my dismay I saw that there were Kinect achievements for the game. This game was also published by EA.

PLEASE BIOWARE NO KINECT ACHIEVEMENTS!!!!

Sorry for the caps, but seriously, that would be horrible. "Hey, to complete the series that you started 4+ years ago, you have to go buy a $150 peripheral for a 5GS achievement!"


Your main concern is that you might not be able to get all the achievements?

#221
Haristo

Haristo
  • Members
  • 1 544 messages

ImmortalArbiter wrote...

Actually, I decided to check out a game that popped into my head as being "Better With Kinect" - Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, and much to my dismay I saw that there were Kinect achievements for the game. This game was also published by EA.

PLEASE BIOWARE NO KINECT ACHIEVEMENTS!!!!

Sorry for the caps, but seriously, that would be horrible. "Hey, to complete the series that you started 4+ years ago, you have to go buy a $150 peripheral for a 5GS achievement!"


Gears of Potter... I heard it was a Reel Shooter when you we're playing with Kinect, even if you have full control of your movements when playing normally... what the **** ? Getting every achevements is not a problems because Achievements are unuseful. However, just look how Gears of Potter is much uglier than Half Blood Prince (even if this game suck too)... <_<

Modifié par Haristo, 02 juin 2011 - 03:01 .


#222
Nuclear Pete

Nuclear Pete
  • Members
  • 166 messages
If it turns out to be true, why is this a bad thing?

#223
shnizzler93

shnizzler93
  • Members
  • 1 637 messages
The tears in this thread are delicious...

...anyways, none of this has been confirmed by Bioware

#224
ScepticMatt

ScepticMatt
  • Members
  • 484 messages
the cover could be real - it is the same that was used on the gameinformer reveal (minus the omni-tool blade)

Modifié par ScepticMatt, 02 juin 2011 - 03:02 .


#225
InfiniteCuts

InfiniteCuts
  • Members
  • 401 messages
I've got to hand it to EA/BioWare... if there is ONE thing that could make me buy a Kinect sensor... it is Mass Effect. :/