327 réponses à ce sujet

[jack_f]

It's a no-brainer really. 

Obsidian has a long history of inclining Bioware franchises, or polishing rough diamonds if you will:

Baldur's Gate -> Baldur's Gate 2
KOTOR -> KOTOR 2
NWN -> NWN2 (esp Mask of The Betrayer)
Mass Effect - > Alpha Protocol (sorta)

Obsidian is the only hope for DA3. Hell, it even worked for FO3.

[Skellimancer]

Sooner they did TES5.

[Atakuma]

Bioware did BGII not obsidian.

Modifié par Atakuma, 02 juin 2011 - 06:50 .

[packardbell]

Obsidian is not likely to survive the year with all the layoffs they've been receiving.

[Airowen27]

Agree!

[Giltspur]

Obsidian didn't make Baldur's Gate II--Bioware did. There are BGII people on the DAII team.

[Herbie_Hind]

I agree, i mean look what Obsidian did to new vegas, they only REVIVED THE ****ING SERIES

[Eli Parker]

No.

[Atakuma]

KOTOR 2 and NWN2 were both inferior in my opinion.

[Atakuma]

Herbie_Hind wrote...

I agree, i mean look what Obsidian did to new vegas, they only REVIVED THE ****ING SERIES

Fallout 3 did just fine, the series was nowhere near needing a revival.

[kaiki01]

Not Obsidian! I want a game that works on launch D:

[Glowz]

Simply put, no.

[Travie]

yes.

[vagrantwanderer]

Hahahaha! So funny. I would loooooove to have a have finished DA3 that is irreparable. That would be awesome. Have you even looked at Fallout New Vegas? I still have game breaking glitches on that game! Obsidian is horrible.

[marshalleck]

vagrantwanderer wrote...
Have you even looked at Fallout New Vegas?

I have. Runs fine after the first patch they put out. 

[Il Divo]

Obsidian will never reach Bioware-level quality. And it's not because their games are necessarily inferior, but because every Obsidian game has a track record suffering massively from bugs, without exception.

KotOR 2
Neverwinter Nights 2
Alpha Protocol
Fallout: New Vegas

I'm curious to see how Dungeon Siege 3 turns out, given Obsidian's track record. If they could actually get some proper development time, I would prefer Obsidian to Bioware as a developer.

Modifié par Il Divo, 02 juin 2011 - 07:10 .

[jack_f]

Bugs can be fixed, **** design can not

[LeBurns]

Obsidian doesn't have a good track record IMO. I still dislike the half finished KotOR2 I got from them. It took players to try and finish the game for them.

But still, anything is better than what DA2 turned out to be in my opinion. Maybe if they just hire 100 monkeys ...

Modifié par LeBurns, 02 juin 2011 - 07:12 .

[outlaw1109]

jack_f wrote...

Bugs can be fixed, **** design can not

This.

[/thread]

[Beerfish]

I'm all for it as long as the DA3 is an epic fun game that ends with 'And rocks fell on your head.'

Modifié par Beerfish, 02 juin 2011 - 07:14 .

[MachDelta]

marshalleck wrote...

vagrantwanderer wrote...
Have you even looked at Fallout New Vegas?

I have. Runs fine after the first patch they put out. 

Consider yourself lucky, the game STILL crashes for me... on a console... *sigh*

Stupid gamebryo engine is cursed, I swear. It's stable like a 3 legged cow wearing rollerskates...

And much love for Obsidian but Blizzard-like polish is defenitly not their forte. I think BW can do a better job.

[Nameless2345]

Err... No.

BG 2 was created before Obsidian, actually. By Bioware.

KOTOR 2 was buggy unfinished mess with interesting characters, nothing more. 

NWN2 was superior in terms of story to NWN1, but inferior as a stable modding platform. I believe there are still much more mods and mod downloads for NWN1.

Mass Effect  has Mass Effect 2, made by Bioware. And on Metacritic ME2 is ranked  higher than Alpha Protocol.

[Travie]

outlaw1109 wrote...

jack_f wrote...

Bugs can be fixed, **** design can not

This.

[/thread]

[Il Divo]

jack_f wrote...

Bugs can be fixed, **** design can not

I'm still waiting on that xbox patch for KotOR 2. Because bugs can be fixed does not mean that bugs will be fixed. I also shouldn't have to wait a few months after release just to buy a stable copy of a game. 

Modifié par Il Divo, 02 juin 2011 - 07:29 .